Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
57
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:27:00 -
[151] - Quote
Boomhaur wrote:This is the stereotypical carebear, I think the goal was to feel sorry for this guy. But well I think everyone here would rather just pop & pod him if someone like this logged into eve. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BMECGvP7UsY
That was painful to watch.
So now, for something completely different. I am 12 and what is this?? |

Auric Veldfinger
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:31:00 -
[152] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:carebear = anyone who actively avoids PVP not really rocket science
Carebears don't avoid PVP, they avoid engagments.
If your goal is to avoid being killed, and are successful at doing this, you have won at PVP. The way a gazelle wins PVP by avoiding lions. |

Smiknight
The Plebian Republic
32
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:39:00 -
[153] - Quote
A carebear is someone who engages in any PvE activity, be it ratting and missioning, to mining, both moon and roid. Security status of systems is irrelevant in these situations, a bear is a bear. It is disheartening to see a game once steeped in cerebral thought and innovative thinking become so homogenized by entitlement and malaise; that indidviduals should instill a theme park existence through a lack of desire to overcome any and all obstacles and instead demand things be made easier for them via nerfs. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 01:52:00 -
[154] - Quote
Inquisitor Kitchner wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:Carebears are awesome, and are the backbone of EVE's economy. Without them, all us ebil people wouldn't have anyone to build ships so that we could blow eachother up.  Course we would. Even though I'm a PvP null sec player if I knew no-one else was building ships I would start building them and cashing in. That's the beauty of EVE EDIT: Also ISD Type40 is actually owning this thread.
Then you would be carebear. Thus preventing exstinction of said bear. |

HollyShocker 2inthestink
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 02:04:00 -
[155] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:I see this term get thrown around a lot, more often as a pejorative for players that play the game a certain way - I'm not sure I understand what that certain way is, though, so I would appreciate it if someone explained. I know I'm going to get a few people who just say "carebears are the scum of highsec" and that's it, but that's not a definition, is it. I *don't* want to know WHY they're scum - or why they're NOT scum... in fact, I'd rather a definition, properly delivered without bias, not include the word scum at all. An explanation would be nice, not more accusations, pejoratives and condemnations. I just want to know what it means, not how you feel about it - although I'm sure some of you will tell me anyway.
The term Care bear cannot be defined or described in a few words. The qualification of the definition can mean different things to different people. Generally speaking Care bear is used to describe players with little or no interest in confrontational player versus player fighting.
The term is used in almost all MMOGÇÖs and also can vary on the level or scope of the definition. In EVE it is usually the industrialist that have spent all their skill points to make them a better producer and less effective at pvp combat.
People like to categorize miners as Care bears in an attempt to justify why they need to feed their ego killing a player who canGÇÖt fight back. After all it wouldnGÇÖt look like griefing if this was to be done to a group of players that were not hated or demonized.
|

Auric Veldfinger
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 02:15:00 -
[156] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:A carebear is anyone who thinks that they don't affect other players in a game like EVE, and because they have this conviction that they're "not hurting anyone" believe that no one should be allowed to affect them using the tools in the sandbox (more specifically combat tools). Carebears may be okay with market PvP because the losses generally sting less and are less abrupt. Carebears think players who use combat tools against unwilling players are bullies and that players should be completely safe unless they're willing to engage in combat.
No. Wrong wrong wrong.
Let me tell you the number one reason for "carebearism". They avoid combat because they don't know how to fight, and therefore, they don't fight. They are afraid to make mistakes, to do stupid things, to fail, and do not want the feeling of humiliation, even when they are alone but especially when they are in a group. You can take a carebear, teach them how to PVP (combat) in eve and they will stop being a carebear, 99% of the time guaranteed. But this ridiculous game has barriers so high to learning PVP, and the teaching and resources that are available are so damn convoluted that people just don't bother. So unless the bear throws caution to the wind, or maybe gets drunk one night and gets into a PVP ship to take the first step, they will stay a bear. |

Auric Veldfinger
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 02:40:00 -
[157] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:PVP is something that touches all aspects of EVE. PVP is a very loose term as many tend to confuse it with a pure combat oriented activity and forget that it encompasses anything where players compete against other players. Be this through trade, mining claims, manufacturing or other aspects of the game. .
Sooo true, and of course, so forgotten even amongst the so-called PVPers, who believe that PVP is akin to 18th century warfare in space, where everyone would line up opposite each other in fields (equal numbers of course, make it fair),wear bright red coats and take musket shots at each other. The warfare doctrine at the time considering warfare to be about fair, hoonourable fights. When really warfare is all about using what you got to get what you want. The solutions to blue powerblocs, afk cloaking, alliances hogging the moons, etc are all PVP yet will not be done because the 18th century style space warfare re creationists cannot think outside their box so whine to CCP, every bit as much as bear if you ask me. |

MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
629
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 02:54:00 -
[158] - Quote
MyB1atch wrote:
Well then I want to hear from the pvpers why where the term came from, not someone who has a clear personal problem against them.
and you started so well.........
WTF?
i have a fanboi? Ok, so you've corrected my spelling,do you care to make a valid point? -áThere are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... |

fukier
Flatline.
136
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:08:00 -
[159] - Quote
To me a carebear is a risk adverse player. they are usually players who love to play EVE but dont like the standard PVP montra of null/low sec... Though a carebear can really live in any space... like nullbears who do annoms and run for the hills when a nuet in frig cloaks in the system...
or simular a FW who runs when someone warps to thier plex...
or even in high sec for all the mission people who stay in npc corps to avoid war decs....
all these are risk adverse... though they do engage in passive pvp...
Carebears can be either casual or even hardcore...
Its not a bad term... it just describes a very important part of eve online...
though i do hope with fixes to bounties and kill rights and the ability to have concord sanctioned PVP (for high sec) i.e mini temp wardecs... this will help people take steps away from thier carebear ways and learn to enjoy loss as much as victory... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:15:00 -
[160] - Quote
Auric Veldfinger wrote: But this ridiculous game has barriers-to-entry so high to learning PVP, and the teaching and resources that are available are so damn convoluted This is terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself for spreading such lies. |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
57
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:25:00 -
[161] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Auric Veldfinger wrote: But this ridiculous game has barriers-to-entry so high to learning PVP, and the teaching and resources that are available are so damn convoluted This is terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself for spreading such lies.
No, this is true. I tried low-sec missioning when I was about 3-months into the game - undocked for my first mission and got ganked instantly without so much as a "lol u suck" from my assailant. Those were his exact words. If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better - nothing about that experience made me want to try low or nul again, and I'm getting my SP up before I venture back out there, it's that simple. I'm getting very close now, though - I already have access to much better ships than I did back then.
And before you ask - yes, I did attempt to fight him. I locked on and hit F1 and waited for the lock to acquire. Probably cycled my guns twice before my ship exploded. I am 12 and what is this?? |

Auric Veldfinger
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:31:00 -
[162] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Auric Veldfinger wrote: But this ridiculous game has barriers-to-entry so high to learning PVP, and the teaching and resources that are available are so damn convoluted This is terrible and you should be ashamed of yourself for spreading such lies.
How long until we hear that nostrum about "getting into pvp from day one, here's an 8 hour skill queue to get you into a pvp corp", like abstinence it works in theory but rarely happens in reality. |

fukier
Flatline.
137
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 03:31:00 -
[163] - Quote
i would think carebear is a state of mind... everyone at times when they play eve are carebears...
if the definition is a risk adverse player...
a large coalition of players who dont have enough players in their fleet decide not to engage in a fight are Carebears...
a person saving up fir thier first carrier avoiding getting killed like the plague is a carebear...
pretty much on a daily basis every person who plays eve will display characteristics of being a carebear...
its human nature. At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 04:21:00 -
[164] - Quote
Auric Veldfinger wrote:How long until we hear that nostrum about "getting into pvp from day one, here's an 8 hour skill queue to get you into a pvp corp", like abstinence it works in theory but rarely happens in reality. Jesus, you and OP have some sort of aversion to reading, Google, and practice it seems.
You have two choices: 1. Nut up and shut up. a. Find some friends and learn with them. b. Put some coins in, choose "hard mode", and learn solo.
2. Whine like a little ***** about how hard **** is and how mean people are. |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
57
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 04:33:00 -
[165] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Auric Veldfinger wrote:How long until we hear that nostrum about "getting into pvp from day one, here's an 8 hour skill queue to get you into a pvp corp", like abstinence it works in theory but rarely happens in reality. Jesus, you and OP have some sort of aversion to reading, Google, and practice it seems. You have two choices: 1. Nut up and shut up. a. Find some friends and learn with them. b. Put some coins in, choose "hard mode", and learn solo. 2. Whine like a little ***** about how hard **** is and how mean people are.
You seem to have some aversion to civilised discourse. Doesn't your mummy love you?? I am 12 and what is this?? |

