Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 11:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead. |

Proteus Maximus
Rusty Knickers Malicious Intent Gentleman's Club
107
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 11:57:00 -
[2] - Quote
Just taking items because someone feels having them is unfair is a slippery slope. If Goons were around when God said, "Let there be light" they'd have called the light gay, and plunged the universe back into darkness by squatting their nutsacks over it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9865
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 11:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.
|

Nanatoa
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
36
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably?
Akita Who? It is never too late to turn from the errors of your ways: He who repents of his sins is almost innocent.
MinerBumping.com |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5122
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
T2 BPOs are a funny thing. The idea of an inventor putting years of profits into an item that will take years to pay for itself and is not necessarily guaranteed to hold its value is, well, amusing. This post was crafted by a member of the Goonswarm Federation posting cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online posting.
fofofofofo |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
18
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:05:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nanatoa wrote:Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably? Akita Who? T |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably?
^^^ T2 BPO owner spotted. ^^^ |

Souisa
WESCORP 2.0
14
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
Why not just give everyone one. Starter kit. Hell when you get a noob ship have it contain a T2 BPO instead of 1 trit |

Jim Hazard
Scrubfleet
26
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:10:00 -
[9] - Quote
Removing them would simply be unfair for everyone who bought them for billions and have not been able to cover the costs with profits so far.
|

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably? ^^^ T2 BPO owner spotted. ^^^
^^^ Butthurt Inventor who doesn't do research spotted. ^^^
Because out-right removing them screws over all the players and corporations who bought those blueprints, or traded them for isk. Also, removing those T2 BPOs isn't going to make things more lucrative for inventors as you might think. Look at the profit margins on inventing and building Heavy Interdictors for example (Which don't have a T2 BPO) . Surely there are massive profits to be had without a T2 BPO producer to compete with? Right...? Right???
|

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1525
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Came expecting Brewlar Kuvakei
left confused TK is recruiting |

S'Way
Bitter Vets
25
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:42:00 -
[12] - Quote
This topic comes up every few weeks / months, was wondering when it would appear again.
Most T2 BPO's aren't even in the hands of the original owners anymore, anyone buying one now will take a very long time (years) to re-coup that outlay and start making a decent profit. Removing them now is kind of pointless, those who got them from the BP lottery era have probably cashed in by selling them on. The majority of owners now have thrown a few billion into one, good luck to them - should CCP see fit to introduce new modules, that costly BPO could be rendered almost worthless. (and if that happens before the break-even time for the holder, they'll actually take a loss overall).
Do they give an advantage over invention ? sure, are they game breaking ? no. Even with a T2 BPO sat copying 24/7 you can't supply the markets full demand for items, there's plenty of room for inventors to still make a good income if they know what they're doing.
|

RaTTuS
BIG Everywhere - Everything
215
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
S'Way wrote:This topic comes up every few weeks / months, was wondering when it would appear again.
Most T2 BPO's aren't even in the hands of the original owners anymore, anyone buying one now will take a very long time (years) to re-coup that outlay and start making a decent profit. Removing them now is kind of pointless, those who got them from the BP lottery era have probably cashed in by selling them on. The majority of owners now have thrown a few billion into one, good luck to them - should CCP see fit to introduce new modules, that costly BPO could be rendered almost worthless. (and if that happens before the break-even time for the holder, they'll actually take a loss overall).
Do they give an advantage over invention ? sure. Are they game breaking ? no. Even with a T2 BPO sat copying 24/7 you can't supply the markets full demand for items, there's plenty of room for inventors to still make a good income if they know what they're doing. they take longer to copy than to build - it's always been the case invention is far more profitable run the figures t2 BPo is just easier on the clicking http://eveboard.com/ub/419190933-134.png
|

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:49:00 -
[14] - Quote
RaTTuS wrote:S'Way wrote:This topic comes up every few weeks / months, was wondering when it would appear again.
Most T2 BPO's aren't even in the hands of the original owners anymore, anyone buying one now will take a very long time (years) to re-coup that outlay and start making a decent profit. Removing them now is kind of pointless, those who got them from the BP lottery era have probably cashed in by selling them on. The majority of owners now have thrown a few billion into one, good luck to them - should CCP see fit to introduce new modules, that costly BPO could be rendered almost worthless. (and if that happens before the break-even time for the holder, they'll actually take a loss overall).
Do they give an advantage over invention ? sure. Are they game breaking ? no. Even with a T2 BPO sat copying 24/7 you can't supply the markets full demand for items, there's plenty of room for inventors to still make a good income if they know what they're doing. they take longer to copy than to build - it's always been the case invention is far more profitable run the figures t2 BPo is just easier on the clicking
Yeah and it never fails, unlike invention. And the supply is unlimited. Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. If we all speak out CCP will have to listen as it is only the few who have these items. |

S'Way
Bitter Vets
25
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 12:58:00 -
[15] - Quote
RaTTuS wrote: they take longer to copy than to build - it's always been the case invention is far more profitable run the figures t2 BPo is just easier on the clicking
I can quite believe that's true. (cashed in long ago on those things the bp lotto gave us to stick to the part of EvE I enjoy - buying / selling, it's less of a headache than getting into building).  |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
713
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:00:00 -
[16] - Quote
How bout CCP removes your assets than we revisit this idea at a later date. Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Christy D Floyd
Astra Research
81
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:03:00 -
[17] - Quote
Is it fair to new players who have joined the game after the lottery. Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
19
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Lord Ryan wrote:How bout CCP removes your assets than we revisit this idea at a later date.
Dude... your face. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Tactical Vendor of Services and Goods Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
1788
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:04:00 -
[19] - Quote
I have a better idea. Introduce T3 modules and munitions. Don't make BPO's for them.
Solved that problem quick... EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
714
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:06:00 -
[20] - Quote
Christy D Floyd wrote:Is it fair to new players who have joined the game after the lottery.
Lottery? I thought they were passed out to friends. Anyways I have a friend who spent years buying and collecting them. I don't think it's fair to him to lose all his work. Anymore than it would be fair for CCP to remove my or your assets or empty our wallet. Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
279

|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:08:00 -
[21] - Quote
Hi everyone,
I've cleaned up this thread a little bit - please stay on topic!
Thanks and fly safe. ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Sarmea Moon
Universal Freelance CONSORTIUM UNIVERSALIS
49
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:08:00 -
[22] - Quote
F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead.
Try harder. This is like "WoW was the first MMO" level of trolling. At least the ******* in the the OP of the "only huge alliances should be allowed to build frigates" put some thought into his troll. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9865
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:08:00 -
[23] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably? ^^^ T2 BPC owner spotted. ^^^ ^^^ Person without any resemblance of an argument for his case spotted. ^^^
Also, FYP.
Quote:Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. No. Everyone defending them have done the maths and realised that there is no need and no reason to get rid of them. In fact, as weak an argument as it might be, keeping them around as memorabilia is a far stronger argument than any that exist for their removal. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.
|

Lord Ryan
True Xero
714
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
ISD Suvetar wrote:Hi everyone,
I've cleaned up this thread a little bit - please stay on topic!
Thanks and fly safe. Why would you remove my comment? What's wrong with it? You can put it back now! Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:17:00 -
[25] - Quote
Tippia wrote:F'elch wrote:Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably? ^^^ T2 BPC owner spotted. ^^^ ^^^ Person without any resemblance of an argument for his case spotted. ^^^ Also, FYP. Quote:Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. No. Everyone defending them have done the maths and realised that there is no need and no reason to get rid of them. In fact, as weak an argument as it might be, keeping them around as memorabilia is a far stronger argument than any that exist for their removal.
No, my mine BPOs are memorabilia. My snowball launchers are memorabilia. A T2 BPO is a license to print money. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9865
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:19:00 -
[26] - Quote
F'elch wrote:No, my mine BPOs are memorabilia. My snowball launchers are memorabilia. A T2 BPO is a license to print money. Funnily enough, mine BPOs and snowball launchers are easier to make money with than T2 BPOs, and the reason to get a T2 BPO these days is much the same as getting one of those items. They're pretty much the same.
Anyway, I expect an eight-point rebuttal and/or a three-point reasoning why T2 BPOs should be removed. Good luck. You're going to need it. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.
|

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:21:00 -
[27] - Quote
Tippia wrote:F'elch wrote:No, my mine BPOs are memorabilia. My snowball launchers are memorabilia. A T2 BPO is a license to print money. Funnily enough, mine BPOs and snowball launchers are easier to make money with than T2 BPOs, and the reason to get a T2 BPO these days is much the same as getting one of those items. They're pretty much the same. Anyway, I expect an eight-point rebuttal and/or a three-point reasoning why T2 BPOs should be removed. Good luck. You're going to need it.
I don't think you will get what you expect, sorry for you. Anyone can see it is unfair to have these items in game. |

Lord Ryan
True Xero
714
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
I think CCP should remove your assets and we should revisit this issue latter. Do not assume-áanything above this line-áwas typed by me. Nerf the Truth, it's inconvenient. Nerf it cause I can't fly it. I want to fly a badass Mon Calamari stlye-ácruiser painted to match my Tron clothes. |

Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
1526
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:25:00 -
[29] - Quote
Anyone that can count to potato can figure out that invention is just as, if not more, profitable than T2 BPOs TK is recruiting |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:26:00 -
[30] - Quote
Lord Ryan wrote:I think CCP should remove your assets and we should revisit this issue latter.
I think you should stop reposting what has already been removed once by the mods.
Also, dude... your face. |

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
38
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:30:00 -
[31] - Quote
I own a siege missile launcher II....erm...torpedo launcher II BPO. The profit margin and production speed on building torp II's is so low that I think I've only built something like 200 in the last two years. It's just not worth the hassle since invention came out.
So no, I don't think T2 BPOs should be removed. Personally, my torp II BPO is more of a collectors item these days than anything else, and I rather like having it. |

Vertisce Soritenshi
Tactical Vendor of Services and Goods Partners of Industrial Service and Salvage
1788
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:30:00 -
[32] - Quote
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:I have a better idea. Introduce T3 modules and munitions. Don't make BPO's for them.
Solved that problem quick... This sounds like an excellent idea. I like this guy. He is smart. EvE is not about PvP.-á EvE is about the SANDBOX! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9867
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
F'elch wrote:I don't think you will get what you expect, sorry for you. So there is no conceivable reason why T2 BPOs should be remove then, since that's what I expected to get.
Well too bad. Like I said: you were going to need a bit of luck on that one and obviously it didn't pan out.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.
|

highonpop
Eve Liberation Force Fatal Ascension
366
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
Christy D Floyd wrote:Is it fair to new players who have joined the game after the lottery.
Is EVE a fair game?
http://www.soundboard.com/sb/Very%20best%20of%20Makalu%20Zarya
R.I.P Vile Rat http://evemaps.dotlan.net/live/Outpost/Rename/2012-09-12 |

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
186
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:47:00 -
[35] - Quote
No, don't remove T2 BPOs...
Boost Invention! |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:49:00 -
[36] - Quote
Tippia wrote:F'elch wrote:I don't think you will get what you expect, sorry for you. So there is no conceivable reason why T2 BPOs should be remove then, since that's what I expected to get. Well too bad. Like I said: you were going to need a bit of luck on that one and obviously it didn't pan out.
I didn't even read the link because I do not recognise your authority on this subject. Nor an any other, for that matter. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
9867
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
F'elch wrote:I didn't even read the link That's your problem and the reason why you fail to come up with the slightest shred of an argument to support your position.
But I'll level with you: I did get what I expected. Pretty much exactly and completely so. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan.
|

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
399
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 13:55:00 -
[38] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too.
Making sweeping generalizations like this is a sure sign that your argument is nothing more than rat excrement. It only takes one counterexample to show that it's wrong, and then you're left there looking like a git.
I don't have a Tech II BPO, nor do I feel they need to be removed from the game. If you're convinced they are so much better, buy one or two and print your own isk for a while. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:02:00 -
[39] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:F'elch wrote:Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. Making sweeping generalizations like this is a sure sign that your argument is nothing more than rat excrement. It only takes one counterexample to show that it's wrong, and then you're left there looking like a git. I don't have a Tech II BPO, nor do I feel they need to be removed from the game. If you're convinced they are so much better, buy one or two and print your own isk for a while.
Name-calling, on the other hand, is some pretty high-level debating. |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
399
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:06:00 -
[40] - Quote
F'elch wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:F'elch wrote:Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. Making sweeping generalizations like this is a sure sign that your argument is nothing more than rat excrement. It only takes one counterexample to show that it's wrong, and then you're left there looking like a git. I don't have a Tech II BPO, nor do I feel they need to be removed from the game. If you're convinced they are so much better, buy one or two and print your own isk for a while. Name-calling, on the other hand, is some pretty high-level debating.
Actually, my good man, I never called you anything. I said your argument style could potentially result in you looking foolish (as in, like a git). I did not, however, call you a git, nor did I heap any other ad hominem attacks upon you.
tl;dr: l2readingcomprehension Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
Well, I'm this close to quitting right now. With the inflating costs of PLEX and ships and the unfairness that has gone on for so many years with the T2 BPOs and CCP favourites, probably in your pockets. Maybe it is time to say goodbye to Eve. Sorry it comes to this because I have invested a lot of time in this game to be put out now. |

KrakizBad
Eve Defence Force Fatal Ascension
920
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
Good, get out. Why did you take my wings away? |

RaTTuS
BIG Everywhere - Everything
217
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:30:00 -
[43] - Quote
eve is fair ? since when? if you're this close contract me all your stuff before you hit the big button ... http://eveboard.com/ub/419190933-134.png
|

William Sedgwick Vyvorant
Why Mine
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:38:00 -
[44] - Quote
I'll be honest I've only been playing for a few months and one thing I've learned is EVE isn't a fair and balanced game, just like life, there are haves and have not, to me iot sounds like the OP is just trolling as I can't see how its a license to print money, run the numbers and you'll see its not.
Personally I'm just getting into invention, mainly for T2 frigates, but I hold no grudge against anyone who happens to have a T2 BPO, why? Because those that have them have either invested significant time and/or money to get them so why not let them have them, who are any of us to say that its highly unfair? I guess the test would be if a T2 BPO you really wanted went on sale, would you buy it or refuse to do so on principle? |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade Intrepid Crossing
399
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:43:00 -
[45] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Well, I'm this close to quitting right now. With the inflating costs of PLEX and ships and the unfairness that has gone on for so many years with the T2 BPOs and CCP favourites, probably in your pockets. Maybe it is time to say goodbye to Eve. Sorry it comes to this because I have invested a lot of time in this game to be put out now.
I will now refer you to my forum signature. Unsub or don't.-á I don't care what your reasons are, and neither does anyone else.-á Just click the button and go away - or don't. |

Tragedy
The Creepshow
41
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:51:00 -
[46] - Quote
F'elch wrote:RaTTuS wrote:S'Way wrote:This topic comes up every few weeks / months, was wondering when it would appear again.
Most T2 BPO's aren't even in the hands of the original owners anymore, anyone buying one now will take a very long time (years) to re-coup that outlay and start making a decent profit. Removing them now is kind of pointless, those who got them from the BP lottery era have probably cashed in by selling them on. The majority of owners now have thrown a few billion into one, good luck to them - should CCP see fit to introduce new modules, that costly BPO could be rendered almost worthless. (and if that happens before the break-even time for the holder, they'll actually take a loss overall).
Do they give an advantage over invention ? sure. Are they game breaking ? no. Even with a T2 BPO sat copying 24/7 you can't supply the markets full demand for items, there's plenty of room for inventors to still make a good income if they know what they're doing. they take longer to copy than to build - it's always been the case invention is far more profitable run the figures t2 BPo is just easier on the clicking Yeah and it never fails, unlike invention. And the supply is unlimited. Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. If we all speak out CCP will have to listen as it is only the few who have these items. I don't have one. I think they should stay. Quit your whining. |

Opertone
Aurora Empire Fuzzy Nut Attack Squirrels
128
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 14:58:00 -
[47] - Quote
instead make t2 BPOs worthless - keep items in game, but make production impossible under current free licensing laws.
"Gallente Feds hate unfair markets and restrict production under BPO exclusive rights to patented invention"
Even better, make BPO t2 so widely available and exchangeable for datacores - it will sure hurt everyone except the buyers. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
20
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 15:05:00 -
[48] - Quote
Opertone wrote:instead make t2 BPOs worthless - keep items in game, but make production impossible under current free licensing laws.
"Gallente Feds hate unfair markets and restrict production under BPO exclusive rights to patented invention"
Even better, make BPO t2 so widely available and exchangeable for datacores - it will sure hurt everyone except the buyers.
Someone who gets it. |

Zelda Wei
New Horizon Trade Exchange
181
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 15:08:00 -
[49] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Tippia wrote:So, you have a good set of rebuttals to Akita T's points about T2 BPOs, presumably? ^^^ T2 BPO owner spotted. ^^^
Politics of envy spotted.
|

Hauling Hal
The Black Ops Black Core Alliance
95
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:34:00 -
[50] - Quote
Came expecting evidence as to why T2 BPOs should be removed. Left disappointed. |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1454
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:38:00 -
[51] - Quote
Why is it always market dudes and isklords that want T2 BPO's removed?  primary target is broadcasted, put all drones on the warp disruption battery. If you are in a frigate you should be at the gate, who blew up? |

