| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 48 post(s) |
|

CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
2845

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 14:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
If you're really good at EVE and if you like money, you'll want to read CCP Bro's new exciting dev blog!
For the first time ever you can (legally) earn modern day Earth currency for blowing up spaceships...so go read the blog and tell us what you think! CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |-á@ccp_guard |
|
|

CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
1719

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 14:49:00 -
[2] - Quote
Booyah Game Designer | Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
|

CCP FoxFour
C C P C C P Alliance
716

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 14:49:00 -
[3] - Quote
So freaking excited about this! Content Designer | Team Five 0 @regnerBA |
|
|

CCP Veritas
C C P C C P Alliance
607

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 14:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Moar space-pewpew on the teevees! \o/ CCP Veritas - Senior Programmer - EVE Software |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
8

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 14:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Remember when you guys said "Why don't we have more tournaments in EVE?". We agreed and thought, what can we add?
The answer was:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETxmCCsMoD0 |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
13

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Dierdra Vaal wrote:Will the broadcasts also include player commentators & studio like the AT?
Will player adverts be allowed like the AT?
Studio - Yes Commentators - To be announced |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1505

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:17:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dierdra Vaal wrote:Will the broadcasts also include player commentators & studio like the AT?
Will player adverts be allowed like the AT?
Ugh, Bro beat me to it :/ CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
13

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Dierdra Vaal wrote:CCP Bro wrote:Dierdra Vaal wrote:Will the broadcasts also include player commentators & studio like the AT?
Will player adverts be allowed like the AT? Studio - Yes Commentators - To be announced and player adverts? :)
There will not be player adverts for this event at least. We are working on giving you a more streamlined action packed broadcast. |
|
|

CCP Legion
60

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:19:00 -
[9] - Quote
p$w p$w! CCP Legion | Team Player Experience & Team Avatar |-á |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2091

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:22:00 -
[10] - Quote
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:why is it always big alliances that can only get into these and not people who do small gang PvP that don't have huge corps/alliances and 10bil isk lying around to enter the auction
This tournament has nothing to do with alliances whatsoever. What we do have is a cost of entry in order to ensure that those who are stating they wish to compete have enough skin in the game to take it seriously. Over the long term we would definitely like to have alternative methods of doing so but we simply don't have any other option at this time. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
13

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:22:00 -
[11] - Quote
Warde Guildencrantz wrote:why is it always big alliances that can only get into these and not people who do small gang PvP that don't have huge corps/alliances and 10bil isk lying around to enter the auction
Also, if you are a small gang PVP expert there is nothing stopping you from being sponsored by an alliance or a corporation. Also, you can search for a team that has the funds available and is recruiting. If you are a top level player just start a search for a team or a search for funds. |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1506

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:29:00 -
[12] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Warde Guildencrantz wrote:why is it always big alliances that can only get into these and not people who do small gang PvP that don't have huge corps/alliances and 10bil isk lying around to enter the auction Because there has to be /some/ way to cut down the number of groups who'd want to enter, to something manageable.
Steve is right to a large extent but I really want to spend some time talking about this as EVE tournaments and eSports are something that CCP Bro and I talk about at length.
In an ideal world we want to expand eSports to become a really big deal in EVE Online and allow players access to a host of tournaments of different sizes with a range of prizes. This is a long term goal and, if I am being completely honest, we have a lot of decision making and planning to do to make this a reality. We want to see tournaments involving everyone from small groups to huge alliances but this is will be much further down the road.
20 PLEX is not a bid every player can make and, as Steve pointed out, there needs to be a barrier of entry otherwise we would end up with a random drawing of hundreds of teams. We are aware that a tournament of this size will attract some of the best pilots from multiple corporations and alliances and we would expect that these teams will be sponsored by their respective corps and alliances.
This tournament is about celebrating individuals who can form a team, not necessarily from the same corps and alliances, and guide those teams to greatness.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Punkturis
C C P C C P Alliance
3268

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:34:00 -
[13] - Quote
daaaayyyyyuuuum this stuff is cool! I wish I could join some team  Gÿà EVE User Interface Programmer Gÿà GÖÑ Team Super Friends GÖÑ @CCP_Punkturis My Dev Blogs |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
14

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:35:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jackie Fisher wrote:CCP Bro wrote:Also, if you are a small gang PVP expert there is nothing stopping you from being sponsored by an alliance or a corporation. If you don't want to be backed by a corporation/alliance, you can search for a team that has the funds available and is recruiting. If you are a top level player just start a search for a team or a search for funds. So presumably team names could be sponsored by Eve related entities as a form of advertising?
For instance that could be a selling point for a team looking for funding to join this tournament. |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2093

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
l0rd carlos wrote:Do we get the plex back if you don't get in? Like we bid 24 plex, but all other bid 55 plex, do we still ne to pay it?
Only the winner of the auction slot pays anything. Those plex would never leave your hands. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2093

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:38:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lord Haur wrote:Clarification request on the Player/character thing: Quote:Each team will consist between eight and 24 players, with eight being the minimum required team size and 24 being the maximum team size allowed. The total number of players submitted is at the discretion of the team captain. It is important to note that payment of any prize to a winning team will be paid by own3D.tv directly to all players listed in a team.
[...]
You may have as many of your characters in a single team as your captain allows. For example, if you own 5 EVE Online accounts with three characters on each there are no restrictions on how many of those characters can be in a single team. If you feel you can multibox your way to victory against some very dedicated teams then more power to you. Is that minimum 8, maximum 24 characters, or RL people? Extremities either way could be one person 8-boxing, or 24 people with the option to use any of their characters. I'm presuming it's referring to player characters.
A person may have multiple characters on the same team. A person MAY NOT have ANY characters in more than one team. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1506

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lord Haur wrote:Clarification request on the Player/character thing: Quote:Each team will consist between eight and 24 players, with eight being the minimum required team size and 24 being the maximum team size allowed. The total number of players submitted is at the discretion of the team captain. It is important to note that payment of any prize to a winning team will be paid by own3D.tv directly to all players listed in a team.
[...]
You may have as many of your characters in a single team as your captain allows. For example, if you own 5 EVE Online accounts with three characters on each there are no restrictions on how many of those characters can be in a single team. If you feel you can multibox your way to victory against some very dedicated teams then more power to you. Is that minimum 8, maximum 24 characters, or RL people? Extremities either way could be one person 8-boxing, or 24 people with the option to use any of their characters. I'm presuming it's referring to player characters.
You presume correctly. You need to supply a minimum of 8 player characters in a team for it to be eligible. CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
138

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 15:46:00 -
[18] - Quote
This is really exciting news; can't wait for this to start! ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1507

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
Eiluvial wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Eiluvial wrote:Sorry but the entrance format is ****.
What stops an entity from registering 32 teams to RMT 10000$ legally?
Like if someone were to buy every spot at 30PLEX each. Thats 528b ISK total at 550m/PLEX for 10k $, at a rate of close to 19$ per billion ISK I'm sure some people will think about it, especially when it's legal.
If someone wants to bankroll the entire tournament they can do it. It's entirely possible that a single entity buys all spots.
Thats kind of bad, isnt it. I would like to encourage all the illegal RMT groups in EVE to attempt to launder their ISK in this manner. What a cunning plan! What could possibly go wrong?  Like lets assume a spot is on average 40 PLEX - my guess is that it will be lower, but if you look at ATX and how much those places went for(in the end almost all close to minimum) (hell the last spot didnt get sold because no one wanted it and devs had to do another auction) and compare to ATX prices (trillions of ISK worth of stuff - way better prices than this tournament) then at a PLEXprice of 550, thats only 704b. Individuals in Goonswarm have that much. PL can buy out the tournament twice if they wanted to. Pretty sure the highest wallet was around 3t if i remember the statistic tweets correctly. (Dont quote me on this) Isn't this just going to be another, more "elite" Alliance Tournament, where Alliances can legally enter more teams? At half the spots of ATX but without restriction to one team/alliance isn't this the exact opposite of ATX rules with Hydra being kicked out? What if the final is going to be another ATIX final with an "A-Team" fighting against a "B-Team"?
I think you are looking at a hyper worst case scenario. While it is possible for a super rich alliance to attempt to buy every slot, it would not be cost effective for them to do so.
We are breaking new ground here with EVE tournaments and we will be analyzing every aspect of how teams are formed and how they participate in the event.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1507

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:09:00 -
[20] - Quote
Aineko Macx wrote:Ship banning will cause lots of tears 
We are hoping for lots of variety  CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
2049

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:
I think you are looking at a hyper worst case scenario. While it is possible for a super rich alliance to attempt to buy every slot, it would not be cost effective for them to do so.
We are breaking new ground here with EVE tournaments and we will be analyzing every aspect of how teams are formed and how they participate in the event.
Why isn't it cost effective? Even at 50% conversion rate from ISK to US$ that's better than 0 conversion rate. I would take a trillion ISK and buy all the teams to make $10,000. Because if I can make a trillion, I can make a trillion more.
Sure, but we're going to be even harsher on colluding and foul play this year, so any sign that you're even remotely doing that and you're getting disqualified (and we'll keep the plexes of course) |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1508

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:26:00 -
[22] - Quote
Azrin Stella Oerndotte wrote:Quote:Once you have a player character on a team, attempting to place another character on a second team will result in disqualification for both of those teams. For example, if you join team A with one of your accounts and then attempt to join Team B with a second account, both teams will be disqualified. Can't this be abused to tears or am I missing something?
Potentially it could, however, the severity of penalties applied to player accounts who participate in this action should not be ignored.
Fake edit: They are severe.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1508

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Hiram Alexander wrote:This being EVE 'n' all... Are there any metagame rules we should be aware of?, for example, should some Team Captain register their team, but trick their bunch of pilots into giving him/her 50 Plex for an auction bid that's never going to be paid, is that going to be a problem, or A-okay...?
We understand this can be a concern. Unless you are 100% sure that your team captain is a stand up guy/girl we would suggest you hold on to your individual PLEX and then pay them to 'CCP Alliance Tournament' individually if you are successful in the auction.
As long as the total number of PLEX is sent by the team then this will not be an issue.
One thing we would stress is that you all must be available to pay the PLEX if and when you win a slot otherwise your slot will be re-auctioned.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
14

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:34:00 -
[24] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:Dierdra Vaal wrote:Will the broadcasts also include player commentators & studio like the AT?
Will player adverts be allowed like the AT? Can we have this question answered please. I'll stop being a punk about the whole situation, I'll just tell you that I know a lot of people are plugging a lot of numbers in right now. Oh, and prediction is PL wins. Already answered this earlier.
Yes there will be a studio
Yes there will be commentators but they will be from CCP
No there will not be player adverts for this tournament as we are trying to minimize the time between matches and give you an action packed event. |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1508

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:45:00 -
[25] - Quote
I'm Down wrote:Will the winter patch be in before this kicks off?
If so
Will T1 "logistics cruisers" count toward the 1 limit?
How will money be given out at the end of the tournament... can't be trusting people when cash is on the line.
No, the winter patch will not be released before this tournament.
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
15

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 16:56:00 -
[26] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:Let's look at the idea from the individual to have the PLEX cost split amongst everyone on a team.
SO, you come in with 16 guys (8 mains and 8 backups) who each put down 2 plex each to get 32 plex on the table for the bidding.
That's gonna be around $35 each or 1.2B PLEX at current prices (i'm sure people are buying PLEX already, I am).
To have a chance at splitting EDIT : $6,000 over 16 people, minus the estimated average bidding, which is $544 = 5456 a prize of $341 each. Which, is almost as much as the whole team together put into the pot each. So, a 1 in 32 chance (random draw) to get 10 times your money back.
Go play a lotto, better chance of winning better prizes.
We're not even considering gaming the system to have 10 PL teams in. At which point everyone is gonna get screwed.
http://www.lottogenie.com/html/odds.html
Those look like worse odds to me and you don't get to blow up spaceships! |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
17

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:20:00 -
[27] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:CCP Bro wrote: Already answered this earlier.
Yes there will be a studio
Yes there will be commentators but they will be from CCP
No there will not be player adverts for this tournament as we are trying to minimize the time between matches and give you an action packed event.
I promised I'd stop being a punk, so here's constructive feedback? Why don't you accept a PLEX for ads? I think some player organizations would be willing to put a PLEX to advertise on your program.
That is a good idea and something that is definitely worth considering. One of the reasons why we are not doing player adverts this tournament is because we want to try limiting the amount of time between matches and maximizing the amount of spaceships blowing up. We will then of course look at your feedback for how that goes and factor that into future decisions.
It is worth noting that this isn't an end all tournament or a grand finale. This is the first step on a hopefully long, entertaining and successful road. Also, the main purpose of this tournament is to engage you, the community, and bring you a full scale tournament production for your entertainment, whether you partake in the tournament or just opt to watch it.
During ATX we received positive feedback and were asked multiple times, why don't you do more tournaments? We took that question to heart and are here to offer you, you guessed it, more tournaments. Any constructive criticism, pointers and observations are of course completely welcome and will help us better this service to you in the future. |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
18

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:21:00 -
[28] - Quote
Servant's Lord wrote:So is the plex "bidding" a deposit, or a onetime payment?
IE if I throw up 35 plex, will I get my plex back at the end win or lose, or do they just disappear once they're contract to CCP Alliance Char?
You will only be required to part with your PLEX if you win a spot. Meaning that you don't pay the PLEX until you have won the auction for the spot. |
|
|

CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
1721

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
Djakku wrote: Are Hydra banned from this aswell?
At this time everyone with an active player account is eligible. Game Designer | Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2093

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:24:00 -
[30] - Quote
Djakku wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Warde Guildencrantz wrote:why is it always big alliances that can only get into these and not people who do small gang PvP that don't have huge corps/alliances and 10bil isk lying around to enter the auction This tournament has nothing to do with alliances whatsoever. What we do have is a cost of entry in order to ensure that those who are stating they wish to compete have enough skin in the game to take it seriously. Over the long term we would definitely like to have alternative methods of doing so but we simply don't have any other option at this time. Are Hydra banned from this aswell?
Hydra doesn't exist as far as this tournament format is concerned as was stated in the post you quoted. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2093

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:26:00 -
[31] - Quote
Eiluvial wrote:CCP Navigator wrote:Azrin Stella Oerndotte wrote:Quote:Once you have a player character on a team, attempting to place another character on a second team will result in disqualification for both of those teams. For example, if you join team A with one of your accounts and then attempt to join Team B with a second account, both teams will be disqualified. Can't this be abused to tears or am I missing something? Potentially it could, however, the severity of penalties applied to player accounts who participate in this action should not be ignored. Fake edit: They are severe. The spies will be burned anyway, and banning those accounts isn't really a problem. Are you saying the main accounts will be affect as well? Punishment to the person and not the chars? Metagaming now an bannable offense? 
Attempting to cheat in the tournament is yes. Was that not clear in the rules? "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Sreegs
C C P C C P Alliance
2093

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:27:00 -
[32] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:Salpun wrote:Bloodpetal wrote:Salpun wrote:Its $6000 for the winning team so its worse then you have been saying lol Right, top prize is $6,000. Got the big $10k in my head. Went back and fixed it, thank you. $10,000 is split 3 ways among the first 3 teams. That is before taxes. Read the devblog  . I did. Just a slip. It only works the argument in my favor. All this amounts to is paying 30B ISK to "have fun" - the real money value is insignificant. And that means the only people that have expendable money to burn are the null sec alliances. And the only people that will get "Sponsored" by anyone with money are going to be A-Teams that already have an ATX track record. As someone pointed out, on the ATX Auction, they could barely even sell the last slot. So what makes you think you can do the same thing here? Sorry, CCP has totally overestimated the amount of Free ISK moving around that would go towards a project like this. You are going to have a hard time filling 32 slots totaling a minimum of 480 Billion ISK, when there were BIGGER prizes, More ISK, more reputation and better rewards for ATX.
I guess we'll find out who's right when we open the bidding. You can go ahead and preserve this post for further discussion at that time based on fact rather than rampant and silly speculation. "Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012 |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
19

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 17:36:00 -
[33] - Quote
Bloodpetal wrote:CCP Bro wrote:
That is a good idea and something that is definitely worth considering. One of the reasons why we are not doing player adverts this tournament is because we want to try limiting the amount of time between matches and maximizing the amount of spaceships blowing up. We will then of course look at your feedback for how that goes and factor that into future decisions.
I understand you have to run a business, but I will point out that MOST sports events make their real money on advertising money, and not off of the players in the tournament. I know you may not have an exact value for the cost of your programs advertising (and has been free, and is an awesome service for free...) - but getting a better idea of that would be in your benefit, and would ease some of the... financial burdens on the "players" (read, not 20B isk to enter the tournament). I am sure that own3DTV made a killing on having 5-10,000K viewers (which I'm sure is huge for an eSports event) on advertising. I would like player advertising to be free whenever possible, but in cases such as this, where you want to limit your advertising time, I'm just putting that out there. :) Also, I'm sure own3dtv wants advertising time, so you're gonna need SOME slow time in between (or it's going to all be ads in between...) The major issue we ran into when playing ads on both platform simultaneously (player ads and other ads) was getting the timing right. This caused some players concern and we got feedback on that. With that feedback in mind we decided to try out a new scheduling format to see if that works better. If it does it can be adapted for future events where we can then incorporate player ads as we have done before. As I said, I like feedback and pointers and this discussion right here is exactly what is needed to help us evolve the tournament format and broadcast structure. |
|
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
2051

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 18:50:00 -
[34] - Quote
Gilbaron wrote:it is kinda sad that there is no special ship as a prize :(
especially with the v3 project, I heard it is extremely easy compared to the past to make a custom skin once the pre work is done. And with fozzie bringing ship balancing to a whole new level, it can't be difficult to find some interesting bonus ideas
We're going to be keeping the different tournaments separate. The ships will still be part of the alliance tournament, while this format will have other goodies.
|
|
|

CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
2051

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 19:47:00 -
[35] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:This will be fun to watch. The bans are a clever innovation. With each captain able to ban two ships, you can wipe out some entire ship classes if so inclined.
I'm surprised that it's even remarkable that CCP hopes to bring in more money than they pay out. That's how lotteries and raffles raise money, as well. After expenses, it probably won't even be that much.
Our tournament fees aren't really made to bring in money, as much as "let's cover our costs". |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1511

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 21:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
After reading through the thread I just have to say that War Kitten absolutely gets it. If you have not read her posts then please do.
We in the tournament team are breaking new ground and EVE tournaments are now monetized. This is a big deal. Who knows how far we can bring this, and believe me, we have big plans.
We understand that EVE, probably more than most MMO's, is the ultimate competitive game. EVE tournaments are not about having the best gear but having the best strategies, the best set ups and, most importantly, the best players. With a solid team set up you guys can potentially start looking at corporate sponsorships in the future and can compete with other eSports.
We are putting our toe in the water with this tournament but everyone in CCP concerned with tournaments understand how big this can become and we want you to come along and be part of it.
Our goal is to grow tournaments to a whole new level and incorporate every class of player possible. This is not going to happen today or tomorrow but I can assure you that we are planning to include as many players as possible.
Let's host this tournament and see how it goes and see how we can make tournaments bigger and better in the future and how we can include lots more players. CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Navigator
C C P C C P Alliance
1513

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 23:00:00 -
[37] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:CCP Bro wrote:Yes there will be commentators but they will be from CCP. I hope the man formerly know as Raivi (CCP Fozzie) will be commentating. He was the best damned player commentator you've had.
Then you are totally in luck 
CCP Navigator -Community Manager |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
20

|
Posted - 2012.09.28 23:35:00 -
[38] - Quote
Dersen Lowery wrote:This will be fun to watch. The bans are a clever innovation. With each captain able to ban two ships, you can wipe out some entire ship classes if so inclined.
I'm surprised that it's even remarkable that CCP hopes to bring in more money than they pay out. That's how lotteries and raffles raise money, as well. After expenses, it probably won't even be that much.
Like Soundwave said, we don't plan on this bringing in money. Most of the comments here don't factor in how much a full scale production costs.
We want this to be engaging content for the community. If you compete or not, we want you to have fun! |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
22

|
Posted - 2012.09.29 21:47:00 -
[39] - Quote
Theory Bore wrote:Any chance I could get some clarification by CCP on some of the rules regarding team size for this tournament? "Dev Blog" wrote: Please note that the minimum team size is eight pilots and the maximum team size is 24 pilots (8 main players plus up to 16 reserves). Here it's somewhat confusing as to what a "player" and what a "pilot" is defined as. Does this mean 24 people can be on any given team or does it mean that there is a limit of 24 in-game characters? (e.g. would a team of 20 people who own 3 accounts each be allowed to use all 60 characters in the tournament) "Dev Blog" wrote:You may have as many of your characters in a single team as your captain allows. For example, if you own 5 EVE Online accounts with three characters on each there are no restrictions on how many of those characters can be in a single team. If you feel you can multibox your way to victory against some very dedicated teams then more power to you.
By the same metric, would a single person who owns 8 accounts be able to enter a team? The rules state that you need a minimum of 8 players, but it's still not clear as to what a "player" is according to the rules.
Regarding your first question, you can have up to 24 people on a team but in that case every person can only field 1 character each. If you have 20 people on a team they can together field up to 24 in-game characters.
The second question, if you own 8 accounts you can register a team and multibox in the tournament. |
|
|

CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
1724

|
Posted - 2012.09.30 14:12:00 -
[40] - Quote
Admiral Goberius wrote:So I have been looking closely at the rules post and the dev replies in this thread and cannot find any details about the whole B team deal.
I get that this is a character based tournament and alliance affiliation doesnt matter.
I see nothing in the rules against the same alliance or group fielding multiple teams as long as: 1. all the teams are made up of independent characters played by independent players 2. no collusion happens if these teams were to face each other on tourney day
HOWEVER
there is quite a big precedent for good players and bad posters getting banned for touching dicks on sisi so could you clarify whether there is *any* restriction to the same alliance fielding multiple teams as long as they do not collude?
Since this tournament is based on teams not alliances the concept of alliance B teams doesn't really apply. We expect that for the first couple times many teams will be from specific alliances but hopefully teams will start developing identities of their own eventually.
There is no restriction against an alliance, corp or any other benefactor sponsoring multiple teams as long as those teams are distinct and are working for their own victory.
As in all previous eve tournaments, the tournament team completely reserves the right to do whatever is needed to ensure that the matches are competitive. Game Designer | Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
|

CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
1724

|
Posted - 2012.09.30 15:00:00 -
[41] - Quote
There are already alliances that were formed just for tournaments and that's fine. This team format also allows people from multiple alliances who like to work together in the tournament but who enjoy having distinct alliances in normal gameplay form one unified team. I'm going to be very interested in seeing the social structures that players continue to develop around these kinds of things.
If teams want to have exhibition matches against each other that's fine. However there's a difference between watching two teams spar against each other and watching one team with two names have internal practices. We know the difference. Game Designer | Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
|

CCP Fozzie
C C P C C P Alliance
1724

|
Posted - 2012.09.30 15:40:00 -
[42] - Quote
Admiral Goberius wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:If teams want to have exhibition matches against each other that's fine. However there's a difference between watching two teams spar against each other and watching one team with two names have internal practices. We know the difference. Ok, in the case of this character based tournament the only way to have one team enter twice is if the same player competed in two different teams by account sharing right? Two teams made of independent players from the same alliance/affiliation sparring against each other is allowed right? I know you mostly already answered this and I apologize if I come across as pedantic but I just want to understand 100% what is cool and what isnt. Thanks again.
A certain amount of vagueness in the rules is a necessary evil so that people won't think they can wiggle through the letter of the law, so sorry if we can't spell things out quite as cleanly as many people would like.
In the last Alliance Tournament there were two reasons for the "B team" rule:
1) To ensure that as many alliances as possible get a chance to compete 2) To ensure that each team will try to win when faced with any other team
Since we're team based for this one the first reason isn't valid. We don't care what alliance any members of any teams are from. Basically make sure it's clear that your team is distinct from other teams and is in this thing to win. That's what I mean by "one team with two names". If two teams have the same leadership and are working towards getting their "A team" through instead of for themselves it becomes fairly obvious. Game Designer | Team Game of Drones https://twitter.com/CCP_Fozzie |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
22

|
Posted - 2012.10.01 10:41:00 -
[43] - Quote
Cat Casidy wrote:What makes you think people are going to want watch not just a and b teams fighting each other (at9), but abcd teams fighting each other? We paid close to 32 bill in the auction for ATX when only one team per alliance was allowed. With these rules there's no limit to "teams" per alliance. "Every tournament we have run in the past has focused on Alliances and has, for better or worse, excluded a vast portion of EVE players who are members of player and NPC corporation"
...so how do those rules accomplish getting those people who were excluded in the past involved? if anythig they seem to make it even more exclusionary. Collusion in the tournament is not allowed, simply put if you throw a match or attempt to game the tournament you will be disqualified. Players are free to scrim and practice against other teams as much as they want as long as they play every match in the tournament with the intent to win. I think our position on colluding is clear after the events of AT9. |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
22

|
Posted - 2012.10.01 11:37:00 -
[44] - Quote
Mawderator wrote:CCP Bro wrote:Cat Casidy wrote:What makes you think people are going to want watch not just a and b teams fighting each other (at9), but abcd teams fighting each other? We paid close to 32 bill in the auction for ATX when only one team per alliance was allowed. With these rules there's no limit to "teams" per alliance. "Every tournament we have run in the past has focused on Alliances and has, for better or worse, excluded a vast portion of EVE players who are members of player and NPC corporation"
...so how do those rules accomplish getting those people who were excluded in the past involved? if anythig they seem to make it even more exclusionary. Collusion in the tournament is not allowed, simply put if you throw a match or attempt to game the tournament you will be disqualified. Players are free to scrim and practice against other teams as much as they want as long as they play every match in the tournament with the intent to win. I think our position on colluding is clear after the events of AT9. So despite you endorsing metagaming, you actually expect people to play nice when real life cash is on the line? I fail to see how these two situations are comparable. One is a corporation theft and the other is throwing a match in a tournament with specific rules. Also, the same rules against collusion were in effect for ATX and there was no real life cash on the line there. It's not about the prize in any way, it is about hosting an entertaining event. |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
22

|
Posted - 2012.10.01 13:40:00 -
[45] - Quote
Molinator Agnon wrote:I'm very glad this tournament is happening.
The prize pool did not surprise me - this is a first step, after all.
From an eSports perspective, 45 minutes is way too long for brooding about your opponent's ban picks. If you're really meta gaming the right way you'll know what ships certain teams commonly use - and you'll know how to defend against a ban on a commonly used ship with a new setup.
15 minutes would allow the bans for the match on deck to take place just before the current match is aired, which would allow viewers to tune into the meta game without having to keep a score sheet and sit around for 3+ matches to take place to see the results of their predictions.
That gripe aside, I'll be tuning into this for sure. I enjoyed watching ATX and I hope to see more of these in the future.
Admiral Goberius wrote:it takes more than 15 minutes to just hand out the prefitted ships, ammo, implants to everyone and double check that everything is fine
Exactly Admiral, that is why we opted to have the bans 45 minutes before to give teams adequate time to adapt to the banned ships. As for your comment Molinator, we will show the bans and discuss them just before we go into the match. This should hopefully take away any need for a score card to keep track of what ships are being banned for each match. |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
23

|
Posted - 2012.10.01 17:28:00 -
[46] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:I am not sure I am interested in a tournament for only $10...now if you want to make that $10,000...then we got something.
(Thread title is wrong.) Or is it? |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
23

|
Posted - 2012.10.01 17:56:00 -
[47] - Quote
Duncan Tanner wrote:I think two years ago there was a comment that Eve Tournaments were something that CCP no longer really budgeted for because they were costly and did not provide a measurable return. Has that changed at all?
In order to create a truly competitive e-sport out of Eve you need to make the competition that happens in the tournament a way that you can play the game normally. This is the case in every other e-sport. As it is now, because of how much effort it is, only very dedicated groups go out of their way to recreate the environment of the competition for practice. More and more people are doing this but it is still a lot of effort. Some people have suggested that Eve needs some sort of arenas. Do you have any thoughts on this?
"Players who are suspected of joining multiple teams to disrupt the tournament or auction process may be subject to administrative penalties including loss of access to their accounts."
This sounds like accounts are being banned from Eve not the tournament. If this is true, banning accounts from Eve based on suspicion alone is pretty drastic. What will be done to prevent someone suspected but not guilty from getting their accounts banned? Will there be some communication between CCP and the player before action is taken?
Thanks. Regarding the first part of your post, it is true that practicing and doing tournaments at this time is a hassle in EVE and if this becomes a more regular thing we will of course look to provide players with the tools necessary to practice more efficiently. How and if that will be done is uncertain at this point.
Regarding the second part of the post, we will of course thoroughly investigate any infringements of the rules and only act if we have evidence that we deem conclusive. I honestly hope that people can respect the rules and put on a good show while striving towards winning the tournament with their piloting skills. After all, you want to be able to call yourself "The best team in EVE" and not "The team that tried to cheat". |
|
|

CCP Bro
C C P C C P Alliance
24

|
Posted - 2012.10.02 12:55:00 -
[48] - Quote
Aotearorian wrote:One think is not stipulated clearly.
If players enter multiply characters on team, would it cause his to resive his share of winning multiply times or just one share per player, not character. The prizes are divided between players, not characters. |
|
| |
|