| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
TharOkha
0asis Group
109
   |
Posted - 2012.10.16 07:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
So exhumers are still vulnerable after that massive whinefest.... 
GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |
TharOkha
0asis Group
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 09:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
Pointing out imbalances is not whining. Crying untill CCP gives you a pre tanked ship that does it all however...
Please show me the ship which is "pre-tanked"
GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |
TharOkha
0asis Group
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 12:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:TharOkha wrote:
Please show me the ship which is "pre-tanked"
Procurer, Retriever, Covetor, Skiff, Mackinaw, Hulk.
Hmm, i dont see any major advantages on any t1/t2 cruiser/battlecruiser and ships you mentioned. in other words, every ship in eve is "pre--tanked" by your definition.
GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |
TharOkha
0asis Group
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 13:48:00 -
[4] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:
You see no difference in base EHP between a mining vessel and a combat vessel.
So are you saying that every non-combat vessel should have lol EHP just because they are noncombat? Lets then put 2500 EHP on freighters and Rorquals and laught on catalysts Killmails, lets then put 500 EHP on logistics (and also "whooping" 50 PowerGrid too).
No you dont see a difference. CCP buffed their EHP because they were primitively cheap to gank. Even well fitted mackiaw was easily ganked by 2-3 catalysts and were profitable to gankers. What CCP did was just balance their EHP. They can be still profitable like some of l4 mission boats. You just have to search for expensive target.
Quote:How about we just give combat vessels the same mining yield as mining vessels and be done with it.
How about we just give mining vessels the same DPS as combat vessels and be done with it. ? Sorry but this post is EPIC FAIL !!!
GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |
TharOkha
0asis Group
109
|
Posted - 2012.10.16 14:05:00 -
[5] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:
They used to have a base EHP that put them in the same class as heavy assault ships. How exactly was that not balanced?
I mentioned this a thousand times. Extremely low PowerGrid. While HAC could fit large tank extenders, miners couldnt.
GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |
| |
|