|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |
Doddy
Excidium.
Executive Outcomes
196
   |
Posted - 2012.09.18 15:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thorax is a bit underwhelming to be honest, i would think a utility high or an additional low slot would be better than extra med, unless we are all just going to continue on the merry way to LSE online. |
Doddy
Excidium.
Executive Outcomes
201
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 11:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lee Vanden wrote:Tomcio FromFarAway wrote:Lee Vanden wrote:
When SoCo, NC. and Solar are defeated, who will you fight then?
No one of course. Them Goons will reign supreme and EvE will finally die.  Take your petty politics out of here.  This goes beyond politics idiot, it's about the future of EVE. I happen to like null-sec warfare and I don't want to see it stagnate and die. No-one joins EVE because they've read about how great carebearing is or how fantastic life in low-sec is, they join because they hear about the huge battles between alliances for null-sec sov that you don't get in other games. When that disappears so will the incentive for many people to play.
Have you any idea how many times this crap has been spouted?
|
Doddy
Excidium.
Executive Outcomes
231
|
Posted - 2012.09.25 23:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Goldensaver wrote:Sigras wrote:
this brings me to another issue, shield tanking is unbalanced against armor tanking.
even the hurricane which has 4 mids and 6 lows is still usually a shield tanking ship, if it were 5/5 it would be no contest. This says to me that shield tanks are just more desirable and low slot modules are more valuable.
Even if I had a ship with 6 mids and like 10 lows, I would still probably shield tank the thing and use 3 tracking enhancers 3 damage mods, 2 nanofibers, an overdrive injector and a DCU, you cant do the same thing to armor tanking.
I can't even begin to fathom why you'd want to do that. A ship with 10 lows (not that the engine can do that) would have to be battleship+ sized, meaning speed doesn't matter. I'd do a 4 plate, 2 EANM +2 damage, 2 tracking mod fit, then put a booster (if using hybrids/lasers), prop, web, point, and 2/3 TD's in the mids. You'd be like a turret, sure, but in plates and trimarks alone, you'd have 30k armor HP, and 60/70+ resist all, giving you a huge tank. Maybe even drop a plate for a DCU. Then the TD's would guarantee that you outrange them. Brick-sniper with ultimate utility man, think outside the box. Edited to snip quotes. Your primary assertion is that a 10 low slot ship would be battleship+ sized. I don't think that's a reasonable assertion given the conversation in question. I know for damn sure that I'd be shield tanking a cruiser with 4 mids and 10 lows. Doing anything else is just stupid. -Liang
What sort ofr egen could you get with 10 sprs? sounds great. |
Doddy
Excidium.
Executive Outcomes
252
|
Posted - 2012.10.08 14:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mike Whiite wrote:That fit has a serious EM resistance problem.
To be fair he just needs to swap an extender rig for an em resist rig
|
Doddy
Excidium.
Executive Outcomes
281
|
Posted - 2012.10.11 11:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
nomad Raholan wrote:Wivabel wrote:Connall Tara wrote:wivabel:
[Thorax, New Setup 1]
Damage Control II
1600mm Reinforced Rolled Tungsten Plates I
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Experimental 10MN MicroWarpdrive I
X5 Prototype Engine Enervator
J5b Phased Prototype Warp Scrambler I
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Void M
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Void M
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Void M
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Void M
Heavy Electron Blaster II, Void M
Medium Ancillary Current Router I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Medium Trimark Armor Pump I
Hammerhead II x5
this is now... I think we'll be fine with the new layout with 30 extra cpu for MOAR WEBBING! considering the overall preformance the single PG rig isn't exactly a crippling weakness ^_^ it is dumb to need a fitting mod to fit the smallest guns Well you can always use the fitting mod for less tank and big guns. Not many ships allow for biggest gun and max tank, is always a compromise..
Not that its really dumb to need fitting mods to fit an oversize tank in the first place.
|
Doddy
Excidium.
Executive Outcomes
294
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 14:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
They should be increasing fitting requirements on extenders, not removing it from plates .... |
|
|
| |
|