| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Sticky:Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate my account on Singularity. Thank you.
- by Athraws - at 2016.01.18 02:49:34
|
2. ***Petition*** Petition to keep the refitting mechanic as is! - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I support this message. Let the capital changes stand on their own and see how they pan out first. If there is still a problem, this issue can always be reexamined at a later date.
- by Athraws - at 2016.01.08 20:46:20
|
3. Combat Refitting - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rosal Milag wrote: An Erebus without links, because I didn't have a way to simulate this on my phone, has around 7 million EHP with a full High Grade Slave set and 3 trimark T2 rigs. 1 million EHP shield 5 mil EHP armor 1 mil EHP structure N...
- by Athraws - at 2015.10.29 04:06:02
|
4. Sticky:[Aegis] More balance! - Ishtars, DDAs and the Tempest - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Personally I feel a good move toward handling the situation is to simply swap the drone bays of the Ishtar and the Eos. I think the Eos is extremely weak in its current form. It is crippled by a 250m3 drone bay (on a ship with extensive bonuses f...
- by Athraws - at 2015.06.23 05:23:10
|
5. Seeding complex modules - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Caleb Seremshur wrote: Tournament ships used to be on the market, now they're not. Because people were taking the **** with them. So their situation is exactly the same as deadspace modules and are therefore relevant to the discussion. The l...
- by Athraws - at 2015.06.09 05:00:21
|
6. Seeding complex modules - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Caleb Seremshur wrote: I don't consider the notion that the power creep you describe as being especially dangerous or the foregone conclusion. Not everyone spent all day every day flying tournament ships (just the special snowflake kids). As...
- by Athraws - at 2015.06.09 02:50:45
|
7. Seeding complex modules - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
There's at least one every mirror... Lets assume, for a moment, that faction/complex mods are seeded. Let us also assume you have fit a nice shiny Tengu that you have some interest in testing, to ascertain if it's worthwhile to acquire on Tranqui...
- by Athraws - at 2015.06.07 21:24:13
|
8. AT Prize ships must be a mistake! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
DHB WildCat wrote: First, the Imp So it gets the exact same bonuses as the succubus with the 7.5% tracking, 20% AB speed, and 150% Turret damage. 1) Extra bonuses, 5% per level range to disruptors and scrams........ 5% really? Pretty weak 2...
- by Athraws - at 2015.06.05 21:46:23
|
9. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate my account Thanks
- by Athraws - at 2015.05.05 20:27:40
|
10. Singularity: Rule violation reporting - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Eklipusa assigning fighters from station. A buddy and I died in Svipuls, returned pods to station, and found a big red circle around Eklipusa's Thanatos on station. Killmails show assisted fighters. He also appeared to not care/disregard the r...
- by Athraws - at 2015.01.29 03:45:59
|
11. Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate my account on the test server. Thanks!
- by Athraws - at 2014.09.17 21:33:00
|
12. Give Geckos light drone or medium AI as a bandaid fix. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote: So this thread has run for a while and it seems that none can seem to offer a valid reason why we should not have a change to the drone AI with regards to the Gecko. When proposing a change like this, th...
- by Athraws - at 2014.08.24 17:35:00
|
13. Carriers/Supercarriers reliably chewing up cruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
hellswindstaff wrote: A small group doesnt have the firepower to down a super anyway so whats the point. So somebody else can do the work? Gotta love the omg just tackle that and hope someone will come kill it idealogy. Nullsec was dead the da...
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.06 17:52:00
|
14. Carriers/Supercarriers reliably chewing up cruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
hellswindstaff wrote: Athraws wrote: hellswindstaff wrote: If there's more than one and you dont have the ability to tackle them (AHEM light Dictor) you should probably stfu and warp out. Much angry butthurt over something you likely wil...
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.06 16:34:00
|
15. Kronos: Welcome back, unkillable supercarriers. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
IIshira wrote: Expense doesn't mean invulnerability. This doesn't compare to the old log off mechanics where you couldn't kill them. It's just harder to kill. I'm sorry if you think a super carrier should be an easy kill. http://community....
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.06 14:25:00
|
16. Kronos: Welcome back, unkillable supercarriers. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Only two things to say: First, this was already mentioned in test server feedback, but of course no one looked at it... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=348932&find=unread And second, for those who say that supercarr...
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.05 17:00:00
|
17. Carriers/Supercarriers reliably chewing up cruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
hellswindstaff wrote: If there's more than one and you dont have the ability to tackle them (AHEM light Dictor) you should probably stfu and warp out. Much angry butthurt over something you likely will never tackle anyway Because light dict...
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.05 16:48:00
|
18. Carriers/Supercarriers reliably chewing up cruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Romana Erebus wrote: Dude.......no one on tq is going to run around with a carrier pure dps tracking fit like that. Unless they like getting blown up . But a dps/tracking fit will pop frigates in one shot. ... btw the odds of you running into...
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.05 15:27:00
|
19. Carriers/Supercarriers reliably chewing up cruisers - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Olivia Berett wrote: What is wrong is a capital ship being stopped by ONE SHIP. I also agree that should be possible for a lone ship to EVADE a capital due to agility and speed, maybe a faceoff of the smaller capital and the bigger battleship c...
- by Athraws - at 2014.06.04 15:27:00
|
20. Mass-test feedback - September 27 - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
OS: Windows 7 Pro 64 bit CPU: Intel i7 960 @ 3.6GHz GPU: Radeon HD 8870 RAM: 8GB 3 Clients Settings: Medium FPS in Fight Zoomed Out: 31 FPS in Fight Zoomed In: 18 FPS/Performance Rating: 4-5 No DC/s Comments: Had lag on jumping gates.
- by Athraws - at 2012.09.27 21:10:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |