| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
237
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
Anyone active on these forums over the last few months will have heard of James 315 and his ambitious project to reform highsec. Needless to say, he is a somewhat controversial character, and has been the subject of many a long debate on these boards.
James' effect on Highsec could not be clearer. You merely have to visit the system of Kamio to see the effect that his organisation has had on the area in only twenty days; Local chat is active and stimulating, and the ice belt is completely free of bots and bot-aspirants. The market is thriving, and there is a healthy amount of PvP occuring, both in the form of ganks and multiple war declarations caused by the New Order's activities. In short, it has been a huge success.
While the reformation of Highsec will surely go on (with the New Order turning its gaze on Osmon just this weekend), many capsuleers feel that it will soon be time for James to set his sights on a loftier goal; the improvement of all New Eden. In his capacity as Supreme Protector, James is ideally situated to positively change Highsec, but the natures of Lowsec and Nullsec mean that it is much harder to have a similar effect. Clearly, James needs to work directly with CCP to improve the game as a whole in the only way possible; by joining the ranks of the CSM and meeting with the developers in person.
Why James would make an ideal CSM candidate: One of the most widely recognised issues with the current CSM body and with many previous ones is the lack of communication. While some members are commendably loquacious, many appear to be completely inactive (most notably the two obvious highsec representatives, Issler Dainze and Kelduum Revaan). James 315 would most certainly not have this problem; he currently maintains an active presence ingame, as well as single-handedly running a blog with substantial updates twice daily.
James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time) and has been one of the foremost creators of emergent gameplay this year. If nothing else, he will be able to spot exploits and loopholes quickly, as well as guide CCP into creating the best sandbox possible.
In specific, James has had extensive experience working with both miners and PvPers in highsec, as well as running highsec corporations and organising highsec fleet ops. James would make a perfect highsec candidate to replace the insubstantial representatives that highsec currently has.
There's no doubt that James 315 is of charismatic and persuasive personality. In the last several months, he has convinced capsuleers to give him almost thirty billion ISK and destroy sixty billion more in assets, using only words and the occasional bump from a Stabber Fleet Issue. James could be the lever we need to fix the CSM's other glaring problem; its impotence. If anyone can persuade CCP to do the right things, it's James.
Why James would not make an ideal CSM candidate: One of the obvious arguments against James being a CSM candidate is that many residents of highsec don't like him much. On the other hand, their opinions don't matter if they don't vote, and if they do vote, then they might have a chance to alter the outcome.
Are there any other reasons?
|

stoicfaux
1860
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
IMHO, Sansha would make a better high-sec CSM representative. He may be an NPC, but he has more name recognition than James 315 could ever hope for. Universal popularity is key to consolidating the high-sec vote, IMO.
|

Sara Mars
The Scope Gallente Federation
30
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:54:00 -
[3] - Quote
10,058 nuff said |

raskonalkov
Tie Fighters Inc
29
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:57:00 -
[4] - Quote
^ Yeah but Sansha allows CCP to nerf them. That would always make the CSM weak. |

Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4054
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
James 315 would make a fine representative for highsec players and can be trusted to do what is in their best interests - not merely what they believe is in their best interests. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2150
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:58:00 -
[6] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:IMHO, Sansha would make a better high-sec CSM representative. He may be an NPC, but he has more name recognition than James 315 could ever hope for. Universal popularity is key to consolidating the high-sec vote, IMO.
Thing is, the percentages of people voting are so skewed away from hisec that hisec is likely not electing its own representation anyway. Whoever proclaims to be representing them would actually have to be voted into office by residents of other space.
Since the last time this topic was brought up, there was widespread support from pirates and nullsec-dwellers for James 315 as hisec representative, so he has a real chance of winning (unlike Sansha).
Also, +1. (Also, I proposed this first; also this thread probably belongs in Jita Park) Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
3016
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ (my spaceblog) http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.co.uk/~ (a¦á_a¦â) |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1236
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 02:59:00 -
[8] - Quote
Poasting in a Null Sec hates High Sec Thread yet again. (yawn).
Really, there is nothing more interesting going on ???? -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

Ritsum
Perkone Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Poasting in a Null Sec hates High Sec Thread yet again. (yawn).
Really, there is nothing more interesting going on ????
Too many blues in null makes them grumpy, so they like to hate on High-sec just to get a response. I am a proud High Sec Pve player. Got a problem? |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
238
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Poasting in a Null Sec hates High Sec Thread yet again. (yawn).
Really, there is nothing more interesting going on ???? As far as I can tell, you're the first person to bring that up in this thread.
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1236
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:11:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Poasting in a Null Sec hates High Sec Thread yet again. (yawn).
Really, there is nothing more interesting going on ???? As far as I can tell, you're the first person to bring that up in this thread.
Actually Lady Spank quite clearly beat me to calling this thread for what it is. Nonsensse. -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

stoicfaux
1860
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:13:00 -
[12] - Quote
raskonalkov wrote:^ Yeah but Sansha allows CCP to nerf them. That would always make the CSM weak. Well a nerf is still better than outright removal...
|

Disciple Amphal
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
I will vote for our High Sec lord and savior, great father James 315. |

Brandon Syne
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:25:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests.
Ooh, catfight time. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2358
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:29:00 -
[15] - Quote
Brandon Syne wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. Ooh, catfight time. It's not a cat fight. Spank is just summing up James' qualifications. Which is zero.
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

Mirima Thurander
Estrada Dynamics - Exploration and Acquisition
457
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:31:00 -
[16] - Quote
Who? Is this a goon troll post? A Dark time comes. A time of terror comes. My time. If it offends you. Stop me. |

masternerdguy
Inner Shadow C.L.O.N.E.
803
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:33:00 -
[17] - Quote
I'd do a better job than James. I was ranting about carebear entitlement before it was cool. If it was up to me there'd be no level 4 missions in hi sec and only veld in the belts. Things are only impossible until they are not. |

raskonalkov
Tie Fighters Inc
29
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:34:00 -
[18] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:raskonalkov wrote:^ Yeah but Sansha allows CCP to nerf them. That would always make the CSM weak. Well a nerf is still better than outright removal...
How about shiny players beat Sansha oh so easily, surely we don't want that happening to CSM? |

foxnod
StarFleet Enterprises Red Alliance
63
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:40:00 -
[19] - Quote
James has my vote. +1 |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1080
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:46:00 -
[20] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests.
HYDRA RELOADED. |

Brandon Syne
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:46:00 -
[21] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Brandon Syne wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. Ooh, catfight time. It's not a cat fight. Spank is just summing up James' qualifications. Which is zero.
>Northern Coalition
I CALL BIAS! |

Simetraz
State War Academy Caldari State
551
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:55:00 -
[22] - Quote
OP, Hmm an interesting way to get people to vote from high-sec. I am not sure you really want to wake up the masses and get them to go to the polls. It may not end the way you it will. EVERYBODY KNOWS |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
241
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 03:55:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. Let me rephrase that sentence for you.
"Someone that irrefutably did run one of the biggest ponzi schemes of the time, nowadays runs one of the most innovative organisations that highsec (if not the entirety of EVE) has to offer, and maintains a blog while writing insightful articles for popular EVE news websites on topics such as the problems with highsec and how to fix them, risk vs reward and why carebear entitlement is a bad thing has every business representing the interests of highsec as a whole at the CSM summits in Iceland.
Mirima Thurander wrote:Who? Is this a goon troll post? Clearly not :/
|

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
3989
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 04:34:00 -
[24] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Brandon Syne wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. Ooh, catfight time. It's not a cat fight. Spank is just summing up James' qualifications. Which is zero.

Definitely must be 12-21-12 Doomsday.
Why?
Because I find myself in full agreement with Lady Spank and Marlona Sky.

DMC |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
2360
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 04:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. HYDRA RELOADED. I guess they could have went with HYDRA FEDERATION, but to each their own right?
Remove local, structure mails and revamp the directional scanner! |

stoicfaux
1863
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 04:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:stoicfaux wrote:IMHO, Sansha would make a better high-sec CSM representative. He may be an NPC, but he has more name recognition than James 315 could ever hope for. Universal popularity is key to consolidating the high-sec vote, IMO.
Thing is, the percentages of people voting are so skewed away from hisec that hisec is likely not electing its own representation anyway. Whoever proclaims to be representing them would actually have to be voted into office by residents of other space. Since the last time this topic was brought up, there was widespread support from pirates and nullsec-dwellers for James 315 as hisec representative, so he has a real chance of winning (unlike Sansha). I wouldn't be quick to throw Sansha off the boat. Only 16.63% of the players voted in CSM 7. The lowest vote count received by an elected delegate was just 1,282 (a mere three tenths of a percent of the player base!) The top vote getter only received a "mandate" from 3% of the player base.
Given such a low voter turnout for a relatively large number of positions (14 delegates,) name recognition alone could probably get a person or NPC elected by the high-sec voting "bloc."
|

Tesal
61
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 04:58:00 -
[27] - Quote
James 315 is a buffoon and troll. If he were to run for CSM he would have to give his real name and it would be plastered all over the internet for all time. |

Nexus Day
Lustrevik Trade and Travel Bureau
178
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 05:16:00 -
[28] - Quote
No one really knows anything about him- check
Spouts senseless rhetoric that polarizes followers and detractors- check
Doesn't truly represent the people for whom he would be elected to represent- check
Easily manipulated by those with true power- check
Sounds like a prototypical politician to me.
|

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
355
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 05:24:00 -
[29] - Quote
No. Fly Minmatar Air --- "Trust in the Rust!" |

Jimmy Gunsmythe
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
164
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 05:56:00 -
[30] - Quote
About as good a representative as Kim Jong Il makes for democracy and tending to the needs of the North Koreans when he still drew breath.
James 315 being a rep for hisec would only hand that to nulsec. It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal. |

Cannibal Kane
Umkhonto We Sizwe
880
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 06:10:00 -
[31] - Quote
No! I'm not a Pirate, I'm a Terrorist.
The Crazy Space Poor South African.
*Hair done by LGÇÖOr+¬al, because I'm worth it. |

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
71
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 06:10:00 -
[32] - Quote
A month ago I would've picked Cannibal Kane over James315. Today... I would still do it.
EDIT: ^ Oh, here you are  |

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
288
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 06:30:00 -
[33] - Quote
isn't james315 already depleted resource for forum flames? i thought he is. He was funny when started but didn't last too long. Let him disappear in the past.... |

Jenavee De'amore
Perkone Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 07:04:00 -
[34] - Quote
masternerdguy wrote:I'd do a better job than James. I was ranting about carebear entitlement before it was cool. If it was up to me there'd be no level 4 missions in hi sec and only veld in the belts.
EDIT: I'd also undo the titan nerf, torp nerf, and nano nerf if possible.
Or go one step further have absolutely no belts in hisec other than the ones you'd find in a tutorial mission.The only missions you could run in hisec will be only tutorial missions and reduce hisec to just a handfull of systems. That would make nullbears extremely happy.
The agenda/ propaganda behind some players is fairly clear. If players like yourself and James 315 had their way, eve would be dead already -.-' hence why James would not get my vote. Try to look unimportant; they may be low on ammo.... |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
289
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 07:09:00 -
[35] - Quote
Mirima Thurander wrote:Who? Is this a goon troll post?
No, these guys make Goons look like the Salvation Army.
EvE Forum Bingo |

Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
823
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 08:10:00 -
[36] - Quote
OP made me laugh  |

pussnheels
The Fiction Factory
793
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 09:32:00 -
[37] - Quote
Sara Mars wrote:10,058 nuff said and then some drunk alliance leader thought he was above the EULA/TOS I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Dave stark
847
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 09:56:00 -
[38] - Quote
i've never really seen him post anything interesting. rather vote for a goon. Reading my posts is like panning for gold; most it will be useless, but occasionally you'll find a nugget of gold. |

Randolph Rothstein
whatever corp.
42
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 10:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
last thing i need is some 2 dollar ******* with NUMBERS IN HIS NAME to be a representative of anythiing 
make yourself a fckin decent name first |

Christ Illusion
Atrocity Vendors
10
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 10:17:00 -
[40] - Quote
lol |

TharOkha
0asis Group
214
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 10:22:00 -
[41] - Quote
Fantastic troll thread  GÇ£If reality can destroy the dream, why shouldn't the dream destroy reality?GÇ¥ |

The Protato
Protus Correction Facility Inc.
115
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 10:28:00 -
[42] - Quote
The sperg is strong with this thread. |
|

ISD Suvetar
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1247

|
Posted - 2012.12.21 11:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
Moved from General Discussion. ISD Suvetar Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1173
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 12:38:00 -
[44] - Quote
James 315: Not the candidate you want, but the candidate you deserve. Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1239
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 13:26:00 -
[45] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:James 315: Not the candidate you want, but the candidate you deserve.
Great Quote, but no thanks. -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
617
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 13:38:00 -
[46] - Quote
I'm sure any candidate that supports ideas that would cost CCP money would do very well on the CSM and be a leading force for change ... or not.
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1239
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 13:43:00 -
[47] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:SmilingVagrant wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. HYDRA RELOADED. I guess they could have went with HYDRA FEDERATION, but to each their own right?
Yeah. May as well be HYDRA REVOLUTIONS for all it matters though. In other words, a money losing fiasco.  -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1239
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 13:47:00 -
[48] - Quote
For those who never bothered to look up James 3:15 in the Book:
"This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic."
Interpret at your own risk. -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
246
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 17:10:00 -
[49] - Quote
Rengerel en Distel wrote:I'm sure any candidate that supports ideas that would cost CCP money would do very well on the CSM and be a leading force for change ... or not.
I'm sure that CCP's own analysts are capable of deciding whether or not EVE would make more money by a) becoming a WoW-clone or b) continuing to occupy the niche that has made it the longest-running widely successful MMO ever.
|

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
280
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 19:05:00 -
[50] - Quote
Despite the fear and fear-mongering I see from some in this thread, James would make an excellent CSM member. Instead of making baseless assumptions, not to mention drastically over-estimating the "power" the CSM has, how about asking what he'd do and what his vision is? No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1241
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 19:14:00 -
[51] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Despite the fear and fear-mongering I see from some in this thread, James would make an excellent CSM member. Instead of making baseless assumptions, not to mention drastically over-estimating the "power" the CSM has, how about asking what he'd do and what his vision is?
He'd bump the other CSM members for starters. -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
283
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 19:36:00 -
[52] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:admiral root wrote:Despite the fear and fear-mongering I see from some in this thread, James would make an excellent CSM member. Instead of making baseless assumptions, not to mention drastically over-estimating the "power" the CSM has, how about asking what he'd do and what his vision is? He'd bump the other CSM members for starters.
Only if they fail to comply.  No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
251
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 19:43:00 -
[53] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:admiral root wrote:Despite the fear and fear-mongering I see from some in this thread, James would make an excellent CSM member. Instead of making baseless assumptions, not to mention drastically over-estimating the "power" the CSM has, how about asking what he'd do and what his vision is? He'd bump the other CSM members for starters. And that is bad/relevant how?
|

Krixtal Icefluxor
Bison - Ammatar Thunder
1242
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 21:01:00 -
[54] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:admiral root wrote:Despite the fear and fear-mongering I see from some in this thread, James would make an excellent CSM member. Instead of making baseless assumptions, not to mention drastically over-estimating the "power" the CSM has, how about asking what he'd do and what his vision is? He'd bump the other CSM members for starters. And that is bad/relevant how?
erm....try: "It's a joke."
Period. -á"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1021
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 21:21:00 -
[55] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:James 315: Not the candidate you want, but the candidate you deserve. Actually with that statement wouldn't he make a better Null sec candidate?
Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

March rabbit
Federal Defense Union
293
|
Posted - 2012.12.21 22:03:00 -
[56] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Despite the fear and fear-mongering I see from some in this thread, James would make an excellent CSM member. Instead of making baseless assumptions, not to mention drastically over-estimating the "power" the CSM has, how about asking what he'd do and what his vision is? according to his function "bumping miners" he has nothing to do in CSM... there is simply nothing to bump there  |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
619
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 02:40:00 -
[57] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Rengerel en Distel wrote:I'm sure any candidate that supports ideas that would cost CCP money would do very well on the CSM and be a leading force for change ... or not.
I'm sure that CCP's own analysts are capable of deciding whether or not EVE would make more money by a) becoming a WoW-clone or b) continuing to occupy the niche that has made it the longest-running widely successful MMO ever.
Citation needed for b)
|

Cyprus Black
Perkone Caldari State
449
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 06:50:00 -
[58] - Quote
I wonder how many alts this guy is using in a desperate grab for attention?
Nobody gives a **** about him nor whatever he's trying to do in highsec. Really. Insert Witty Signature Here |

raskonalkov
Tie Fighters Inc
30
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 07:34:00 -
[59] - Quote
Bumping the thread for good reads to all. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1021
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 10:14:00 -
[60] - Quote
Cyprus Black wrote:I wonder how many alts this guy is using in a desperate grab for attention?
Nobody gives a **** about him nor whatever he's trying to do in highsec. Really. Bit hard to drum up support for the Cowards Party.
Actually he might fit into the current CSM, they seem to like to let CCP clean their boots on their backs. Any Spelling, gramatical and literary errors made by me are included free of charge.
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
257
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 12:56:00 -
[61] - Quote
Cyprus Black wrote:I wonder how many alts this guy is using in a desperate grab for attention? None. James' only participation in this thread thus far is to 'like' a few posts.
|

Zol Interbottom
The Scope Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 16:20:00 -
[62] - Quote
Look if you want an egotistical ******* who uses one sided game mechanics to extort people with no proper way of retaliating as CSM 8 then there are plenty of choices right here on the forums, but i have to say, James 315 stands out.
I mean, he perfected abusing the hell out of miners in a way that makes him completely untouchable to conventional retaliation because he hides behind a mechanic that leaves no way for the victims to gain killrights and sits in NPC corps as a way of being immune to wardecs, leaving miners with the choice of ruining their standings and only wining a temporary victory against his insanely effective money making crusade and religious following of his mad creed which seems to be completely absorbed into his ego and sustaining his very being, that even if he was killed would probably lead to him to accusing them of using dirty tactics.
Seriously, best CSM candidate if there ever was one, not only does he completely represent ALL of highsec from the humble miners who he harrases on a daily basis, the PVE players who have no idea who he is, the station traders who make crazy money and have no idea who he is and dont even care, he just perfectly captures what it is to be all of these players and how to lead them all, his new order being the perfect choice for taking High Sec to new heights.
OK ill admit it, i dont know what the **** a CSM is, let alone what they do, i assume its something important, and that means that its important for James 315 to be a CSM, because it is important, it has power, it has responsibility, it gets things done. i think. only James 315 has what it take the be CSM, he knows what needs to be done, he has the support to get it done, he knows how to lead and he will lead the other CSMs whether they like it or not, because thats what he is, a leader.
James 315 embodies all of the values of High Sec, he is a leader, he has a plan, he knows what he wants and by god he knows how to get it, you should vote for this man to be CSM 8, because he is the man for the job, the man who can do it, who will do it, he is the man you deserve, the man deep down you know you want, the man you need, the right man, the man for High Sec!
If you vote for James 315, you know what you are getting, you are getting an egotistical troll with a god complex who wont fight anyone on fair terms or even unfair terms, instead using a completely one sided and unfair tactic that you cannot defend against unless your own self destruction is worth it to only encourage his misguided crusader against the evils of high sec miners and their love of easy AFK ISK farming, ruining the work of intelligent miners who learnt from Hulkaggendon and stopped AFK mining and started fitting their ships with proper tank only for someone to come along and not even have the decency to engage them on terms that allow them to fight back, choosing to be a coward and bump without an risk to himself them until they give up on mining and all the **** they dealt with or pay him 10 million ISK and surrender to his extortion campaign.
If you vote for James 315 you are one of three things, a low/null sec troll who doesn't care about High Sec, one of the "New Order" or just someone who is completely uninformed and votes for the person with the most spammed support.
TL:DR i need sleep, what did i just write, for the love of god dont vote for James 315 if you value High Sec, change bumping mechanics so bumping spam gives killrights or suspect flag or something |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
257
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 17:20:00 -
[63] - Quote
Zol Interbottom wrote:an egotistical ******* who uses one sided game mechanics to extort people with no proper way of retaliating
Zol Interbottom wrote:he perfected abusing the hell out of miners in a way that makes him completely untouchable to conventional retaliation because he hides behind a mechanic that leaves no way for the victims to gain killrights and sits in NPC corps as a way of being immune to wardecs, leaving miners with the choice of ruining their standings and only wining a temporary victory against his insanely effective money making crusade and religious following of his mad creed which seems to be completely absorbed into his ego and sustaining his very being, that even if he was killed would probably lead to him to accusing them of using dirty tactics.
Zol Interbottom wrote:James 315 embodies all of the values of High Sec, he is a leader, he has a plan, he knows what he wants and by god he knows how to get it, you should vote for this man to be CSM 8, because he is the man for the job, the man who can do it, who will do it, he is the man you deserve, the man deep down you know you want, the man you need, the right man, the man for High Sec!
Zol Interbottom wrote:If you vote for James 315, you know what you are getting, you are getting an egotistical troll with a god complex who wont fight anyone on fair terms or even unfair terms, instead using a completely one sided and unfair tactic that you cannot defend against unless your own self destruction is worth it to only encourage his misguided crusader against the evils of high sec miners and their love of easy AFK ISK farming, ruining the work of intelligent miners who learnt from Hulkaggendon and stopped AFK mining and started fitting their ships with proper tank only for someone to come along and not even have the decency to engage them on terms that allow them to fight back, choosing to be a coward and bump without an risk to himself them until they give up on mining and all the **** they dealt with or pay him 10 million ISK and surrender to his extortion campaign.
You paint a picture of James as a man who knows an awful lot about highsec mechanics and how to exploit them. Who better to help CCP fix highsec?
|

Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
53
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 18:39:00 -
[64] - Quote
Ironically using one of the most broken features of hisec gameplay to interfere with the most cancerous of hisec denizens sounds like the best qualification for hisec representative one could ask for.
James 2013 |

Jimmy Gunsmythe
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
167
|
Posted - 2012.12.22 21:45:00 -
[65] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:James 315: Not the candidate you want, but the candidate you deserve.
We will not fight for James 315, therefore we do not deserve him, and will lose him.
At least, that's what I'm hoping for, by the grace of Great Tippia's Ghost. It is the greatest inequality to try to make unequal things equal. |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2294
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 23:04:00 -
[66] - Quote
Jimmy Gunsmythe wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:James 315: Not the candidate you want, but the candidate you deserve. We will not fight for James 315, therefore we do not deserve him, and will lose him. At least, that's what I'm hoping for, by the grace of Great Tippia's Ghost.
You do not have to fight for James 315. James 315 will fight for you. That's what a true public servant does. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Zol Interbottom
Nanotrasen Inc
61
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 11:07:00 -
[67] - Quote
no but seriously if someone takes this seriously and somehow he gets made CSM i want to see the sub count before and after the elecctions to see how many miners raged (and other people) Nivin Sajjad > we fly perpetually networked, neural interfaced spaceships yet can't communicate coordinates to each other without physically passing back and forth little pieces of paper. it's weird |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
542
|
Posted - 2013.01.07 11:20:00 -
[68] - Quote
Zol Interbottom wrote:(and other people) Who is going to rage other than AFK miners and bots, hm? And why?
|

Amun Doshu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 19:57:00 -
[69] - Quote
if mittani can be there then james would be a proper partner. ccp like to surround itself with monkeys
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Zol Interbottom wrote:(and other people) Who is going to rage other than AFK miners and bots, hm? And why?
do you really eat that ****? james do it cos he like tears, not to change highsec, he grief all the miners not the afkers and especially not the botters, botters dont cry, they just launch an other miner. he grief those who JUST can live from mining. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
575
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 20:03:00 -
[70] - Quote
Amun Doshu wrote:do you really eat that ****? james do it cos he like tears, not to change highsec, he grief all the miners not the afkers and especially not the botters, botters dont cry, they just launch an other miner. he grief those who JUST can live from mining. Botters do cry when you gank the third or fourth Mackinaw.
As for changing highsec versus being amused by tears, why would the New Order offer extremely cheap mining permits if all we wanted were tears? What puts you in a better position than mine to judge James' motives? Why can't we change highsec and enjoy the impotent rage of those criminals who would stand against us?
|

