EVE Search - Mass-test feedback

All Channels

Test Server Feedback

Mass-test feedback - September 27

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)

CCP Habakuk C C P C C P Alliance 265	Posted - 2012.09.27 20:54:00 - [1] - Quote Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 27th of September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: CPU: GPU: RAM: How many clients were you running at the same time? Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: CCP Habakuk \| EVE Quality Assurance \| Team Gridlock Writing bug reports \| Mass tests

Me ofcourse There is no life in space 18	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:00:00 - [2] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 27th of September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 profesional 64 bit Processor:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.8GHz GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770 XFX XXX Memory:16384 MB RAM How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high (maxed out) User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 40 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):20 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Asmoden Heroes in Vain 1	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:00:00 - [3] - Quote OS version: Win7 64bit CPU: I5 GPU: GTX260 RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high Average FPS during fights wre 20 Zoomed 16 Scale 5 No disconnects or crashes Although we did't do that much tonight, it ws fun and useful to see the district concepts. Warping around a planets districts was one of the best bits for me. the VPV was fun too!
Me of Course There is no life in space 2	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:01:00 - [4] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 27th of September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 profesional 64 bit Processor:Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.8GHz GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5770 XFX XXX Memory:16384 MB RAM How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high (maxed out) User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 40 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):20 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Marvin Sinister EVE University Ivy League 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:03:00 - [5] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 CPU: AMD Phenom X2 GPU: Nvidia GTS250 RAM: 2GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 10 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Total chaos, which isn't a bad thing.
Darth Behelzebhu Black Marsh X Eternal Syndicate 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:05:00 - [6] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win Vista 64 CPU: Intel core 2 Quad Q8200 GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT120 2 1gb each RAM: 16gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 12-15 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 3-6 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
RFD commander The Knight's Who Say Ni 10	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:05:00 - [7] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 x64 CPU: Althon II x4 645 GPU: HD 7750 RAM: 8Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 23 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 7 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 4 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: One Crash when being moved from low sec system to 6-CZ49 Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything went fine from what i saw apart from the random crash.
Silentkiller7 A.F.T.E.R. EFFECT 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:05:00 - [8] - Quote Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit AMD Phenom ll X6 1090t MSI 6970 Radeon 2GB 8GB Ram One Client High Settings 30fps zoomed out 12fps zoomed in 4 No disconnects or crashes Interested Test
Evemir Hemdaill F.R.E.E.L.A.N.C.E.R.S 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:05:00 - [9] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 Professional 32bit CPU: Pentium D 2,66GHz GPU: Asus GeForce GT520 1GB RAM: 2GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Was testing high and low. Not big difference between any of them. My CPU sucks but graphics card is sufficient. I guess... User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 5 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 2 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? 1 but on TQ I never participated in such huge fleet fight. Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I didnt saw any bombardments or beams on planets. Maybe because of settings? But districts look nice to mee. Too bad I don't have PS3 and have such sh---y CPU or even whole PC.
killroy v2 Thorn Project 5	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:06:00 - [10] - Quote CCP Habakuk wrote: Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 27th of September, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template: Machine Info and Settings OS version: windows 7 home premium 32 bit CPU: intel pentium 4 @3.00ghz GPU: RAM:8 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): between 2 and 5 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): <1 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: the only difference is all of the ships on the field, i haven't been in one of those in a while.
Ford Perfekt Avix Industries Industrial Technonauts 3	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:06:00 - [11] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 x64 CPU: i5 - M560 @ 2.67Ghz GPU: NVS3100M RAM: 8Gb How many clients were you running at the same time? - 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): AA- Disabled; PP- None; Shader - High; Texture - High; LOQ - High; Shadow -Disabled; Interior - Low; Interior - Low User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 2FPS Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 1.8FPS On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) = 3 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? = No dissconnects, no crashes - Only camera got stuck for 30sec after clicking on district on planet. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I like that I can participate in future expansions.
Athraws Rising Thunder 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:10:00 - [12] - Quote OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit CPU: Intel i7 960 @ 3.6GHz GPU: Radeon HD 8870 RAM: 8GB 3 Clients Settings: Medium FPS in Fight Zoomed Out: 31 FPS in Fight Zoomed In: 18 FPS/Performance Rating: 4-5 No DC/s Comments: Had lag on jumping gates.
Fiendstateft Finnish Space Jaegers Gentlemen's Agreement 1	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:10:00 - [13] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 64bit CPU: Intel i5 760 2.80GHz GPU: GeForce 8800 GTS RAM: 4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out: 30 Average FPS - Zoomed in : 20 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Smoother than expected
Josurr Navy Angels 1	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:11:00 - [14] - Quote Machine Info and Settings GÇó OS version: Windows 7 64 bit GÇó Processor:Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU 2100 @ 3.10GHz x 4 GÇó GPU: ATI Radeon HD 6670 GÇó Memory: 4 Gb GÇó How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 GÇó Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium User Experience GÇó Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): sorry didnt see GÇó Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 60 GÇó On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 GÇó Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no GÇó Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: new install of client, have to find everything again. Fitting of ship works nicely, from old save to corp.
oResolution Rising Thunder 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:11:00 - [15] - Quote OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit CPU: Intel i7 960 @ 3.6GHz GPU: Radeon HD 8870 RAM: 8GB 3 Clients Settings: Medium FPS in Fight Zoomed Out: 32 FPS in Fight Zoomed In: 19 FPS/Performance Rating: 4-5 No DC/s Comments: Traffic Control...
Hisaya Kobayashi TransStellar LLC 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:11:00 - [16] - Quote OS: Vista 32 bit Processor: ProcessorIntel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6850 @ 3.00GHz, 3003 Mhz, 2 Core(s), 2 Logical Processor(s) GPU: Nvidia Geforce 7950 GT Memory: 3 Gig Clients: 1 Setting: Low Fps Zoomed out: 55 Fps Zoomed In: 30 Comparison Scale: 4 Crashes, Disconnects: no It was a fun experience, Planet connecting worked fine, Orbital bombardment looked cool. Only bad thing i would say was changing gates as it would take a long long long time to jump.
Marie Madullier Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:12:00 - [17] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 64 Bit CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 (3,2GHz, 6 cores) GPU: ATI Radeon HD 6850 RAM: 8GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 mass test / 1 tranquility Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight at the gate in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 10 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Logan Kurtis Stellar Solutions Factory Ewoks 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:13:00 - [18] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: win Ultimate 64x CPU: AMD Phenom II x4 965 3,40GHz GPU: Radeon HD 6950 RAM: 16.000 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Ultra User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 40 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 25 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: -
Sulzer Wartzilla Production N Destruction INC. The Last Chancers. 1	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:13:00 - [19] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 64-bit CPU: Intel i5-2310 2.9GHz GPU: Nvidia Geforce 560 Ti RAM: 4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 20-25 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 10 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 4-5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I just want to nuke stuff. :c No really this seemed to work well. I couldn't see any beams during the bombing, though. Just the impact itself. Were we supposed to see the beams?
Eli Green The Arrow Project 19	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:14:00 - [20] - Quote machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 CPU: intel i3 GPU: intel HD Graphics RAM: 6 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low-med User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 20 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 7 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: only got a brief glimpse of the orbital bombardment effect as camera controls locked up after connecting to the district. traffic control displayed incorrect wait times. e.g. traffic control: 137s, actual: 45s during the initial move to 6-C while warping under TDs effects the distance to tunnel collapse increased. other than that all good.
Alistair Kion Rising Thunder 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:14:00 - [21] - Quote OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit CPU: Intel i7 960 3.6GHz GPU: Radeon HD 8870 RAM: 8GB Ran 3 Clients Settings: High FPS in Fight Zoomed Out: 23 FPS in Fight Zoomed In: 9 FPS/Performance Rating: 4 No DC/s Comments: Got stuck on gates a bit.
