Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Napoleon Baleine
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 04:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ |

Liam Inkuras
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
10
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 04:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Because you want your opponents to truly poop themselves when they see a few blops on scan, knowing that the closely portion must be in tow . Also, it would get crazy because you'd had blops warping in at 0, uncloaking, opening the can of whoopass, and then leaving. |

fukier
Flatline.
175
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 05:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
it would be cool if blops could mjd cloaked.... At the end of the game both the pawn and the Queen go in the same box. |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
843
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 05:40:00 -
[4] - Quote
Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? 14 |

Napoleon Baleine
The Scope Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 05:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
I want to warp cloaked so I can have a cloaky BS capable of solo nullsec exploration :D (I don't have tengu skills yet). |

Gingerlord
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 08:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
If you get a covert cyno scanning alt you can park the blops safe and when you find a good site, cyno in. |

Aurelius Valentius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
205
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 08:46:00 -
[7] - Quote
I find that being uncloaked in warp is terrible, all that lack of being able to be intereacted with [other then bubbles] is so scary... and when I come out, and have 30 seconds [usually] to click the move and then cloak button.... it's nerve racking... ok maybe not.
I think the issue is this - newer to this concept of B/O you think it's a big C/O ship it should be like that with a butt-load of hurt... but then you find out it can't use the C/O cloak... bummer... this all before you fly one... then if you ever do fly one you realize it doesn't need it, doesn't make it better, doesn't do anything, but it does seem to steal the whole point of a cyno C/O ship then... they would be pointless almost...
The idea I think is this, team work - few things in EVE seem to be still dependent on team-work, at least game mech wise... that isn't being chipped at towards more solo play - mining for instance just got [and I am not complaining at all, since I solo mine] a big move to solo play, what we need is more move towards you have to have someone else with you to make it work best [well other than mining, since miners are a paranoid reculsive hermit cave dwelling survivalist belt-dwelling ore munching freaks... but useful]; nah B/Os don't need them, the C/O ship need something to do in game, they are bloody useless in just about everything else but a cyno beacon. Look at all the Macks in local...impressive...very impressive...I see you have fashioned a new exhumer...much like you father's... your skills as a miner are now complete...indeed you are powerful as CCP Devs have foreseen. <- 204 people are obviously confused. |

ilammy
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 09:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
You tackle things. You light a covert cyno. BO ships jumping in. Big scary blue jump stuff, instalock of the BOs, your target dies. The BOs appear on top of the victim instantaneously! They even don't need to be in the system! That's much better than a cloaked warp. |

Alberik
Eusebius Corporation
10
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 18:04:00 -
[9] - Quote
ccp cant do anything on this matter. its the eve universe physics that dont allow such huge masses to warp cloaked |

Solutio Letum
Lost Dawn Chaos Stealth Syndicate
1
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 21:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
Alberik wrote:ccp cant do anything on this matter. its the eve universe physics that dont allow such huge masses to warp cloaked
lols, if thats true im sorry but this was a good one xD
ok well id love to see this happen but thats the only reason to keep covert jump briges really, they are only there to jump into a close system on top of what they want without anyproblems, hell even gets you around faster... and if you wanna solo in a Blackops ships PvE in null you are CRAZY... you know that bubbles also catch these ships rigth? and that even if you cloak anyone has a couple seconds to get on top of you, any fast frigs would get 2 km and scram you without problems..... |

ilammy
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 22:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alberik wrote:ccp cant do anything on this matter. its the eve universe physics that dont allow such huge masses to warp cloaked LIAR!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Ti9-p08LaA |

Gneeznow
Ship spinners inc
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 22:39:00 -
[12] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what?
Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to? |

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
179
|
Posted - 2012.11.29 23:23:00 -
[13] - Quote
Gneeznow wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to?
yes they can - provided you gimp your combat effectiveness by usng a mediocre in combat subsystem on it.
Black ops dont have to do that hence should not be allowed to warp cloaked.
And before you carry on qqing about it show me any current ship that can warp cloaked and have anything like the combat potential of a black ops. |

Akuma Tsukai
24th Imperial Crusade Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 00:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Gneeznow wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to? yes they can - provided you gimp your combat effectiveness by usng a mediocre in combat subsystem on it. Black ops dont have to do that hence should not be allowed to warp cloaked. And before you carry on qqing about it show me any current ship that can warp cloaked and have anything like the combat potential of a black ops. Wait a sec, BO has combat potential??? Did i miss their buff or something? |

Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
178
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 03:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what?
1. So you can keep up with every other ship in the black ops gang, instead of having a several hundred million isk jump portal.
2. So you can get rid of the cloaked velocity bonus, and give them a combat bonus instead so they can be used in combat, instead of having a several hundred million isk jump portal.
3. Let's hear some ACTUAL arguments against it, aside from "giving everything a cov ops cloak is lazy balancing" |

Kosetzu
Avitus Lugus
17
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 04:55:00 -
[16] - Quote
Dorian Wylde wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? 1. So you can keep up with every other ship in the black ops gang, instead of having a several hundred million isk jump portal. 2. So you can get rid of the cloaked velocity bonus, and give them a combat bonus instead so they can be used in combat, instead of having a several hundred million isk jump portal. 3. Let's hear some ACTUAL arguments against it, aside from "giving everything a cov ops cloak is lazy balancing" Not to mention it's a pain when you warp the BOps on grid and it uncloaks half your gang... Even when you take great care with this it happends sometimes.
The BOps does have combat bonuses if you look at them, but they're not very easy to keep alive unless you can bring ECM to keep them safe, which seems stupid that you have to bring one thing to use the other with such a ship.
I agree that replacing the cloaked velocity with a cov ops cloak would be worth it. Would actually move slower with the cov ops cloak actually, and make the ship a proper cloaky like its intended use would suggest.
Not much of a surprise in warping a BOps on grid either, you can see them exit warp and have time to gtfo unless already tackled. Making it a MUST to covdrop it in their face seems to limit the usefulness of the ship greatly. |

Forum Chav
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 10:22:00 -
[17] - Quote
Gneeznow wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to?
This. |

Escomboli
Hammer Holding Wrong Hole.
3
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 18:23:00 -
[18] - Quote
CCP already stated that Blops were due for a major overhaul "soon".
From what I remember reading they will be broken into two separate ships. One will be more of a support, and one more of a dps. One will have bridging, one will not. This is about all the info they gave on the subject.
Blops are in desperate need of some good buffs though. They have been for years. They are basically an expensive, super skill intensive jump bridge for cov-ops. That is it. |

Dorian Wylde
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
179
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 19:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kosetzu wrote: Not to mention it's a pain when you warp the BOps on grid and it uncloaks half your gang... Even when you take great care with this it happends sometimes.
The BOps does have combat bonuses if you look at them, but they're not very easy to keep alive unless you can bring ECM to keep them safe, which seems stupid that you have to bring one thing to use the other with such a ship.
I agree that replacing the cloaked velocity with a cov ops cloak would be worth it. Would actually move slower with the cov ops cloak actually, and make the ship a proper cloaky like its intended use would suggest.
Not much of a surprise in warping a BOps on grid either, you can see them exit warp and have time to gtfo unless already tackled. Making it a MUST to covdrop it in their face seems to limit the usefulness of the ship greatly.
I know they do have some, but it's that 4th bonus that irks me. Covert ops cloak does 2 things: lets you move at full speed, and lets you warp. That bonus is giving you one of those things. What is the point in not just giving it the other?
It doesn't even have to be a DPS bonus. One of the biggest complaints I see is the fuel usage. Make that 4th bonus a reduction in fuel costs. Just something besides what you can give it with a module type that it's already fitting anyway. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 23:00:00 -
[20] - Quote
Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/
Wait 4th December and you'll be able to. Be patient. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2012.11.30 23:02:00 -
[21] - Quote
Gneeznow wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to?
"the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' as you call it, can warp all around cloaked but trades something for it you seem not able to realize.
|

Hatsumi Kobayashi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
231
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 00:27:00 -
[22] - Quote
Because there would be more people using it as the next level coward PvE ship than as a ganking platforms.
Because a jump drive is much better, despite its drawbacks (fuel usage and low range).
Because there are already plenty of ways to make them awesome on the field with a little creativity and effort.
Not to say that they're fine as they are right now, but just tacking on a covert ops cloak will hardly correct their flaws. The BlackOps BS are threading on a fine line between horrible piece of dung and overpowered and random, not thought-out fixes have the potential to be really disastrous. CAUTION
SNIGGS |

Midnight Pheonix
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.01 06:18:00 -
[23] - Quote
Moving BlackOps in a separate direction might be the way to go, keep the conventional cloak and give them the ability to use a set amount of fuel and jump to different celestials or bookmarks in a system while a MJD is equipped. It would reinforce it's role as a combat ship (or use this role on combat Black Ops). No need to warp cloaked when you can just micro jump to the battle. |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
640
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 04:48:00 -
[24] - Quote
So many armchair generals.
You can make a Proteus which gets 700 DPS and fits a covops cloak. You can use a BLOPs to drop this monster of a thing on some poor sucker at zero. It has point range bonuses, 60K EHP, and a sig radius like a dessicated walnut.
You could also just drop your BLOPs itself; it is slower, fatter, has BS guns with useless tracking and resolution, costs more, tanks 0-20K EHP more, and gets 0-150 DPS more, unless you have figured out the ridiculous Sin fit which I've got, which actually does 1100DPS. That's a beast.
I can't see why it would be so broken to make BLOPs fly cloaked. In reality, you'd just have people doing what they do now with bomber and recon gangs, except you'd have a bit of tank to go with your gank, and could deliver it all super-secret.
You would see a few people rolling idiotic levels of BLOPs gangs around ganking people (my vote: Shadow Cartel). But they do this anyway with cloaky Proteuses which forego the 700DPS for a 120K buffer tank, and then just hop in gangs via Titan bridge (ie; Shadow Cartel) or the old fashioned way of warping. It is not like having a BLOPs flying cloaked would be the only way you would be able to get about the place ganking people.
For wormholes, yeah, covert cloaking BLOPs would be pretty revolutionary and awesome. It would give you a cloaky-flying heavy hitter which could move about the place unseen stalking, eg, ratting carriers.
The biggest impediment to BLOPs isn't whether or not they can fly cloaked. Nor is it the cost. it is the hindrances which all battleships share, namely sluggishness, giant sig radiuses, guns which don't apply DPS well. Taking submissions for "Trinkets friendly Advice Column" via evemail or private convo in-game. Anonymity sorta guaranteed. http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Gibbo3771
AQUILA INC Verge of Collapse
282
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 14:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
Darek Castigatus wrote:Gneeznow wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to? yes they can - provided you gimp your combat effectiveness by usng a mediocre in combat subsystem on it. Black ops dont have to do that hence should not be allowed to warp cloaked. And before you carry on qqing about it show me any current ship that can warp cloaked and have anything like the combat potential of a black ops.
A Proteus.
/thread
|

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
849
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 16:20:00 -
[26] - Quote
Gneeznow wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Napoleon Baleine wrote:What is the main argument against letting these ships warp while cloaked? Would it be such a big deal? :/ Let's start with arguments FOR it. I have never heard any. "Because I want my B/O to warp cloaked" is not an argument. I want my Abso to deal 2000 DPS, so what? Because it costs 700 million isk and since the tech 3 ''jack-of-all-trades'' ships can warp around the place cloaked then surely a specialist covert ops ship should be able to? At the end of the day it all comes down to whether CCP thinks cloaky, hot-dropping and risk-free gameplay should be encouraged any further. I, for one, don't see how these things are good for the game health in the long run. 14 |

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
500
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 21:37:00 -
[27] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote: You would see a few people rolling idiotic levels of BLOPs gangs around ganking people (my vote: Shadow Cartel). But they do this anyway with cloaky Proteuses which forego the 700DPS for a 120K buffer tank, and then just hop in gangs via Titan bridge (ie; Shadow Cartel) or the old fashioned way of warping. It is not like having a BLOPs flying cloaked would be the only way you would be able to get about the place ganking people.
I like this post, since one of the most frequently heard whines in our comms is that we never DO blops enough, and when we do we never have enough of the battleships and end up with ridiculous dps pilgrims and the like.
I also think the last time I personally titan bridged ontop of a target was in 2011, so I'm not sure where that idea comes from.
You have some odd preconceptions of how we work mate, I'm afraid they are rather off. |

Norris Packard
Wings of Redemption Black Flag Alliance
43
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 22:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
I wouldn't mind seeing a new set of BO ships that were battleships with covert ops cloaks without all the nasty jump mechanics, but to give the current versions covert ops cloaks seems like it would be too powerful. BOs have issues but I don't see the need for the current rendition of them to covert cloak. |

Shaemell Buttleson
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 23:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
They are already successfully used as they are.
Because they cannot warp cloaked you need to be very careful with them and you really don't want to hang around in a drawn out fight so the high DPS are used the most like the redeemer.
The sin is hard to use safely unless you are prepared to lose drones a lot and therefore not popular for this reason. Seems daft to me it has the drone bonus where the Gallente marauder which is PVE doesn't have that bonus and uses turrets. That's the least popular Marauder also.
Anyway I digress, as I said Black-ops can be used very effectively but considering the price, their size and agility I personally don't think it would be game breaking to give them the co-ops ability.
|

Helicity Boson
Immortalis Inc. Shadow Cartel
501
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 06:40:00 -
[30] - Quote
I realize I had not weighed in on the actual topic, apologies.
What makes Blops nasty is the bridge and the jump to covert cynos, it has surprisingly little to do with cloaking in general; and I REALLY don't feel that EVE needs -yet another- covert ops get-out-of-jail-free shipclass. |
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |