| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
172
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 20:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brujo Loco wrote: I still will enjoy it for the simple fact it brings to an end a cycle of movies dedicated to the works of Tolkien ! The Silmarillion -only if it were made into a movie ...or better yet an animation (not 3D). |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
174
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 07:08:00 -
[2] - Quote
Grimpak wrote:Webvan wrote:Brujo Loco wrote: I still will enjoy it for the simple fact it brings to an end a cycle of movies dedicated to the works of Tolkien ! The Silmarillion -only if it were made into a movie ...or better yet an animation (not 3D). sensorial overload due to the massive ammount of data needed to process. no, really the book is awesome, but extremely complex. Yeah that's why I'd go with animated, would seem easier to produce compared to live actor film. It would be rather lengthy, not just a single 2 hr movie. I really like the animated movies of the hobbit and lotr (decades old), more the style but maybe higher detail. In any case, in that form, the animation work would be a lot easier compared to the older animated movies, all the hand work to produce those compared to today's computer animation tools. Not sure why EEEEeeeverything needs to be 3D these days though (CG and live), ...hehe much like happened in the late 70's for a few years and then died. Old cel animations still look awesome, have artistic style. |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 02:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote: That entire sequence in "King Kong" was so long in the tooth, I could not finish the movie in one sitting.
I found the entire film a dull bore, even though 'slow' rarely turns me off. I'm one who can sit endlessly through "Tree of Life" and "Koyaanisqatsi" (not even any dialogue or characters for that matter).
It's clumsy slowness I am talking about here, and with King Kong, Peter Jackson proved himself a master at that.
er the movie is usually in the top ten list of the year. IMDB has it at #3 after Star Wars and Batman. This movie was fail? It's on about every top ten list for 2005, and there were many big movies in 2005...
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:But Disney already made a failed attempt in the 60's and Bakshi's and Rankin/Bass LOTR were god awful. uh-huh... that's why they still sell them at Best Buy, horrible horrible movies... lol I have all the animated Tolkien movies, they're all good. Part of my collection, including first edition books I've had since long before the blockbuster movies and the recent craze they brought. But the cartoons were awesome, I highly recommend them to any that haven't seen them yet.
|

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2012.12.07 10:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sooo... Best Buy sells it among the classics, the other is top 10 of the year for 2005 (3rd to 8th) thus I'm just trolling ... lulz so yawn...
 |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
185
|
Posted - 2012.12.11 01:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
AlleyKat wrote:
The only thorny issue is really for the audiences who have consistently paid more for watching a film, even though the all of the costs of film distribution have dropped to practically zero. Previously a single print would cost a disty $2k. Multiply that by the amount of screens in N.America (35,000) and you get a figure of roughly $70 mill.
They've saved, we've paid.
AK
And still many of the productions move overseas (from the US). It even effects TV shows, where once good series were made, it's cheaper to make a reality show (e.g sY-fY ch.). Production, taxes, all the piles of cost here now. Not that this was ever a production here, but would be more costly if it were, and maybe never made.
|

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
197
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:04:00 -
[6] - Quote
It was terrible!!!!
haha made you look  |

Webvan
State War Academy Caldari State
197
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 14:14:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Eterne wrote:I deleted a bit of spam from this thread. wasn't spam, we had a debate early in the thread and I made a kindly joke here w/o animosity regarding the movie actually not turning out to be a flop as was my position. but whatever spam spam spam yeah... 
|
| |
|