| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

xKillaH
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 18:58:00 -
[1]
do CCP ban chars when they gank ppl in 1.0 space? ----------------------------------------------------------------- (\_/) (O.o) (> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |

Judas Jones
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 19:05:00 -
[2]
Yarrr you got some devilish scheme up your sleeve yarrr? 
Only thing that is meant to disuade 1.0 ganking is concorde, I don't belive ganking in 1.0 space is a banning offence, yarrr perhaps a spacing offence but not banning. imo. 
|

RollinDutchMasters
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 19:07:00 -
[3]
Only if you recycle alts to clear their sec status in the process.
Originally by: Sochin CCP has provided you with the tools you need to avoid crime. You're just too lazy/stupid to use them.
|

Corvus Dove
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 19:15:00 -
[4]
Also, thanks to the Yulai incident, you must lose your ship in the process. Not losing your ship for ganking in 1.0 is now considered an exploit. "You Griefer!!!" = "You Doodyhead!!!" |

0seeker0
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 19:35:00 -
[5]
What was the yulai incident?
I have heard of it before and always wanted to know, but never asked. it sounds interesting!
San. Character "Widescreen" is a scammer; beware.
Check my bio for a list of known scammers.
|

Cividari
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 19:41:00 -
[6]
Originally by: 0seeker0 What was the yulai incident?
I have heard of it before and always wanted to know, but never asked. it sounds interesting!
San.
Wasent it when ZOMBIE tanked sentrys/concord in yulai using remote armor/shield boosters and such and went on a killing spree and then got out safely or something?
|

AnakinSkywalker
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 20:05:00 -
[7]
Edited by: AnakinSkywalker on 04/04/2005 20:19:14 Edited by: AnakinSkywalker on 04/04/2005 20:18:26 yeah that sounds like the one.....there is a great video on it in the EVE videos section.
Found it.....
http://myeve.eve-online.com/download/videos/Default.asp?a=download&vid=82
|

Corvus Dove
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 20:43:00 -
[8]
ZOMBIE successfully destroyed over 100 ships in the Yulai Incident before the Devs finally showed up. The Devs said, "OK, good work for figuring out how to do that, but we'll have to declare it an exploit or we'll lose new players. So stop now."
Zombie didn't stop. So they got banned. There's a whole thread on it elsewhere on this forum.... "You Griefer!!!" = "You Doodyhead!!!" |

Cummilla
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 23:37:00 -
[9]
Was that before sentries changed targets and were beefed up?
|

Tobiaz
|
Posted - 2005.04.04 23:51:00 -
[10]
Originally by: RollinDutchMasters Only if you recycle alts to clear their sec status in the process.
I noticed when you delete a char, the time needed to delete it rises.
(No I don't do suicide kestrels)
Anyone knows if this is correct?
|

jeNK
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 02:49:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Corvus Dove ZOMBIE successfully destroyed over 100 ships in the Yulai Incident before the Devs finally showed up. The Devs said, "OK, good work for figuring out how to do that, but we'll have to declare it an exploit or we'll lose new players. So stop now."
Zombie didn't stop. So they got banned. There's a whole thread on it elsewhere on this forum....
If you think about it, maybe even less selfishly for a second (not implying you were, but maybe if ZOMBIE want to think about it..,) they have a perfectly reasonable argument. Someone who has been playing the game for just a fraction of the time ZOMBIE guys, have *no where* that is safe.. not exactly right is it?
Now I await much smack talk about how everyone should be fair game from the very people who probably cry when they lose, if they even try to stand and fight and don't run, unless they are guranteed to win.
|

kwoodward
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 14:31:00 -
[12]
zombie got banned cause they ignored the gm not for ganking the noobs.
 Meow! |

Espen
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 14:52:00 -
[13]
They still banned? 
|

CrusherDK
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 15:14:00 -
[14]
And if try to pvp people in systems below 0.5 i get banned still?
|

duckling1
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 17:15:00 -
[15]
I was in Yulai and all I got was this lousy T-shirt ---------------------------------------------
|

Kyle Caldrel
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 17:54:00 -
[16]
Last i checked they got permabanned.
|

UnrulyEvil
|
Posted - 2005.04.05 19:14:00 -
[17]
Yea it took place way back. when concord would only attack who ever attacked first. Now concord will shoot anyone in the gang or who ever is helping the offencive player will be flaged and shoot at too. So... no way out concord for the kill.
How did GM's stoped them? took them offline or brought in titans with fleet of concord ? lol |

Niko Succorso
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 00:51:00 -
[18]
Originally by: CrusherDK And if try to pvp people in systems below 0.5 i get banned still?
No, you can take your chances. The ZOMBIE thing was a one-off involving a corp in a planned, orchestrated spree that caused nothing but grief (even if it did wake CONCORD up a little). That's why they were banned. You want to play pirate, go right ahead. Just remember piracy lowers your security rating, can leave you open to bounty, and prevent you entering Empire space. __________________ Interstellar joy-rider |

Tiidan Soban
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 07:12:00 -
[19]
Originally by: Cummilla Was that before sentries changed targets and were beefed up?
no that was before the sentries started switching targets and assisting someone that was criminally flagged wasnt considered an offence by concord yet. _____________________________________
oOoOoOo FiReWoRkS!!! :D |

kwoodward
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 09:03:00 -
[20]
from what i could tell though the lag and OH YER it was a tad laggy. the gm's did something to concord i think and loads and loads spawned everywhere. (maybe it was lag) either way loads of peeps got killed other than zombie from trying to stop them once the lag started to clear wish i still had that log
 Meow! |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |