|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
|
CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 16:37:00 -
[1]
The summit held in May 2011 with CSM 6 and the CCP produced over 40 pages of meeting minutes covering a broad spectrum of topics related to EVE Online. The blog can be found by clicking this link.
Due to the number of topics discussed in this blog, both the CSM and CCP would appreciate if comments and queries are kept within this thread. This will make it easier for everyone to address your points in a timely manner.
Navigator Lead Community Representative CCP Hf, EVE Online
|
|
|
CCP Veritas
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 16:44:00 -
[2]
InB4 Meissa
Fake edit: Damnit!
|
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 17:22:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Kerrisone
Quote:
The CSM repeated the concern, raised at previous summits, that too many resources were devoted to "new and shiny". The question of whether, after the initial development of Incarna and Establishments, some of those resources could be redirected towards fixing existing features was raised.
CCP replied that a significant portion of the resources used to develop Incarna have been borrowed from other projects, or are being used to develop infrastructure that has broader application than just Incarna.
CSM pointed out that iterating on an existing feature and at the same time adding some new functionality and art will provide the new "shiny" that Marketing & Sales can use to promote an expansion.
CCP observed that doing the Dead Horse revamp would require 2 tech teams plus an art team for one or two releases. It was also pointed out that if the subscriber base grows (via Incarna and microtransactions), it would be possible to hire more people to work on EVE.
Again there is money for WOD/DUST but not for EVE, thanks again CCP.
Oh and I thought you guys said that MT from NEX was to pay for the development of NEX items cause fashion designers that make stuff I could draw up when I was 9 years old cost so much.
http://www.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&bid=913
It's actually the other way around. We've been heavily borrowing resources from projects like WoD for EVE.
|
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P Alliance
|
Posted - 2011.07.12 17:45:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Taleris Kline Edited by: Taleris Kline on 12/07/2011 17:30:58 Out of curiosity, what is the process for balancing ships?
Will it be something similar to: 1) CCP Tallest proposes a change to CCP Soundwave with associated data of why they want to make that change. 2) Pending CCP Soundwave's approval, CCP Tallest makes a change on SiSi or Duality and asks players opinions on it. 3) Pending no game breaking response, CCP tallest submits the change for TQ?
Or will it be just released onto TQ?
It's a process with quite a few steps, including consulting the CSM. We're not going to release any balanced ships without them being reviewed thoroughly.
|
|
|
|
|