| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nullity
Gallente
   |
Posted - 2011.07.01 09:25:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Nullity on 01/07/2011 09:25:13
I'm realistically canceling my two accounts if I don't get an acceptable answer out of the CSM meeting by Monday. Is that "being realistic"?
|
Nullity
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.01 09:33:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Nullity on 01/07/2011 09:33:47
 Originally by: Karii Ildarian
Originally by: Saving Face
That's entirely their own fault. They said something stronger than that (no microtransactions in EVE) in the past and look what we have. No wonder nobody trusts them if they make vague statements that could go in either direction.
Actually they said something like, it was not their, then, current intention to do so. I seriously doubt that a company would ever bind itself to a specific promise, unless it felt that such a promise was in it's financial interest.
Summer last year:
Originally by: CCP Shadow
Edited by: CCP Shadow on 24/06/2010 17:30:40
Just for clarification, the skillpoints CCP will be giving pilots to make up for the extended downtime in this case is not tied to microtransactions.
Editing to add this: We do not have plans to go microtransaction with EVE.
Originally by: CCP Shadow
No. There are no microtransaction plans, whatsoever. I wrote "in this case" because this extended downtime was an unusual situation. It's not every day we relocate our servers to a new facility.
Originally by: CCP Shadow
Are you trolling me bro? Cool
Our business model isn't changing, you all have nothing to be concerned about.
April 2008.
Something changed.
|
Nullity
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.01 09:41:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Karii Ildarian
Indeed, their plans did...
What I did not see in your supplied quotes was a statement saying that EVE would never have MT.
He said their business model wasn't changing. How much more explicit could he have been? The drop off in respect for their customers has been huge.
|
Nullity
Gallente
|
Posted - 2011.07.01 10:06:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Nullity on 01/07/2011 10:06:39
Originally by: Lonox
Dev alt, botter, horrible person that should DIAF detected!! No, seriously, that'll be their argument for your reasoning. 
Actually, how I read his post was someone desperately reading into Shadow's pretty blunt statement to make it sound like CCP wasn't promising what they were promising. Not a horrible person so much as one clinging to a reality that's slipped away (or is about to).
|
| |
|