| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
17
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 03:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
AWOXing in Faction War:;
As i understand the term its, When a player of an millitia attacks the other allied millitia player without provocation or as an act of piracy. Why they dont get standing penalty for their respective millitia. This is flawed, they should be penalized somehow, or dont appear purple at all.
von Khan Philosopher |

Aldrith Shutaq
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
126
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 07:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yes, certain Caldari militia members have been preying on Amarr members, especially ones who are not experienced enough to know of this. People are ragequitting FW because supposed 'friendlies' are killing them with impunity. It really isn't healthy for FW at all. |

Schalac
Apocalypse Reign
190
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 08:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
You mean like when Cal Mil would come down to help out slaver mil and get ganked while they were fighting frogs and slaves? Amarr is just as much an enemy to Cal Mil as the frogs and slaves are. SCHALAC HAS SPOKEN!! http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schalac |

Hidden Snake
Genco Fatal Ascension
164
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 08:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
no need to fix ... low sec is dangerous space .....
.... just to make it clear I am not killing amar people ....
... i am jsut creative in killing minnies and gallente ......  IBS recruiting >>> http://ingloriousbs.wordpress.com -á>>> questionable ethics >>> tears >>> happy snakes>>>frog cocktails free?>>>????-áPublic ch.: Basterds on vacation Hans resign from CSM! |

Mich Farmer
Nasranite Watch
11
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 09:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Aldrith Shutaq wrote:Yes, certain Caldari militia members have been preying on Amarr members, especially ones who are not experienced enough to know of this. People are ragequitting FW because supposed 'friendlies' are killing them with impunity. It really isn't healthy for FW at all.
I wonder why CCP marked Amarr militia as blue when there does not seem to be any repercussions from engaging them anyway, sec status aside. It's very annoying to see known wt alts and/or awoxers as blue in my local and as said, new people wont know the difference.
Perhaps I just need to roll up my own alt and go have fun. |

Cynthia Nezmor
Nezmor's Golden Griffins
83
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 13:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
As the greatest practitioner of the art said:
n++[ 2012.01.15 18:36:17 ] Adolf Ehrnrooth > you were in fully armed combat ship |

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
20
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 14:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
I get all that, and thats my point if i would have known that they are hostile i would have engaged. If they are allies they should be subject to the same penalties as shooting your own militia. Its very simple and i dont understand why is not like that unless its intended to allow AWOXing.
If this is the case there should be a way to label allied militia differently so you can be aware of the risk.
von Khan Philosopher |

Gunship
FATAL Warfare Reckless Faith
19
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 14:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
OP has a valid point and CCP should fix it. Come join us for Amarr FW pvp-áaction. More info here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2145548&#post2145548
|

Alec Enderas
Sovereign Front
17
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Why fix something that is not broken ? Can corpmates attack you, even in hisec ? YES !! So, why not treat 'friendly' militia as hostile until you know them personally ? |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
199
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:15:00 -
[10] - Quote
This
Alec Enderas wrote:YES !! So, why not treat 'friendly' militia as hostile until you know them personally ?
QCATs is recruiting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
22
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alec Enderas wrote:Why fix something that is not broken ? Can corpmates attack you, even in hisec ? YES !! So, why not treat 'friendly' militia as hostile until you know them personally ?
There is a process in place to deal with same corp killing, the AWOXer wil get away with it for a while until he gets kicked out of corp and thats the end of it, but for FW you could do this for ever without repercussion.
von Khan Philosopher |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
199
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:28:00 -
[12] - Quote
Shoot back? Actively hunt them?
As was said before if you don't know them, they should be on your overview and suspect. That goes for anyone in your militia or allied militia.
von Khan wrote: the AWOXer wil get away with it for a while until he gets kicked out of corp and thats the end of it, but for FW you could do this for ever without repercussion.
QCATs is recruiting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |

cearaen
Imperial Outlaws
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:31:00 -
[13] - Quote
von Khan wrote:I get all that, and thats my point if i would have known that they are hostile i would have engaged. If they are allies they should be subject to the same penalties as shooting your own militia. Its very simple and i dont understand why is not like that unless its intended to allow AWOXing.
If this is the case there should be a way to label allied militia differently so you can be aware of the risk.
You can give them negative standings and adjust your overiew for this. Put negative above militia. However this can cause some problems because then others who you had set negative might join your militia. Perhaps you set them negative because you didn't like them for whatever reason but you aren't willing to shoot them when they are blue. So now you have to readjust all those standing so you know who you are shooting even if they are in your militia and who you are shooting unless they are in your miltiia. Also you can use the color tag and the back ground seperate. So its kind of a hassle at first but this can be accomplished.
The real problem is the standings hit we receive if we attack them first. I do not know if you still get the standings hit if you war dec them. Perhaps someone from late night can tell us since they like to war dec their own miltiia.
But even if the wardec means you don't get a standings hit they can easilly jump to different corp.
There should be some sort of flag that applies if you attack your own miltia or friendly militia first. The flag means you are a wartarget for all 4 militias. Perhaps the first time you do this it lasts an hour. The second time it lasts a week. The Third time and subsequently you get flagged for a month. No standing hit, gate guns, or sec status hits if a militia attackes a person with this flag. |

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
23
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
Princess Nexxala wrote:This Alec Enderas wrote:YES !! So, why not treat 'friendly' militia as hostile until you know them personally ?
I dont think that is how Faction War is meant to be played.
von Khan Philosopher |

RavenPaine
RaVeN Alliance
208
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 15:48:00 -
[15] - Quote
When ships explode, CCP makes money. They will support any mechanic that makes ships explode. |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
199
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 16:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
I disagree, I feel CCP finds this type of behavior acceptable or there would be a mechanic in place to at least discourage it. I find it full of fail and the realm of bads who can't properly pvp, but it is a valid tactic none the less.
von Khan wrote:
I dont think that is how Faction War is meant to be played.
QCATs is recruiting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
23
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 16:35:00 -
[17] - Quote
I guess its fare to assume CCP finds this action acceptable, but what im asking is to have better labeling to tell apart allied militia or if purple they should play under the same rules as ALL purple. All im asking is consistency.
I filed a petition for all that is worth to fix this and I encourage you to do the same.
von Khan Philosopher |

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate
200
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 16:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Good point actually, give them a separate overview state, or add in the faction standing hit for consistency across allied militia. While I prefer the former...i would be ok with the latter as well.
von Khan wrote:I guess its fare to assume CCP finds this action acceptable, but what im asking is to have better labeling to tell apart allied militia or if purple they should play under the same rules as ALL purple. All im asking is consistency.
I filed a petition for all that is worth to fix this and I encourage you to do the same.
QCATs is recruiting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |

Abyssum Invocat
Justified Chaos
44
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 17:26:00 -
[19] - Quote
von Khan wrote:AWOXing in Faction War:;
As i understand the term its, When a player of an millitia attacks the other allied millitia player without provocation or as an act of piracy. They dont get standing penalty for their respective millitia. This is flawed, they should be penalized somehow, or dont appear purple at all. Have you tried shooting them back? |

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate
263
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 17:49:00 -
[20] - Quote
Adding the militia column to your overview will at least let you know which militia they are in when they are on grid. I do think the no purple/standings hit to your faction for shooting allied faction should be implemented though (my preference is towards the latter). |

Dzajic
65
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 18:11:00 -
[21] - Quote
Trolls, trolls and pathetic excuses for griefers everywhere.
With current (hopelessly broken) standing system you lose faction standing when shooting at "fellow" militia members even if they have aggroed you first, and have suspect timer and limited engagement timer with you. You still lose faction standings by just shooting back.
Btw Caldari, you appear to be running out of systems. Enjoy not being able to dock anywhere in lowsec, Soon(tm). |

Schalac
Apocalypse Reign
191
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 18:49:00 -
[22] - Quote
Dzajic wrote:
Btw Caldari, you appear to be running out of systems. Enjoy not being able to dock anywhere in lowsec, Soon(tm).
What do you mean? We are all switching to frog side so we can dock, farm and AWOX. It's like christmas morning over here. Tier 5 for life. SCHALAC HAS SPOKEN!! http://eveboard.com/pilot/Schalac |

Cynthia Nezmor
Nezmor's Golden Griffins
85
|
Posted - 2012.12.12 22:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
Just stop it!
A few people doing it, and some well known corps, it would take nothing to wardec them if you, or the noobs of Kamela as a whole has a problem with them. Of course it is easier to rant on forums, than run 1 mission to pay for wardec fee.
You bring shame to Amarr Militia.  |

Colt Blackhawk
Forced Penetration Reckless Faith
16
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 08:13:00 -
[24] - Quote
A lil bit off but also on topic: I had an idea today and if it works I think it should be considered as exploit (although using offgrid boosters is exploiting too in my opinion). For example: 1.) Haul each 100 stasis webifier 1, warp scrambler 1, cheap blaster into the warzone where you can dock. 2.) Create militia alt, join hostile militia, start to web scram and shoot friendly (with my main: hostile) militia. Rookie ship shoould be enough. 3.) Hostile militia needs to shot you and looses standings. 4.) If your toon is known simply create new toon. 5.) Procees until target militia gets kicked from militia due to loss of standings.
Would that work? I would not post it here if I would know that I am mostly dealing with mature people but actually I am really playing "sociopath online" and before some `?!$-º(/& gets the idea doing that (especialy against amarr militia because I have the feeling that minmatar militia consists mostly of 10year old children) I better post it here. If it works it needs a quick fix because it is a highly dangerous exploit then.
|

Colt Blackhawk
Forced Penetration Reckless Faith
16
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 08:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
Quote: What do you mean? We are all switching to frog side so we can dock, farm and AWOX. It's like christmas morning over here. Tier 5 for life.
Always enjoy it when people want to play simply the game^^ |

Hidden Snake
Genco Fatal Ascension
165
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 09:34:00 -
[26] - Quote
chatgris wrote:Adding the militia column to your overview will at least let you know which militia they are in when they are on grid. I do think the no purple/standings hit to your faction for shooting allied faction should be implemented though (my preference is towards the latter).
this IBS recruiting >>> http://ingloriousbs.wordpress.com -á>>> questionable ethics >>> tears >>> happy snakes>>>frog cocktails free?>>>????-áPublic ch.: Basterds on vacation Hans resign from CSM! |

Erehwon Rorschach
Air The Unthinkables
79
|
Posted - 2012.12.13 13:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Nice rack 
Chatgris Because your mum just couldn't say no. |

Glathull
Suicidal Panda Tears of Love and Death
1
|
Posted - 2012.12.15 23:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
Wait second . . . Let me get this straight. I can sign up, say for amarr militia and shoot as many Minnie AND Caldari as I want? Isn't that basically pvp Christmas all over high sec (and parts of low, I guess)??? |
|

ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
74

|
Posted - 2012.12.16 00:08:00 -
[29] - Quote
Clarifying what's going on...
The root of the issue: Retribution changed the "in my militia" overview state to "in my militia or one allied to mine".
What the issue is:
- Shooting neutrals gives you a Suspect Flag (used to be GCC) .
- Shooting people in your own militia (blues) gives you Suspect Flag (used to be GCC) and docks your standings with your militia to discourage shooting allies.
- Shooting people in an allied militia (now also blues) only gives you a Suspect flag (used to be GCC), and does not penalize you for shooting allies.
Previous to Retribution, the third bullet point did not exist, as allied militia just showed up as neutral. The lack of differentiation between "my militia" and "allied militia" is making it unclear who is shootable and with what consequences.
Please keep the comments constructive. ISD LackOfFaith Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
28
|
Posted - 2012.12.16 04:23:00 -
[30] - Quote
Thanks, i submitted a ticket before, didn't know were to post it so i did here. I forwarded this to the Assembly Hall now, Thanks for the help.
von Khan Philosopher |

Hidden Snake
Genco Fatal Ascension
167
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 07:33:00 -
[31] - Quote
Dzajic wrote:Trolls, trolls and pathetic excuses for griefers everywhere.
With current (hopelessly broken) standing system you lose faction standing when shooting at "fellow" militia members even if they have aggroed you first, and have suspect timer and limited engagement timer with you. You still lose faction standings by just shooting back.
Btw Caldari, you appear to be running out of systems. Enjoy not being able to dock anywhere in lowsec, Soon(tm). old information ... card turned in last weeks ....
IBS recruiting >>> http://ingloriousbs.wordpress.com -á>>> questionable ethics >>> tears >>> happy snakes>>>frog cocktails free?>>>????-áPublic ch.: Basterds on vacation Hans resign from CSM! |

Hidden Snake
Genco Fatal Ascension
167
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 09:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
ISD LackOfFaith wrote:Clarifying what's going on... The root of the issue: Retribution changed the "in my militia" overview state to "in my militia or one allied to mine". What the issue is:
- Shooting neutrals gives you a Suspect Flag (used to be GCC) .
- Shooting people in your own militia (blues) gives you Suspect Flag (used to be GCC) and docks your standings with your militia to discourage shooting allies.
- Shooting people in an allied militia (now also blues) only gives you a Suspect flag (used to be GCC), and does not penalize you for shooting allies.
Previous to Retribution, the third bullet point did not exist, as allied militia just showed up as neutral. The lack of differentiation between "my militia" and "allied militia" is making it unclear who is shootable and with what consequences. OP, you could take this issue to the CSM or Features & Ideas to get addressed. Please keep the comments constructive.
Still allows 1 week blast in case u use some throwaway corp .... IBS recruiting >>> http://ingloriousbs.wordpress.com -á>>> questionable ethics >>> tears >>> happy snakes>>>frog cocktails free?>>>????-áPublic ch.: Basterds on vacation Hans resign from CSM! |

Dzajic
66
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:01:00 -
[33] - Quote
What do you mean "old information". Don't you dare say my info on game mechanics and prominent FW players from summer of 2008 is obsolete, don't break my heart man. |

Bad Messenger
Nasranite Watch The Bloody Ronin Syndicate
302
|
Posted - 2012.12.17 11:25:00 -
[34] - Quote
CCP made new crimewatch and forgot that militia exists when they did it  |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
3440
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 04:35:00 -
[35] - Quote
I will warn you right now that AWOX-ing already has a tried-and-true, player-driven solution. Wardec the offending individuals if they are in a player corp, set standings and overview to view them as red, and eke revenge as necessary. I personally do not believe in an any kind of contrived mechanic to prevent purple-on-purple attacks. This is EVE Online, unsolicited PvP is everywhere, Faction Warfare should be no exception.
That being said, the OP has a point in that labeling two factions the same color while having differing standings penalties is confusing, and against the stated purpose of Crimewatch 2.0 which is to make rules and penalties crystal clear. I will speak to CCP about this and in the meantime, situational awareness is everything. Remember - no amount of visual distinction between militias will tell you who's about to AWOX you. I think the solution here lies more in the standings penalty than trying to encourage people to rely on someone's color to warn you of danger. Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|
|

ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
87

|
Posted - 2012.12.18 04:48:00 -
[36] - Quote
I'd like to point out that, for a more official venue for discussion, von Khan reposted this issue in Assembly Hall.
Also, Hans, the wardec solution does not work for those in NPC FW corps (TLF, 24IC, FDU, STPRO) since wardecs are not something they can declare or receive. ISD LackOfFaith Lieutenant Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Taoist Dragon
Forced Penetration Reckless Faith
91
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 05:03:00 -
[37] - Quote
As someone who DGAF about my security status
The 'allied' militia are neutrals as far as I'm concerned seeing as attacking them doesn't hit your militia standings. The thing that annoys me is I can't seperate them on my overview (unless you guys and gals know of a way i can?) as they are treated as 'allies'.
I'm amarr and the caldari militia is fair game to me unless my corp/alliance has blue standing with specific corps/alliances in calmil or I know them and have personal blue standing towards them. That is the Way, the Tao.
Balance is everything.
I'm NOT a Pirate! I'm a privateer! |

Zoe Panala
Blobcats
31
|
Posted - 2012.12.18 14:17:00 -
[38] - Quote
ISD LackOfFaith wrote:I'd like to point out that, for a more official venue for discussion, von Khan reposted this issue in Assembly Hall. Also, Hans, the wardec solution does not work for those in NPC FW corps (TLF, 24IC, FDU, STPRO) since wardecs are not something they can declare or receive.
Nobody doing this is in NPC corps, as you get kicked very soon. People use their own corps for this for years now. |

Gah'Matar
Knights of the Nyan
4
|
Posted - 2012.12.20 16:31:00 -
[39] - Quote
Zoe Panala wrote:Nobody doing this is in NPC corps, as you get kicked very soon. People use their own corps for this for years now.
LackOfFaith was alluding to the victims that are in NPC corp having no option to wardec AWOXING player corps.
So when I was in 24th Imperial Crusade, I could not retaliate. Now that I have my own FW corp, I can wardec. This is however an annoying mechanic.
Of course no one awoxes from NPC corp.
This could be fixed by making it so no corp may remain in FW if they have a player with -5 or below faction standing and check this every downtime. So awoxers would trigger corp kick quickly. |

Muad 'dib
The Imperial Fedaykin
658
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 15:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
this issue is why some militias find it difficult for corps to be confident with working with other corps and individuals, this is why esp for the amarr with its lower numbers, hard to combine its efforts safely and respectfully.
solving the issue however, since FW is low sec, is basically impossible, sadly. http://img299.imageshack.us/img299/4375/mynewsig2.jpg |

von Khan
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
50
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 19:10:00 -
[41] - Quote
This is the answer to my ticket.
2012.12.20 15:55:00 GM Nythanos
Greetings,
When someone attacks a person enlisted in a militia they should receive a penalty whether they are in a militia or not, even if it's an allied militia or the same one. If you are encountering cases where players are not being penalized for their attacks it would be best to file a Big Report with details regarding those incidents so that the lack of a standing loss can be investigated and addressed accordingly. If you have any additional questions or matters we can assist with please let me know.
Best regards, Senior GM Nythanos EVE Online Customer Support
von Khan Philosopher |

Zenethalos
Mecha Enterprises Fleet Villore Accords
15
|
Posted - 2012.12.25 19:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
I have been doing FW with Gal now for about 3 days. I joined a reputable corp and have been instructed to fly with only certain other corps. Not heeding this warning I joined a small plex fleet with a few vanilla militia members. First plex almost done, then I get tackled by a friendly. Thinking it was a mistake I ask him wtf on comms, no response and then a neut jumps in and they finish me off.
My first day in I had two guys offer to scout my hauler in for me. Figured it was safe as they were in a small corp that was on the board with some decent kills. As soon as we hit lowsec they tried to scram me on a gate. Luckily I was not a stupid hauler and had stabs and a tank just in case.
Rather annoying. The best solution is to fly smart and only work with those that have a good reputation.
|

psycho freak
Snuff Box
136
|
Posted - 2012.12.28 21:32:00 -
[43] - Quote
Trust no one shoot first shoot anyone that comes within scram range
just becouse ppl in same or allied millitia doesnt make them friendlys just another target unless you know them and fly with them regulary my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k
nop cant find it |

Spugg Galdon
APOCALYPSE LEGION
274
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 08:20:00 -
[44] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:I will warn you right now that AWOX-ing already has a tried-and-true, player-driven solution. Wardec the offending individuals if they are in a player corp, set standings and overview to view them as red, and eke revenge as necessary. I personally do not believe in an any kind of contrived mechanic to prevent purple-on-purple attacks. This is EVE Online, unsolicited PvP is everywhere, Faction Warfare should be no exception.
That being said, the OP has a point in that labeling two factions the same color while having differing standings penalties is confusing, and against the stated purpose of Crimewatch 2.0 which is to make rules and penalties crystal clear. I will speak to CCP about this and in the meantime, situational awareness is everything. Remember - no amount of visual distinction between militias will tell you who's about to AWOX you. I think the solution here lies more in the standings penalty than trying to encourage people to rely on someone's color to warn you of danger.
My biggest problem with awoxing is that it does not generate kill rights. Why doesn't it do this?
Also, does crimewatch consider awoxing a criminal act? As it really is because someone engaging someone who isn't in their corp or is at war with is, as I understand it, an illegal act.
Like I say, I have no problem with them doing it but standings hits and kill rights need to be generated. |

Fabio Bittar
Dark Circle Enforcement Templis Dragonaors
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 15:30:00 -
[45] - Quote
There is no such thing as unsolicited PvP.
Read the rules again.
You undocked. |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1137
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 21:41:00 -
[46] - Quote
Douche-bags exist in all places in life, intarwebs spaceships games. Just make a note of who they are, spread the news when you can, and never forget. Personally I'm thinking about setting up GSCs outside places like Hek/Boundless with the names of the AWOXers/Spais just to annoy them and make them flip. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." -á --- Sorlac |

Theron Urian
The Moirae Syndicate
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:07:00 -
[47] - Quote
Ok all of the unsolicited pvp blah blah blah aside, you are signing up with a militia group to further your empires interests and have an ally of another militia group as well.
Does no one find it kind of odd that the militia doesn't really give two poops about you shooting the allied militia and only gives you a slap on the wrist for shooting your own?
You joined in to a mechanic that endorse objective based group play to further the goals of your and the allies militia, sorry but it would make sense to have a large standing hit for shooting both your own militia and allies.
If you want to shoot neutrals go ahead, if you want to shoot evrey one then go pirate.
I understand eve is dangerous and all the "I am so L33T" jabber but this does not make sense from a game play or lore stand point.
You shoot a corp or alliance mate in a player corp, buh bye your booted. I don't see going to that extreme in this case but there should be some strict penalty's, that will eventually end up in a boot. |

B55
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 16:02:00 -
[48] - Quote
So.. since I mainly operate in Gallente space I was thinking of joining my POS corp into the fw so I have something to do while production lines do their work. However what I read here is troubling.
Besides being able to attack me with no drawback (save a standing loss) can other members Militia members attack my High Sec POS without any previous war dec and no drawback?
Am I better just creating an alt for this? |

Coryanna
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 17:10:00 -
[49] - Quote
I think you should use an alt. If you don't have one, I am very good at off grid boosting and have excellent gallente and minmatar faction standings. I am for sale here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=201968
|

Theaty Chelien
NEWB ALERT
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 03:12:00 -
[50] - Quote
Cynthia Nezmor wrote:As the greatest practitioner of the art said:
n++[ 2012.01.15 18:36:17 ] Adolf Ehrnrooth > you were in fully armed combat ship
Oh adolf...that moda_____ awoxes me any time any spot he meets me  |

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
828
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 03:22:00 -
[51] - Quote
Cynthia Nezmor wrote:As the greatest practitioner of the art said:
n++[ 2012.01.15 18:36:17 ] Adolf Ehrnrooth > you were in fully armed combat ship
Yeah as if getting your range and surprise is no advantage. Awoxing is definitely a way to pad your bc killboard but its about as legit as killing your own alts. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Fireflyb1
Walden 2.0
25
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 05:26:00 -
[52] - Quote
[quote=Aldrith Shutaq]not experienced enough to know of this.quote]
Unfortunately, this means absolutely nothing in Eve... |

Agustice Arterius
Couch Athletics
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 23:41:00 -
[53] - Quote
So the ingame message says
"We are at war with the Caldari State, and their allies the Amarr Empire"
That is actually false? Since according to this forum, Caldari State should treat the Amar as neutrals instead?
"We are at war with the Caldari State, and their sorta kinda not friends Amarr Empire"? |

Makavelia
Red Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 10:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
Omg ;p. I was thinking on giving FW a try but glad i read this. It's funy how the people killing say ''part of the game'' ''hardcore yo''. That's not real pvp lol ;p.. attcking somebody you are suppose to be allied with o0. As the other guys said, it's about as valid as killing your own alt.
And CCP are imo a bad company to dress up FW as allied combat. It appears to be nothing more than a place for vets to gank unsuspecting ''allies'' with no punishment. If you wanted to offer players more pvp with less punishment theirs easier ways to go abou it than dressing it up so newb players take the hit. That's such a bad policy and their is nothing ''hardcore'' or ''fun'' about it other than for the delushional EVE fanboys who think they are ahead of the curve.
But w/e, you can hide bad ideas with the ideals that eve is suppose to be a harsh place.. it's a load of bs though ;p. |

Morgan Torry
Arma Purgatorium Templis Dragonaors
104
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 11:29:00 -
[55] - Quote
Just throwing this out there: I have been in FW for over three months now and I have witnessed an AWOX only once...due to an overview problem regarding a pilot's security status overriding their ally status. No ship losses were incurred. So yeah...I hear about AWOX'ers and what not on here but I have yet, in the tens of fleets I am in weekly, ever witnessed a true one. Nor have I overheard griefing or complaining about someone being AWOX'd. Arma Purgatorium - For the State, For the Corporation Faction Warfare, PvP, Industrial - Open for Recruiting http://goo.gl/j1J09 |

Lin Suizei
89
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 11:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Makavelia wrote:And CCP are imo a bad company to dress up FW as allied combat. It appears to be nothing more than a place for alts in cloaky stabbed ships to generate tremendous amounts of LP defensive plexing while at zero risk to themselves
I see you made some spelling errors in your post, I have fixed them for you. Besides, if someone's flying a ship worth awoxing, someone will probably have a go at that individual, war target or not. Do your part for a better Highsec tomorrow - kill an AFK miner today! |

Dante Uisen
Push button receive bacon
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 11:44:00 -
[57] - Quote
Makavelia wrote:Omg ;p. I was thinking on giving FW a try but glad i read this. It's funy how the people killing say ''part of the game'' ''hardcore yo''. That's not real pvp lol ;p.. attcking somebody you are suppose to be allied with o0. As the other guys said, it's about as valid as killing your own alt.
I play faction warfare on my main character, and friendly killing don't seem to be a huge problem, i have not yet been killed by "friendly" fire. I'm fighting for Amarr, and i have not had any problems with the Caldari players i meet, so don't let the chance of friendly fire keep you from trying factional warfare.
I would personally prefer if they removed allied status, instead of changing the colors. Either you are allied with same color and don't shoot each other, or you are not. Having different colors, is the same as saying "don't trust that guy", so there is no reason for the allied status. |

Takseen
University of Caille Gallente Federation
208
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 13:53:00 -
[58] - Quote
Morgan Torry wrote:Just throwing this out there: I have been in FW for over three months now and I have witnessed an AWOX only once...due to an overview problem regarding a pilot's security status overriding their ally status.
Heh, I nearly shot at a friendly yesterday because of the same overview problem. How embarassing.
I've only been doing FW for a day but I don't think its especially common. Certainly the fleet I was operating with was happy not to worry about any purples/blues in local. And I'd imagine word would travel fast following a blue on blue kill.
|

Cearain
Goose Swarm Coalition
828
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 18:27:00 -
[59] - Quote
CCPs default overview is really bad and needs to be fixed. I think it places the negative sec status background as a priority over someone being in your militia. So most attacks on miliita are not from awoxing and ccp should give us a better default overview.
That said I have lost ships ot awoxers. I guess my combat ship was fully armed but I wasn't even thinking of attacking the 2 cruisers until they had me scrammed and webbed. I have seen other people getting awoxed as well.
I would agree that it is not so common that it should keep someone out of faction war now. But it is common enough that the "top ranked recent" battleclinic pvper is a fw awoxer.
Its rare that people in fw will refer to this as some sort of "art" or give them any credit like Cynthia Nezmor seemed to do. I will say local can be pretty funny from these guys. But on the whole ccp should stiffen the penalties and make the militias more aware of who is doing this. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Princess Nexxala
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
277
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 18:58:00 -
[60] - Quote
Agreed, this happened to me just this weekend, purples land, point me, so I blapped them. Found out later their FC saw me only as red and ordered engaging. It's annoying and while it does provide some "surprise" pvp and kills, I always feel a bit guilty afterwords.
Cearain wrote:CCPs default overview is really bad and needs to be fixed. I think it places the negative sec status background as a priority over someone being in your militia. So most attacks on miliita are not from awoxing and ccp should give us a better default overview.
QCATs is recruiting https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=146180 |

chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
357
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 19:02:00 -
[61] - Quote
A possible solution that would help deter awoxing as well as still allow people to join who don't have good faction standing could be as follows:
You can join a corp if you have poor standing: However, if you perform any action that decreases your faction standing, if you do not have the individual standing to remain in FW you are removed from corp and cannot reapply to any FW corp in that faction for say a week.
That way, people who otherwise maintain good fw standings and make some mistakes won't have any issues. Those who join a FW corp to repair their standings can do so as long as they are careful. Those who merely awox others can only do so once a week per faction. |
|

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
isd community communications liaisons
1967

|
Posted - 2013.02.13 23:22:00 -
[62] - Quote
Removed an off topic post. Please do not attempt to sell characters unless you are selling them in Character bazaar. Thank you. ISD Dorrim Barstorlode Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Silence iKillYouu
KA POW POW Inc Late Night Alliance
234
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 21:54:00 -
[63] - Quote
Everybody does it. Yes we should get standings hit for it but we don't EVE Mail me i dont check forums often. |

Kara Books
Deal with IT.
381
|
Posted - 2013.02.14 22:48:00 -
[64] - Quote
von Khan wrote:AWOXing in Faction War:; As i understand the term its, When a player of an millitia attacks the other allied millitia player without provocation or as an act of piracy. They dont get standing penalty for their respective millitia. This is flawed, they should be penalized somehow, or dont appear purple at all. ISD LackOfFaith wrote:Clarifying what's going on... The root of the issue: Retribution changed the "in my militia" overview state to "in my militia or one allied to mine". What the issue is:
- Shooting neutrals gives you a Suspect Flag (used to be GCC) .
- Shooting people in your own militia (blues) gives you Suspect Flag (used to be GCC) and docks your standings with your militia to discourage shooting allies.
- Shooting people in an allied militia (now also blues) only gives you a Suspect flag (used to be GCC), and does not penalize you for shooting allies.
Previous to Retribution, the third bullet point did not exist, as allied militia just showed up as neutral. The lack of differentiation between "my militia" and "allied militia" is making it unclear who is shootable and with what consequences.
Umadbro? sowwee |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |