Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
460
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 22:47:00 -
[1] - Quote
I mean Christ. I remember when we were able to sit down and have a pretty decent conversation about mechanics, issues, fights, what-have-you without descending to some base level of "you suck, no you suck". It's a giant negative-feedback circlejerk that is unproductive and inefficient. 
Personally, I've always had a lot of respect for most of the old-guard Amarr who have always been pretty reasonable and logical (besides some of the obvious nut-cases and trolls [of which there are some from all sides]), but a lot of these new guys seem to just want to pick a fight or make accusations or cry without knowing any of the history of FW. The system used to be ******* ****; now at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP who I think have done a pretty decent job with Inferno and hoping to fix Inferno's problems with FF and Retribution.  Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1420
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 22:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:... at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP ...  We're getting attention. But is bukkake really love?
Amarr Militia |

Deen Wispa
Justified Chaos
355
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 22:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yeah, the rhetoric is pretty awful. But honestly, there are only a dozen people on any one side who complain on the forums about this stuff. That's not bad considering there are thousands of people in each militia. So that's not even 1%. I've talked privately with a couple of Caldari and they enjoy the new patch as well. Forum warfare was always just for lolz anyway. No one here takes the forum warrioring that seriously....or at least they shouldn't.
FW people really don't know how great they have it relative to lowsec piracy or nullsec. Many are just ungrateful and suffer from tunnel vision.
I remember the few months leading up to Inferno in Gal/Cal space. You couldn't find wartargets who were in BCs or higher. All the squids were in cruisers and below. So many Gallente pilots would go gank the poor bastards for even daring to roam our chokepoints. And if there was intel of a squid BC gang (usually Bolsterbomb's and the THE4 guys), we all thought it was major troll because all they did was fly cruisers and below.
Heck, I remember nights when Gallente could camp every major chokepoint from Heyd up to Vlill w/o fear or repercussion. And now, everyone is spread out, we're all rich beyond imagination, and loads of WTs from frigs to T2 ships are found roaming. But yet, FW people still manage to complain and whine about something.
Thanks CCP- I love the new patch ! Gallente FW Blog http://iamsheriff.com/blog C'est La Eve :) |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1420
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:05:00 -
[4] - Quote
It happened about the time tiered LP payouts occurred, I'd imagine.  Amarr Militia |

Taoist Dragon
Forced Penetration
59
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
The new FW mechanics and the fixes is what has brought me back to it.
Loving it so far and can only see it getting better.
I still pirate from time to time as I enjoy the hunt and the unsuspecting kill/ransom but it is more of a hobby for me now.  That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything.
I'm NOT a Pirate! I'm a privateer! |

Rezig Huruta
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
55
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:... at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP ...  We're getting attention. But is bukkake really love?
I wasn't involved in FW until fairly recently. However, is it better now than it was before? (not sarcasm, it's a real question). |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
461
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Rezig Huruta wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:... at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP ...  We're getting attention. But is bukkake really love? I wasn't involved in FW until fairly recently. However, is it better now than it was before? (not sarcasm, it's a real question).
Absolutely. It was great (for what it was) for maybe the 1-2 years following it's release and then it kind of stagnated into bored and bitter vets. Inferno has been great for all sides. Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1420
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:24:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rezig Huruta wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:... at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP ...  We're getting attention. But is bukkake really love? I wasn't involved in FW until fairly recently. However, is it better now than it was before? (not sarcasm, it's a real question). There was a time, when there was no reward for taking part in FW. CCP look upon this situation and said "You do far too much PvP. We will thus make the PvE far more valuable than the PvP." 
I've no problem with the PvE, really. It's that CCP has weighted the PvE over the PvP by an order or two of magnitude.
If someone wants to do FW PvE, they should be able to earn X LP/hour. If someone would prefer to spend their time doing FW PvP, they should be able to earn Y LP/hour. X and Y should be approximately the same.
They should also get rid of tiered LP payouts. System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Amarr Militia |

Krawdad
The Racket
6
|
Posted - 2012.10.31 23:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more.
Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly.
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
626
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:31:00 -
[10] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:I mean Christ. I remember when we were able to sit down and have a pretty decent conversation about mechanics, ....
Yeah and then one side was told their view would be considered but really it wasn't. Your alliances views were represented very well in the actual changes but everyone else was told to f off. Now the system is stupidly lopsided.
You may have Zarnak fooled into thinking things are grand as you make 150% more isk than him for doing the same thing but others aren't so easilly duped.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
626
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:35:00 -
[11] - Quote
Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly.
I would much prefer it to go back to inferno or pre inferno.
I hate that every isk I make from occupancy will put 2 isk in my enemies coffer after as soon as I leave.
But the minmatar complained that they were being punished for winning with inferno so ccp had to make sure the rules were even more lopsided in their favor. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Drunk 'n' Disorderly
229
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cearain wrote:Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. I would much prefer it to go back to inferno or pre inferno. I hate that every isk I make from occupancy will put 2 isk in my enemies coffer after as soon as I leave. But the minmatar complained that they were being punished for winning with inferno so ccp had to make sure the rules were even more lopsided in their favor.
But the minmatar make less ISK from FW now then they did before this patch.
The amarr make more.
Isn't this a net positive that both sides are now more equal? |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
462
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:39:00 -
[13] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote:Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. I would much prefer it to go back to inferno or pre inferno. I hate that every isk I make from occupancy will put 2 isk in my enemies coffer after as soon as I leave. But the minmatar complained that they were being punished for winning with inferno so ccp had to make sure the rules were even more lopsided in their favor. But the minmatar make less ISK from FW now then they did before this patch. The amarr make more. Isn't this a net positive that both sides are now more equal?
Apparently not. Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
462
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:44:00 -
[14] - Quote
Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly.
He didn't.
It used to be exactly like he described and everyone complained that there was no meaning. Lots of people on both sides have wanted system occupancy to mean something over the years. Ideas proposed (yes, even by Amarr) were stuff like LP rewards, station lock outs, etc. Stuff we now have; but it seems the people who were so in favor of these changes are not happy now that they have them. Grass is greener and all that.
Poetic, FW was ******* terrible before Inferno. PVP was at an all time low for the 6-12 months prior to Inferno with only some brief spikes when CCP would release new expansions (which is normal for all of EVE). It was literally ****. You are lucky you never knew FW back then: we aren't, otherwise you wouldn't be so quick to judge how Inferno is so ****, and we have to listen to your ill-informed drivel.
Hmmm... I started off trying to be nice in the above paragraph but, well, sorry.  Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
626
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Cearain wrote:Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. I would much prefer it to go back to inferno or pre inferno. I hate that every isk I make from occupancy will put 2 isk in my enemies coffer after as soon as I leave. But the minmatar complained that they were being punished for winning with inferno so ccp had to make sure the rules were even more lopsided in their favor. But the minmatar make less ISK from FW now then they did before this patch. The amarr make more. Isn't this a net positive that both sides are now more equal?
Amarr probably could have hit tier 5 cashouts if we worked at it under inferno and that would have given us an equal footing. To the extent we could not hit tier five Hans and ccp had the option to tweak it to help the underdog. For example they could have given fewer vp for d-plexing. This and other solutions were presented in the I hub features and ideas threads. These recomendations were ignored.
Instead they went in the opposite direction and actually removed all the balancing mechanics that help the underdog.
Tier 2 is not as much as even tier 4 that amarr could easilly hit.
Its true minmatar now make less, but the problem with this system is there is no balance once the snowballing starts.
Yay we are at tier 2! Minmatar are at tier 4. Why would people choose amarr when they can make 150% more for the same activity by joining minmatar.
This was the big F you. Hans may claim he didn't want this balance removed but he was cheerleading these changes. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
626
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 00:57:00 -
[16] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. He didn't. It used to be exactly like he described and everyone complained that there was no meaning. Lots of people on both sides have wanted system occupancy to mean something over the years. Ideas proposed (yes, even by Amarr) were stuff like LP rewards, station lock outs, etc. Stuff we now have; but it seems the people who were so in favor of these changes are not happy now that they have them. Grass is greener and all that. Poetic, FW was ******* terrible before Inferno. PVP was at an all time low for the 6-12 months prior to Inferno with only some brief spikes when CCP would release new expansions (which is normal for all of EVE). It was literally ****. You are lucky you never knew FW back then: we aren't, otherwise you wouldn't be so quick to judge how Inferno is so ****, and we have to listen to your ill-informed drivel. Hmmm... I started off trying to be nice in the above paragraph but, well, sorry. 
I'd go back to the pre inferno rules in a heartbeat.
The only reason we have more pvp now is not due to the rules. Its due to more people flocking to the feature of the season.
No more station lockouts where I have to travel 5 jumps just to repair my ship.
No more knowing that every plex I cap gives my enemy 2xs as much isk as I will make capping it.
edit: to be clear I would probably take inferno over pre inferno but it would be close. But I would much rather have pre-inferno to this **** we have now. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Krawdad
The Racket
6
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 01:00:00 -
[17] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. He didn't. It used to be exactly like he described and everyone complained that there was no meaning. Lots of people on both sides have wanted system occupancy to mean something over the years. Ideas proposed (yes, even by Amarr) were stuff like LP rewards, station lock outs, etc. Stuff we now have; but it seems the people who were so in favor of these changes are not happy now that they have them. Grass is greener and all that.
That's what I was getting at. The line I quoted struck me as contrary to what I remember every other FW player saying before Inferno.
I'm not currently involved in FW so I'm not weighing in on how the new system affects faction balance, but I figured I should point out that the e-peen system has been proven to be boring as hell for everyone involved. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
626
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 01:15:00 -
[18] - Quote
Krawdad wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. He didn't. It used to be exactly like he described and everyone complained that there was no meaning. Lots of people on both sides have wanted system occupancy to mean something over the years. Ideas proposed (yes, even by Amarr) were stuff like LP rewards, station lock outs, etc. Stuff we now have; but it seems the people who were so in favor of these changes are not happy now that they have them. Grass is greener and all that. That's what I was getting at. The line I quoted struck me as contrary to what I remember every other FW player saying before Inferno. I'm not currently involved in FW so I'm not weighing in on how the new system affects faction balance, but I figured I should point out that the e-peen system has been proven to be boring as hell for everyone involved.
Before the inferno there was allot of agreement it needed fixing but there very little agreement on what to do.
Most people claimed they wanted the occupancy war to be about pvp, but somehow that is still being overlooked.
Most people claimed they wanted rewards. CCP delivered that with inferno. Inferno also heeded voices who said they need to be careful or the winning side would snowball. But those voices were explicitly ignored in this last patch which removes the inferno balances.
A few people asked for station lockouts pre inferno but each time that view was shouted down by the majority of fw pilots. CCP did it anyway. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

subtle turtle
Imperial Outlaws
56
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 01:24:00 -
[19] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
If someone wants to do FW PvE, they should be able to earn X LP/hour. If someone would prefer to spend their time doing FW PvP, they should be able to earn Y LP/hour. X and Y should be approximately the same.
Poetic, I'm actually not sure if I could possibly disagree more. PVP should not be an ISK earning activity, other than the incidental income from drops. PVP is in all essence an ISK sink on the market, and that is what makes it special in Eve.
In Eve, PVP means you are engaging in a real risk, the stakes being your investment in time. If I'm PVPing, the real consequences of my actions are that I can lose a ship that I had to EARN, not one that was given to me. This is why, 3 years and 900ish kills into Eve, my hands will still shake going into a big fight. If I know that the drake on the line represents 2 hours of boring as hell PVE, I'm that much more engaged and invested in the activity.
PVP should not be self sustaining. Actually, I think the new system, where the PVE contains the inherent potential for PVP, is a really nice compromise and balance. The tension of factoring in the DPS of the rats also makes for an interesting scenario, and can help with an asymmetric engagement. |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1421
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 01:54:00 -
[20] - Quote
Krawdad wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:System/warzone control should be a bragging rights/e-peen/roleplay enticement, and nothing more. Did you play FW before Inferno? If so, did you like the FW system then? Not trying to be snide, but this is pretty much how it was before that patch if I remember correctly. You did read the paragraphs before the one you quoted, where I do state that LP rewards are still given out.
Amarr Militia |
|

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1421
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 01:58:00 -
[21] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Poetic, FW was ******* terrible before Inferno. Only because of some terrible bugs (locking plex spawning) and the fact that there were zero rewards. Other than that, what was wrong with it?
I'm not suggesting that the rewards go away. Just suggesting that the rewards are not a) tiered, and b) pvp and pve rewards are roughly equal on an LP/hour basis. Amarr Militia |

Poetic Stanziel
Fweddit I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1421
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 01:59:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:Hmmm... I started off trying to be nice in the above paragraph but, well, sorry.  Ah. So the problems stem with you! 
Amarr Militia |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
626
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 02:06:00 -
[23] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:Poetic, FW was ******* terrible before Inferno. Only because of some terrible bugs (locking plex spawning) and the fact that there were zero rewards. Other than that, what was wrong with it? I'm not suggesting that the rewards go away. Just suggesting that the rewards are not a) tiered, and b) pvp and pve rewards are roughly equal on an LP/hour basis.
Faction war got better after inferno mainly because of the number of new people joining. (not because of any rule changes)
It would be better than now if they would go back to pre inferno except give us a set amount of lp per plex. Done. Equal for all sides and let the best faction win. But Minmatar (who have a csm member) won't have that.
They might also try to do something to make plexing more of a pvp activity. But that seems a low priority with this csm and ccp compared to giving the winning side additional advantages. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Milton Middleson
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
137
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 06:14:00 -
[24] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote: I'm not suggesting that the rewards go away. Just suggesting that the rewards are not a) tiered, and b) pvp and pve rewards are roughly equal on an LP/hour basis.
If you solo an enemy titan, at tier one your income per hour is approximately 5 billion per hour.
The only one stopping you is you. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
18
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 10:05:00 -
[25] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote: I'm not suggesting that the rewards go away. Just suggesting that the rewards are not a) tiered, and b) pvp and pve rewards are roughly equal on an LP/hour basis.
That makes no sense.
Since the idea is to give to players a chance to compete for resources, occupancy and benefits for the warzone control (LP is just only a game mechanics to simulate this).
If the LP reward were the same then there were no intrest and no competition to control the warzones. On the countrary: controlling more system would simply mean having less resources (aka less plex).
Then one can say "I don't like occupancy gameplay". Fine, then do not play it. But canno't cry and demand to shape everyone's gameplay on a personal dislike.
Nothing in eve is symmetrical, even, balanced, with identical rewards for everyone. Otherwise we go in the direction of instanced premade battlegrounds with same rewards for everyone. |

Yuri Intaki
Nasranite Watch Liandri Covenant
100
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 12:51:00 -
[26] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:I mean Christ. I remember when we were able to sit down and have a pretty decent conversation about mechanics, issues, fights, what-have-you without descending to some base level of "you suck, no you suck". It's a giant negative-feedback circlejerk that is unproductive and inefficient. 
For me it started at around 2009 when gallente militia did what they did with Ankh leading them (= crossed the line between in-game & off-game). After that I didnt need much other motivation than to poison the general athmosphere of FW everywhere I could. |

Diesel47
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
301
|
Posted - 2012.11.01 18:51:00 -
[27] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Vordak Kallager wrote:... at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP ...  We're getting attention. But is bukkake really love? unfunny, gtfo. |

subtle turtle
Imperial Outlaws
67
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 04:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
Vordak Kallager wrote:I mean Christ. I remember when we were able to sit down and have a pretty decent conversation about mechanics, issues, fights, what-have-you without descending to some base level of "you suck, no you suck". It's a giant negative-feedback circlejerk that is unproductive and inefficient.  Personally, I've always had a lot of respect for most of the old-guard Amarr who have always been pretty reasonable and logical (besides some of the obvious nut-cases and trolls [of which there are some from all sides]), but a lot of these new guys seem to just want to pick a fight or make accusations or cry without knowing any of the history of FW. The system used to be ******* ****; now at least we're getting some love and facetime from CCP who I think have done a pretty decent job with Inferno and hoping to fix Inferno's problems with FF and Retribution. 
Look at it this way; every forum rant represents time and effort that would otherwise probably be put into some equally obnoxious anti-social behavior. Every time I read someone going off the deep end on the Eve-o forums I think "well, that's one less puppy that guy is going to punch in the face today." |

Dan Carter Murray
179
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 10:23:00 -
[29] - Quote
Answer to title: because you never have to do anything for isk again and have sfi*1000 while us amarr get ****** every opportunity that the csm can unzip his pants. Oh and his female alliance mate does the pushing. Oh and npc still in your favor. Oh and your ships are lolunbalanced. Oh and war zone is lolunbalanced. Etc. etc. etc. you know the answer don't ask stupid questions.
And one more thing: it's been emotional. |

Mehashi 'Kho
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
25
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 10:56:00 -
[30] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:I'm not suggesting that the rewards go away. Just suggesting that the rewards are not a) tiered, and b) pvp and pve rewards are roughly equal on an LP/hour basis. Since when do PVPers spawn regularly like NPCs? The idea that you can work to an isk/lp/hr rate in pvp is fairly "lol". Maybe one day ill not kill anyone, maybe another I kill 20 in 5 minutes. That's some pretty wild fluctuation. I'd hate to see someone try to balance NPC based income to that. |
|

Lemon Sorbet
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 15:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote: I'm not suggesting that the rewards go away. Just suggesting that the rewards are not a) tiered, and b) pvp and pve rewards are roughly equal on an LP/hour basis.
That makes no sense. Since the idea is to give to players a chance to compete for resources, occupancy and benefits for the warzone control (LP is just only a game mechanics to simulate this). If the LP reward were the same then there were no intrest and no competition to control the warzones. On the countrary: controlling more system would simply mean having less resources (aka less plex). Then one can say "I don't like occupancy gameplay". Fine, then do not play it. But canno't cry and demand to shape everyone's gameplay on a personal dislike. Nothing in eve is symmetrical, even, balanced, with identical rewards for everyone. Otherwise we go in the direction of instanced premade battlegrounds with same rewards for everyone.
You're forgetting that conveniently these are two scenarios that Poetic knows full well are not possible in time for the Dec. 4 release. He's well aware CCP is not going to throw out design work they've invested in, and well aware that there is a hard limit to PvP payouts as an income source.
He had plenty to say on the subject back in the summer, where he endorsed the modifications to the tiered payout system, and endorsed a scaled defensive plexing LP mechanic. He was active with his ideas back when it mattered in the development process, before final decisions were made. Since than, he's joined Hans's in-game enemies and now suddenly all his own ideas are out the window in favor of a no-win scenario that sets him up perfectly to declare FW a failure and write a triumphant blog post that ignores the fact that he's reversing his position on changes he previously endorsed.
Its a stupid political game that he's already admitted to playing, and if not that he simply is clueless about software development processes and the fact that if you want your opinion to matter, you insert it into the process at the right time (which Poe did, via a series of blog posts) and that you don't get to complain a month before release that someone else is to blame when there are mechanics he recommended that are in the Dec. patch.
Even things like geography changes are extremely convenient things for him to demand suddenly, because he now knows that they won't make it in time for Dec. 4 either. He waited till after Hans came on the Fweddit talk and stated that it wouldn't be in the initial release (same with equivalent PvP payouts across factions) and so suddenly these are the "must-haves" that Hans is "dropping the ball" on. Once again, these are all things that if they truly mattered to Poe he could have brought them up months ago, instead of promoting other iterations instead.
His sad, fail attempt at "meta-gaming" is as translucent as glass to anyone that's actually been following along, and I think its pretty clear he either doesn't really care about how this turns out, or he's clueless about how to be an effective agent of change. |

sYnc Vir
Wolfsbrigade Lost Obsession
390
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 17:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
Well having been in Caldari, Amarr and Minnie with a couple alts I can honestly say the people on each side are pretty much the same.
Each one has its assholes, idiots, nice guys and also's. Fw is just a box to pvp in, the people are a lot alike and would, could and have banded together to fight.
Generally I always found the he said, she said, you suck, no you suck. Mostly came from the Assholes and Idiots. People who are easily ignored.
However I don't miss it, as towards the end, there were more idiots then anything else and who has the time to care about them. Don't ask about Italics, just tilt your head. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
234
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:01:00 -
[33] - Quote
Personally, I think CCP's attempts to "fix" FW, while well-intentioned, created bigger issues that annoyed many. (Myself included)
I bailed on FW when the massive farming started and the accompanying boolshite with everybody and their brother having alts in every faction. I've only ever been in Minnie FW, and no desire to go elsewhere. I'll be rejoining shortly to check out the recent fixes.
I'd suggest a round-table of THE COMMUNITY (not the agenda-laden CSM) to build a list of what's good, what's bad, and what would be nice for faction warfare... but I think we all know how well that will go (read: "the squeeky wheel...") |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
227
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 19:36:00 -
[34] - Quote
I have not gotten into faction wars myself. But I believe an objective opinion might be worth something.
It is a fact that the current system really rewards the wining side with better PVE isk/hour.
However Faction Wars is supposed to be PVP content. Looking at it from another view point it is actually very balanced. Before judging my statement please read the rest of my post.
Another fact is there are many PVPers that are looking for good fights and couldn't care less about the PVE isk/hour of faction wars. So if the winning side is drawing in a lot of members then logically this is a driving factor for those looking for PVP to join the opposing faction as they will then have more targets.
The balance will start shifting as the numerous PVE FW bears on the wining faction will be getting there butts kicked by the elite PVPers that joined the other side in their quest for PVP targets. Once these PVPers do enough damage the power will start to shift as more and more of the FW farmers switch over to avoid getting killed. As the power shifts to the other side it will eventually reach the point where there is more isk/hr to be farmed on that side. At this point more and more FW farmers will switch sides taking that faction to the top.
Once that becomes the popular faction then the PVPers will switch to the other side as most of there targets are now on their side. This will start the cycle over again. Faction Wars will continue to flow with power shifting from one side to the other with no further actual game changes. Just by letting the players adapt to the new system. Give it some time. it will happen.
With the current system in place, although very out of whack right now, once the dust settles the FW farmers should be drawn to the wining faction for the bonus isk/hr. While the FW PVPers should be drawn to the losing faction for the increased targets. It is a win win. As the ancient proverb say "It is better to send 1 Lion than 100 sheep." This is also true when comparing PVPers to Farmers in an MMO. It will only take a small number of PVPers to shift the balance and start building up the losing side. The power should continue to shift without ever settling, as long as there are PVPers joining the losing side looking to maximize the number of targets.
I could be way off on this, but it seems to make sense based on my many years of experience playing many different MMO's. The PVPers always go where the targets are. When the targets move so do the PVPers. |

Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
470
|
Posted - 2012.11.02 22:46:00 -
[35] - Quote
sYnc Vir wrote:Well having been in Caldari, Amarr and Minnie with a couple alts I can honestly say the people on each side are pretty much the same.
Each one has its assholes, idiots, nice guys and also's. Fw is just a box to pvp in, the people are a lot alike and would, could and have banded together to fight.
Generally I always found the he said, she said, you suck, no you suck. Mostly came from the Assholes and Idiots. People who are easily ignored.
However I don't miss it, as towards the end, there were more idiots then anything else and who has the time to care about them.
Miss you Sync. <3 Send Cap1 my love. Sa souvraya niende misain ye. |

Dan Carter Murray
179
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 01:55:00 -
[36] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: The PVPers always go where the targets are. When the targets move so do the PVPers.
Nice analysis, but 0 alliances or major corporations from minmatar FW have swapped to amarr to get more fights.
So unfortunately, although your theory is sound, in practice it is not.
Winmatar often make ridiculous and laughable statements...they normall start with
Some dumb **** minmatar wrote: "I want more pew but won't swap sides because"
and end with one of the following:
- For bullshit RP reasons I can't swap sides
- I HAVE FRIENDS...I DON'T WANT TO SHOOT MY FRIENDS...I NEVER PLAYED SPORTS AGAINST MY FRIENDS GROWING UP...WHAT IS THIS PLAYING AGAINST YOUR FRIENDS NONSENSE YOU SPEAK OF
- But how am I supposed to make isk?
- Missiles hurt me in plexes and the minmatar shoot them...lasers may run like maze but they hit ****.
- eventually I'll run out of stabber fleet issues and don't know how to actually fly ships that require more than hitting approach and fire.
- i've been minmatar so long...if i leave now...(no one will give a **** if you leave)
- I don't know where my balls are
- The winmatar militia draft board has misplaced my balls
- I didn't read the form when I signed up for winmatar and accidentally checked the box that said "castrate" instead of "temporarily remove"
- I HAVE TO DO MORE THAN 1 MINOR TO PAY FOR A ******* FACTION BATTLESHIP WITH MY LP??!?!?!!11/?!oneone
- i will have to face swarms of stabber fleet issues backed by logi and blackbirds...and the amarr most of the time have half the numbers and can't counter the 25/5/5 SFI/BB/LOGI gang
- I'm scared of pvp that takes risk
- I don't know what risk means, and I'm scared of things I know nothing about
- many amarr pilots likes to go out and fight solo a lot...and i don't know how to fight solo
- i don't want to die in eszur...to the no-skill militia guys there....
- etc. etc. etc.
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
635
|
Posted - 2012.11.03 01:58:00 -
[37] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:I have not gotten into faction wars myself. But I believe an objective opinion might be worth something.
It is a fact that the current system really rewards the wining side with better PVE isk/hour.
However Faction Wars is supposed to be PVP content. Looking at it from another view point it is actually very balanced. Before judging my statement please read the rest of my post.
Another fact is there are many PVPers that are looking for good fights and couldn't care less about the PVE isk/hour of faction wars. So if the winning side is drawing in a lot of members then logically this is a driving factor for those looking for PVP to join the opposing faction as they will then have more targets.
The balance will start shifting as the numerous PVE FW bears on the wining faction will be getting there butts kicked by the elite PVPers that joined the other side in their quest for PVP targets. Once these PVPers do enough damage the power will start to shift as more and more of the FW farmers switch over to avoid getting killed. As the power shifts to the other side it will eventually reach the point where there is more isk/hr to be farmed on that side. At this point more and more FW farmers will switch sides taking that faction to the top.
Once that becomes the popular faction then the PVPers will switch to the other side as most of there targets are now on their side. This will start the cycle over again. Faction Wars will continue to flow with power shifting from one side to the other with no further actual game changes. Just by letting the players adapt to the new system. Give it some time. it will happen.
With the current system in place, although very out of whack right now, once the dust settles the FW farmers should be drawn to the wining faction for the bonus isk/hr. While the FW PVPers should be drawn to the losing faction for the increased targets. It is a win win. As the ancient proverb say "It is better to send 1 Lion than 100 sheep." This is also true when comparing PVPers to Farmers in an MMO. It will only take a small number of PVPers to shift the balance and start building up the losing side. The power should continue to shift without ever settling, as long as there are PVPers joining the losing side looking to maximize the number of targets.
I could be way off on this, but it seems to make sense based on my many years of experience playing many different MMO's. The PVPers always go where the targets are. When the targets move so do the PVPers.
That actually sort of sounds like the theory soundwave suggested. But it seems not to be working. Minmatar have had the economic edge since inferno and the numbers gap keeps growing in their favor. They lost none of the main pvp corps or alliances. Amarr lost allot of theirs. Minmatar also gained a bunch of occupancy farmers.
Maybe we haven't given it enough time. But how long should it take for the shift to start?
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Vera Algaert
Republic University Minmatar Republic
405
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 10:12:00 -
[38] - Quote
I think CCP underestimated the power of traders and made a mistake by leaving implants in the FW LP stores.
From my POV the idea always was:
Faction A wins -> Faction A gets a lot of LP and gets rewarded for their performance -> Faction A keeps winning -> LP store items for Faction A crash hard due to over-supply -> people switch to Faction B following the economic incentive -> Faction B starts winning -> ...
This scheme makes success meaningful by rewarding it with high income - but as more and more people jump on the bandwagon, ISK/LP deteriorates until it becomes more efficient to push the opposing Faction B to tier 4/5 and give the market for items from the Faction A L store time to recover.
I'm a NPC corp alt, any argument I make is invalid. |

Mra Rednu
Black Watch Guard
131
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 10:19:00 -
[39] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:I think CCP underestimated the power of traders and made a mistake by leaving implants in the FW LP stores.
From my POV the idea always was:
Faction A wins -> Faction A gets a lot of LP and high ISK/LP -> Faction A keeps winning -> LP store items for Faction A crash hard due to over-supply -> people switch to Faction B following the economic incentive -> Faction B starts winning -> ...
This scheme makes success meaningful by rewarding it with high income - for a time. As more and more people jump on the bandwagon, ISK/LP deteriorates until it becomes more efficient to push the opposing Faction B to tier 4/5 and give the market for items from Faction A's LP store time to recover.
You seem to grasp the farming side of FW but not the FW side of FW.
|

Machiavelli's Nemesis
Angry Mustellid Iron Oxide.
30
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 11:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
"You've got plenty of amarrians to shoot at and you're making money hand over fist. You should swap sides to help out the poor hard-done-to enemy"
.....
.....
...LOL no. |
|

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin
619
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 12:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
damned kids skateboarding on our sidewalks!
also about the balance thing before inferno when all things were equal the differences were slight, when isk tips the scales you are simply always going to have trouble maintaining an equal attraction level to both sides. http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate Drunk 'n' Disorderly
158
|
Posted - 2012.11.05 15:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
No, you suck... QCATs is recruiting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |

jjohnpaul xvii
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 11:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Dan Carter Murray wrote:Bugsy VanHalen wrote: The PVPers always go where the targets are. When the targets move so do the PVPers.
Nice analysis, but 0 alliances or major corporations from minmatar FW have swapped to amarr to get more fights. So unfortunately, although your theory is sound, in practice it is not. Winmatar often make ridiculous and laughable statements...they normall start with Some dumb **** minmatar wrote: "I want more pew but won't swap sides because"
and end with one of the following:
- For bullshit RP reasons I can't swap sides
- I HAVE FRIENDS...I DON'T WANT TO SHOOT MY FRIENDS...I NEVER PLAYED SPORTS AGAINST MY FRIENDS GROWING UP...WHAT IS THIS PLAYING AGAINST YOUR FRIENDS NONSENSE YOU SPEAK OF
- But how am I supposed to make isk?
- Missiles hurt me in plexes and the minmatar shoot them...lasers may run like maze but they hit ****.
- eventually I'll run out of stabber fleet issues and don't know how to actually fly ships that require more than hitting approach and fire.
- i've been minmatar so long...if i leave now...(no one will give a **** if you leave)
- I don't know where my balls are
- The winmatar militia draft board has misplaced my balls
- I didn't read the form when I signed up for winmatar and accidentally checked the box that said "castrate" instead of "temporarily remove"
- I HAVE TO DO MORE THAN 1 MINOR TO PAY FOR A ******* FACTION BATTLESHIP WITH MY LP??!?!?!!11/?!oneone
- i will have to face swarms of stabber fleet issues backed by logi and blackbirds...and the amarr most of the time have half the numbers and can't counter the 25/5/5 SFI/BB/LOGI gang
- I'm scared of pvp that takes risk
- I don't know what risk means, and I'm scared of things I know nothing about
- many amarr pilots likes to go out and fight solo a lot...and i don't know how to fight solo
- i don't want to die in eszur...to the no-skill militia guys there....
- etc. etc. etc.
|

roigon
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
31
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 12:33:00 -
[44] - Quote
The notion of corps/alliances switching sides is a silly one. Even ignoring the faction standings issue, they would have a hard time getting accepted by the existing corps of the other side.
Also, even if PvP corps from the winning side join the losing side, then who will be left to shoot at? risk averse plexers? No, the best solution is to grow the pie instead of redividing it. Get more groups interested in FW and the potential of fights we have.
As for the animosity. I personally don't like to play that game, I love my targets and I love my allies and will happily chat with either.
I am of course not blind and deaf, so I sometimes do see the vitrol. Most of it stemming, in my perception, from a feeling that the opponents are unwilling to fight. Which is something that happens everywhere, not just in FW. Just take a look at the syndicate thread on failheap challenge and see how rote feels about that right now.
But in FW it's magnified, because by it's very nature it's us vs them. Not specific corps/alliances. If LNA upships it's "those damn minnies upshipped", if iron oxide undock a 1:1 ratio BC's/logi "it's those damn minnies". If sicarius uncloak multiple falcons "it's those minnies again". I'm sure that in reality more imaginative words where uttered, but I'm not that creative.
I'm also sure "the minnies" have similar experiences with "the amarr".
And as a multiplier to this, especially before the patch, there where clear strategic fleets. Fleets that had no intention of fighting, but where just there to lock down systems to prevent plexing by the opposing side. This luckily has died down a bit after the patch. Because "no fun allowed" fleets are a bit silly for a video game.
Anyway, I think a good way to reduce the animosity is simply to communicate, and I'd invite people to take a look at the fairly recently created failheap fw topic and make it work. Trough understanding why we both undock the fleets we do, and communicate how we think about the fights and fleets other people undock we can start to understand each other better, and create better engagement opportunities.
Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us. |

Mehashi 'Kho
Spiritus Draconis Sicarius Draconis
27
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 13:14:00 -
[45] - Quote
roigon wrote:**Reasonable observations ending with...**
Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us. Glad there are still some of us out there. +1 amarrian scum / friend (delete appropriate to situation) |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
232
|
Posted - 2012.11.06 14:58:00 -
[46] - Quote
Cearain wrote: That actually sort of sounds like the theory soundwave suggested. But it seems not to be working. Minmatar have had the economic edge since inferno and the numbers gap keeps growing in their favor. They lost none of the main pvp corps or alliances. Amarr lost allot of theirs. Minmatar also gained a bunch of occupancy farmers.
Maybe we haven't given it enough time. But how long should it take for the shift to start?
I realize the Minmatar have had the upper hand for some time. And this attracted a lot of farmers with the huge isk that could be made while avoiding actual PVP. But the change to nerf this income has just happened, and the reduction in ease and volume of isk from farming FW will take a while before the impact starts to noticeably shift the balance.
But really what shift are you waiting for? If you want to PVP the minmatar militia is currently full of juicy targets.
Now while the minmatar still have the edge it will still be the best place to farm LP to make isk. But the returns will be lower. This farming does not hold the same appeal to PVPers. There are two types of PVPers in this scenario. Their are the elite PVPers looking for good fights with no real interest in hunting down farmers who don't know how to fight. Then there are the majority of PVPers who will hunt and kill anyone. These players don't care which side they are on, or which side is better for farming isk. These players are looking for the most targets they can find to kill.
Well with so many players on the minmatar side of the Faction Wars, these players will get the most targets by joining the opposing militia. The more that join the Amarr militia the stronger that militia will get., and the more risk farmers will face as the opposing militia is hunting them in greater numbers. It should not take long for this balance to reach a point where the farmers start changing sides for safety reasons and the difference in income will get smaller and smaller as the balance shifts.
Keep in mind that with the way FW farming was working until the last change all factions would spike their own control to cash out and then use alts on the other side to drive it back down to generate better rewards from farming. So most farmers have characters on both sides already. Switching back and forth will not be difficult.
Why have we not seen this change yet? Well up until last week it was still better to keep your faction low and spike it when you needed to cash out. Now with loyalty points being maxed out by keeping you faction control up we will now see actual fighting over control rather than spiking control for cash outs.
All we need now is for the majority of FW PVPers to realize that taking the side of the under dog will give them more targets. Once this happens we will start to see a natural swing of power back and forth, driven by PVP as FW was meant to be, and the FW PVPers keep saying it should be. So to you PVPers out there, I say, Does it not make sense that being on the opposite side of all the farmers will give you more targets to shoot at. What is more important to you, belonging to the dominant PVE faction, or filling you PVP kill board with as many FW farmer kills as possible? True PVPers care far more about their kill board than what faction they are fighting for.
PVP content is driven by players, not made by developers. They have given us the tools we need, now it is up to us to use them.
Sure there will be some who care about immersion and role-play to the point where they will not change sides. But these will certainly be in the minority. The only way to get PVP content is to undock and GO TO WHERE THE OTHER PLAYERS ARE. We have many systems full of minmatar farmers. This means the Amarr militia have a tone of targets and thus a tonne of PVP content. All you have to do to get access to that PVP content is join the fight. The game developers can no more force players to become your targets then they can force you to go where the targets are. It is all on your head if you want to PVP. Stop crying, get out there and start killing. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
637
|
Posted - 2012.11.07 17:56:00 -
[47] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: But really what shift are you waiting for? .
The shift you seem to anticipate happening below:
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Well with so many players on the minmatar side of the Faction Wars, these players will get the most targets by joining the opposing militia. The more that join the Amarr militia the stronger that militia will get., and the more risk farmers will face as the opposing militia is hunting them in greater numbers. It should not take long for this balance to reach a point where the farmers start changing sides for safety reasons and the difference in income will get smaller and smaller as the balance shifts..
Most who start in faction war for the pvp do some evaluation which includes whether they will be able to fund the pvp. Sure vets who are space rich may not care. But most new people who go in are much more like Kazim:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2145288#post2145288
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Keep in mind that with the way FW farming was working until the last change all factions would spike their own control to cash out and then use alts on the other side to drive it back down to generate better rewards from farming. So most farmers have characters on both sides already. Switching back and forth will not be difficult.
Why have we not seen this change yet? Well up until last week it was still better to keep your faction low and spike it when you needed to cash out. Now with loyalty points being maxed out by keeping you faction control up we will now see actual fighting over control rather than spiking control for cash outs.
All we need now is for the majority of FW PVPers to realize that taking the side of the under dog will give them more targets. .
Well I think the majority of faction war pvpers found that being poor and outnumbered doesn't really make for all that much better pvp.
But I realize that there seems to be a dispute. So ok lets see what happens.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Dan Carter Murray
209
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 10:06:00 -
[48] - Quote
jjohnpaul xvii wrote:Dan Carter Murray wrote:Bugsy VanHalen wrote: The PVPers always go where the targets are. When the targets move so do the PVPers.
Nice analysis, but 0 alliances or major corporations from minmatar FW have swapped to amarr to get more fights. So unfortunately, although your theory is sound, in practice it is not. Winmatar often make ridiculous and laughable statements...they normall start with Some dumb **** minmatar wrote: "I want more pew but won't swap sides because"
and end with one of the following:
- For bullshit RP reasons I can't swap sides
- I HAVE FRIENDS...I DON'T WANT TO SHOOT MY FRIENDS...I NEVER PLAYED SPORTS AGAINST MY FRIENDS GROWING UP...WHAT IS THIS PLAYING AGAINST YOUR FRIENDS NONSENSE YOU SPEAK OF
- But how am I supposed to make isk?
- Missiles hurt me in plexes and the minmatar shoot them...lasers may run like maze but they hit ****.
- eventually I'll run out of stabber fleet issues and don't know how to actually fly ships that require more than hitting approach and fire.
- i've been minmatar so long...if i leave now...(no one will give a **** if you leave)
- I don't know where my balls are
- The winmatar militia draft board has misplaced my balls
- I didn't read the form when I signed up for winmatar and accidentally checked the box that said "castrate" instead of "temporarily remove"
- I HAVE TO DO MORE THAN 1 MINOR TO PAY FOR A ******* FACTION BATTLESHIP WITH MY LP??!?!?!!11/?!oneone
- i will have to face swarms of stabber fleet issues backed by logi and blackbirds...and the amarr most of the time have half the numbers and can't counter the 25/5/5 SFI/BB/LOGI gang
- I'm scared of pvp that takes risk
- I don't know what risk means, and I'm scared of things I know nothing about
- many amarr pilots likes to go out and fight solo a lot...and i don't know how to fight solo
- i don't want to die in eszur...to the no-skill militia guys there....
- etc. etc. etc.
ZOMG this article might be funniest thing ive ever read in whole hilarious history of funny reading ever. The really funny observations made are both sharply funny, and funnily sharp. I particularly enjoy end where you looked down nose at other peoples PVP and mocked them a bit for it. How would i go about immediately joining up to your corp? I can only imagine that your comms are ''electric''.
they are quite "electric" but we don't accept people into corp who refuse to fly without links, scout, griffin alt, SFI only doctrine, etc.
long story short, I've heard you in comms and we'd love to have you just to hear your goofy british pedo sounding voice so we can make a soundboard. so put your app in today please.
|

Joanna Ramirez
Intaki Militia
87
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 13:25:00 -
[49] - Quote
roigon wrote:Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us.
Well, GENOS joined Gallente side so I quess that says enough about desire of "good fights" of all people. After all, it's so much easier to get "good fights" (= ganks) when you have three times the active numbers compared to your enemy. |

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
236
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 15:01:00 -
[50] - Quote
Joanna Ramirez wrote:roigon wrote:Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us. Well, GENOS along with alt alliance of Goonies (terribad though, easily killed) joined Gallente side so I quess that says enough about desire of "good fights" of all people). After all, it's so much easier to get "good fights" (= ganks) when you have three times the active numbers compared to your enemy. For most people, it's about the isk and pvp comes secondary to...well....anyone else except those who join Amarr/Caldari militia I quess.
Exactly my point. The good PVPers who actually care more about finding good PVP are already on the under dog side. Since these players are generally much better PVPers than the FW farmers that are so numerous in the Minmatar militia, who actually care more about their bankroll. The actual power will balance out. More and more good PVPers will join the under dog side. Some will just be alts with their mains on the dominant side. Others will actually work to switch their main over.
Just as one Lion is better than 100 sheep. One good PVPer is better than 100 farmers.
I see this shift already happening, but I guess only time will tell. |
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
639
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 15:11:00 -
[51] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:Joanna Ramirez wrote:roigon wrote:Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us. Well, GENOS along with alt alliance of Goonies (terribad though, easily killed) joined Gallente side so I quess that says enough about desire of "good fights" of all people). After all, it's so much easier to get "good fights" (= ganks) when you have three times the active numbers compared to your enemy. For most people, it's about the isk and pvp comes secondary to...well....anyone else except those who join Amarr/Caldari militia I quess. Exactly my point. The good PVPers who actually care more about finding good PVP are already on the under dog side. Since these players are generally much better PVPers than the FW farmers that are so numerous in the Minmatar militia, who actually care more about their bankroll. The actual power will balance out. More and more good PVPers will join the under dog side. Some will just be alts with their mains on the dominant side. Others will actually work to switch their main over. Just as one Lion is better than 100 sheep. One good PVPer is better than 100 farmers. I see this shift already happening, but I guess only time will tell.
Except the gallente are currently winning the occupancy war at tier 4 while caldari are only at tier 2. So its sort of the opposite of your theory. Good and bad pvpers would both prefer more money instead of less money.
Now i am not saying Genos/goonie alts chose Gallente because of the faction war store. I really don't know. Genos is a unique situation. But whatever their reasons they did not join the side that makes less money. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Joanna Ramirez
Intaki Militia
88
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 15:14:00 -
[52] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Exactly my point. The good PVPers who actually care more about finding good PVP are already on the under dog side.
You do understand that they did not join the underdog and it does not matter if one pvp'er is worth 100 farmers in battle for the simple reason that one pvp'er has to sleep, work, etc. at some stage.
When that happens, farmers flip systems and there is nothing the pvp'er can do about it. Eventually all systems will be owned by CCP's designated farmer militias = gal/matar and pvp militias end up with ****** income and option to stage outside fw zone.
I am probably a pessimist but I always assume the worst of all possible situation/people because that way I never get disappointed, only mildly delighted if things dont go utterly to the scheissehaus. |

Flyinghotpocket
Amarrian Vengeance
86
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:31:00 -
[53] - Quote
jjohnpaul xvii wrote:Dan Carter Murray wrote:Bugsy VanHalen wrote: The PVPers always go where the targets are. When the targets move so do the PVPers.
Nice analysis, but 0 alliances or major corporations from minmatar FW have swapped to amarr to get more fights. So unfortunately, although your theory is sound, in practice it is not. Winmatar often make ridiculous and laughable statements...they normall start with Some dumb **** minmatar wrote: "I want more pew but won't swap sides because"
and end with one of the following:
- For bullshit RP reasons I can't swap sides
- I HAVE FRIENDS...I DON'T WANT TO SHOOT MY FRIENDS...I NEVER PLAYED SPORTS AGAINST MY FRIENDS GROWING UP...WHAT IS THIS PLAYING AGAINST YOUR FRIENDS NONSENSE YOU SPEAK OF
- But how am I supposed to make isk?
- Missiles hurt me in plexes and the minmatar shoot them...lasers may run like maze but they hit ****.
- eventually I'll run out of stabber fleet issues and don't know how to actually fly ships that require more than hitting approach and fire.
- i've been minmatar so long...if i leave now...(no one will give a **** if you leave)
- I don't know where my balls are
- The winmatar militia draft board has misplaced my balls
- I didn't read the form when I signed up for winmatar and accidentally checked the box that said "castrate" instead of "temporarily remove"
- I HAVE TO DO MORE THAN 1 MINOR TO PAY FOR A ******* FACTION BATTLESHIP WITH MY LP??!?!?!!11/?!oneone
- i will have to face swarms of stabber fleet issues backed by logi and blackbirds...and the amarr most of the time have half the numbers and can't counter the 25/5/5 SFI/BB/LOGI gang
- I'm scared of pvp that takes risk
- I don't know what risk means, and I'm scared of things I know nothing about
- many amarr pilots likes to go out and fight solo a lot...and i don't know how to fight solo
- i don't want to die in eszur...to the no-skill militia guys there....
- etc. etc. etc.
ZOMG this article might be funniest thing ive ever read in whole hilarious history of funny reading ever. The really funny observations made are both sharply funny, and funnily sharp. I particularly enjoy end where you looked down nose at other peoples PVP and mocked them a bit for it. How would i go about immediately joining up to your corp? I can only imagine that your comms are ''electric''.
i direct you to our corp description in game and follow the link to the recruitment board
|

Flyingleanpocket
Amarrian Vengeance
5
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:39:00 -
[54] - Quote
Dan Carter Murray wrote:jjohnpaul xvii wrote:Dan Carter Murray wrote:Bugsy VanHalen wrote: Things
Some more things Some dumb **** minmatar wrote: Words
Litany of common excuses Boring Sarcasm long story short, I've heard you in comms and we'd love to have you just to hear your goofy british pedo sounding voice so we can make a soundboard. so put your app in today please.
BOOSH! |

Destru Kaneda
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
121
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 19:51:00 -
[55] - Quote
And with that I'd have to agree it's absolutely shocking we decided against switching sides. Music for robots, geeks, hackers, and nerds. Nerdiest homepage on the internet? |

Dan Carter Murray
220
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 20:48:00 -
[56] - Quote
Destru Kaneda wrote:And with that I'd have to agree it's absolutely shocking we decided against switching sides.
because we actually respond back to dipshit british pedo sounding jackasses who fail at being smug with sarcasm?
if you like to bend over, we don't want you anyway. |

Destru Kaneda
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
122
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 22:01:00 -
[57] - Quote
Dude, calm down.
Even though I found your response in poor taste, I'm really not that sensible to prepubescent chest pounding. I was rather referring to the fact that you basically post a list of reasons why Minmatar FW pilots are terrible/gutless/whatever, simultaneously complaining that not more of them join Amarr. Might want to revisit that strategy. Music for robots, geeks, hackers, and nerds. Nerdiest homepage on the internet? |

Dan Carter Murray
220
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 22:11:00 -
[58] - Quote
Destru Kaneda wrote:Dude, calm down.
Even though I found your response in poor taste, I'm really not that sensible to prepubescent chest pounding. I was rather referring to the fact that you basically post a list of reasons why Minmatar FW pilots are terrible/gutless/whatever, simultaneously complaining that not more of them join Amarr. Might want to revisit that strategy.
as long as dipshits in your militia complain about a lack of targets and "OMG Y U NO ATTACK MY 1:1:1 RATIO OF SFI:GUARDIAN:BLACKBIRD FLEET" then expect sarcasm asking you to join amarr.
i could care less if you guys cry about a lack of targets or no one engaging your jesus SFI/BB/guardian fleets.
just quit having a winge...having a ******* cry about it...not you personally, just your militia full of dipshits...although you might personally be a dipshit. I don't know for sure.
|
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
978

|
Posted - 2012.11.10 06:04:00 -
[59] - Quote
I've removed some off topic posts. Please keep it civil and on topic please. Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Damar Rocarion
Nasranite Watch Liandri Covenant
178
|
Posted - 2012.11.10 06:18:00 -
[60] - Quote
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:I've removed some off topic posts. Please keep it civil and on topic please. Thank you.
Are you worried about company bottom line when we as consumers also say that your staff is biased and product you created has turned worse with every new edition or only about public image our complaints causes to you? |
|
|

CCP Falcon
631

|
Posted - 2012.11.10 20:32:00 -
[61] - Quote
Damar Rocarion wrote:ISD Dorrim Barstorlode wrote:I've removed some off topic posts. Please keep it civil and on topic please. Thank you. Are you worried about company bottom line when we as consumers also say that your staff is biased and product you created has turned worse with every new edition or only about public image our complaints causes to you?
CCP are very receptive to player opinions and suggestions for changes in gameplay. Those opinions and suggestions do however have to be presented in a collected, reasonable and coherent manner, through the correct channels, and within the rules of the forums.
If you have any doubt as to the rules on these forums, then feel free to refresh your memory here.
If you would like to do this, then I'll kindly direct you to the Features & Ideas Discussion Forum for any existing ingame features that you would like to discuss, or any ideas you have for new features.
For discussion regarding content in development on the test server, I will direct you to the Test Server Feedback forum.
If you feel you would like to bring things directly to our attention via the CSM, then you can post in the CSM Assembly Hall
On a more serious note, I suggest that you tread very carefully on how you respond to our volunteers, and the tone you use when addressing them.
Trolling and attacks on them will not be tolerated.
Despite having to moderate it quite heavily, I'll leave this thread open, as there are a number of very good points being made here.
I do however suggest people think before they post.
Ignorance with regards to the forum rules is no excuse.
CCP Falcon -á-á||-á-áEVE Community Team -á|| -á-áEVE Illuminati -á || -á-á@CCP_Falcon -á || -á-á@EVE_LiveEvents
-á-- Disciple Of The Delicious Tea -- |
|

Major Killz
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
107
|
Posted - 2012.11.11 00:51:00 -
[62] - Quote
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
Cough*
I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
Like kunta kinte!
Factional warfare has always had head cases talking mad sh!t for as long as I can remember (2009). Nothing new here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNx3tb9w2s4 enjoy! [SMUG]-áSORRY for party rocking! v0v
|

Shaalira D'arc
Quantum Cats Syndicate Drunk 'n' Disorderly
545
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 19:03:00 -
[63] - Quote
Joanna Ramirez wrote:roigon wrote:Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us. Well, GENOS along with alt alliance of Goonies (terribad though, easily killed) joined Gallente side so I quess that says enough about desire of "good fights" of all people). After all, it's so much easier to get "good fights" (= ganks) when you have three times the active numbers compared to your enemy. For most people, it's about the isk and pvp comes secondary to...well....anyone else except those who join Amarr/Caldari militia I quess.
Caldari militia, according to publicised statistics, have more pilots than the Gallente militia. This has been true with years, over the course of fluctuations that have affected both sides.
There's often an assertion that Caldari militia is the one outnumbered, usually based on anecdotal or 'gut' feelings about activity or PvPers versus PvEers. But to my knowledge, no one's ever actually put forth statistical evidence of this.
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
643
|
Posted - 2012.11.12 19:08:00 -
[64] - Quote
Shaalira D'arc wrote:Joanna Ramirez wrote:roigon wrote:Naive or not, I still think a large majority on both sides actually WANT to fight, and if we can stop the complaining and shitposting about eachother, then perhaps we can make a better place for the both of us. Well, GENOS along with alt alliance of Goonies (terribad though, easily killed) joined Gallente side so I quess that says enough about desire of "good fights" of all people). After all, it's so much easier to get "good fights" (= ganks) when you have three times the active numbers compared to your enemy. For most people, it's about the isk and pvp comes secondary to...well....anyone else except those who join Amarr/Caldari militia I quess. Caldari militia, according to publicised statistics, have more pilots than the Gallente militia. This has been true with years, over the course of fluctuations that have affected both sides. There's often an assertion that Caldari militia is the one outnumbered, usually based on anecdotal or 'gut' feelings about activity or PvPers versus PvEers. But to my knowledge, no one's ever actually put forth statistical evidence of this.
It would be nice if we knew how many of the accounts that are in each militia are even active anymore. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

jjohnpaul xvii
CTRL-Q Iron Oxide.
41
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 13:35:00 -
[65] - Quote
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:
Exactly my point. The good PVPers who actually care more about finding good PVP are already on the under dog side. Since these players are generally much better PVPers than the FW farmers that are so numerous in the Minmatar militia, who actually care more about their bankroll. The actual power will balance out. More and more good PVPers will join the under dog side. Some will just be alts with their mains on the dominant side. Others will actually work to switch their main over.
Just as one Lion is better than 100 sheep. One good PVPer is better than 100 farmers.
I see this shift already happening, but I guess only time will tell.
If all of ''The good PVPers'' (lol) are already on the under dog side....can you remind me exactly why it is that i should be swapping to join them? I want to be fighting the ''The good PVPers'', not stuck on the same side as them ganking farmers.
#confused
|

Opera Noir
Inglorious-Basterds The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 14:26:00 -
[66] - Quote
From what I can tell after coming back from a two year hiatus is that FW is much better than it was. I love station locks the most I think, even though almost all my stuff ended up being inaccessible . Even if FW isn't perfect now, it's way better than the years of neglect it used to have, and it seems to be moving in the right direction. |

subtle turtle
Imperial Outlaws
72
|
Posted - 2012.11.13 20:23:00 -
[67] - Quote
Opera Noir wrote:From what I can tell after coming back from a two year hiatus is that FW is much better than it was. I love station locks the most I think, even though almost all my stuff ended up being inaccessible  . Even if FW isn't perfect now, it's way better than the years of neglect it used to have, and it seems to be moving in the right direction.
I agree totally. The new mechanics make for a new, interesting tactical situation that I think the player base is just learning to use.we had a great fight with LNA last night using plexes to our advantage (kudos to LNA for taking the fight), and I think fun was had by all, as well as a great even fight.
Overall, the changes to faction warfare have been positive, and the problems that have come up have, in my opinion, been quickly addressed by ccp. It's nice to see ccp actively engaging and responding to the player base.
There will never be a GÇ¥perfect system,GÇ¥ because the player base will never agree what perfect would be. but in my opinion, the system we have now is a pretty damn place to start. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |