| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Gloria Stitz
   |
Posted - 2011.07.02 20:36:00 -
[1]
Can you guys have a real look at the statement issued by CCP and find anything of any real substance in it?
I can't find anything.
Absolutely nothing has changed since last week.
Unfortunately hope has blinded too many players to the smoke & mirrors used here.
What about the famous Goon lawyers?
-------------
'Don't try to learn Eve all at once, otherwise your brain will explode' - Albert Einstein
------------ |
EdwardNardella
Capital Construction Research
|
Posted - 2011.07.02 20:55:00 -
[2]
What is it that your looking to hear exactly?
CCRES is recruiting pilots who want to live in WSpace/Wormholes. Fill out an application here! |
vikari
Serenity Engineering and Transport Company
Fatal Ascension
|
Posted - 2011.07.02 22:41:00 -
[3]
Are you serious?! Holy crap a lot of you guys are whining about things like you have no intelligence. There are some basic, very basic requests from the player base....
1. Allow us not to take part in the Incarna (walking in stations) immersion until they've resolved the effects it has. IE higher resources uses, lack of content and lack of usability vs the original hanger we had.
2. Do not allow for micro-transactions to make eve another "pay to win" game where those that can simply dump RL money into the game can become the dominating power. Do not replace time/experience/commitment for RL money.
3. Better communicate your (CCP's) intent to the player base, and respect the fact that our voices and opinions do in fact matter. So much so that if disregarded Eve may not continue to exist.
Between the video and the Dev Blog, I think we can safely say those points were greatly discussed and CCP has openly stated they will adjust to meet our requests in those areas.
|
Darryl Ward
|
Posted - 2011.07.03 05:32:00 -
[4]
Methinks you're just mad you wasted so much ammo protesting nothing.
CCP said no on pay-to-win items. They said they'll address the performance concerns with CQ. They said they'd bring back ship-spinning somehow.
The only thing you're right about is that nothing has changed since last week.
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |