EVE Search - Suggesting James 315 as the Highsec representative for CSM 8

Check My IP Information

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

Suggesting James 315 as the Highsec representative for CSM 8

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Frying Doom Zat's Affiliated Traders 1708	Posted - 2013.02.08 07:25:00 - [151] - Quote Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Frying Doom wrote: Yes I agree completely, you really need that edge, you should donate all your earnings to James 315 for the cause. Actually it is best to keep some ISK for yourself, otherwise it just takes longer to donate it, then claim the reimbursements back. Well you could always sell those shares......Oh wait I saw what happened when someone tried that on another forum Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 847	Posted - 2013.02.08 16:58:00 - [152] - Quote Frying Doom wrote: Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Frying Doom wrote: Yes I agree completely, you really need that edge, you should donate all your earnings to James 315 for the cause. Actually it is best to keep some ISK for yourself, otherwise it just takes longer to donate it, then claim the reimbursements back. Well you could always sell those shares......Oh wait I saw what happened when someone tried that on another forum Selling shares is completely acceptable. Of course, you can't really sell them for the same as what you bought them for, otherwise the person would just go directly to James. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
TheGunslinger42 All Web Investigations 963	Posted - 2013.02.11 09:54:00 - [153] - Quote I hope James bumps the outrageously awful CSM reps/candidates (trebor, ripard, etc) out of the CSM with the same grace he bumps bots out of belts.
Heath Major Eve's Celestial Ninjas 0	Posted - 2013.02.21 01:22:00 - [154] - Quote No thanks, James 315 is an idiot, go listen to http://crossingzebras.com/. If people don't play the way he thinks we should play then we should be encouraged to quit.
Agent Eunoli BRAB0 63	Posted - 2013.02.21 02:07:00 - [155] - Quote Heath Major wrote: No thanks, James 315 is an idiot, go listen to http://crossingzebras.com/. If people don't play the way he thinks we should play then we should be encouraged to quit. What a concise position you have. Perhaps you would care to elaborate why you think James 315 is an idiot? I also like how you posted the exact same thing in multiple threads. Were you unable to think of more than what you wrote? Cinematic HD EVE Movies: http://www.youtube.com/user/EveEunoli/
Amyclas Amatin EVE University Ivy League 6	Posted - 2013.02.21 08:32:00 - [156] - Quote I can respect the new order using force to "Fix" high-sec into what it thinks it should be, but politicking CCP is just low. Will the game really be better with players being pushed out of high-sec? With high-sec players outnumbering the rest, it probably won't happen. Financially, I don't see how nerfing high-sec would help CCP. Maybe high-sec players need to be more vocal in politics, but most are casual players who don't give a **** about what goes on in the forums. Anyway, I fully support high-sec ganking. Do that, and leave the mechanics alone!
Cyprus Black The Learning Curve. 661	Posted - 2013.02.21 08:39:00 - [157] - Quote After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works. Trolling is like art. Anyone can finger paint, but it takes true talent to create a masterpiece.
Lapine Davion Outer Ring Applied Logistics 538	Posted - 2013.02.21 09:04:00 - [158] - Quote Cyprus Black wrote: After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works. A Heath Major alt? I think it could be! Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 7744	Posted - 2013.02.21 15:22:00 - [159] - Quote IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
Karl Hobb Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium 1205	Posted - 2013.02.21 15:38:00 - [160] - Quote Malcanis wrote: IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? I do believe he was cleared of any wrong-doing after the fact. I wonder if that still counts in CCP's eyes? If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8.

Karl Hobb Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium 1205	Posted - 2013.02.21 15:45:00 - [161] - Quote Amyclas Amatin wrote: I can respect the new order using force to "Fix" high-sec into what it thinks it should be, but politicking CCP is just low. How is that low? High-sec is badly in need of balancing. James 315 certainly can't dictate to CCP how things should be done but he would serve as an effective sounding board able to point out bad ideas that would further the current, nearly intolerable imbalance. Amyclas Amatin wrote: Will the game really be better with players being pushed out of high-sec? With high-sec players outnumbering the rest, it probably won't happen. I can't see where people get this idea that anybody is pushing them around. Even if high-sec were nerfed into oblivion nothing would prevent you from staying there. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8.
John E Normus New Order Logistics CODE. 26	Posted - 2013.02.21 17:46:00 - [162] - Quote Malcanis wrote: IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. A vote for James 315 is a vote for a stronger EVE!-á VOTE 315 4 CSM8
Karl Hobb Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium 1205	Posted - 2013.02.21 17:49:00 - [163] - Quote John E Normus wrote: Malcanis wrote: IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. I'm detecting sarcasm, but I should also note that the candidate application period hasn't started yet. We'll know for sure when James 315 sends in his application. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8.
Cyprus Black The Learning Curve. 663	Posted - 2013.02.21 18:16:00 - [164] - Quote Lapine Davion wrote: Cyprus Black wrote: After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works. A Heath Major alt? I think it could be! Nobody puts Cyprus in the alt corner! Trolling is like art. Anyone can finger paint, but it takes true talent to create a masterpiece.
Malcanis Vanishing Point. The Initiative. 7752	Posted - 2013.02.21 18:26:00 - [165] - Quote John E Normus wrote: Malcanis wrote: IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. I'm just curious. I disagree with James on some important issues, but I respect his passion for his vision of EVE. However his passion is moot if he's not qualified to run. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
John XIII The Carnifex Corp 1	Posted - 2013.02.21 21:59:00 - [166] - Quote Malcanis wrote: John E Normus wrote: Malcanis wrote: IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. I'm just curious. I disagree with James on some important issues, but I respect his passion for his vision of EVE. However his passion is moot if he's not qualified to run. I'm curious what important issues do you disagree with James 315 on? Since you mention it. I think this will be a helpful exercise. :allears:
John E Normus New Order Logistics CODE. 26	Posted - 2013.02.21 23:26:00 - [167] - Quote John E Normus wrote: Malcanis wrote: IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. No "?" jeez, I suck I'd like to thank the EvE community for not busting my chops for that mistake. A vote for James 315 is a vote for a stronger EVE!-á VOTE 315 4 CSM8
Bantara Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance 22	Posted - 2013.02.25 20:25:00 - [168] - Quote Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Bantara wrote: Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Are there any other reasons[to not vote for James]? Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)... I'm flattered to see that you feel the need to reiterate my own points, but did you have anything to add? Is your sarcasim a passive-aggressive way of disagreeing with my obvious-even-if-indirect point? Let me point it out for you if you missed it, though I don't actually think you did... Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James...has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)... You asked the question, I provided the answer that you yourself listed.
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 916	Posted - 2013.02.25 20:55:00 - [169] - Quote Bantara wrote: Let me point it out for you if you missed it, though I don't actually think you did... Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James...has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)... You asked the question, I provided the answer that you yourself listed. Hardly a reason not to vote for James. Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. It shows that the scammer is in touch with all areas of the game - scamming is a legitimate playstyle too! Secondly, The Mittani is known to have scammed several supercaps, amounting to at least tens of billions of ISK, and he is the exec of probably the alliance with the greatest scamming history in the game. He was hands-down the most effective chairman the CSM has ever had. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric Vote James 315 for CSM 8!
Vin King State War Academy Caldari State 49	Posted - 2013.02.25 21:14:00 - [170] - Quote James' scam was done to highlight the EXACT nature of EIB, and in the end, James was absolutely correct. This highlights that while the man has had his doubters and detractors, he always ends up being shown as right in the end, and is known for maintaining his cool throughout! 315 4 CSM 8! 315 4 CSM 8

Bantara Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance 22	Posted - 2013.02.25 21:56:00 - [171] - Quote Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. And thus why I laughed. Do not confuse legality with morality.
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 921	Posted - 2013.02.25 22:06:00 - [172] - Quote Bantara wrote: Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. And thus why I laughed. Do not confuse legality with morality. You should watch out for confusing actions in a vidya game with morality, too. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric Vote James 315 for CSM 8!
IbanezLaney the church of awesome Caldari State Capturing 225	Posted - 2013.02.25 22:07:00 - [173] - Quote I spend my days mining away in my asteroid eating carebear suit in Hykanima. Why hasn't James315 come to bump me? It seems they are not serious about their bumping business which is a good indicator James315 will not be any good at CSM. No point voting for him if he can't deliver on his own services. Fix this **** See Sea Pea.
Bantara Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance 22	Posted - 2013.02.25 22:09:00 - [174] - Quote Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: You should watch out for confusing actions in a vidya game with morality, too. You are a human being. I am a human being. Morality is involved. You don't have to agree. But there it is.
Vin King State War Academy Caldari State 49	Posted - 2013.02.25 22:17:00 - [175] - Quote Bantara wrote: You are a human being. I am a human being. Morality is involved. You don't have to agree. But there it is. So do I need to turn myself into the police for all the times I played Modern Warfare online and shot other people to death while laughing manically? Or the times I played Counter Strike and planted bombs as a terrorist? Should I repent for all the times I played Left 4 Dead and took glee in the malicious murder of other players? All the team killing I've done? All the jumpkick spam I did in FEAR? Am I to be judged by a jury of my peers for the thousands upon thousands of deaths I've inflicted in a mere day of playing StarCraft? Thank goodness I'm not to blame for all the griefing I did in Team Fortress 2 against the other team of human beings when I deployed a sentry, though, as the sentry did all that. That would have been too much for me to bear. 315 4 CSM 8
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 921	Posted - 2013.02.25 22:45:00 - [176] - Quote Bantara wrote: You are a human being. I am a human being. Morality is involved. You don't have to agree. But there it is. You signed up for a game in the full knowledge that someone could and would try to steal your space pixels. I stole your space pixels, as part of the game. That's like saying I'm an evil person because I asked for my rent in Monopoly. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric Vote James 315 for CSM 8!
Bantara Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance 22	Posted - 2013.02.25 23:14:00 - [177] - Quote You guys are taking that too far, that wasn't my point. Some people are pvp pilots and run on "pvp" platforms. Others live in sov space and run on 0.0 sovereignty platforms. Others are hi-sec dwellers and run on that platform. Others are pirates and run on pirate platforms. You're comfortable with scamming. You find it to be an interesting and unique element of Eve. To you, this is a point in James's favor. But not everyone thinks the same way. What for you is a pro, to another is a con. It's not like you only said, "James has excellent knowledge of how Eve works," something I would hope all players would approve of. You said, "look, James has pulled off huge scams!" and then asked "why wouldn't one want to vote for him?" It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed. Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one.
Alonzo Harris Elbflorenz Industries 1	Posted - 2013.02.26 01:13:00 - [178] - Quote and thus, the circlejerk continues... Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/
Nathalie LaPorte Republic University Minmatar Republic 85	Posted - 2013.03.01 00:30:00 - [179] - Quote Bantara wrote: It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed. Eve-centrism on the EVE-O forums? Outrageous! Thus, I laughed. Quote: Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one. Where?
Kainotomiu Ronuken Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 932	Posted - 2013.03.01 12:01:00 - [180] - Quote Bantara wrote: It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed. That's like saying that someone running for Chinese president should focus on Ukrainian cultural ideas. Hello, this is an EVE election. It seems fair that we focus on elements of EVE's culture. Bantara wrote: Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one. Actually he doesn't. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric Vote James 315 for CSM 8!



Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.