Juil
Gallente Phoenix Industries Pty. Ltd.
|
Posted - 2011.07.02 19:07:00 -
[1]
The problem is that CQ is being forced onto us, some of us dont' mind the CQ I don't.. I like it but I don't like the Load Times, the performance hit or the fact I can't Dual Client anymore..
I also don't like the fact that I've had a lot of function taken away from me, I don't see how it makes sense in context of the game's 'universe' either..
Nor as a Programmer and 3d artist do I see how/why they can not simply reactivate the existing code, given said code is still in use in space and should unless some one was effectively very STUIPID exist within the Codebase.
Lastly I have a problem with the fact that the CSM and CCP seem to be hung up on one minor issue (RMT) rather then the fact that CCP has promised things now for years and broken those promises again and again while apparently openly discussing breaking them behind our backs.
You are meant to be our voice and yet all we get from you most of the time is 'Ohh they have sweet stuff coming but it's all under NDA' really if you are our 'voice' and our 'eyes' then anything YOU get to see / hear WE should also have access to.. you can't have an open and transperant system with out it.. think of it as the same as ohhh the Freedom of Information Act.. We don't have that, we can't demand access to what you do, we can only go 'please sir may we have a tad bit' and while that exists there is no reason for us to believe a lot of what is in this, simply because we can't verify anything your claiming can we?
And no that's not tin foil it's just common sense, your democratically elected.. to be what our voice to a dictatorship apparently, where information is not freely traded.
Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel
Originally by: Mag's
Originally by: Meissa Anunthiel So it's about the "idea" that your player goes out of its pod? Or is it about the associated performance of loading your character?
Which is it?
Both have been addressed by CCP's statement.
You're trolling, right?
the current "Disabled Incarna Door" will be replaced with an environment that will provide similar functionality and performance to the pre-Incarna Hangar.
*THAT* answers both those concerns.
The most ridiculous bit about this whole hangar argument is that *I* was the one getting all mad at :ccp: when I thought they didn't understand the whole problem with mandatory InCarna docking. I've been convinced, so please rephrase your issue in clearly defined terms so I can answer them appropriately and kill this.
- Juil Phoenix Industries
|