Jhan Niber
Big Johnson's
11
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:38:00 -
[52] - Quote
Sounds like a poor person that is just unhappy that they aren't as rich as a small group of people and doesn't like that populations follow a bell curve. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
1721
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:40:00 -
[53] - Quote
Op is bitter for not being as rich and leet as the rest of us.
The street corner is that way ->
Take your idea with you. Eve is about Capital ships, Boobs, PI and Isk! |

Nylith Empyreal
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
135
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:43:00 -
[54] - Quote
Well no new ones are getting in, you could simply destroy the bastards stupid enough to haul the rest. "Oh, you can't help that," said the troll: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad." "How do you know I'm mad?" -ásaid the forumwarrior. "You must be," said the troll, "or you wouldn't have come here." |

Suitonia
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
111
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:46:00 -
[55] - Quote
I doubt Tech II Blueprints have much bearing on Inventor profits anyway. Look at the margins on Heavy Interdictors, there is nothing there and in a lot of cases you will make a loss unless you build from higher ME blueprints (which cost more to begin with), building a Phobos from the BPs currently on contracts will result in a NET LOSS. Surely there should be massive profits to be had without a T2BPO pinning those inventors down!.
|

Gilbaron
Free-Space-Ranger Ev0ke
370
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:48:00 -
[56] - Quote
i kinda want to make a new way to make T2 BPOs to be a task that is so overwhelming that only the really big player corporations can make it happen.
slowly devaluateing the value of the existing T2 BPOs by introducing new ones to the economy |

Callic Veratar
Power of the Phoenix
255
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 16:59:00 -
[57] - Quote
The burden of proof is on you to show how they are unfair, and not on CCP or the player base to defend T2 BPO existence. If you really hate them that much, they are sold on the contract market. Save your pennies, buy them, and trash them. |

Spaceman Jack
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
26
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 17:08:00 -
[58] - Quote
F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead.
I guess someone is voting for Obama |

Christy D Floyd
Astra Research
82
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 17:18:00 -
[59] - Quote
Wrayeth wrote:I own a siege missile launcher II....erm...torpedo launcher II BPO. The profit margin and production speed on building torp II's is so low that I think I've only built something like 200 in the last two years. It's just not worth the hassle since invention came out.
So no, I don't think T2 BPOs should be removed. Personally, my torp II BPO is more of a collectors item these days than anything else, and I rather like having it.
So let me get this straight the T2 Torp BPO isnt making you the iskies you like so why would you be upset if you lost it? What if CCP just gave you a certificate saying you were once the proud owner of a T2BPO....... Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons. |

Christy D Floyd
Astra Research
82
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 17:19:00 -
[60] - Quote
Spaceman Jack wrote:F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead. I guess someone is voting for Obama. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. The only way for you to know if having a T2 BPO was an advantage is if you had the experience of owning one and comparing the difference. Considering your sour grapes, I doubt this is the case. I know a few people with T2 BPOs, myself included who have actually SOLD them because the margins are so low now. You know who bought them... collectors.
See above post. Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons. |

Reverend Cletis
Synister Mynisters
72
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 17:26:00 -
[61] - Quote
OP.
No. |

Eternus8lux8lucis
Journies End
146
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:08:00 -
[62] - Quote
I can see the arguments for and against having T2 BPOs in game. As a 2003 player I know several people Ive played with who have had t2 bpos through the lotto. Some good, others meh.
Personally I like having them in game tbh. Theyre a store of increasing value due to the fact theres a few getting blown up here and there and they dont make them anymore. For that value you get a bit of a break on costs. But anything you want to create or build in serious quantity youd still have to go the invention route simply because you cannot DO economies of scale due to the reason youll only have one of each type at best, to the richest few who hardly need more isk anyway, two or perhaps three of a single kind. With this you cant scale it well so your license to print money doesnt work as I know personally of people that can push out hundreds if not thousands of modules PER day due to alts and economies of scale through invention. Something that nets them far more isk, for much less investment, daily than a T2 BPO ever could on its own.
So yeah do they give the holder an advantage? Yes they do. One thats been paid for through playing this game the way CCP intended it, not handed to them, but through fair chance and working for the RPs or through the isk investments. As the game grows that advantage has DECREASED not increased at all for these holders again due to better economic supply and tighter margins as the game evolves and grows. So do they give an unfair advantage? Hell no, a to say anything else is ludicris. Strength isnt measured in numbers but in force of will. For if one motived willful individual stands many will fall around him that are weak.
http://tinyurl.com/YarrFace |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:24:00 -
[63] - Quote
Well the fact that this thread has got to three pages shows that there is still interest in this subject and quite a few people are taking my line on this. Thanks to those who are willing to support an unpopular opinion. To those against the removal of T2 BPOs, your arguments that they are useless actually only helps to strengthen the argument that they should be removed.
And to those who seem to think their high post count and number of "likes" makes them some kind of authority (I'm looking at you, Tippia), I would say that your own inflated sense of importance and overconfidence in the so-called "right answer" blinkers you to the overall affect these items have on the game and the attitude of builders and traders as a whole. |

Sable Moran
Moran Light Industries
64
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:37:00 -
[64] - Quote
Gilbaron wrote:slowly devaluateing the value of the existing T2 BPOs by introducing new ones to the economy
And in the process completely annihilate invention? That's crazy talk.
Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Laboratories Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene. |

Evei Shard
122
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:47:00 -
[65] - Quote
F'elch wrote: Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. If we all speak out CCP will have to listen as it is only the few who have these items.
I'll have to check my item hangar, this is my lucky day!!
T2 BPO's are something that bugs me, because I don't own any, on any of my accounts.
Unlike you, however, instead of demanding CCP remove them so everyone has what you have (or don't have), I'm working towards buying one.
This is Eve. In Eve, some things take a long time to accomplish. Getting the isk to buy a T2 BPO is one of those things.
While you are at it, can you start a new AFK Cloaking whine thread too? Hasn't been one of those for a short while either. Profit favors the prepared |

Kale Eledar
Mining and Industrial Services The Irukandji
52
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:49:00 -
[66] - Quote
Funny...I feel like I've seen this thread before before before before before before before before *smack* Sorry. Seriously...just look up Akita T's responses to this issue. First come smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:50:00 -
[67] - Quote
Evei Shard wrote:F'elch wrote: Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too. If we all speak out CCP will have to listen as it is only the few who have these items. I'll have to check my item hangar, this is my lucky day!! T2 BPO's are something that bugs me, because I don't own any, on any of my accounts. Unlike you, however, instead of demanding CCP remove them so everyone has what you have (or don't have), I'm working towards buying one. This is Eve. In Eve, some things take a long time to accomplish. Getting the isk to buy a T2 BPO is one of those things. While you are at it, can you start a new AFK Cloaking whine thread too? Hasn't been one of those for a short while either.
Don't lecture me on how I should enjoy the fact that it takes a long time to accomplish things and I should be grateful for that. I wouldn't have been here for this long if I didn't consider that to be a virtue of the game. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:51:00 -
[68] - Quote
Kale Eledar wrote:Funny...I feel like I've seen this thread before before before before before before before before *smack* Sorry. Seriously...just look up Akita T's responses to this issue.
See my above post on self-important forum contributors. |

qDoctor Strangelove
Beware of the Red Fox
42
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 18:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
Christy D Floyd wrote:Is it fair to new players who have joined the game after the lottery.
So... 2012-2003.. About 9 years 9 years x 12 months x 15 usd... That is about 1600 usd.. And I started 3 accounts in 2003, so multiply by 3..
I have earned my T2 BPO's thank you. Between the 3 of them, I plex one account with the profits. |

Arkon Olacar
Imperial Guardians Tribal Band
161
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:00:00 -
[70] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Kale Eledar wrote:Funny...I feel like I've seen this thread before before before before before before before before *smack* Sorry. Seriously...just look up Akita T's responses to this issue. See my above post on self-important forum contributors. Talking of sel-important forum contributors, I've just read three pages of this garbage and not once have you even attempted to explain why T2BPO's need removing, or why they are bad in any way at all. "The rest will be in the blog rather than invented at the keyboards of forum posters and bloggers." -á-á-á-á-á-á-á - CCP Sreegs, 23/06/2012
Umad forum warriors? |

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
643
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:05:00 -
[71] - Quote
RaTTuS wrote:S'Way wrote:This topic comes up every few weeks / months, was wondering when it would appear again.
Most T2 BPO's aren't even in the hands of the original owners anymore, anyone buying one now will take a very long time (years) to re-coup that outlay and start making a decent profit. Removing them now is kind of pointless, those who got them from the BP lottery era have probably cashed in by selling them on. The majority of owners now have thrown a few billion into one, good luck to them - should CCP see fit to introduce new modules, that costly BPO could be rendered almost worthless. (and if that happens before the break-even time for the holder, they'll actually take a loss overall).
Do they give an advantage over invention ? sure. Are they game breaking ? no. Even with a T2 BPO sat copying 24/7 you can't supply the markets full demand for items, there's plenty of room for inventors to still make a good income if they know what they're doing. they take longer to copy than to build - it's always been the case invention is far more profitable run the figures t2 BPo is just easier on the clicking
Invention is NOT far more profitable... that's a LIE.....
T2 BPO's allow for the production of a t2 item without the cost of invention, and without the poor ME & PE levels produced from invention. Any item produced from a t2 BPO will be CHEAPER, and MORE PROFITABLE, than an item produced through invention... So this bullcrap about invention being more profitable is just wrong...
Invention does allow you to "focus" on a single item and mass produce them, whereas a T2 BPO doesnt. That does NOT mean that invention is more profitable... as if you had 10 t2 BPO's for that item (giving you an appropriate comparison), the T2 BPO production would be vastly more profitable...
Now, FYI, I invent, I do not own a t2 BPO... and I do NOT support the removal of t2 BPO's. T2 BPO's are legacy items that have become investment items. They should not be removed or made obsolete... they should be made more vulnerable...
|

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
Arkon Olacar wrote:F'elch wrote:Kale Eledar wrote:Funny...I feel like I've seen this thread before before before before before before before before *smack* Sorry. Seriously...just look up Akita T's responses to this issue. See my above post on self-important forum contributors. Talking of sel-important forum contributors, I've just read three pages of this garbage and not once have you even attempted to explain why T2BPO's need removing, or why they are bad in any way at all.
"...it never fails, unlike invention. And the supply is unlimited. Everyone defending T2 BPO has one, otherwise you would want to get rid of them too..."
QFT
Also, reduced production costs, as mentioned by others. Also, unethical distribution in the first place. |

Othran
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
236
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:15:00 -
[73] - Quote
With a few exceptions a T2 BPO is a fairly dodgy asset - it can be devalued, or appreciate significantly in the course of a single patch.
A good example is the Hulk BPO - license to print money mmm? Such a BPO would go for a few hundred bill - and did.
Mining barge buffs come along and suddenly hulks aren't so attractive for the price.
Loss on BPO? 50bill on one BPO sale that I know of - that was maybe 16% reduction in the BPO value overnight.
I don't have a T2 BPO by the way - if I did I'd pick my time and sell it. I certainly wouldn't bother producing from it as you'd be dead before you amortised the cost.
tl;dr T2 BPOs are mainly hedges against Eve inflation, but they're pretty risky hedges.... |

Horsus Benj
Celestial Void Redneck Rage
7
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:32:00 -
[74] - Quote
F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead. Please explain how investing the cost of a titan for one bpo that makes me 1.5 bill a month is such a huge unfair advantage that it makes it necessary to remove the t2 bpos. If they are so op why dont you just get one? |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:32:00 -
[75] - Quote
Why is that that CCP are always so quiet on this subject? There must be some reason that this issue has not been addressed and I would like to know why. |

F'elch
Wall Street Trading
22
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:34:00 -
[76] - Quote
Horsus Benj wrote:F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead. Please explain how investing the cost of a titan for one bpo that makes me 1.5 bill a month is such a huge unfair advantage that it makes it necessary to remove the t2 bpos. If they are so op why dont you just get one?
Please read the thread, it should be obvious by now. |

Nikodiemus
Jokulhlaup
54
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 19:42:00 -
[77] - Quote
If T2 bpo are so nearly useless, why pay tens of billions to buy one?
If T2 bpo are so game breaking they need to be removed, why don't you want one? |

Cede Forster
Enlightened Industries Test Alliance Please Ignore
117
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 20:14:00 -
[78] - Quote
Come on guys, you are overreacting. It is not like CCP members were actually going around and giving these BPO away. It was a fair distribution with proper oversight, nothing shady was going on there.
No reason to be bitter just because you started playing later or just had bad luck back when.
Now if there would be evidence that the system would have been rigged and there was no guerrante that the "lottery" was ever fair or unbiased, that be an argument. But that is not the case so ... shhuu shuuu go away. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
170
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 20:51:00 -
[79] - Quote
F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead.
I see Brewery Kuvalopi's alt has come out of hiding. Another poster to block. |

Varesk
Origin. Black Legion.
172
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 20:54:00 -
[80] - Quote
F'elch wrote:It is about time this unfair advantage was removed from the game. You've done well, you've had your profit. Now they should be removed. Give the owners some datacores or something instead.
Its not CCPs fault or the owners of T2 BPOs fault. The fault lies on you for not playing EVE when the t2 bpo lottery was active.
|

octahexx Charante
Morior Invictus. Ethereal Dawn
17
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 21:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
from a non indy perspective:
if inventors and collectors like these highpriced items why would you want to take away their endgame goals?
Every profession needs something to strive for. |
|

ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1712

|
Posted - 2012.10.12 21:08:00 -
[82] - Quote
Thread moved from GD to F&I - ISD Type40. ISD Type40 Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Luc Chastot
Moira. Villore Accords
34
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 21:49:00 -
[83] - Quote
"Remove T2 BPOs because I say so and everyone knows I am right lalalalalalalalalalalalala I am right"
ISD, please lock this thread. Make it idiot-proof and someone will make a better idiot. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
844
|
Posted - 2012.10.12 21:54:00 -
[84] - Quote
Considering that a lot of people are complaining about ship prices, I don't think removing T2 BPO's is a good idea at this stage. Crimewatch 2.0: Protecting stupid people & rewarding lazy people. This hurts the smart & industrious people by making their intelligence & industry provide them with less benefit over the stupid & lazy people. ~ Ruby Porto |

Kale Eledar
Mining and Industrial Services The Irukandji
54
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 15:00:00 -
[85] - Quote
F'elch wrote:Well the fact that this thread has got to three pages shows that there is still interest in this subject and quite a few people are taking my line on this. Thanks to those who are willing to support an unpopular opinion. To those against the removal of T2 BPOs, your arguments that they are useless actually only helps to strengthen the argument that they should be removed.
And to those who seem to think their high post count and number of "likes" makes them some kind of authority (I'm looking at you, Tippia), I would say that your own inflated sense of importance and overconfidence in the so-called "right answer" blinkers you to the overall affect these items have on the game and the attitude of builders and traders as a whole.
A few things:
-"Quite a few" is relative here. This subject has, with little hyperbole, been brought up on these forums almost a hundred times. I get that you feel there is an unfair advantage, but it's not like they're the only thing in Eve players can't acquire easily. Difficulty of acquisition is not really relevant in a capitalistic space market game. Could the original system have been done better? Of course. But nobody has been able to provide a convincing reason why such a massive change should happen NOW or how to go about it the fairest way possible.
-Nobody has implied that post count or 'like count' confer authority except you. Rather, these people TEND to be more experienced, more knowledgeable, and earn their likes (for the most part). This is not to say that there aren't forum whores, but so far, the players we have referenced actually know what they are talking about in this instance. Akita is one of the old guard and has massive industrial experience. The arguments presented by that character were brought up because there is a veritable wealth of educated opinions he has already spent a lot of time on that are out there for you to reference, and which are, for the most part, watertight positions. So no, it has nothing to do with post count. Read his posts, and we won't knee-jerk react to your complaining, which these poasters have gotten used to after seeing the same argument ad-nauseam.
-You can't just propose they are removed without discussing how.
-Most people who bash them tend to ignore the profit potential of invention.
ADDENDUM: I don't own one - bad investment IMHO. First come smiles, then lies. Last is gunfire. |

Omnathious Deninard
Extrinsic Operations
234
|
Posted - 2012.10.13 16:01:00 -
[86] - Quote
Luc Chastot wrote:"Remove T2 BPOs because I say so and everyone knows I am right lalalalalalalalalalalalala I am right"
ISD, please lock this thread. ISD did the next best thing, moved it to features and ideas. Ideas for Drone Improvement https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1658683#post1658683 Updated 10/10/12 |

Sbrodor
Oscura Simmetria Yulai Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.10.19 15:58:00 -
[87] - Quote
my effort to discussion is a my real life friend stated playing eve and paying subscribtion.
he played indy career.
when seen the t2 intie are sold at less the production price with invenction he left 3 account of eve.
he played with passion and time, he will start to making some profit with intelligence and industrial job , like the website said.
http://www.eveonline.com/sandbox/manufacturer/
I played some weeks, after he left , with their toon and as i seen the t2bpo question i understood the t2 market is broken.
i will stop playing the indy and come back to my main pvper....
is not funny playing without the chance to fight in a market where u r in ME -4 aganist ME 100 bpo ;D
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |