| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 16:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
With the current changes to Cruisers and Battlecruisers, specifically the powergrid loss for various medium modules (arty, beams and heavy pulses), along with the changes to H/Ms and the loss of around 15% of the Hurricane's powergrid (225 grid), as well as the changes to ASB's, how do you see the current B/C balance changing?
In my (inexpert) opinion, we're going to see a lot less Hurricanes, and what we do see will be Shield and/or Nanofits. SeeBoing ArtyCanes may also become surprisingly popular. The Cyclone is taking a minor nerf with the ASB changes, but should still remain functional.
The Drake is going to be fine, with the Tech 2 missile changes cancelling out the nerfs to H/Ms, though hopefully we'll also see a few more brawlDrakes fitted with HAM's as well. The Ferox, I cannot genuinely see any notable change to.
The Harbinger is one we may be seeing a lot more of, with it's upcoming pwg requirements nerf. Might be a fun little beast to try out. Unsure how it's Tier 1 counterpart will fare, but hopefully, again, we will be seeing more of it.
As for the Gallente, I am even more ignorant of their fate. The Myrmidon and Brutix should, theoretically, remain unchanged, though with the ArmourCane's nerf we may see an increasing role for the Brutix as a heavy brawler. The Myrm, well, she's an odd (and cool-looking) beast but I don't see her changing much, aside from seeing more use in general.
The Tier 3s should be just fine, probably coming out stronger with the various nerfs to their Tier 2 and 1 contenders. But I don't fly Tier 3s that much, so I can hardly claim any great authority here. HAC pilots may rejoice a little, their days of being whelped by Battlecruisers...well, I don't think they're over, but the contention might be a little less lopsided. Cruiser pilots, especially kiting cruiser pilots, are going to have it a bit easier against their bigger brothers.
|

Dibblerette
The Phantom Regiment THE ROYAL NAVY
103
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 16:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
Small stealth buff to the Myrmidon in the patch notes, gate guns will no longer target drones I know my shield cane will be sad tomorrow, I still can't decide whether to drop a gun size or a neut size. |

Garviel Tarrant
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
254
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 16:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want. |

Zarnak Wulf
Imperial Outlaws
759
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 19:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
It's not only obvious but also partially confirmed by CCP as to what to expect. Tier one BC are getting a buff. The Ferox and Brutix can expect an extra slot (16 to 17). The Prophecy is becoming a drone boat an probably staying at 16 slots. The Cyclone, which already has 17 slots, is probably losing the mixed weapon platform. Expect bonuses and layout to change.
Tier 2 BC are getting nerfed. Expect all of them to lose a slot. This would put them all from 18 to 17 slots except for the Myrm which would be at 16 like the Prophecy. Expect bonuses and layouts to change, albeit less so then Tier one.
Tier 3 - all 17 slot layouts, will have their mobility slightly nerfed. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 19:13:00 -
[5] - Quote
Kamenev Drang wrote:With the current changes to Cruisers and Battlecruisers, specifically the powergrid loss for various medium modules (arty, beams and heavy pulses), along with the changes to H/Ms and the loss of around 15% of the Hurricane's powergrid (225 grid), as well as the changes to ASB's, how do you see the current B/C balance changing?
You loose 15% base PG on the ship it self, then arty is loosing 10% PG requirements meaning, with perfect skills, you might as well downgrade some items from T2 to meta but it's not a real problem.
Quote:In my (inexpert) opinion, we're going to see a lot less Hurricanes, and what we do see will be Shield and/or Nanofits. SeeBoing ArtyCanes may also become surprisingly popular. The Cyclone is taking a minor nerf with the ASB changes, but should still remain functional.
Why should we see less hurricanes? -biggest nerf hurricane got was scan res nerf (deserved), this pg thing is nothing and takes absolutely nothing from ship abilities or interest.
As long as Brutix is only good for mining barges/freighters ganks, battlecruisers will not be balanced and seems this was what this iteration was about, balancing those. Then we no longer will have Tiers but role ships, and this is when I'm happy for having them all.
|

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 19:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:[
You loose 15% base PG on the ship it self, then arty is loosing 10% PG requirements meaning, with perfect skills, you might as well downgrade some items from T2 to meta but it's not a real problem.
10% less cost for Cruiser arty is great, for artillery fitted ships, but it does not address the issues of brawler fits.
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Why should we see less hurricanes? -biggest nerf hurricane got was scan res nerf (deserved), this pg thing is nothing and takes absolutely nothing from ship abilities or interest.
The inability to fit an armour (specifically, 1600mm-plated) fit would seem to me, as a Hurricane pilot, to kill one of the rather popular fits - the buffer-fit tackle 'Cane. While the Shield Cane is going to remain viable as ever, it does mean the ship loses versatility of fit. |

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2012.12.03 19:33:00 -
[7] - Quote
Kamenev Drang wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:[
You loose 15% base PG on the ship it self, then arty is loosing 10% PG requirements meaning, with perfect skills, you might as well downgrade some items from T2 to meta but it's not a real problem.
10% less cost for Cruiser arty is great, for artillery fitted ships, but it does not address the issues of brawler fits. Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Why should we see less hurricanes? -biggest nerf hurricane got was scan res nerf (deserved), this pg thing is nothing and takes absolutely nothing from ship abilities or interest.
The inability to fit an armour (specifically, 1600mm-plated) fit would seem to me, as a Hurricane pilot, to kill one of the rather popular fits - the buffer-fit tackle 'Cane. While the Shield Cane is going to remain viable as ever, it does mean the ship loses versatility of fit.
Well, 220's instead of 425's or 800 instead of 1600 means only this ship now requires some decisions, this is good. Which other ship had more pg/cpu than it could use all fitted? -none
Once again I think this will change nothing about what you can do with but just bring it on pair with other bc's. Hurricane was far too good at everything: lots of high's, lots of mids and lows hell sometimes for trolling CCP some of us even asked more mids/lows to use all the pg/cpu available. I think this was a good decision from CCP. |

Herr Hammer Draken
167
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 02:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
BC's are going to have the major rebalance in the next summer update. These are just a few minor changes happening now to BC's. It is much too early to be deciding upon which BC to fly after the rebalance as they are not being done now. Herr Hammer Draken "The Amarr Prophet" |

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 14:39:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:Kamenev Drang wrote:Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:[
You loose 15% base PG on the ship it self, then arty is loosing 10% PG requirements meaning, with perfect skills, you might as well downgrade some items from T2 to meta but it's not a real problem.
10% less cost for Cruiser arty is great, for artillery fitted ships, but it does not address the issues of brawler fits. Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote: Why should we see less hurricanes? -biggest nerf hurricane got was scan res nerf (deserved), this pg thing is nothing and takes absolutely nothing from ship abilities or interest.
The inability to fit an armour (specifically, 1600mm-plated) fit would seem to me, as a Hurricane pilot, to kill one of the rather popular fits - the buffer-fit tackle 'Cane. While the Shield Cane is going to remain viable as ever, it does mean the ship loses versatility of fit. Well, 220's instead of 425's or 800 instead of 1600 means only this ship now requires some decisions, this is good. Which other ship had more pg/cpu than it could use all fitted? -none Once again I think this will change nothing about what you can do with but just bring it on pair with other bc's. Hurricane was far too good at everything: lots of high's, lots of mids and lows hell sometimes for trolling CCP some of us even asked more mids/lows to use all the pg/cpu available. I think this was a good decision from CCP.
It's a fairly significant nerf. I'll freely admit to being something of a Hurricane jockey, but now neither the 425/buffer/neut cane is very viable, nor is the 1600+220 Cane. And having to drop a plate size and a gun size is hardly a decision, it's just an automatic downgrade.
The Drake, on the other hand, hasn't really had a significant nerf to it's tank, and while H/Ms are being nerfed, the Tech 2 missile buff will more than make up for that.
As for other BC's, again, freely admit I don't fly them yet as I don't have the skills.
The Harbinger is looking very tempting with the grid reduction to all it's guns. The Myrm I'd always been interested in, though I need the drone skills. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession Brothers of Apocrypha.
89
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 14:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Herr Hammer Draken wrote:BC's are going to have the major rebalance in the next summer update. These are just a few minor changes happening now to BC's. It is much too early to be deciding upon which BC to fly after the rebalance as they are not being done now.
I don't think it's going to be this summer, remember the warning that the destroyer and BC skill changes were going to happen after the BC balance was done, and that for those with out V in them may want to do so soon. I am thinking late winter or early spring myself
|

Recoil IV
Black Rain Cartel
48
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 18:43:00 -
[11] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want.
wrong.425mm set + 2 medium neuts + 10mn meta mwd + 2x lse II = fail in powergrid.needs anc
same goes for pretty much any cane standard fitt. |

Liam Inkuras
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
13
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 19:20:00 -
[12] - Quote
Recoil IV wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want. wrong.425mm set + 2 medium neuts + 10mn meta mwd + 2x lse II = fail in powergrid.needs anc same goes for pretty much any cane standard fitt. Drop a medium neut for a small maybe? |

Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
850
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 19:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
Recoil IV wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want. wrong.425mm set + 2 medium neuts + 10mn meta mwd + 2x lse II = fail in powergrid.needs anc. That's cause you're asking way too much in the first place. Ever tried fitting a NH? That's how all ships should be designed - struggling to cram stuff into ships and thus having to make trade-offs is exactly the reason why we need CPU and grid concepts in this game. 14 |

Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
780
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 20:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
Fon Revedhort wrote:Recoil IV wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want. wrong.425mm set + 2 medium neuts + 10mn meta mwd + 2x lse II = fail in powergrid.needs anc. That's cause you're asking way too much in the first place. Ever tried fitting a NH? That's how all ships should be designed - struggling to cram stuff into ships and thus having to make trade-offs is exactly the reason why we need CPU and grid concepts in this game.
Using the Nighthawk as a template might be a bit extreme but I have to agree with this in principle. The 'cane was too easy to fit with all the damn goodies you might want. Now it's not. |

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
3
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 22:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
No, now it's impossible to fit with...well, anything.
And so the Drake becomes king? |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
44
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:01:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nighthawk will be interesting in a year, although I'm not sure how it'll be different from the redesigned claymore. Both will be shield missile boats, but the claymore will be faster and have a different shield bonus. I wear my sunglasses at night. |

Fronkfurter McSheebleton
Squirrel Horde Habitat Against Humanity
126
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:06:00 -
[17] - Quote
I want to see the brutix lose its armor rep bonus, honestly. It would be brilliant with a falloff or tracking bonus instead. There's no point in having TWO BCs with an active tank bonus, IMO. Triple rep Myrms are like what you'd get if you strapped a beehive to Robocop. |

Alara IonStorm
3714
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:18:00 -
[18] - Quote
Perihelion Olenard wrote:Nighthawk will be interesting in a year, although I'm not sure how it'll be different from the redesigned claymore. Both will be shield missile boats, but the claymore will be faster and have a different shield bonus. I would assume there would be a slot disparity, Probably one extra +1 to the Nighthawk, +1 Low to the Claymore.
I also I would not be surprised if the Nighthawk gets exp velocity changed to 10% missile velocity The Claymore might get a painting bonus instead like the HAM Bellicose. Last I heard they are deciding whether to put one on the Cyclone or makes its bonuses like the Breacher. I don+¿t think it will have enough mids though to make use of it so I kind of hope for Explosion Velocity.
That would make the Hawk a Range Dmg Application Brick while the Claymore would be fast and suited to applying it.
Claymore 5% Missile Dmg 7.5% Shield Boost Amount 5% Explosive Dmg 7.5% Painter or 5% Explosion Velocity
8 highs (7 Launchers) / 5 mids / 5 lows / 40m3 Drone Space.
Nighthawk 5% Missile Dmg 5% Shield Resists 5% Kinetic Dmg 10% Missile Velocity
8 highs (7 Launchers) / 6 mids / 4 lows / 25m3 Drone Space.
Something like that I imagine. If I got the mid / low slot count right.
|

Alara IonStorm
3714
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:19:00 -
[19] - Quote
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:I want to see the brutix lose its armor rep bonus, honestly. It would be brilliant with a falloff or tracking bonus instead. There's no point in having TWO BCs with an active tank bonus, IMO. I personally think they will Domi / Vexor the Myrmidon and bring the Brutix up like a mini Hyperion. |

Lord Calus
Fractured Core Fatal Ascension
61
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:25:00 -
[20] - Quote
Call the press, the world is ending. The hurricane can't have its' cake and eat it too!! |

Byzan Zwyth
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.05 23:40:00 -
[21] - Quote
I've thought for a long time that their should be some love for the tier 1 BC's
The logical change in my opinion would be to slightly reduce the sig radius and slightly increase the base speed of the Tier 1 BC's so they are in effect a little smaller and faster than the tier 2 BC's, maybe a little lighter as well?
That would make sense to me, currently the Tier 2's are basically better in every way. |

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 00:18:00 -
[22] - Quote
Byzan Zwyth wrote:I've thought for a long time that their should be some love for the tier 1 BC's
The logical change in my opinion would be to slightly reduce the sig radius and slightly increase the base speed of the Tier 1 BC's so they are in effect a little smaller and faster than the tier 2 BC's, maybe a little lighter as well?
That would make sense to me, currently the Tier 2's are basically better in every way.
Aside from the fact an ASB-fit Cyclone can still eat one for breakfast. |

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
145
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 00:23:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kamenev Drang wrote:The Ferox, I cannot genuinely see any notable change to.
Correct. It still makes a great gas mining platform. |

Lloyd Roses
Blue-Fire Tribal Band
6
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 10:06:00 -
[24] - Quote
And the hurricane's gas sucking performance isn't reduced aswell :D |

Robert Lefcourt
Audentia et Artis E.B.O.L.A.
11
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 11:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
Fronkfurter McSheebleton wrote:I want to see the brutix lose its armor rep bonus, honestly. It would be brilliant with a falloff or tracking bonus instead. There's no point in having TWO BCs with an active tank bonus, IMO.
Especially regarding the fact, that active armor sucks in combination with turrets that need cap too.
regards,
rob |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
45
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 13:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
Robert Lefcourt wrote:
Especially regarding the fact, that active armor sucks in combination with turrets that need cap too.
regards,
rob
Well, judging by what the devs said about the harbinger in their balancing blog, CCP will likely be improving armor tanking at the same time they balance the battlecruisers. I wouldn't mind the brutix becoming something like the current incursus. That way it doesn't become a less DPS version of the talos. In terms of their new system, brutix and myrmidon would be combat and the talos would be attack. I wear my sunglasses at night. |

Maeltstome
The Burning Red
137
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 14:07:00 -
[27] - Quote
Kamenev Drang wrote:No, now it's impossible to fit with...well, anything.
And so the Drake becomes king?
Drake always has been king. It's my most flown ship and i've only owned one for 6 months. They dont die and the project amazing damage.
Now they Do even more damage. |

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:38:00 -
[28] - Quote
Maeltstome wrote:Kamenev Drang wrote:No, now it's impossible to fit with...well, anything.
And so the Drake becomes king? Drake always has been king. It's my most flown ship and i've only owned one for 6 months. They dont die and the project amazing damage. Now they Do even more damage.
Yeah. It was just nice when the Hurricane was even something of a contender. Now ALL the Tier 1/2 BC's have been nerfed into awfulness, save the Drake (and possibly the Cyclone).
|

Praxis Ginimic
76
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 16:30:00 -
[29] - Quote
I'm a bit butt hurt that the cane got a Nerf before I managed to spec med AC's but I'm really exceed to try out a dual web nano HAM drake paired with a heavy tackle enyo or vengence. |

Jerick Ludhowe
The Nyan Cat Pirates Nyanpire
224
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 16:38:00 -
[30] - Quote
Kamenev Drang wrote:Byzan Zwyth wrote:I've thought for a long time that their should be some love for the tier 1 BC's
The logical change in my opinion would be to slightly reduce the sig radius and slightly increase the base speed of the Tier 1 BC's so they are in effect a little smaller and faster than the tier 2 BC's, maybe a little lighter as well?
That would make sense to me, currently the Tier 2's are basically better in every way. Aside from the fact an ASB-fit Cyclone can still eat one for breakfast.
Aye, so can an active tanked brutix 1v1 , doesn't mean it's balanced though.
|

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 20:35:00 -
[31] - Quote
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:Kamenev Drang wrote:Byzan Zwyth wrote:I've thought for a long time that their should be some love for the tier 1 BC's
The logical change in my opinion would be to slightly reduce the sig radius and slightly increase the base speed of the Tier 1 BC's so they are in effect a little smaller and faster than the tier 2 BC's, maybe a little lighter as well?
That would make sense to me, currently the Tier 2's are basically better in every way. Aside from the fact an ASB-fit Cyclone can still eat one for breakfast. Aye, so can an active tanked brutix 1v1 , doesn't mean it's balanced though.
So, wait, an active tanking bonused ship is better in 1v1 than the non-active tanking Tier 2...
And this isn't balanced?
HOW EVEN? I mean, yes, the active-tank bonused ship will not be as good in fleet fights where you have logistics and massive alpha (thus making raw buffer and damage the most important features), but that's just it's nature. You get a better skirmisher in exchange for not being as good a fleetfighter. That's what I call balance. |

CaptainFalcon07
Caucasian Culture Club Transmission Lost
54
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 08:19:00 -
[32] - Quote
I really wish CCP would not turn the prophecy into a drone boat. Drones suck and Amarr Drone Boats are mostly weak compared to Gallente in terms of dps.
The Prophecy should be a missile boat. |

Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery Swift Angels Alliance
650
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 07:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Crivens, you bunch of whiners.
Kemenev et al. in The Hurricane Sucks Party: if you want your 425 and dual neut welpcane, learn to Reactor Control II. Powergrid issues totally solved. Your argument? Destroyed.
As for the Cyclone totally eating everything alive? Now, 10% less due to the ASB nerf. And on that note, people can always go back to the old 720DPS buffer-gank fit I always flew, which now eclipses the canes of idiots too ignorant to look in the Engineering module section when fitting their Hurricanes. Er...yeah, I guess that does make the Cyclone OP, then.
As for the Ferox? The ship is out-DPSed and nearly out-tanked by a Moa these days.
The way it seems to me, Fozzie has moved the hull classes into roles. The role for an attack cruiser seems to make them push out between 450-550 DPS without going stupid gank. This is pushing at the lower limit of what a non-gank Ferox is doing and has always done, except you get out of the whole experience about 500m/s faster and 30-40M cheaper.
Bombardment cruisers seem to be hitting 350-450 DPS across the board. Given the tier 3 battlecruisers exist, these are gunboats which fit the Bombardment role quite well.
So. Looking at BC's, if we take the Hurricane to be an Attack BC, which with the judicious use of a single fitting module, becomes a benchmark at around 800 DPS. You can't make the Cyclone fit the Bombardment role as that is clearly the Tornado. So maybe the role thing will get a bit fuzzy, or maybe the vision is to turn the Tier 1's into EWAR Battlecruisers, which would be pretty interesting.
The Harby as an attack BC, is in the butter zone. It is equivalent to a Cane, DPS and Tank wise, and it is not really in need of a change.
Gallente wise, the Brutix will probably get a DPS bonus of some sort, and be spruced up to fit a beefier shield tank - losing the rep bonus maybe. It is pretty naive to think any armour ship can compete with ASB's and the surgery to restore active armour to parity with ASB's will probably see further things broken, versus balance. The Myrm is definitely not a bombardment platform and would fit more into the utility or EWAR field - leaving the Brutix as an Attack BC.
Caldari wise, Drake is the Attack role model and is basically fine, but the Ferox wcannot be the Bombardment BC, and better not get any rail bonus (Naga, CCP, Naga). So you really do start to want to see an EWAR role in the Battlecruiser hull class.
So what would a line of EWAR Battlecruisers look like?
For a start, as they'll almost all be Tier 1 hulls, maintaining the Warfare Link CPU bonus would be one essential role bonus to give them.
Given we have the Scorpion, BB, Falcon, Keres, the Caldari hardly need another ECM boat. Even the thought of a Ferox with 70K EHP tank, decent maneuverability, and 6 ranbow jams makes me /wrists. On the other hand, a tanky bloated Arbitrator style Prophecy; a damp-capable drone-spewing Myrmidon (ie; a mega-Maulus), a TP'ing kitey HAM-chucking Cyclone are all doable concepts.
So I would think the Ferox, in this role, would maybe gain remote sensor boosting (making it an invaluable pirate boat overnight), remote ECCM maybe, or even ECM burst or other bizarre bonus in order to avoid having to make an even more stupid ECM boat than already exists.
Minnie wise, if they do murder the Cyclone's awesome dual weapon platform and dumb it down to a giant Breacher, we should expect that it will be a HAM-chucking kiting ship with 650-750 DPS and a TP bonus. This will require 7 HAMs in the highs and the ability to kludge on 2-3 BCU's, a DCU and maybe a fitting module.
The Prophecy as a EWAR BC with drones will need to either field 5 Ogre IIs and utility highs (think: giant Dagoon) to get to 650 DPS, or be a Cycloneclone and Drake Clone, yet another HAM-chucker. I would hope they turn it into a bloated Arby with TD bonus, neut range bonus (4 x 24km mediums ftw) and 5 large drones for DPS.
The Myrm as an EWAR BC probably needs one more mid, a damp bonus, ability to chuck out 5 Ogres, and that's about it.
Under this fanciful plan, CCP would then be left nly with Logistic and Exploration roles to fill in the BC class, which I would think would be for some far future bizarro world where Scythes and Scimitars are no longer effective.
Taking submissions for "Trinkets friendly Advice Column" via evemail or private convo in-game. Anonymity sorta guaranteed. http://www.localectomy.blogspot.com.au
|

Kamenev Drang
Sacred Templars Unclaimed.
5
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 14:28:00 -
[34] - Quote
Trinkets friend wrote:Crivens, you bunch of whiners.
Kamenev et al. in The Hurricane Sucks Party: if you want your 425 and dual neut welpcane, learn to Reactor Control II. Powergrid issues totally solved. Your argument? Destroyed.
If that's how you destroy an argument, then please, never take up politics. Even the mouthbreathers in office now will WELP you. |

Sheynan
Lighting the blight
153
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 17:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
I am still very mad at CCP for trying to remove splitweapons, instead of fixing them. |

Alec Stacer
Raven's Flight Nulli Legio
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 19:16:00 -
[36] - Quote
Garviel Tarrant wrote:MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want.
really, then how come I can't fit 2 med neuts with my shield buffer that used to work? |

Tarn Kugisa
Infinite Covenant Tribal Band
191
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 20:44:00 -
[37] - Quote
ferox needs love it's an awesome looking ship IMHO but it sucks ass  I Endorse this Product and/or Service Source Recorder-esque tool for EVE |

Red Teufel
Blackened Skies Nulli Secunda
112
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 21:35:00 -
[38] - Quote
oh noes cruisers are a viable fleet comp now....what ever shall we do? |

Aria Ta'Rohk
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 21:48:00 -
[39] - Quote
HAM Nighthawk anyone? |

Kalel Nimrott
EG CORP Talocan United
84
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 22:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
Kamenev Drang wrote:Trinkets friend wrote:Crivens, you bunch of whiners.
Kamenev et al. in The Hurricane Sucks Party: if you want your 425 and dual neut welpcane, learn to Reactor Control II. Powergrid issues totally solved. Your argument? Destroyed.
If that's how you destroy an argument, then please, never take up politics. Even the mouthbreathers in office now will WELP you. Your toon looks like a clown, your argument is invalid. |

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
208
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 23:03:00 -
[41] - Quote
Just undocked my 220 Cane with modules offlined.... Looks like I have to lose the 2 neuts.
Confirming that the downgrade sux. |

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy Caldari State
238
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 23:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
Alec Stacer wrote:Garviel Tarrant wrote:MEH, AC shield hurricanes can still fit whatever the **** they want. really, then how come I can't fit 2 med neuts with my shield buffer that used to work?
Adapt.
[Hurricane, 425]
Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I J5 Prototype Warp Disruptor I Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M 425mm AutoCannon II, Barrage M Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Medium Ancillary Current Router I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
or
[Hurricane, 220]
Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Gyrostabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Damage Control II
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I J5 Prototype Warp Disruptor I Large Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Barrage M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Barrage M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Barrage M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Barrage M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Barrage M 220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Barrage M Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Took around 10 seconds to figure it out. |

Perihelion Olenard
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
47
|
Posted - 2012.12.08 23:37:00 -
[43] - Quote
Still looks overpowered. :D I wear my sunglasses at night. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |