EVE Search - Updating Destroyers

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Bazman	Posted - 2005.04.08 22:04:00 - [1] Remove the Destroyers ROF penalty, and they will finally be worth something
Bazman Caldari Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2005.04.08 22:04:00 - [2] Remove the Destroyers ROF penalty, and they will finally be worth something ----- OMG READ TUXFORD!!!1
Bazman	Posted - 2005.04.09 12:09:00 - [3] Originally by: Alexi Borizkova It appears the problem lies in people comparign the desty(which is t1) to t2 ships. Compare the Destroyer not to the t2 ships, but to plain old t1 frigates... now they appear nearly godlike in their offensive capability. It seems that the Destroyers would have been great if they had existed as t1 ships all along, and now would be time to introduce a t2 version, but instead they were released into an environment where tech1 ships and modules are becoming virtually obsolete for... well, nigh on anything. Much like my main arguments about the current market system, it would have been great if it was that way from the beginning, but inflicting it on the game now is a nerf of massive proportions. Bah, destroyers die to properlly fitted(tm) kestrals, they suck :p A Dessie with 7 or 8 guns firing at their normal rate can only sustain it for a little while, after that, they either have cap death, or they are dead. If dessies didn't have the rate of fire penalty, they might actually be a danger to interceptors and fast frigates, all the while still being paper thin
Bazman Caldari Shinra Lotka Volterra	Posted - 2005.04.09 12:09:00 - [4] Originally by: Alexi Borizkova It appears the problem lies in people comparign the desty(which is t1) to t2 ships. Compare the Destroyer not to the t2 ships, but to plain old t1 frigates... now they appear nearly godlike in their offensive capability. It seems that the Destroyers would have been great if they had existed as t1 ships all along, and now would be time to introduce a t2 version, but instead they were released into an environment where tech1 ships and modules are becoming virtually obsolete for... well, nigh on anything. Much like my main arguments about the current market system, it would have been great if it was that way from the beginning, but inflicting it on the game now is a nerf of massive proportions. Bah, destroyers die to properlly fitted(tm) kestrals, they suck :p A Dessie with 7 or 8 guns firing at their normal rate can only sustain it for a little while, after that, they either have cap death, or they are dead. If dessies didn't have the rate of fire penalty, they might actually be a danger to interceptors and fast frigates, all the while still being paper thin ----- OMG READ TUXFORD!!!1

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.