| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
39
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
New bounty system. Place a bounty on anyone. Get 20% of the lost value when you blow up a ship or pod of someone that has a bounty on them. Go inactive for 5 months to remove the bounty from your toon, returning the ISK to the toon that put the bounty on you. Since you have to lose 5x the value of the bounty in ships to remove the bounty, this will be an excellent extortion tool.... pay me X isk, or I will put a X isk bounty on you.... Also a great way of breaking up rival corporations. Someone is recruiting too heavily? Shut them down by putting a massive bounty on their corp. No new player is going to want to join a corp that has a massive bounty on it. (I know, I know... works as designed... Except most of the shenanigans the bounty system is intended to let you get "retribution" for, is done with throw away toons.)
Changes to frigs and cruisers to give each a dedicated role... repair, probing, electronic warfare(web, scram, jam, etc). New dedicated mining frigate ORE ship. New destroyer for each race. (eventually there will be a skill split so that there will be separate destroyer and BC skills for each rice, like other ships... but this is not happening until "early 2013". When it does happen, you will get the racial destroyer skill to the level of your current destroyer skill, for any race you have frig 4+ and the BC skill of each equal to your current BC level for each race that you have cruiser 3+. )
Rats will switch targets now. Not a big deal if you solo L4s high sec, but could be a big deal for escalations like mazes.
UI changes for how locked targets are displayed.
Changes to inventory window to make up for the disaster that was the shared inventory window.
Okay, I'm sure I've missed stuff. So, what am I missing?
|

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
361
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
crimewatch |

Nex apparatu5
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
387
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:30:00 -
[3] - Quote
I think you're overestimating the effect new bounties will have. Bounties will be exactly as relevant after the patch as before. |

Aziesta
Sathainn Braithrean Cartel Apocalypse Now.
128
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Inventory updates. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
What is this change? Details please.
|

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:37:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nex apparatu5 wrote:I think you're overestimating the effect new bounties will have. Bounties will be exactly as relevant after the patch as before.
I hope you are correct, while I fear you are not. |

Doddy
Excidium. Executive Outcomes
361
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:40:00 -
[7] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:What is this change? Details please.
Why don't you read the forum section where it has been discussed for the last 2 months, or maybe the dev blogs instead of cluttering up GD? |

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers.  |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2763
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:43:00 -
[9] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:What is this change? Details please.
I think he is referring to how criminal flagging works, including the "suspect" status where anyone can shoot you but not Concord. Sellable kill rights also figures into that. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2763
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Nex apparatu5 wrote:I think you're overestimating the effect new bounties will have. Bounties will be exactly as relevant after the patch as before. I hope you are correct, while I fear you are not. I don't. The whole point is for them to be more relevant for those operating on both sides of the law. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2763
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 16:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Don't forget heavy missiles nerfed, most other missiles buffed. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Don't forget heavy missiles nerfed, most other missiles buffed.
I've been resisting setting up a HAM Tengu, because I love my 112k Heavy range... But since I've never done it before, I'll have to give it a whirl!! |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
166
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers. 
And nobody will miss them. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:19:00 -
[14] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers.  And nobody will miss them.
Cause CCP doesn't care about their RL isk.  |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:20:00 -
[15] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers.  And nobody will miss them.
This. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:22:00 -
[16] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers.  And nobody will miss them. Cause CCP doesn't care about their RL isk. 
If we're talking RL here, I'm sure Dr. Whats-his-name at CCP has already factored in corporate losses on a much higher scale from the released of DUST over the first 12-18 months than from those few EveO whiners that actually quit rather than failquit over something like a minor mechanic change.
edit: speeling |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Doddy wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:What is this change? Details please. Why don't you read the forum section where it has been discussed for the last 2 months, or maybe the dev blogs instead of cluttering up GD?
Sorry. Just recently returned to game after a year away. Trying to catch up.
I read the dev blog twice, and here is what I came up with.
1) if you steal, anyone can shoot you, not just the corp you stole from. 2) Logi pilots will no longer be able to just jump through the gate and back when they get targeted in PVP... 3) Selling kill rights
|

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:24:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers.  And nobody will miss them. Cause CCP doesn't care about their RL isk.  If we're talking RL here, I'm sure Dr. Whats-his-name at CCP has already factored in corporate losses on a much higher scale from the released of DUST over the first 12-18 months than from those few EveO whiners that actually quit rather that failquit over something like a minor mechanic change.
Except this isn't a minor mechanic change. It's basically giving griefers a free pass to not be Concorded for as long as they have isk.
That's not minor. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
166
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:28:00 -
[19] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:Except this isn't a minor mechanic change. It's basically giving griefers a free pass to not be Concorded for as long as they have isk.
That's not minor.
Yo, bounty doesn't equal kill rights. Learn2read otherwise you can have trouble finding that unsub button you love so much. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:29:00 -
[20] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote: That's not minor.
We'll have to agree to disagree. This is minor in the larger scale of things. It will most likely get changed within 6 months as soon a CCP sees how much it'll be abused, and absolutely nothing of consequence will come from the change. How many times have the failquitter calls gone out in the last year? I personally doubt whether any numbers of any real consequence left the game permanently at those times. Tactics and play styles changed, and they will again. |

Sentamon
264
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:30:00 -
[21] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:Except this isn't a minor mechanic change. It's basically giving griefers a free pass to not be Concorded for as long as they have isk.
That's not minor. Yo, bounty doesn't equal kill rights. Learn2read otherwise you can have trouble finding that unsub button you love so much.
Read? Are you mad? Much easier to write complaints. ~ Professional Forum Alt -á~ |

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:30:00 -
[22] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:Except this isn't a minor mechanic change. It's basically giving griefers a free pass to not be Concorded for as long as they have isk.
That's not minor. Yo, bounty doesn't equal kill rights. Learn2read otherwise you can have trouble finding that unsub button you love so much.
See
LHA Tarawa wrote: 3) Selling kill rights
Selling kill rights, buying kill rights. In the end, it's kill rights, it prevents CONCORD from showing up.
And I already have the unsub button ready to go if this is the case :) |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:32:00 -
[23] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:And if those bounty changes are right, mass unsubs will follow from casual gamers.  And nobody will miss them.
CCP has gone to great lengths to make a game that can be enjoyed by both PVPers and carebears.
They have created a sandbox with different areas, that allow different players to enjoy playing different playing styles.
I believe that CCP saw the PVPers bringing war to carebears as a major problem, and came up with changes to the bounty system as a fix. A PVPer messes with a carebear, the carebear can slap a bounty on the PVPer as a means fo coutner griefing. Unfortunately, I don't think it will actually be used that way. I think it will be used by griefers to cause more grief to carebears.
I don't see any posts from carebears chomping at the bit to put bounties on the bumpers and gankers. I see lots of posts from PVPers hoping it will be a way for them to cause more grief to carebears.
Here is the bottom line: If, the new bounty system "messes up" the ability of casual gamers to play EVE mostly free from girefing by PVPers, and the carebears begin to mass unsub as a result, there WILL be changes to the new bounty system. |

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
166
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:34:00 -
[24] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote: 3) Selling kill rights
Selling kill rights, buying kill rights. In the end, it's kill rights, it prevents CONCORD from showing up. And I already have the unsub button ready to go if this is the case :)
Well, how is it griefing if you buy somebody's kill rights? Kill rights mean somebody got killed in the first place, so going after killer is griefing now? I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:35:00 -
[25] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote: 3) Selling kill rights
Selling kill rights, buying kill rights. In the end, it's kill rights, it prevents CONCORD from showing up. And I already have the unsub button ready to go if this is the case :)
You only get kill rights to sell, when they attack you, and you are not a legal target.
If you never illegally attack someone, then there will never be kill rights on you for someone to sell to someone else. |

Ginger Barbarella
State War Academy Caldari State
246
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:39:00 -
[26] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:If, the new bounty system "messes up" the ability of casual gamers to play EVE mostly free from girefing by PVPers, and the carebears begin to mass unsub as a result, there WILL be changes to the new bounty system.
The only "mass" protest I see happening, if anything, is that people will waste time (which they paid for, one way or another) to sit in-game doing NOTHING but shoot at non-destructible objects in game.
Ironic, huh?
Edit: on a quick note, let's not confuse a BOUNTY with KILL RIGHTS. They aren't the same thing. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
47
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:42:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote: That's not minor.
We'll have to agree to disagree. This is minor in the larger scale of things. It will most likely get changed within 6 months as soon a CCP sees how much it'll be abused, and absolutely nothing of consequence will come from the change. How many times have the failquitter calls gone out in the last year? I personally doubt whether any numbers of any real consequence left the game permanently at those times. Tactics and play styles changed, and they will again.
I quit for a year and a half after CCP's pay-to-win plans were leaked by CSM.
4 accounts x $15 x 18 = a tad over $1000 they lost from just me. I hear the numbers were like 25K lost subscriptions over that one.... quarter to half a million dollars a year. Seems CCP took notice of that one.
I hear similar numbers were dropping after the perm-a-hulkageddon and war on high sec began... thus the changes to mining barges to keep the carebears in game.
CCP has shown they do, in fact, care about how many subscriptions they are selling per month.
|

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:43:00 -
[28] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:If, the new bounty system "messes up" the ability of casual gamers to play EVE mostly free from girefing by PVPers, and the carebears begin to mass unsub as a result, there WILL be changes to the new bounty system. The only "mass" protest I see happening, if anything, is that people will waste time (which they paid for, one way or another) to sit in-game doing NOTHING but shoot at non-destructible objects in game. Ironic, huh? Edit: on a quick note, let's not confuse a BOUNTY with KILL RIGHTS. They aren't the same thing.
How are they not the same thing in this situation? From what I see, Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. Griefer B, in the same corp as Griefer A, buys kill rights to Bear B and then proceeds to kill them again and again.
Is this right? |
|

ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
25

|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:47:00 -
[29] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:How are they not the same thing in this situation? From what I see, Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. Griefer B, in the same corp as Griefer A, buys kill rights to Bear B and then proceeds to kill them again and again.
Is this right? I don't think so. If I remember correctly, kill rights only work for one kill. Unless Bear B is actually PvPer B who has a lot of people owning his killrights, buying them over and over won't be an option. ISD LackOfFaith Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
48
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:If, the new bounty system "messes up" the ability of casual gamers to play EVE mostly free from girefing by PVPers, and the carebears begin to mass unsub as a result, there WILL be changes to the new bounty system. The only "mass" protest I see happening, if anything, is that people will waste time (which they paid for, one way or another) to sit in-game doing NOTHING but shoot at non-destructible objects in game. Ironic, huh?
Some people play the game to blow up other players ships. Some people play the game to harvest resources, build stuff, and sell it to people that got their ships blown up.
Why can not both player types co-exist in the same game? Why do those that enjoy blowing up other people's ship insist on making every ship a legal target? There are MORE than enough of you PVPers to have plenty of fun blowing each other up. There is no need to turn every carebear into a PVPer.
NOR, more importantly, is it possible to convert a carebear into a PVPer. You can't make them play the game, so you can't make them play the game the way you want them to play it. Anytime you think "It would be easier for me to kill carebears if CCP changes...." just change it to "The carebears will quit playing and CCP will lose revenue if....".
You can't make us play a game where we would be little more than easy targets for griefers to use to grow their epeen by padding their KB stats.
|

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:50:00 -
[31] - Quote
ISD LackOfFaith wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:How are they not the same thing in this situation? From what I see, Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. Griefer B, in the same corp as Griefer A, buys kill rights to Bear B and then proceeds to kill them again and again.
Is this right? I don't think so. If I remember correctly, kill rights only work for one kill. Unless Bear B is actually PvPer B who has a lot of people owning his killrights, buying them over and over won't be an option.
Wait really?
Hold on. So if Bear B didn't pod anyone or anything, he can't get killed EVEN if Griefer A puts a bounty on him?
But is Bear B is actually PVP'er B, and he podded Griefer A in the past, Griefer A can buy kill rights, pop him ONCE, and then he can't pop him again? |
|

ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
25

|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:53:00 -
[32] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:Hold on. So if Bear B didn't pod anyone or anything, he can't get killed EVEN if Griefer A puts a bounty on him? Bounties are completely separate from killrights/GCC/everything crimewatch. Bounties are just a side-system to reward those who kill someone -- be it a legal or illegal kill.
Unit CA108AF wrote:But is Bear B is actually PVP'er B, and he podded Griefer A in the past, Griefer A can buy kill rights, pop him ONCE, and then he can't pop him again? Bolded the important part. The podding would give Griefer A the right to kill Bear B once (it gives Griefer A a killright against Bear B). If Bear B podded others too, Griefer A would be able to buy more killrights for more kills.
At that point, I'd just go for a wardec, but maybe that's just me. ISD LackOfFaith Ensign Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:56:00 -
[33] - Quote
ISD LackOfFaith wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:Hold on. So if Bear B didn't pod anyone or anything, he can't get killed EVEN if Griefer A puts a bounty on him? Bounties are completely separate from killrights/GCC/everything crimewatch. Bounties are just a side-system to reward those who kill someone -- be it a legal or illegal kill.
OK I think I'm getting this now. So, Bear B would have a bounty on him. But since Bear B didn't POD anyone, or PvP at all, no one could take out kill rights on him, or sell kill rights on him, because he never killed anyone?
If that's the case and carebears are safe, then meh, I'm fine with it. As long as the pubbies aren't persecuted by CCP. This could actually be REALLY good for them. |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
173
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:57:00 -
[34] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:ISD LackOfFaith wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:How are they not the same thing in this situation? From what I see, Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. Griefer B, in the same corp as Griefer A, buys kill rights to Bear B and then proceeds to kill them again and again.
Is this right? I don't think so. If I remember correctly, kill rights only work for one kill. Unless Bear B is actually PvPer B who has a lot of people owning his killrights, buying them over and over won't be an option. Wait really? Hold on. So if Bear B didn't pod anyone or anything, he can't get killed EVEN if Griefer A puts a bounty on him? But is Bear B is actually PVP'er B, and he podded Griefer A in the past, Griefer A can buy kill rights, pop him ONCE, and then he can't pop him again?
Pretty much yes.
A lot of people bleating on about bounties and saleable kill rights seem to be forgetting that if the player has done nothing that generates a kill right theres nothing for people to sell or buy. Using your example if Bear B has never killed another player or done anything else that could generate a kill right for someone to sell the only way he can be attacked is if the other two are willing to suicide gank him, which is no different from how it is right now. |

Unit CA108AF
Unit Commune Celestial Imperative
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 17:59:00 -
[35] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:ISD LackOfFaith wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote:How are they not the same thing in this situation? From what I see, Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. Griefer B, in the same corp as Griefer A, buys kill rights to Bear B and then proceeds to kill them again and again.
Is this right? I don't think so. If I remember correctly, kill rights only work for one kill. Unless Bear B is actually PvPer B who has a lot of people owning his killrights, buying them over and over won't be an option. Wait really? Hold on. So if Bear B didn't pod anyone or anything, he can't get killed EVEN if Griefer A puts a bounty on him? But is Bear B is actually PVP'er B, and he podded Griefer A in the past, Griefer A can buy kill rights, pop him ONCE, and then he can't pop him again? Pretty much yes. A lot of people bleating on about bounties and saleable kill rights seem to be forgetting that if the player has done nothing that generates a kill right theres nothing for people to sell or buy. Using your example if Bear B has never killed another player or done anything else that could generate a kill right for someone to sell the only way he can be attacked is if the other two are willing to suicide gank him, which is no different from how it is right now.
Well damn. I am sorry for bleating with the rest of them then! Thank you for the clarification!  |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:00:00 -
[36] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote:Ginger Barbarella wrote:LHA Tarawa wrote:If, the new bounty system "messes up" the ability of casual gamers to play EVE mostly free from girefing by PVPers, and the carebears begin to mass unsub as a result, there WILL be changes to the new bounty system. The only "mass" protest I see happening, if anything, is that people will waste time (which they paid for, one way or another) to sit in-game doing NOTHING but shoot at non-destructible objects in game. Ironic, huh? Edit: on a quick note, let's not confuse a BOUNTY with KILL RIGHTS. They aren't the same thing. How are they not the same thing in this situation? From what I see, Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. Griefer B, in the same corp as Griefer A, buys kill rights to Bear B and then proceeds to kill them again and again. Is this right?
NO, that is not right.
You and I are not at war, you have not stolen from me, we are not in null sec.... therefore, I can not legally attack you. I attack you anyway, and blow up your ship. You now have kill rights on me. (You can blow up one of my ships without getting a suspect or criminal flag). You are not a PVPer, so have no use for the kill rights. So, you put the kill rights up for sale. Just for giggles, you also put a bounty on me.
I fly into a system with another PVPer. He sees by an icon in the overview that someone has kill rights on me, and has thos kill rights for sale. He checks and sees I also have a bounty on me. He buys the kill rights from you, blows up my ship, and collects the bounty.
Now the kill rights are gone and no one else can "buy them" since they do not exist.
At least, I think this is how CCP "intended" the bounty system to work. In actuality, I think it will be more like this.....
PVP corp sees carebear corp running a mining op. PVP corp says to mining corp, give us 100 million ISK a week or we'll put a 100 million bounty on you every week. When the bounty gets big enough, PVPers will come gank your ships to get the bounty. It will be much cheaper to pay us the protection money than to lose 5x as much in mining barges/exhumers.
OR: mining corp 1 sees mining corp 2 picking up too many new recruits and mining too many of the belts that corp 1 wants. So, corp 1 puts a massive bounty on corp 2. Corp 2 has to stop recruiting, stop mining, and basically falls apart as players leave to get the big target off their backs so they can go back to mining in peace. To prevent the mass exodus, corp 2 creates a "new" corp leaving just a single alt in the bountied corp... of course, then they have to unanchor and reanchor POSes, unlock and relock BPOs, move all the players to the new corp, etc. What a hastle, just to get out from under the bounty. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
49
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Unit CA108AF wrote: If that's the case and carebears are safe, then meh, I'm fine with it. As long as the pubbies aren't persecuted by CCP. This could actually be REALLY good for them.
Just because no one has kill rights on you does not make you "safe". If there is a 40 million ISK bounty on you, and you are out mining in a 200 million ISK hulk, than a pack of 20, 1 million ISK destroyers can profitably suicide gank you. They lose 20 million ISK to CONCORD and collect 40 million ISK ( 20% of the 200 million iSK loss) from the bounty payout.
(Aside: I do not have any idea if it would really take 20 destroyers to take out a hulk... I was going with a number I assumed to be "way more than enough to do the job".)
|

Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
1670
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:12:00 -
[38] - Quote
Doesn't matter what size of bounty is on your alliance, corp, or person. A killer will only receive A % of isk on your ship/pods worth. Run as much as you like, its easy to put up several mil on your head. I imagine every single highsec pilot will have at-least a mil bounty in a month. I know I will be putting the minimum on every single unbountied player I see.
|

Schmata Bastanold
Black Rebel Rifter Club The Devil's Tattoo
166
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Unit CA108AF wrote: If that's the case and carebears are safe, then meh, I'm fine with it. As long as the pubbies aren't persecuted by CCP. This could actually be REALLY good for them.
Just because no one has kill rights on you does not make you "safe". If there is a 40 million ISK bounty on you, and you are out mining in a 200 million ISK hulk, than a pack of 20, 1 million ISK destroyers can profitably suicide gank you. They lose 20 million ISK to CONCORD and collect 40 million ISK ( 20% of the 200 million iSK loss) from the bounty payout. (Aside: I do not have any idea if it would really take 20 destroyers to take out a hulk... I was going with a number I assumed to be "way more than enough to do the job".)
Yes, you have no idea but you wrote it anyway. Just as other people who have no idea about most of things they create threads about spreading panic and threats of "mass unsub". Also, hulk will die because it is fun friday night corp party, 40mil of bounty is irrelevant. I am not my skills but... http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schmata_Bastanold |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
50
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
Schmata Bastanold wrote: Yes, you have no idea but you wrote it anyway. Just as other people who have no idea about most of things they create threads about spreading panic and threats of "mass unsub". Also, hulk will die because it is fun friday night corp party, 40mil of bounty is irrelevant.
What exactly do I have wrong?
Yes, I know that there are a lot of people that play this game because they enjoy the taste of carebear tears. They seem to forum in inordinate numbers too.
Fun Friday night? Sociopathic tendencies being expressed in a non-RW-consequences environment? Pathetic losers that can't win PVP against others that are looking for and are ready for a fight, so proving their manhood by beating up on people that are not prepared or ready for a fight?
You say tomAto, I say tomato. Why argue over semantics?
Some say that without fear of retribution from law enforcement or an all powerful, intelligent, creator of the universe, they would be free to do anything (kill, ****, burn pillage, plunder...). What frightens me is how many of these people are telling the truth when they say this. Have they no empathy? No ability to apply the golden rule? |

Merouk Baas
The Scope
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:33:00 -
[41] - Quote
Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B.
The only way to get at the bounty ISK is to kill Bear B, and because Bear B hasn't suicided anyone etc., there are no kill rights for Bear B.
Griefer C wants some bounty, so he does attack Bear B. But Bear B usually hangs out in high-sec, so this is an unprovoked high-sec attack and Concord responds, killing Griefer C. Griefer C may or may not have time to actually POD Bear B before Concord responds (probably not). So Griefer D kills Bear B's pod in order to get at the bounty. And Concord, which is already on the scene, kills Griefer D too, for an unprovoked attack in high sec space.
So maybe Griefer C was smart and was in a fleet with Griefer D, and they both get a bit of the bounty, split between the both of them. However, Griefer C has lowered security standing due to a suicide attack in high-sec, and Griefer D has a hugely lowered security standing for PODDING in high-sec space. And both of them have lost their ships to Concord.
And Bear B now has killrights against Griefer C and Griefer D. Which, he sells to Mercenary M. And puts a bounty on C and D.
So now Mercenary M has the right to attack Griefer C and Griefer D legally, and will get a bounty when podding them. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
51
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:39:00 -
[42] - Quote
Merouk Baas wrote:Griefer C may or may not have time to actually POD Bear B before Concord responds (probably not). So Griefer D kills Bear B's pod in order to get at the bounty.
You will no longer have to pod to collect bounty. Bounty payout will be the lesser of 1) 20% of lvalue of blown up ship / lost implants in the case of blown up pod 2) the amount of the bounty on the player.
Griefer C can blow up bear B's 200 million ISK hulk and collect upto 40 million ISK bounty (assuming there is 40 million ISK bounty on Bear B), even if he doesn't get a chance to kill bear B's pod.
|

Merouk Baas
The Scope
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:53:00 -
[43] - Quote
Ah, ok.
So, what's likely to happen is this:
Griefer A puts bounty on Bear B. A whole bunch of people check the bounty boards and see the bounty. A whole bunch of people head out to where Bear B is.
Some suicide-gank Bear B, lowering their sec but gaining some bounty ISK, depending on what Bear B is flying (the criteria for whether to suicide-gank still apply, it's just they can add a percentage of the bounty to the value in Bear B's mods and cargo hold, which may or may not be enough to justify a suicide attack).
Others try to trick Bear B into flagging up somehow, stealing his ore, flipping his wrecks, baiting with "gift" containers, what have you. The flagging response to these infractions is changing, though, so we'll see what can be done to the can flippers etc.
A select third group try to trick Bear B into going to lowsec or null with various contract or market scams, to get him to where he can be killed with fewer repercussions.
In any case, a lot of attention is being paid to Bear B and his whereabouts, making carebear life rather miserable for him.
|

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
53
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 18:59:00 -
[44] - Quote
Merouk Baas wrote:
In any case, a lot of attention is being paid to Bear B and his whereabouts, making carebear life rather miserable for him.
At which time, bear B unsub's the account, and when asked why, says it is to clear the bounty off his toon. CCP then makes changes to the new bounty system to stop the unsub's.
|

Hate 101
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 21:54:00 -
[45] - Quote
read it 2 times too says kill rights last 30 days :) for players to buy them nice little icon on the players name so no one miss them when they out flying around nothing is going to happen with bountys wet dream of gankers they are the one that are going to be hunted |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2763
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 22:39:00 -
[46] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:Merouk Baas wrote:
In any case, a lot of attention is being paid to Bear B and his whereabouts, making carebear life rather miserable for him.
At which time, bear B unsub's the account, and when asked why, says it is to clear the bounty off his toon. CCP then makes changes to the new bounty system to stop the unsub's.
You boys make it sound like bear B is going to draw any special attention because he has a bounty. Thousands of characters will have bounties, no need to single out poor bear B.
You might also keep in mind that that bounty award will be split between all 20 members of that hypothetical gank squad. Not quite so attractive now is it? 
On the bright side, I suppose when he finally gets suicide ganked bear B will be able to point at the bounty system as the cause of his woe's instead of his own terrible fit for a change.  To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Kaaii
Kaaii-Net Research Labs KAAII-NET
15
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 23:04:00 -
[47] - Quote
I haven't read it anywhere, but will the bounty placer be known to be the one that placed the bounty on the bountyee'?
(yes I did that on person, no its not a joke question)

|

Arduemont
Rotten Legion Ops
710
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 23:28:00 -
[48] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:New bounty system. Place a bounty on anyone. Get 20% of the lost value when you blow up a ship or pod of someone that has a bounty on them. Go inactive for 5 months to remove the bounty from your toon, returning the ISK to the toon that put the bounty on you. Since you have to lose 5x the value of the bounty in ships to remove the bounty, this will be an excellent extortion tool.... pay me X isk, or I will put a X isk bounty on you.... Also a great way of breaking up rival corporations. Someone is recruiting too heavily? Shut them down by putting a massive bounty on their corp. No new player is going to want to join a corp that has a massive bounty on it. (I know, I know... works as designed... Except most of the shenanigans the bounty system is intended to let you get "retribution" for, is done with throw away toons.)
Changes to frigs and cruisers to give each a dedicated role... repair, probing, electronic warfare(web, scram, jam, etc). New dedicated mining frigate ORE ship. New destroyer for each race. (eventually there will be a skill split so that there will be separate destroyer and BC skills for each rice, like other ships... but this is not happening until "early 2013". When it does happen, you will get the racial destroyer skill to the level of your current destroyer skill, for any race you have frig 4+ and the BC skill of each equal to your current BC level for each race that you have cruiser 3+. )
Rats will switch targets now. Not a big deal if you solo L4s high sec, but could be a big deal for escalations like mazes.
UI changes for how locked targets are displayed.
Changes to inventory window to make up for the disaster that was the shared inventory window.
Okay, I'm sure I've missed stuff. So, what am I missing?
Didn't you already open this thread before? Your flogging a dead horse mate.
As you said "Working as intended".
"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
906
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 23:30:00 -
[49] - Quote
Asteroid comes down from the sky and smacks into eve. Everyone in this thread dies. |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
260
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 23:40:00 -
[50] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Asteroid comes down from the sky and smacks into eve. Everyone in this thread dies. Good thing I'm not in this thread then!
Edit: ohcrap |

Miss Silv
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.11.20 23:49:00 -
[51] - Quote
LHA Tarawa wrote:
Rats will switch targets now. Not a big deal if you solo L4s high sec, but could be a big deal for escalations like mazes.
*Mr.Smithers' finger twiddling*
Eeeeexcellent..... |

Terranid Meester
Tactical Assault and Recon Unit
67
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 00:14:00 -
[52] - Quote
Placing a bounty on someone should generate a killright on that person! |

Nexus Day
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
122
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 00:37:00 -
[53] - Quote
I will trick Bear B with honey.
Or maybe a picnic basket. |

Lance Rossiter
CHAINS Corp
12
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 00:41:00 -
[54] - Quote
I think the most dangerous and probably amusing part is going to be the first couple of weeks, as people who don't understand the change suicide gank people with high bounty values but low value ships, and then wonder why they only got 40,000 ISK back in exchange for their battlecruiser (or whatever).
Given the threshold required for existing suicide ganking to be considered economically worthwhile in high sec, you'd have to be flying some pretty expensive stuff for bounties to be a problem for you there, assuming people understand how they work. |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
261
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 00:50:00 -
[55] - Quote
Lance Rossiter wrote:I think the most dangerous and probably amusing part is going to be the first couple of weeks, as people who don't understand the change suicide gank people with high bounty values but low value ships, and then wonder why they only got 40,000 ISK back in exchange for their battlecruiser (or whatever) Yep, I said something along those lines weeks ago.
Shederov Blood wrote:There's still going to be a lot of uninformed individuals about when this goes live. My predictions:
Day 1. "I just put a 200mil bounty on some dude and I'm not allowed to attack him, WTF CCP!!!1"
Day 2. "I just killed a cruiser with a 200mil bounty on it, and I only got a 3mil payment, but it's supposed to be 20%, WTF CCP???!" |

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
54
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 05:14:00 -
[56] - Quote
While we are at it, there was a thread spreading information (was it true?) that act of "selling" killrights is going to be not some kind of transfer of killrights from on individual to another, but some sort of ability to magically turn a person into a suspect at any moment (making them attackable by everyone). Were those just a rumors? I maybe fail @ searching, but don't really see anything like that told by reliable source.
If that isn't right and killrights remain what they basically are now except for ability to transfer them, then I'm ok with that. |

Shederov Blood
Wrecketeers
263
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 05:25:00 -
[57] - Quote
Barrogh Habalu wrote:While we are at it, there was a thread spreading information (was it true?) that act of "selling" killrights is going to be not some kind of transfer of killrights from on individual to another, but some sort of ability to magically turn a person into a suspect at any moment (making them attackable by everyone). Were those just a rumors? I maybe fail @ searching, but don't really see anything like that told by reliable source. Those were not mere rumors, here is your reliable source.
|

Remiel Pollard
Devlin Security Devlin Alliance
125
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 05:39:00 -
[58] - Quote
Shederov Blood wrote:Barrogh Habalu wrote:While we are at it, there was a thread spreading information (was it true?) that act of "selling" killrights is going to be not some kind of transfer of killrights from on individual to another, but some sort of ability to magically turn a person into a suspect at any moment (making them attackable by everyone). Were those just a rumors? I maybe fail @ searching, but don't really see anything like that told by reliable source. Those were not mere rumors, here is your reliable source. A reliable source wrote:Kill rights are bought GÇ£on the spotGÇ¥ in space, i.e. if you select a player in space and that player has a kill right on him for sale, you can buy & activate (one action) it right then and there. This immediately puts a Suspect Flag on the target, thus allowing you and others in your vicinity to attack the target. If the target player is killed while under a Suspect flag, then the kill right is GÇÿspentGÇÖ. If the target manages to escape and the Suspect flag timer (15 minutes) lapses, the kill right is still available to be purchased (activated) later on.
Actually, I like this. If you've got kill rights levelled against you, then why shouldn't the player who has them have a better opportunity for revenge?
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
2763
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 06:25:00 -
[59] - Quote
Kaaii wrote:I haven't read it anywhere, but will the bounty placer be known to be the one that placed the bounty on the bountyee'? (yes I did that on person, no its not a joke question)  I tried to find the quote and failed , however Punkturis responded in another thread saying that they decided to allow the person that receives the bounty to know who placed it on them (or contributed to it).
So yes they will know who set the bounty and no, you can't place a bounty on someone for no apparent reason and not have to deal with the repercussions eventually. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

LHA Tarawa
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
59
|
Posted - 2012.11.21 16:32:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kaaii wrote:I haven't read it anywhere, but will the bounty placer be known to be the one that placed the bounty on the bountyee'? (yes I did that on person, no its not a joke question) 
I asked the question and got a response direct from a DEV. Yes. When you place a bounty on someone, they will get an eve mail telling them who put the bounty on them and how much the bounty is.. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |