Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 07:48:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Cpt Pugwash
Originally by: StiZum Hilidii Edited by: StiZum Hilidii on 06/04/2005 07:29:18 sorry pug i fell asleep after the first line can you condense it down a little. from what i gather from your long winded post, your a little miffed your corp isnt recognised as a decent pvp one and you think by dying hard to us it will bring you up in peoples estimations?
Flame number 1
I had money on it being either you or The Lung Thanks Stan.
Oh and and maybe I better not mention the message you sent me congratulating Rubra on being a great PvP force you even signed it on behalf of Xanadu.
If you really believe Rubra are so weak why bother replying at all?
You know what, I'd almost think of taking you serious if your character didnt look like such a *****.
Then again, after meeting you on the field of battle we know where your skills are at.
|

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 07:50:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Heikki To briefly return to the original subject; wonder what Stain Empire plans really were. The SCA coalition was clearly formed against that Cursed Nation thing (in way like NATO was formed against SU, without plans to attack).
Apparently you're political henchmen failed to inform most of SE of the plan.
|

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 08:55:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Nev Amati
Originally by: Cpt Pugwash
Originally by: Darkrydar
You know what, I'd almost think of taking you serious if your character didnt look like such a *****.
Then again, after meeting you on the field of battle we know where your skills are at.
There is nothing like Constructive critisim... and this is nothing like constructive critisim.
This typical of Shinra/ATUK forum warriors mass flame anyone who speaks out against them.
He's wearing eye shadow... forum queen maybe? Forum princess?
Look my pic up in gme nub. I paid to have it replaced over a year ago. But, it seems ccp's about as good as your politicians.
|

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 08:57:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Cpt Pugwash
Originally by: Darkrydar
You know what, I'd almost think of taking you serious if your character didnt look like such a *****.
Then again, after meeting you on the field of battle we know where your skills are at.
There is nothing like Constructive critisim... and this is nothing like constructive critisim.
This typical of Shinra/ATUK forum warriors mass flame anyone who speaks out against them.
We gain/give respect to those who deserve it. You and your FA buddies cowerdice and living like the rats you are ahs earned you done. You are far from a good opponent, you are more akin to Burn Eden. One can only wait for CCP to implement the 75 safespot scanning.
|

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 08:58:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Nev Amati
Originally by: AvanCade Nato is a defencepact as well. if one party is the agressor and gets shot back, Nato will not defend the agressor.
You have to win first to write the history ;)
How is the PBL doing?
|

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 15:05:00 -
[6]
WOW, the Republic Military School's political science must being doing a lot of current events assignments.
|

Darkrydar
|
Posted - 2005.04.06 15:36:00 -
[7]
Needless to say both SNRA and ATUK are well versed in Fishbowl pvp.
|
|
|