Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kari Moltov
|
Posted - 2005.04.03 13:16:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Kari Moltov on 03/04/2005 13:18:11 Edited by: Kari Moltov on 03/04/2005 13:18:00
|
Kari Moltov
|
Posted - 2005.04.03 13:17:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Kari Moltov on 03/04/2005 13:19:17 able to anchored at gates in 0.0, espcially in Alliance space? Ever?
|
Fendor Atar
|
Posted - 2005.04.03 13:46:00 -
[3]
this has been discussed over and over again
mercs and pirates whine there arses off
alli people say god bless CCP if they do this...
oo.. nvm.. this is the way it always is when changes come
|
Amaron Ghant
|
Posted - 2005.04.03 16:46:00 -
[4]
painted orange so they show up better?
|
Fendor Atar
|
Posted - 2005.04.03 17:02:00 -
[5]
naa pink has to be pink and all sorts of colours and if they glow a bit aswell would be nice.. and while where at it why not a Disco ball funktion?
|
Jack Blank
|
Posted - 2005.04.03 19:58:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Kari Moltov Edited by: Kari Moltov on 03/04/2005 13:19:17 able to anchored at gates in 0.0, espcially in Alliance space? Ever?
never!! alliences get of your arses, stop mining and defend your space
|
Zdragva
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 04:15:00 -
[7]
Sentry guns that can be deployed in gates in systems with a POS, that use ammo, can be set via standings to shoot, and can be destroyed and dont need any fuel except ammo = good
just my opinion tho :) better to have modules that cause debate than to have nothing at all?
|
Kyle Caldrel
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 05:34:00 -
[8]
First off- its a stupid idea.
Why is it a stupid idea?
mmmm- you dont own space really, you claim it. Having POSes in system gives you a really secure safespot. how about we get rid of 0.0 all together? lets make it all .1 security all the way out, so no fighting at gates anymore? that sound good? Its 0.0 for a reason- NO RULES
|
Noriath
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 05:47:00 -
[9]
And no rules means if someone wants to put up a huge freakin gun battery behind a gate they can... afterall, who is going to stop them if there are no rules...
|
Cory
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 12:00:00 -
[10]
Well, what's the point of having all the space if you cant do anything with it? If all alliances are doing is defending their space and losing ships, then whats the point of having the space?
|
|
Marcus Aurelius
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 12:03:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Marcus Aurelius on 04/04/2005 12:03:21 exactly
Anchorable sentries are good, but come with a price.
Why not discuss is in a thread I made thats on this same page ? I make some suggestions there about static defenses to help territorial control.
Rod Blaine
|
Matrin III
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 12:06:00 -
[12]
Most people who reject this idea will do it because they have closed minds. They think "OMG sentry = high damage undestroyable gun oh noess!!"
Um.. hello? The sentry guns thart players anchor would have like 500-5000 hp, cost 1-70 million and do 10-150 damage.
|
Marcus Aurelius
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 12:10:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Matrin III Most people who reject this idea will do it because they have closed minds. They think "OMG sentry = high damage undestroyable gun oh noess!!"
Um.. hello? The sentry guns thart players anchor would have like 500-5000 hp, cost 1-70 million and do 10-150 damage.
Thats details, people focus too much on details when new ideas crop up. Details are there for testing and tweaking.
What matters is not bogging up in endless yes/no arguments and getting the show on the road again.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |