| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5399
|
Posted - 2012.10.30 20:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dar Manic wrote:Soon Shin wrote:I find it funny that many 0.0 players dislike the safety of high sec yet when people talk about the safe and easyness of the Intel that local chat provides they get defensive about it. Not to mention the constant whines about afk cloakers.
^^ This ^^ :)
We'll talk about local and all that when the risk/reward of hisec is properly balanced. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5417
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 18:36:00 -
[2] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:THIS^ right there ^
is why Local should be removed in 0.0 space.
Think of all the great emergent gameplay.
"please make ratters blind so I don't risk failure when hunting them" ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5417
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:34:00 -
[3] - Quote
White Quake wrote:absolute rubbish
high sec players have a right to play how they want to
they pay to play
not pay to play your version of eve
you're right, hisec players are the only ones paying to play this game ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5417
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
Hecate Shaw wrote:Because the 'feared, immortal space demi-gods' are most often working for them? General Dynamics works for the US government, and they seem to have no problem setting up bomb factories. Besides, there are SOME liberties taken to make a playable game, the idea is not to take the liberties too far. That is, if I'm not mistaken, why most people find real-world analogies suspect, is it not?
yeah lemme just call up General Dynamics and buy an Abrams
oh wait what's that, I can't
also among those "liberties taken" is throwing "realism" out the window in favor of "balance" ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5417
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
White Quake wrote:The issue is everyone blues each other and then runs out of targets, hostile gangs come in and get bobbed and dont come back. null sec screwed itself and blame high sec
stupid argument
yeah we're blue to all of nullsec, including our best friends NCdot and -A- ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:45:00 -
[6] - Quote
White Quake wrote:Absolute rubbish again
if you want to gank a mackinaw it should take an expensive ship, not a throwaway destroyer to cause billions in damages, eve is harsh, nothing is easy
ofc they asked for a buff
why should you have it easy?
"eve is harsh, therefore I should be immune" ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:49:00 -
[7] - Quote
White Quake wrote:and this means what?
or just another goon idiot twisting words?
pvp pilots have it easy, u say *thats just eve* they give miners more protection you say *omg wtfbbqcryhader*
it's the hypocrisy of saying "eve is harsh" while demanding that your ships are made less vulnerable to ganks with the nth buff to hisec safety
CCP has also shown that they're willing to disincentivize freighter ganking as much as possible because publords should be able to autopilot their freighters loaded with 50bn of faction loot ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:50:00 -
[8] - Quote
White Quake wrote:keep replying, im gonna sit here and tear every argument down to its base fact and prove you wrong
you haven't proven anyone wrong you're just showing how you're not actually what you claim to be ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:51:00 -
[9] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Oh look its the ignoring "risk versus rewards" fallacy: cheap ships killing vastly more expensive ships... see what I did there?
oh man the guy who advocates for hisec safety buffs and a revert to the escalation incursion nerfs is talking "risk versus reward"
this is gold ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:54:00 -
[10] - Quote
White Quake wrote:why not? shouldnt you be in previous null fighting the baddies?
why you in empire? To grief, thats why
Your not pvpes, your blobbers and run when the fight gets tough
goons has been kicked down so many times and the only reason ur here now is you surrounded yourself with massive allies
idiot
thank you for your input
now, are you actually going to tell me why hisec should be 100% safe, especially since CCP is taking the extra step of ensuring that hiseccers don't get ganked for being dumb and flying their loaded freighters and officer-fit nightmares around on autopilot
or are you just going to post nonsense? ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:55:00 -
[11] - Quote
White Quake wrote:yes lets make bs killable in frigs
nothing stops a frigate from killing a battleship hth ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:56:00 -
[12] - Quote
White Quake wrote:none of you have any basis of argument other than butthurt bullshite
PVP pilot can gank a mackinaw in a destroyer *thats just eve, get used to it*
CCP ten buffs mining barges u have to actually spend to gank expensive ships and you go *omg thats not fair, u took our toys away, damn you, we hate you, JIHAD*
grow up :) U wanna pvp in high sec without war decs, use big ships n spend money doing it
if a pvp pilot finds summit easy, hes happy, if its difficult, its broken
stupid reasoning
lmao
CCP is just changing the game to cater to the lowest common denominator, not to make it "harder" on "those damned PvP pilots" ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 19:57:00 -
[13] - Quote
White Quake wrote:ill respond to that as a question
what is a null sec pilot doing in empire looking for pvp?
when u answer that, ull have your own answer
hunting people dumb enough to load their freighters with tens of billions of ISK, since people outside of hisec don't tend to be that dumb
now, tell me why hisec should be risk-free ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 20:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
White Quake wrote:and you run to the forums and try to get high sec nerfed so u can go back to nailing barges with ease and laugh as the miners stop mining because they just die non stop, mineral prices go up, ship prices go up, everything goes up and then ur back here in two months time complaining
tell me why you seem to think that I'm in favor of dirt-cheap minerals
I'm actually not because I like it when losses actually matter and capitals aren't replaced in a matter of a few hours of PvE ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 20:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
White Quake wrote:id love to see u troll a rl carbear at fanfest, specially one u killed, i saw a pvper do that at the last fanfest outside a hotel, called him a noob and smiled, he wasnt smiling when the guy broke his nose in one hit.
your all just cowards who gank those who cant fight bk
were you smiling when you made that story up or was this hypothetical 'carebear' smiling when he had to convince the dude not to press charges ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5418
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 20:13:00 -
[16] - Quote
I mean I have the self control needed not to punch somebody in the face when they make fun of how bad I am at a video game ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5423
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 22:16:00 -
[17] - Quote
Touval Lysander wrote:[Indeed. I owned a cat, a horse, 3 budgies and a dog once. I am therefore a vet. (<< pun intended)
good thing mittens doesn't read these forums or we'd end up with him feeling compelled to get a horse
"Oh man I just rode MY HORSE" "Let me tell you about MY HORSE" "brb gonna go get some horseshoes, you know, for MY HORSE" ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5423
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 22:22:00 -
[18] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Andski wrote:Touval Lysander wrote:[Indeed. I owned a cat, a horse, 3 budgies and a dog once. I am therefore a vet. (<< pun intended) good thing mittens doesn't read these forums or we'd end up with him feeling compelled to get a horse "Oh man I just rode MY HORSE" "Let me tell you about MY HORSE" "brb gonna go get some horseshoes, you know, for MY HORSE" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vbPBASC9rYo
it's like it's 2008 all over again ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5424
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 05:16:00 -
[19] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Anybody can see who there is to shoot at just by looking at local.
Cutting both ways again, sweet pea.
yeah without local finding ratters to shoot will be so hard, you know, since there isn't a way to see the number of NPCs killed in a given system simply by opening the map, and it's so hard to set a destination and take gates somewhere, and it's so hard to warp around through havens and hubs until you find a ratter, motorboat while cloaked until you're under his optimal, decloak, instalock, point, light a cyno and kill him
oh man that'll be so hard
well it will be hard to find targets since there won't be any, but yeah ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5424
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 05:24:00 -
[20] - Quote
also i love it when hiseccers think that removing local will make nullsec more favorable to small alliances
because, you know, small alliances will definitely be able to use supercaps without getting dropped in their staging system because they're blind when it comes to cloaked cynos waiting for them to jump back in ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5424
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 06:31:00 -
[21] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Look I can understand some of you nullsec guys don't like the idea of no local because you won't have an instant intel tool. Even you lowsec guys won't see that local spike coming to bust up your camp so you can dock in your orca and hide in high sec.
So here's some advice for you guys.
1. Don't undock in anything you can't afford to lose. 2. Always stay aligned. 3. Learn to fit for PVP. Use your lows and mids for actual tank, warp stabs, and such other related modules instead of just fitting for maximum gank. 4. Get a scout alt to monitor adjacent systems. 5. Mash the D-Scan until your finger falls off.
These methods work in highsec. I know this because this is something like the same list I have seen handed from null and lowsec uber leet superhuman PVPers to people in highsec. So it MUST be good, right?
Oh and if you don't like your own medicine: >>>>>> WOW >>>>>>>
actually i'd just throw your advice out the window and advise dudes to train hisec PvE alts ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5428
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:51:00 -
[22] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:No Local:
A defender does not know if someone has entered the system. They must take precautions. An offender does not know if someone is in the system they entered. They must hunt.
Keep pretending that this isn't completely slanted towards the attacker. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5429
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:43:00 -
[23] - Quote
In my opinion, wormholes suck up a lot of talented players whose skills would otherwise be useful to newer organizations looking to move into nullsec. But that's another thread. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5430
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 23:52:00 -
[24] - Quote
Dorian Wylde wrote:Attacker has to either be very skilled at using d-scan or drop combat probes, and hunt someone down.
Defender mashes d-scan 360 degrees and leaves as soon as anything shows up.
Explain how it is at all slanted towards the attacker.
They do not have to probe anything down - if they're in a bomber, they can simply warp to anomalies while cloaked and hold their cloak until they find a target. They won't be visible on dscan. If you cannot see how this is entirely slanted towards the attacker, I can't help you, but you probably shouldn't opine on this topic if you are entirely unfamiliar with how nullsec works. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~ |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5455
|
Posted - 2012.11.04 07:08:00 -
[25] - Quote
Shepard Wong Ogeko wrote:Balance in this case is going to need some give and some take. To balance out the inflation of increasing rat bounties in nullsec, highsec would need a bigger isk sink, like increase station service fees, or isk costs in LP stores. If you add ore to nullsec, you have to take some from highsec or increase mineral costs for production, increase mineral loss or lower refinery yields.
And realistically, there should be some higher costs associated with living in the nice neighborhood of Eve.
You know that CCP won't do that because the hiseccers would whine endlessly. They'd come up with some nonsense like "we don't want to punish 'new players' so we're balancing the faucets by increasing sov bills by 100%" and we'd be back at square one. ~*a-áproud belligerent undesirable*~
TheMittani.com |
| |
|