| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Roime
Shiva Furnace
1404
   |
Posted - 2012.11.08 15:15:00 -
[31] - Quote
Rolstra wrote:Roime wrote:Scanning down an OGB T3 is not "hard", it is impossible without max skills and the Virtue set. So it takes a perfectly skilled toon to scan down a prefectly skilled toon? I see balance, and you see impossible task, I guess we play different games.
Not, it requires perfect skills and a full pirate implant set to just scan down a properly fitted OGB. The skills of the OGB don't matter at all, it can be as low-skilled as you like.
Shiva Furnace - recruiting again! |
Rolstra
Moo's Mudpit
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 16:03:00 -
[32] - Quote
Roime wrote:Rolstra wrote:Roime wrote:Scanning down an OGB T3 is not "hard", it is impossible without max skills and the Virtue set. So it takes a perfectly skilled toon to scan down a prefectly skilled toon? I see balance, and you see impossible task, I guess we play different games. Not, it requires perfect skills and a full pirate implant set to just scan down a properly fitted OGB. The skills of the OGB don't matter at all, it can be as low-skilled as you like.
I am agreeing with you, it does take a considerable amount of skill and hardware to find something that gives the opposing fleet a 30% boost. As it should, with the current battle cry of risk vs. reward it should take a very well trained and expensive Toon to find the lynchpin that allows you to take down a few billion ISK worth of unprepared, improperly tanked ships (assuming the opposing fleet fitted up with the OGB in mind).
If the OGB is GÇÿlow skilledGÇÖ then donGÇÖt bother killing it. The boosts are relatively negligible for anything not trained to use T2, and even less without the Mindlink. The Killmail should tell you everything you need to know and lacking a kill then quick ship scan will advise your FC if the OGB is even worth the manpower needed to kill it.
Of course that requires it being in space and not in a POS so once again, I agree. They should not be able to hide in an inaccessible spot. And the opposing fleet should launch a counter measure to neutralize it, not have it handed it to them with a bow on top.
BTW not having the manpower to kill it is no excuse, a nueted dry command ship is no better than a docked one.
|
Risien Drogonne
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
21
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 19:46:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rolstra wrote:Roime wrote:Scanning down an OGB T3 is not "hard", it is impossible without max skills and the Virtue set. So it takes a perfectly skilled toon to scan down a prefectly skilled toon? I see balance, and you see impossible task, I guess we play different games.
Except that any noob can benefit from the OGB, so there goes the balance. |
Jack Miton
Aperture Harmonics
K162
772
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 20:55:00 -
[34] - Quote
Rolstra wrote:Roime wrote:Scanning down an OGB T3 is not "hard", it is impossible without max skills and the Virtue set. So it takes a perfectly skilled toon to scan down a prefectly skilled toon? I see balance, and you see impossible task, I guess we play different games.
except you dont need to be a perfect toon to be 'unprobable', you just need to be able to fit ECCM. |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.08 23:50:00 -
[35] - Quote
Some posts have been removed. We appreciate that this subject is one that inspires passion, but any further racial insults will be dealt with very seriously.
So please keep it passionate, but at all times civil.
Forum Rules #11: The posting of pornography; discriminatory remarks which are sexually explicit, harmful, threatening, abusive, defamatory, obscene, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive; excessive obscene or vulgar language; posts which discuss or illustrate illegal activity; providing links to sites that contain any of the aforementioned.
ISD Ezwal
Ensign
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
64
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 07:40:00 -
[36] - Quote
Well, shame I didnGÇÖt get to see what they wrote the deserved censorship. :(
There is no "I" in "team." but there are 5 in "narcissistic personality disorder." |
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
64
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 08:17:00 -
[37] - Quote
goldiiee wrote:Well, shame I didnGÇÖt get to see what they wrote the deserved censorship. :(
I can only assume it was a parting quote from Herr Ronin good friend who has decided to go get a real life and stop playing EVE. Take care Ronin and best wishes to you my friend.
There is no "I" in "team." but there are 5 in "narcissistic personality disorder." |
Emperor Salazar
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
717
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 17:43:00 -
[38] - Quote
Apparently my post got deleted by some power tripping n azi ISD nerd.
So I'll repeat.
No one cares about the fact that your precious jewing back bone is getting nerfed. This nerf is necessary for game balance and game balance revolves around pvp. Not jewing.
Deal with it. |
shashanana
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 18:42:00 -
[39] - Quote
Emperor Salazar wrote:Apparently my post got deleted by some power tripping n azi ISD nerd.
So I'll repeat.
No one cares about the fact that your precious jewing back bone is getting nerfed. This nerf is necessary for game balance and game balance revolves around pvp. Not jewing.
Deal with it.
anti-semitism always makes your point more valid. |
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
65
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 18:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
Emperor Salazar wrote:Apparently my post got deleted by some power tripping n azi ISD nerd.
So I'll repeat.
No one cares about the fact that your precious jewing back bone is getting nerfed. This nerf is necessary for game balance and game balance revolves around pvp. Not jewing.
Deal with it.
WOW your so angry, and misinformed, there are an average of 23,000 players online and playing each day last week and only 30% of them were involved in PVP using kill-net and battle clinic data (so your overinflated sense of importance should be checked at the door) and as I am also one of the players that do PVP and donGÇÖt want my hard earned skill point to be rendered useless for the sake of unimaginative PVP'ers.
I can only assume as stated before.
"Yeah can't have PVP'ers tears they are so loud they drown out reason. :) "
And your obvious need to continue to use **** and *** in your post points to a predisposed lack of reason and thought. If you donGÇÖt mind the upcoming proposed changes sit back and do nothing. As you are confident in your belief then you will be justly rewarded.
I however would very much like players to learn tactics to also persevere, improvise, and overcome, rather than whine and have the game turned into Doom or some other rendition of GÇÿHit the button till you win and please donGÇÖt ask me to thinkGÇÖ
There is no "I" in "team." but there are 5 in "narcissistic personality disorder." |
Rolstra
Moo's Mudpit
2
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 19:16:00 -
[41] - Quote
PVP is great.
PVP is a way of proving our team has more, better, faster, than their team,
But when their team has more, better, faster, they cheated.
And since they cheated, and we didnGÇÖt learn anything, we tried again.
And they still cheated.
So we took away some of their toys (Whined till CCP listened) and we won.
We are so cool. (Dancing gif inserted here)
|
|
ISD TYPE40
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
2862
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 19:16:00 -
[42] - Quote
This thread has been cleaned of Anti Semitism and attacks on ISD staff.
Forum Rules wrote:
4. Be respectful of others at all times.
The purpose of the forum is to provide a platform for the exchange of ideas. Occasionally, there will be conflicts that arise when people voice opinions. Be courteous when disagreeing with others. It is possible to disagree without being insulting.
5. Ranting is prohibited
A rant is a long-winded, redundant post, often filled with angry, non-constructive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and helpful in the development of the game, but rants are disruptive and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise, clear manner and avoid going off on rambling tangents.
6. Personal attacks are prohibited.
Commonly known as flaming, personal attacks are posts that are designed to personally berate or insult another. Text of this nature is not beneficial to the community spirit and will not be tolerated. Corporation, faction and alliance members and other players are cautioned to avoid allowing GÇ£in characterGÇ¥ disputes from becoming "out of character" personal attacks. The game is designed for role-playing and/or portraying a role and it is sometimes easy for tempers to flare when the lines between the virtual world and the real world are crossed. Please keep in-game disputes in the game and off the forum unless it is clearly a mutual, in-character exchange.
7. Trolling is prohibited.
Trolling is the word used to describe a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting the players. Posts of this nature are disruptive and do not contribute to the sense of community we want for our forums.
29. Personal attacks and abuse of CCP staff.
There has been a worrying trend of increased personal attacks on developers on our own forums as of late, this will not be tolerated. Our forums are an area for players to exchange ideas in a polite and friendly manner for the betterment of EVE Online. Players who abuse staff will receive a permanent forum ban across all of their accounts which will not be subject to review at any time.
While we understand that certain subjects will bring out the passion in people, we ask that you post within the rules and be respectful of other forum users and staff, thank you - ISD Type40.
ISD Type40
Lt. Commander
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
65
|
Posted - 2012.11.09 19:18:00 -
[43] - Quote
Thanks ISD. Sorry for the declne in decorum.
There is no "I" in "team." but there are 5 in "narcissistic personality disorder." |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |