| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
AnzacPaul
the united
Negative Ten.
   |
Posted - 2011.09.03 19:13:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: XIRUSPHERE
The only real way large entities like GS and friends could get CCP to listen is if high sec was sieged to the point CCP's bread and butter started collectively abandoning ship due to threat of annihilation.
This is really where Mittani should be using his pull. Although a lot of us think he's a tool, many of us (myself included), would probably call to arms, if he started a revolt in game to get ccp to listen.
Non-stop suicide ganks, lagging mission/market hubs to breaking point, stop production/market activity, mass logoffs (even the entire goonswarm logging off would show a dip, no doubt).
Instead of keeping it in the Goons, get all the disgruntled to participate, ill even use another plex up to hang around to join in.
______
 |
AnzacPaul
the united
Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 23:40:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Tippia
In the real world, outside of these paranoid fantasies, highsec will see zero change because highsec is simply too low-end to be affected by any change to the high-end, which is what CCP were discussing.
Why are they even making the changes then if it will have no effect? Is it to help 0.0? or to help convince high sec dwellers to move to 0.0?
______
|
AnzacPaul
the united
Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 23:54:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: AnzacPaul
Why are they even making the changes then if it will have no effect?
Because the effect it will have is to ensure that the ôtopö everything can be found in 0.0 ù that is not quite the case right now.
In other words, to encourage people to move to 0.0 over high sec. It's not by any means a needed change, as you said it will have zero effect on high sec.
______
|
AnzacPaul
the united
Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.09.04 00:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Tippia
Originally by: AnzacPaul
In other words, to encourage people to move to 0.0 over high sec. It's not by any means a needed change, as you said it will have zero effect on high sec.
Having no effect over highsec is not the same thing as having no effect on the players who currently choose highsec.
Lol, so you weren't talking about the actual players and how it will affect them, but rather that there wont be certain types of Ice roids on the overview anymore? I'm pretty sure when most people talk about the change it will have on high sec/low sec/null/wormholes, they generally mean the change on the playerbase, not the physical implementation of it.
______
|
AnzacPaul
the united
Negative Ten.
|
Posted - 2011.09.04 01:33:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Oglyn
Is this the same Mittani who flamed CCP on 11 November 2009 for their supercarrier nerf?
Is this the same Mittani who flamed CCP for letting players have out of game access to Devs?
The guy sure backtracks fast when it is in his interest rather than that of the game.
Wait, what? He is also the head of the CSM?
Those are the guys who are meant to be looking out for the best interests of the entire playerbase, right? (After being setup on the pretext of preventing further player influence over devs?)
Just, wow 
Irony overload.
The problem is, there aren't many others who could have such a large influence. Chribba maybe, or perhaps a few of the csm combined, so in this case if Mittani is actually serious about this ****, let's hope he gets everyone on bored and not make it a goonswarm event.
______
|
AnzacPaul
Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 22:26:00 -
[6]
Edited by: AnzacPaul on 05/09/2011 22:25:59
Originally by: Sullen Skoung
Originally by: Paragon Renegade
It's like watching Halo fans argue about Armour Lock.
This is a good thing.
never played much halo whats armor lock lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-t3f5zn51M&feature=related
lol you can imagine the tears when it was introduced :P
______
|
| |
|