Nikodiemus
Jokulhlaup
54
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 04:36:00 -
[166] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Carebears are awesome, and are the backbone of EVE's economy. Without them, all us ebil people wouldn't have anyone to build ships so that we could blow eachother up. 
Another dev response that has no value at all. Connecting with the community doesn't actually require useless banter with a blue icon to send you there. |

XxRTEKxX
Fenrir's Dogs of War Union 0f Revolution
21
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 04:52:00 -
[167] - Quote
I thought carebear was simply someone doing any form of pve. Missioning and mining mainly.
|

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:17:00 -
[168] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:You seem to have some aversion to civilised discourse. The substance of my post must have offended you, huh? Maybe try reading it again and understanding what I was talking about?
There's no point crying about mean people in EVE. You either kill them back, slink away and try not to let it happen again, or whine on the forums. The latter option should be received with nothing but contempt.
There is no barrier to entry into PvP, it's all in your head. |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:27:00 -
[169] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:You seem to have some aversion to civilised discourse. The substance of my post must have offended you, huh? Maybe try reading it again and understanding what I was talking about? There's no point crying about mean people in EVE. You either kill them back, slink away and try not to let it happen again, or whine on the forums. The latter option should be received with nothing but contempt. There is no barrier to entry into PvP, it's all in your head.
There is substance in your posts?
Could have fooled me.
FYI, why don't you read my posts and point out the ones where I was "crying" about it. I haven't cried about **** - I got blown up in lowsec and decided not to go back until my skills are better. I haven't whined - point out the post where I have, please. A link, not a quote. I know there's no "barrier" per se, but many players aren't interested in participating in something that basically means they have to "jump in the deep end of the pool" so to speak, without first learning how to swim. There are different schools of thought, such as the only way to learn is to jump in the deep end, but that doesn't make it a superior school of thought, nor does it make it the only one available.
Contempt itself is more worthy of contempt than whining, though, because whining is harmless - contempt, on the other hand, is usually just as unproductive and completely irrelevant. Instead of showing contempt to the whiners, why don't you try teaching them instead? Offer them alternatives to whining. Or, just keep showing contempt if your brain can't handle anything better, but I wonder if you realise that in that very "contempt", you are whining yourself. Whining about the whiners.
It all comes full circle, and then you become just as much a whiner as they do. Do you think that has earned you just a little contempt? I am 12 and what is this?? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:37:00 -
[170] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:I haven't whined - point out the post where I have, please. A link, not a quote. Why not a quote? |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:39:00 -
[171] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:I haven't whined - point out the post where I have, please. A link, not a quote. Why not a quote?
Quotes can be edited. Der. I am 12 and what is this?? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:40:00 -
[172] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Quotes can be edited. Der. So can posts. Der. |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:42:00 -
[173] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Quotes can be edited. Der. So can posts. Der.
Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of the post that I whined in, since I haven't got one. So instead of wasting your time arguing the semantics of link vs quote, why don't you make a point to me by finding the post in which I've whined. Unless you're willing to admit that you've bitten off more than you can chew in your elitist rants & ravings on my thread. I am 12 and what is this?? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:47:00 -
[174] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of the post that I whined in, since I haven't got one Remiel Pollard wrote:undocked for my first mission and got ganked instantly without so much as a "lol u suck" from my assailant. Those were his exact words. If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better So, uh, you gonna go edit that again? |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 05:53:00 -
[175] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:Well, I'm having a hard time thinking of the post that I whined in, since I haven't got one Remiel Pollard wrote:undocked for my first mission and got ganked instantly without so much as a "lol u suck" from my assailant. Those were his exact words. If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better So, uh, you gonna go edit that again?
That wasn't a whine. That was an explanation of what happened, explaining why I don't go back there until I've got better skills. How did you interpret that as a whine? Or do you just interpret everyone that explains their reasons for not going into nul or low as a whine?
See, what I was actually explaining was how I dealt with the situation - that is, I decided to avoid low and nul and work on my skills. But I never whine about it. That was over three months ago when that happened - if I was going to whine about it, I would have done it then.
And no where in that post do I mention any demands I made for changes to the game. I merely explained how I did with what happened with what was available to me at the time, including actually trying to fight him. The point of that post wasn't about me getting killed, it was about my personal experience of how hard it is for new players to get into PvP, and how degrading it can be when other players make it harder on them.
EDIT: what you just did is called cherry-picking. The post as a whole provides the context for the anecdote, which you seem to have ignored or missed. Instead, you picked out the part that you could make look like a whine, and tried your very best to do so, but you are only fooling yourself.
Now, please try again. I am 12 and what is this?? |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 06:00:00 -
[176] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better
If you were talking about this particular part, then I can understand why you might mistake this for whining. However, this is not a whine - I don't care how people want to treat other players, I handle it my own way. I was pointing out the conditions of how to achieve the result of less whiners, and more active PvPers. If you REALLY want to see less whining on the forums, then give people less stuff to whine about. Otherwise, they aren't going to care about you anyway - who are you to them? No one but an avatar on a computer monitor and a few pixels of text. You mean nothing to the whiners, you mean nothing to me, but the problem is, you seem to think you should mean something to everyone - that's your problem, and yours alone buddy. I am 12 and what is this?? |

Some Rando
University of Caille Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 06:03:00 -
[177] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:That wasn't a whine. That was an explanation of what happened Here's where you whined:
Remiel Pollard wrote:If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better You were whining about mean people.
Remiel Pollard wrote:EDIT: what you just did is called cherry-picking. The post as a whole provides the context for the anecdote, which you seem to have ignored or missed. Not at all, I quoted the relevant part, where you whined, with enough substance to put that into context. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
1409
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 06:04:00 -
[178] - Quote
Official definition from the Webster New Eden Galactic Dictionary:
Quote:A carebear is a pilot who lives either in high security or sovereignty null security space. Risk averse and lacking the capacity to adapt by nature, these herd animals seek safety in numbers, and typically depend on CCP to change the game mechanics so their species can survive in this cold and harsh universe. Shiva Furnace - recruiting again! |

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
58
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 06:11:00 -
[179] - Quote
Some Rando wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:That wasn't a whine. That was an explanation of what happened Here's where you whined: Remiel Pollard wrote:If you want to encourage players to engage in more PvP, then the more experienced players are going to have to start treating the noobs better You were whining about mean people.
Not a whine about mean people. An explanation of how the way people treat other players will set their opinion of the game and how they should play it. Do you understand the difference? If I was going to whine about it, I would have done that three months ago when it happened. This is just an example from personal experience of what kind of player behaviours exist, but I didn't whine about it.
You complain about people not reading, which is another form of whining itself, but you are completely missing everyone's point as if it is irrelevant next to your own. Perhaps if you paid attention to other people instead of expecting them to pay attention to you and only you and swallow your words as "biblical" you might be able to lose this self-absorbed attitude of yours and be able to adapt to the fact that there are other people playing this game.
EDIT: IF people are going to get treated like crap in the game, then why shouldn't they complain? Why shouldn't they speak out against jerks, elitists, self-absorbed egomaniacs like yourself, and other foul behaviour in the game? Even if it is allowed according to game mechanics and EULA, if you're treating people like crap then you should probably EXPECT them to complain. Expecting them not to is really quite daft and naive. I am 12 and what is this?? |

BoSau Hotim
The Artist's
3084
|
Posted - 2012.11.14 06:27:00 -
[180] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:I see this term get thrown around a lot, more often as a pejorative for players that play the game a certain way - I'm not sure I understand what that certain way is, though, so I would appreciate it if someone explained. I know I'm going to get a few people who just say "carebears are the scum of highsec" and that's it, but that's not a definition, is it. I *don't* want to know WHY they're scum - or why they're NOT scum... in fact, I'd rather a definition, properly delivered without bias, not include the word scum at all. An explanation would be nice, not more accusations, pejoratives and condemnations. I just want to know what it means, not how you feel about it - although I'm sure some of you will tell me anyway.
IMO
1. a Carebear is someone who wants to live in high sec with absolutely no possible way for them to get ganked/bumped/can flipped/war dec'd/ninja salvaged or have any other player's actions negatively affect them. They don't PvP. They live in a magical world until they are introduced to the realities of EvE and then you find them on these forums raging.
2. Some use the term to refer to anyone who lives in hi sec (PvPing or not) I'm not a carebear... I'm a SPACE BARBIE -á ***DISCLAIMER*** Regarding this avatar - any resemblance or similarity to other avatars-áeither living or dead is purely coincidental.
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |