|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5143
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 08:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:A lack of new veteran content is definitely a problem though, look for the CSM to press that point hard at the Summit.
Bear in mind that "new content" needn't necessarily mean "new ships" or "new modules". What we need is new things to do. A good example is bounty-hunting - technically this is already in the game, but in the current system it's basically a place-holder. After Retribution, it will be a viable profession. It will be a New Thing To Do.
Ideally, each expansion would add at least one new thing to do, however minor or niche. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5144
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 13:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Poetic Stanziel wrote:Malcanis wrote:After Retribution, it will be a viable profession. It will be a New Thing To Do. Hopefully. The new wardec system was supposed to make mercenaries a viable profession, but that didn't really pan out. Best to see how bounties actually play out once live, rather than make the mistake of assuming it'll do what it's intended to do.
Well let's just say that I'm more confident about the bounty system than I was for the revised wardec one. I'm certainly confident that it'l be way better than what we have now.
As for wardecs, I'm not sure that there can even be a good solution to making them workable for the wardeccer and fair to the wardecced. The expectation gaps are just too wide. As I've said previously, I'd rather see Faction Warfare expanded further to provide PVP-risk in hi-sec than rely on the wardec system to do so. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5144
|
Posted - 2012.11.19 13:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Kirith Kodachi wrote:While I like a lot of what was said in this document, I am a little disappointed that nothing was said in regards to supercap proliferation and dominance contributing to the stagnancy of null sec.
Overall, B+.
Supercaps have already been quite heavily nerfed, and they're not the sub-cap killers that they used to be. Unsupported supers are horribly vulnerable once again. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5151
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 07:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mara Rinn wrote:What about expanding the role of titans to deliberately include blapping subcaps?
This has been tried. It did not end well, unless you think roving fleets of dozens of titans killing everything with impunity is "well".
MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5184
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 07:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
rodyas wrote:Poetic Stanziel wrote:Is it just me, or is it kinda hilarious that the CSM reps who are weighing in most heavily on nullsec issues are not particularly knowledgeable about nullsec? Hans. Issler. And to a lesser extent, Aleks.
(Aleks is probably the closest we have here to a CSM representative who understands anything about nullsec.)
Hell, Kelduum should start weighing in now.
(Aren't there some actual nullsec representatives?) Null sec residents are all dicks. Their representatives are just continuing that tradition for taking the icelandic trip then doing nothing. Just to be a ****, just to be a null sec resident representative. Who cares about null sec anyhow? They don't care, why should we?
There's something you should read. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
5190
|
Posted - 2012.11.22 14:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
rodyas wrote:^ So we need each other?
You do know, the goons denounce and try to burn freeports right? As well as other groups probably would as well.
Perhaps, the idea of improving things is a bit wishy washy with how many players support burning stations and totally **** ******* other people in null.
I support "burning stations". But I even more support stations worth building in the first place. MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
6878
|
Posted - 2012.12.23 19:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:What are you expecting CCP to do with it, exactly?
Forum posts = attention = activity = everyting is perfect forever MatrixSkye Mk2: "Remember: You consent to unconsensual PVP the moment you press the "Undock" button." |
|
|
|