| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 19:05:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Cebraio It's been said that super-carriers would lose the ability to field regular drones.
How is that a nerf? Isn't it more useful for them to launch Fighters and Bombers anyway?
Not if they're being blobbed by sub-caps. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 22:59:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Kengutsi Akira That whole "no ice for you in highsec" and "we're gonna take all the best agents an put em in 0.0" and the other **** they lain out, when combined with the "watch what they do not what they say" argument seem to support them killing off highsec.
àyou mean apart from the fact that moving the best agents will have zero effect on highsec and that the ôno iceö statement was more along the lines of ôonly some ice products will be available through highsec beltsö, so the effect of that will be minimal as well. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 23:20:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Tippia on 03/09/2011 23:20:38
Originally by: Sullen Skoung right who needs good agents in high sec. all the mission runners will go to 0.0
Huh?
Do you have any idea what you're talking about?
The whole ôhighsec is getting nerfedö is something brain-damaged highsec dwellers have dreamed up because they have no clue whatsoever about what's actually available in EVE. So when CCP said that they were moving the best agents, they drooled ôdurrrà that must mean my L4s go away! waaah!ö when in reality, highsec L4s are so far away from qualifying as ôthe best agentsö that it's downright laughable that anyone would even be able to have such a stupid idea as to equate the two.
So no, moving the best agents will have no effect whatsoever on highsec for the simple reason that the best agents do not, and have never, existed in highsec. Highsec will have the same mediocre agents as right now, and they are not good enough to be affected.
The other bit of abject retardation is the ôonoz, ice will be goneö, when what was actually proposed was that some particular ice products would no longer be available through highsec ice-mining. Again, it is just highsec:ers' persecution complex making them spout ignorant nonsense because they have no idea that things exist outside of highsec that are already different (and better) than what they have access to. The same goes for the mentions made about deadspace and faction loot.
In the real world, outside of these paranoid fantasies, highsec will see zero change because highsec is simply too low-end to be affected by any change to the high-end, which is what CCP were discussing. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 23:52:00 -
[4]
Originally by: AnzacPaul Why are they even making the changes then if it will have no effect?
Because the effect it will have is to ensure that the ôtopö everything can be found in 0.0 ù that is not quite the case right now.
Originally by: Sullen Skoung you have issues with the mentally impaired I see.
No, I have issues with self-imposed and willing ignorance of the kind some highsec dwellers have chosen to display when dreaming up that kind of nonsense. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.03 23:57:00 -
[5]
Originally by: AnzacPaul In other words, to encourage people to move to 0.0 over high sec. It's not by any means a needed change, as you said it will have zero effect on high sec.
Having no effect over highsec is not the same thing as having no effect on the players who currently choose highsec. ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|

Tippia
Caldari Sunshine and Lollipops
|
Posted - 2011.09.04 00:04:00 -
[6]
Originally by: AnzacPaul I'm pretty sure when most people talk about the change it will have on high sec/low sec/null/wormholes, they generally mean the change on the playerbase, not the physical implementation of it.
Since all they every cry about is this mythical ôhighsec nerfö, no, not really ù they're talking about changes in the implementation (changes that aren't planned and will not happen). ùùù ôIf you're not willing to fight for what you have in ≡v≡ you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.ö ù Karath Piki
|
| |
|