EVE Search - Diplomacy Table - Latest Update À 26.05.2005

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Diplomacy Table - Latest Update À 26.05.2005

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 6 post(s)
Qalten	Posted - 2005.05.11 08:19:00 - [1] Edited by: Qalten on 11/05/2005 08:19:54 Originally by: Weebear Edited by: Weebear on 09/05/2005 11:39:47 Would be good if you could add in Ascendant Frontier. We've gone ahead and added ASCN officially. Please review the standings and report any adjustments to this thread. MODS: Could I get the date changed on the first post and some of the older entries cleaned up? Much appreciated Cheers! -Q EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.05.23 20:35:00 - [2] Updated with recent [SE]/[FA] war declaration. We'll be addressing the [5] on the table soon, methinks. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.05.29 06:40:00 - [3] Originally by: Khaerie SE Napped with FIX, Red Alliance & Mercenary Coalition [SE] change made. The FIX NAP used to be set here, wonder what happened to it. Thanks! EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.01 20:11:00 - [4] Originally by: Seleene I know nothing of this and such an agreement would have had to be run by myself and the MC Leadership. Please explain. Also, the MC is no longer at war with Imperium and please change the contact info from 'Squagel' to 'Hygelac'. Thanks! [SE]/[MC] NAP changed to Neutral until I hear otherwise from both sides. [MC]/[IMP] Standings changed, and [MC] contact info updated. Cheers! EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.07 15:11:00 - [5] Originally by: Takrolimus [5] Enemies: G, IMP, Foundation, Fountain, FIX, XETIC Friendship: FSA, Coalition, -V- Enemies and Friendship Standings added. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.19 18:48:00 - [6] Edited by: Qalten on 19/06/2005 18:55:34 Edited by: Qalten on 19/06/2005 18:49:32 [MC] standings cleared [ASCN] & [IMP] Contact/Description Information Updated [RA]/[FSA] standings changed John Blackthorn: We don't currently list COE on the table at this time. Ithildin: We'd like to stay on top of MC standings if they change in regards to other entities on our table. If we don't hear about it, we're more than willing to change them if posted here MODS: When you have a moment, could you tidy up to John Blackthorns post on 2005.06.17 19:56:00? Much obliged. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.21 15:58:00 - [7] Edited by: Qalten on 21/06/2005 15:58:43 Originally by: Coug Edited by: Coug on 21/06/2005 14:52:29 Please adjust VC standings to ASCN to enemies, not a full War at this time. Thank you. Our pleasure, [VC]/[ASCN] change made. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.23 20:47:00 - [8] Originally by: Aphoxema G Aegis Militia is presently at war with Ushra'Khan [AM]/[UNITY] Change made. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.28 20:33:00 - [9] Originally by: MAXSuicide FE also has geminate again Erm, I think you want the "Territorial Map" just down the hall. Perhaps try here? EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.06.30 20:00:00 - [10] Originally by: Ithildin Mercenary Coalition has contracts on Imperium Alliance and Celestial Apocalypse going live tomorrow. Mark them as you will, but I suggest you make a special tag for mercenary contract (so that people don't take them too seriously if they remain on the table overly long). That's actually an excellent idea. I'll see if we can setup a new status of "mercenary war" or something similar. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.07.01 23:05:00 - [11] Originally by: Ithildin Mercenary Coalition has contracts on Imperium Alliance and Celestial Apocalypse going live tomorrow. Mark them as you will, but I suggest you make a special tag for mercenary contract (so that people don't take them too seriously if they remain on the table overly long). Per your excellent suggestion, we've now added a Mercenary Contract state. We've adjusted [MC]'s standings towards [IMP] to this end. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.07.08 03:33:00 - [12] Just took a look, everything seems to be operating normally. Do you still get the error? If so, can you be a bit more specific in what you were doing? EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.07.25 16:17:00 - [13] Originally by: Ithildin Mercenary Coalition contracts no longer active. (Imp / FA) New contract(s) under negotiation, stay tuned. Contracts removed. Thanks for the update. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.07.28 18:44:00 - [14] Edited by: Qalten on 28/07/2005 18:45:03 Edited by: Qalten on 28/07/2005 18:44:03 Originally by: Ithildin SMASH has chosen Mercenary Coalition as enemies. Please mark a regular war between us as we are not contracted to war them. I believe we're in the process of getting SMASH added to the table and once we do, will set them to the appropriate full war with MC. Thanks for the colour suggestions, it's always something I'm looking to improve so we'll see what we can do. Cheers EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.08.05 19:45:00 - [15] Originally by: Witch Doctor Nice chart. While the description for the U'K is fairly apt, we do not consider ourselves at war with 5 nor do we have a formal declaration as we do with AM and CVA. At worst, I would say an "Enemies" designation is in order, but even that is arguable depending on the standard. There have been some hostilities in 0.0, but we do not officially consider them enemies. So I would downgrade it to Enemies at least if not neutral. Duly noted. We'll do Enemies for now and if perhaps hostilities wind down, we'll downgrade it to Neutral. Thanks for the info. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.08.15 18:31:00 - [16] Edited by: Qalten on 15/08/2005 18:31:35 I think we can clean up to Amataras's post on 2005.08.11 17:01:00. Table updated with recent info given. Thanks and keep it coming! EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.09.14 17:19:00 - [17] Changes made. Give a look, and thanks for the update! Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.09.23 19:50:00 - [18] Originally by: Darko1107 Please remove as contact for IRON. Done. o/ Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.10.06 15:21:00 - [19] Hans Roaming, Buddrow, & Jonkai: Changes made. Thanks for the info! Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.10.15 03:23:00 - [20] I think we only deleted FA after repeated attempts in asking for any FA representatives to state otherwise. If even one had stepped up and said "Hey, we're here! We're active! o/" FA wouldn't have gone anywhere. Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.10.16 03:10:00 - [21] [SMASH] and [UNITY] standings set. And Peoke, while we do love a colourful table, we reserve the Red standings for actual in-game declared wars, so if you want to specify which are in-game declared and which are just KOS, we'll swap those oranges to reds. Cheers for the info! Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.10.17 03:18:00 - [22] Edited by: Qalten on 17/10/2005 03:18:25 [FIX] Changes made. Thanks Nez! o/ Also updated the recent in-game declared wars against [5]. This should prove to be quite interesting :D Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.10.19 03:22:00 - [23] Thanks, Chronical. Hope your corp finds what they're looking for! [OPUS] standings reset and contact info updated. Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.10.23 17:13:00 - [24] Originally by: Amataras done, done and done etc I'm not sure if this is a mistake, but take a look at SMASH's enemy list Is that accurate or have we made a blunder somewhere? Nope! Someone from SMASH posted a nice long list of enemies. They almost got a perfect score by filling in all the squares. Maybe next time :D Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.11.14 15:08:00 - [25] Originally by: El*** Ethenwe* What no R.I.S.K ? I'll ask Amataras to include this in his first post so it's known to all. Any new alliance that feels it should be added needs to post here saying so as well as give us a list of initial diplomatic standings, and at least one player who will be the contact. With this information in hand, it will very much expedite getting an alliance added. Cheers! Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.11.23 20:58:00 - [26] Edited by: Qalten on 23/11/2005 20:59:02 Originally by: SlyPanther Edited by: SlyPanther on 20/11/2005 16:18:37 Wasn't sure to post here or contact you in game. Just have a problem with the chart, very hard for me to read it. I am in the minority who are red/green colour blind. So it looks like a big blur to me. I have to filter and remove everything and do it one at a time, I can get 2 though.. Just thought I would give you some feedback. I'm looking at graphically reorganizing the chart in the very near future. Goals will be to: a) Organize it to better display the large number of alliance it tracks and b) implement alternative display methods (currently includes using ASCII characters or another low-bandwidth method) Hopefully when this is implemented you will find it much easier to use, and as such, everyone wins. The EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2005.12.06 21:04:00 - [27] Originally by: Amataras Originally by: Seleene MC contract on V continues. MC contract on 5 is ended but limited hostilities continue in 0.0. We are still having problems with our -V- settings, so it isnt showing for some reason. Should be all set now. I'll be keeping an eye on it. EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.01.23 00:53:00 - [28] Gypsy: Much obliged for all the info. C.D.C's been added with all your submitted info Riley: The "At War" designation is explicitly only for official war declarations, or un-official but reliable declarations of alliance-wide war. If you can get an official BoB representative to confirm that you're not at war (under the terms I just specified) then we will be more than happy to adjust the table accordingly. Cheers, Q ~ EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.01.31 16:34:00 - [29] Edited by: Qalten on 31/01/2006 16:34:53 [SNU] Added [EKP] standings/info added [5]/[FE] standings changed. Thanks for the updates. ~ EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.03.15 16:16:00 - [30] Just wanted to point out that it's been one year to the day since we first posted about the Diplomacy Table. It's been a fascinating time seeing all the Alliances that have come, have gone and are still here, interacting with one another. Three cheers to Am for keeping this going and thanks to all the players who have helped keep it fresh and updated! ~ EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.04.03 16:22:00 - [31] MadNite: We're always willing to look into Alliances we may have missed. However, you'll need to provide some actual information before it can be addressed. thoth foc: [5] change made Oceana: [NBSI] changes made Krollji: [SDX] removed, [EKP] added and standings added Keep the updates coming! ~ EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.04.06 15:29:00 - [32] * [MC] Standings Updated * [FE] Standings Updated * [EKP] Contacts Updated * [5] Contacts Updated * [SNU] Standings Updated Cheers! ~ EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.04.27 13:45:00 - [33] Just wanted to give everyone a heads up, the server the Diplomacy Table is hosted on is changing hosts so if you can't reach it, you'll know why. Should be cleared up in a few days. ~ EVE Diplomacy Table
Qalten	Posted - 2006.04.30 03:25:00 - [34] Server change looks to be complete, shoot me an EVEmail or post here if you get any errors. Thanks! ~ EVE Diplomacy Table

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.