|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
AnzacPaul
Perkone
   |
Posted - 2011.09.05 20:44:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Cipher Jones
It is excellent to see that you paid money to complain about it, and even better that you used someone else's money (self admitted) to do so.
Thank you for your contribution to this great game.
Actually, this wouls only be true once plex go into demand. At the moment there is a plentiful supply of them.
For example, If your paying with a sub, you are giving CCP $15 a month. There is still an excess of plex on the market.
You cancel sub, CCP get 15$ less from you, still excess of plex on market. the plex you buy off the market is already paid for, regardless of who buys it. But if someone that was once an active subscriber buys it, to me that's an overall loss to CCP.
as I said, provided Plex dont get to the stage where they are selling as fast as they are put up.
______
 |
AnzacPaul
Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 20:56:00 -
[2]
Edited by: AnzacPaul on 05/09/2011 20:56:42
Originally by: Ranger 1
Connect the dots, my short sighted friend.
Actually considering plex are bought to be resold for isk, its the buyers of the plex (with RL cash) that control the market, not the other way around.
______
|
AnzacPaul
Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 21:01:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Cipher Jones
Just for clarification purposes, we are referring to one PLEX that was used to pay for Tokyo's subscription. We are not talking about sold but unused PLEX cards.
I can't believe people genuinely don't comprehend that.
So are we, that plex was already paid for.
So long as there is more plex on the market than what is needed, CCP aren't making any money.
People buy plex to sell for isk, people looking for game time via plex do not control this. There is no demand for plex atm.
Get it yet? Tokyo's been trying to tell you for about 10 posts.
______
|
AnzacPaul
Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 21:09:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ranger 1
A surplus of PLEX on the market does not change the fact that CCP got paid.
No it doesn't. But lets say the person that buy's the plex with RL cash buys 5 plex a month to support his isk habit.
Is he going to go and buy 6 a month, because 1 person who was paying $15 a month to CCP via sub, drops that and buys 1 of the persons plex?
Why would anyone spend more money to support someone else's habit?
______
|
AnzacPaul
Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 21:15:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Cipher Jones
troll, or stupid, can't work out which.
Back under your bridge.
______
|
AnzacPaul
Perkone
|
Posted - 2011.09.05 21:24:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Cipher Jones
When you can't use logic against it
Exactly, which is why I gave up with you.
______
|
|
|
| |
|