Einherjar Taron Open University of Celestial Hardship Art of War Alliance 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:19:00 - [22] - Quote OS version: Windows 7 64bit CPU: Intel Core I7 Q720 GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5700 RAM: 4GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client - Medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out: 31 Average FPS - Zoomed in: 16 No disconnects or crashes. Traffic control was somewhat slow. Overall great!
OKISAD Technology Acquisition Collective LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:20:00 - [23] - Quote GÇóOS version: win 7 GÇóCPU: Intel Core i5-2700k GÇóGPU: GeForce GTS 250 GÇóRAM: 2Gb GÇóHow many clients were you running at the same time? 2 GÇóGraphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 20 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):12 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 10 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? one disconnect no crashes Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: BEST mass test
easterbunny16 Romanian DUDE 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:22:00 - [24] - Quote GÇóOS version: win 7 GÇóCPU: Intel Core i5-2700k GÇóGPU: GeForce GTS 250 GÇóRAM: 2Gb GÇóHow many clients were you running at the same time? 2 GÇóGraphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high User Experience User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 20 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):12 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 10 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? one disconnect no crashes Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: BEST mass test
galathil eru OrioGen 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:24:00 - [25] - Quote OS version: Win 7 64 bit CPU: AMD Phenom II X6 GPU: Radeon HD 5870 1gb RAM: 8gb How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high FPS in Fight Zoomed Out : 29 FPS in Fight Zoomed in: 15 On a scale of 1-10, never been in a fleet of that size so nothing to compare against really, but had no problems and was great fun no D/C's orbital is looking cool, looking forward to seeing how this goes thanks guys, great fun
theelusiveyoda Black Nexus Proj3ct I Got Banned For That 11	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:24:00 - [26] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 X-64 Ultimate CPU: Intel I7 930 @ 3.5GHZ GPU: 2 X HD 6970 2GB In Crossfire RAM: 12 GB DDR 3 2000MHZ How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 65 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 16 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6/7 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: good mass test guys.
Fribain Magnusson Caldari Provisions Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:31:00 - [27] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate, 64-bit CPU: AMD AthlonII X3 450 (3 cores, 3.2 GHz) GPU: nVidia GTX 560, driver version 306.23 RAM: 16GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): 30 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 25 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No, but it did take a while to load everything a few times. Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Lots of fun, and the look of the planetary districts is sweet! I look forward to nuking them from orbit.... Its the only way to be sure....
Mister Ripley 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:34:00 - [28] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: Win XP CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo, 2x 2,16 GHz GPU: Radeon HD 6800 RAM: 2GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium User Experience Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): ~18 Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): ~16 On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5 Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything was fine.
Gaia Ma'chello V.I.C.E. 27	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:36:00 - [29] - Quote Machine Info and Settings OS version: 10.7.5 CPU:2.66 GHz Intel core i7 GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M 512 MB RAM: 8 GB 1067 Mhz DDR3 How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low but for texture which was high (to better see districts). User Experience I had to log due to RL before the PvP part. Average FPS during the fight in 6-CZ49, zoomed out (no brackets): NA Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): NA On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 3 for what I saw. Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No, Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Grid loading after a jump was very slow. It always loaded, but there were times during the grid loading process when the FPS was zero for 10 to 20 seconds. Only once did the grid load fast enough for me to align before a fleet warp was issued. Many times it seems like the client was still trying to catch up even during the warp and after arriving at the next gate. Turning on brackets caused only the smallest drop in FPS, like from 16 to 14 while sitting at a gate. Fleet voice worked, a rarity for the Mac. I was able to connect to the district and see the strikes.
luna1102 Perkone Caldari State 0	Posted - 2012.09.27 21:37:00 - [30] - Quote OS version: Windows 7 x64 CPU: Core i5 3570K 3,40 GHz GPU: Asus HD 6970 RAM: 32 GB How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high Scale: 5 Crashes/Disconnect: 1 time - Overview (empty) was not reloading, must do a reconnect. (logserver on) Comments: Big Fleet Jump was very slow U forgot about 20 people in Odamia (got a late fleet invite) - do the fleet battle 20 Jumps from Odamia makes no sense to follow :(

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.