Wescro
Powerful Friends in Low Sec
113
|
Posted - 2013.01.10 22:27:00 -
[71] - Quote
Let's face it, there is one group of players that is consistently over-represented in EVE. Not in the CSM, but in the sense that their every wish is taken care of expeditiously by CCP. The patch notes read like a list of crimes against high-sec. Mining barges buffed, insurance payout voided, concord response time shortened. At this rate it won't be long before Concord response time becomes 0 seconds and you're average Retriever has the same tank as a battleship, as absurd as that is to imagine.
The entitlement mentality is transforming the fundamental nature of EVE, from a game of freedom and consequence, risk and reward, to a chore. And if the people who actually make EVE fun no longer have fun, who will the miners mine for? Is a single player mining simulator the glorious future of EVE?
It's in opposition to the stagnating effect of this entitlement mentality that I support James 315 if he chooses to run for CSM8. Of course this isn't about James 315 himself, I will support anyone who will draw a line in the sand and say "the game isn't going to change for you, you must change for the game." You have a keyboard. Use it, or lose your mining ship.http://www.minerbumping.com/ |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
316
|
Posted - 2013.01.11 00:34:00 -
[72] - Quote
I will vote for our High Sec lord and savior, great father James 315. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

rswfire
Fire Incorporated DRACONIAN COVENANT
5
|
Posted - 2013.01.12 13:34:00 -
[73] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Amun Doshu wrote:do you really eat that ****? james do it cos he like tears, not to change highsec, he grief all the miners not the afkers and especially not the botters, botters dont cry, they just launch an other miner. he grief those who JUST can live from mining. Botters do cry when you gank the third or fourth Mackinaw. As for changing highsec versus being amused by tears, why would the New Order offer extremely cheap mining permits if all we wanted were tears? What puts you in a better position than mine to judge James' motives? Why can't we change highsec and enjoy the impotent rage of those criminals who would stand against us?
Why does highsec need to be changed? I've yet to see any relevant argument for this.
From my point of view, all I've seen is a bunch of people who want to turn highsec into lowsec or nullsec. What is the point of that? If you like life in lowsec/nullsec, go live there. What does it matter what the people in highsec do?
Seriously. Please explain! You guys act like it's broken. It's not. Fire Incorporated is recruiting. -áIf you're looking for a nice group of players, check us out. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=182994 |

Robert Tables
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 04:13:00 -
[74] - Quote
Apparently this New Order thing has been going on for a few months; I didn't hear about it until around Christmas. I'll admit, I thought bumping miners to be a great deal more clever than just blowing them up; I got a chuckle out of it.
Amun Doshu wrote:if mittani can be there then james would be a proper partner. ccp like to surround itself with monkeys Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Zol Interbottom wrote:(and other people) Who is going to rage other than AFK miners and bots, hm? And why? do you really eat that ****? james do it cos he like tears, not to change highsec, he grief all the miners not the afkers and especially not the botters, botters dont cry, they just launch an other miner. he grief those who JUST can live from mining. ...but pretty much this. From everything I've seen, the Order doesn't appear to distinguish between bot and not-bot; they distinguish between paid-the-fee and didn't-pay-the-fee. James and his Order run a protection racket; nothing more, nothing less.
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:...James' effect on Highsec could not be clearer. You merely have to visit the system of Kamio to see the effect that his organization has had on the area in only twenty days; Local chat is active and stimulating... I just flew through Kamio an hour ago; local chat was about as dead as any other system in EVE that I've flown through. I have two votes to give in this year's election, one of which is probably going to Malcanis. I don't think I'm convinced to give the other to a second-rate Don Corleone; I think I could vote for Mittani and expect more benefit to the game to come of it. |

Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
3844
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 06:42:00 -
[75] - Quote
The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  Vice Secretary of the 7th Council of Stellar Management.
|

Zol Interbottom
Nanotrasen Inc
98
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 06:44:00 -
[76] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering. 
damnit man, this is INTERNET SPACESHIPS, humor isnt money Nivin Sajjad > we fly perpetually networked, neural interfaced spaceships yet can't communicate coordinates to each other without physically passing back and forth little pieces of paper. it's weird |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2314
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 06:45:00 -
[77] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  I, for one, am perfectly serious.
James 315 for CSM! Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

No More Heroes
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2119
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 07:21:00 -
[78] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering. 
AFK income is serious business
Always follow orders little bees |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1588
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 07:22:00 -
[79] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  Well here is a good why James 315 should not be on the CSM
During a debate with other CSM members things get a little tense.
But James 315 falling into normal patterns, immediately hides behind a chair and demands CCP save him as the people he is arguing against do not appear to be defenseless, so he wants the CSM version of CONCORD to save him 
One of the current disagreements with CSM7 is that it is not activist enough, we really don't need cowards, when we need people to stand up to CCP on points.
It may just be the character he is playing but personally the risk is too great. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
613
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 11:17:00 -
[80] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  We're deadly serious, you know.
Frying Doom wrote:Well here is a good why James 315 should not be on the CSM During a debate with other CSM members things get a little tense. But James 315 falling into normal patterns, immediately hides behind a chair and demands CCP save him as the people he is arguing against do not appear to be defenseless, so he wants the CSM version of CONCORD to save him  One of the current disagreements with CSM7 is that it is not activist enough, we really don't need cowards, when we need people to stand up to CCP on points. It may just be the character he is playing but personally the risk is too great. Your attempt at humour is commendable. :)
|

Trebor Daehdoow
Dirt Nap Squad Dirt Nap Squad.
2444
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 17:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  But James 315 falling into normal patterns, immediately hides behind a chair and demands CCP save him as the people he is arguing against do not appear to be defenseless, so he wants the CSM version of CONCORD to save him  If James 315 manages to get elected to the CSM, I will be happy to provide him (for a modest fee, of course) with one of my custom-anodized Tech-II Folding Titanium Assault Sporks . An elegant weapon for a more civilized age, the CAT2FTAS is optimized not only for defense, but also short-range (scooping) and long-range (throwing) offensive maneuvers. 4 hand-sharpened Prongs Of PiercingGäó ensure that your opponent will truly get the point.
The CAT2FTAS -- the official weapon of the CSM. The Sarcasm is Strong with Me GÇó Member of CSM 5-7 GÇó Blog |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2314
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 18:00:00 -
[82] - Quote
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  But James 315 falling into normal patterns, immediately hides behind a chair and demands CCP save him as the people he is arguing against do not appear to be defenseless, so he wants the CSM version of CONCORD to save him  If James 315 manages to get elected to the CSM, I will be happy to provide him (for a modest fee, of course) with one of my custom-anodized Tech-II Folding Titanium Assault Sporks . An elegant weapon for a more civilized age, the CAT2FTAS is optimized not only for defense, but also short-range (scooping) and long-range (throwing) offensive maneuvers. 4 hand-sharpened Prongs Of PiercingGäó ensure that your opponent will truly get the point. The CAT2FTAS -- the official weapon of the CSM. But... does it bump things? Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1596
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 22:15:00 -
[83] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Trebor Daehdoow wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:The amount of players in this thread with no sense of humor is staggering.  But James 315 falling into normal patterns, immediately hides behind a chair and demands CCP save him as the people he is arguing against do not appear to be defenseless, so he wants the CSM version of CONCORD to save him  If James 315 manages to get elected to the CSM, I will be happy to provide him (for a modest fee, of course) with one of my custom-anodized Tech-II Folding Titanium Assault Sporks . An elegant weapon for a more civilized age, the CAT2FTAS is optimized not only for defense, but also short-range (scooping) and long-range (throwing) offensive maneuvers. 4 hand-sharpened Prongs Of PiercingGäó ensure that your opponent will truly get the point. The CAT2FTAS -- the official weapon of the CSM. But... does it bump things? No, No
That should be "But... does it bump defenseless things? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
614
|
Posted - 2013.01.15 22:46:00 -
[84] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:No, No
That should be "But... does it bump defenseless things? We've all established months ago that there are perfectly good defenses against bumping.
|

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1598
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 00:09:00 -
[85] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Frying Doom wrote:No, No
That should be "But... does it bump defenseless things? We've all established months ago that there are perfectly good defenses against bumping. Yes but they don't like bumping things with guns Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
638
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 08:52:00 -
[86] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Yes but they don't like bumping things with guns  People with guns don't mine, so there'd be no point in bumping them.
We gank them instead.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
859
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 13:41:00 -
[87] - Quote
The bot-tears are strong in this thread. I'd vote for James 315 |

Arronicus
Vintas Industries Mistakes Were Made.
68
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 22:59:00 -
[88] - Quote
James attended the rocky mountain fur-con, and recieved the runners up prize for best furpiler.
I'll leave it to you all to decide whether this is a reason to vote for, or against. |

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations Shaktipat Revelators
1197
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 18:03:00 -
[89] - Quote
If James315 runs for CSM he is guaranteed at least one of my votes. |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
21
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 21:02:00 -
[90] - Quote
   oh....*sniff* heh
yeah, no....
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Are there any other reasons[to not vote for James]?
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
695
|
Posted - 2013.01.17 21:05:00 -
[91] - Quote
Bantara wrote:   oh....*sniff* heh yeah, no.... Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Are there any other reasons[to not vote for James]?
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
I'm flattered to see that you feel the need to reiterate my own points, but did you have anything to add?
|

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
361
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 09:47:00 -
[92] - Quote
James is going to save EvE. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Hrothgar Nilsson
Black Core Federation Black Core Alliance
236
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 11:23:00 -
[93] - Quote
I've read a lot of this miner bumping discussion over the past few months on the forum, and I really couldn't care one way or the other as I don't live in high-sec and don't mine, but thought I'd make this point to those ice miners complaining about being bumped by James315 and his crew.
1) You mine ice. 2) You sell ice. 3) For a relatively low fee of 10 million, James315 and his crew bump ice miners who are not you, disrupting their production and raising the price you receive for your ice mining efforts.
You pay the guy off once, and for all practical purposes are subsidizing him to go about disrupting your competitors, like, forever.
Does it get any better than that? Sounds like a great bargain to me.
If I were an ice miner, it would be well worth the 10mil ISK to have someone do that for me. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZTzA_xesrL8 |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
409
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 11:37:00 -
[94] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Bantara wrote:   oh....*sniff* heh yeah, no.... Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Are there any other reasons[to not vote for James]?
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
I'm flattered to see that you feel the need to reiterate my own points, but did you have anything to add?
I think his point is that James hasn't spent his entire Eve life mindlessly shooting lasers at defenceless rocks; he's seen the sights and has a solid grasp on how each area of the game is interdependant on the others. This, naturally, makes him the ideal choice to represent highsec players. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings Damu'Khonde
2315
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 17:12:00 -
[95] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote: You pay the guy off once, and for all practical purposes are subsidizing him to go about disrupting your competitors, like, forever.
Eh... not quite. Usually this is what it amounts to, but the miner bumpers have no central repository of "who paid". If a new miner bumper decides to start operating in your mining system, you may have to pay the 10 mil again. Rifterlings - small gang frigate PvP - low/nullsec operations, newbie-friendly, free ship program; Join today! www.rifterlings.com
Accidentally The Whole Frigate (blog) - Learning how to pew pew, one loss at a time - www.thewholefrigate.com |

Runeme Shilter
New Order Logistics CODE.
23
|
Posted - 2013.01.19 19:14:00 -
[96] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: Eh... not quite. Usually this is what it amounts to, but the miner bumpers have no central repository of "who paid". If a new miner bumper decides to start operating in your mining system, you may have to pay the 10 mil again.
Well, we have the holy spreadsheet and bumpers for the New Order are advised to look for the bumper sticker (Pledge of loyalty) to James 315 in the bio before bumping. In case you get bumped despite having paid and a note in the bio, contact anyone in New Order Logistics to sort it out.
RS |

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
15
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 18:27:00 -
[97] - Quote
CSM8?
Seems like a demotion from the Saviour of Highsec. But, if that's what the big guy wants he's got my votes. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1679
|
Posted - 2013.01.25 22:57:00 -
[98] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:CSM8?
Seems like a demotion from the Saviour of Highsec. But, if that's what the big guy wants he's got my votes. And probably your money as well.
Have to give it to James 315, he hasn't really done anything to bother miners as a whole but he has managed to loot peoples wallets by selling them "shares", that are in reality just a great scam by him.
oh and for those of you still gullible enough an actual share is
Wikipedia wrote: A share is a single unit of ownership in a corporation, mutual fund, or any other organization. A joint stock company divides its capital into shares, which are offered for sale to raise capital, termed as issuing shares. Thus, a share is an indivisible unit of capital, expressing the proprietary relationship between the company and the shareholder. The denominated value of a share is its face value: the total capital of a company is divided into a number of shares.
In financial markets, a share is a unit of account for various financial instruments including stocks (ordinary or preferential), and investments in limited partnerships, and real estate investment trusts. The common feature of all these is equity participation (limited in the case of preference shares).
The income received from shares is known as a dividend. A shareholder, also known as a stockholder, is a person who owns shares of a certain company or organization, and is thus a part-owner of the company. The process of purchasing and selling shares often involves going through a stockbroker as a middle man.
I wonder if your shares have the words "Non refundable" and "Share is worth no monetary value" on them  Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
784
|
Posted - 2013.01.26 11:21:00 -
[99] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I wonder if your shares have the words "Non refundable" and "Share is worth no monetary value" on them  EVE =/= Real Life
EVE Shares =/= Real Life Shares
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
18
|
Posted - 2013.01.29 22:17:00 -
[100] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:I wonder if your shares have the words "Non refundable" and "Share is worth no monetary value" on them 
Well, I've invested 100 million isk with James 315 and have been paid over 250 million out of the general fund for services rendered. I'm perfectly satisfied as an investor in the minerbumping movement and someone who slaughters a miner everytime I undock.
I've also collected 90 million in permit sales. 30 million in player donations from pilots who support the cause and wanted to give directly to a ganker. And 50 million from a miner who wanted me to run all the Brap refugee miners out of her home belt... mission accomplished friend!
Isk is reallly a non-issue for us Doom. This is the pledge James 315 gave us when he put out the "Call to Gank." This is a pledge he's kept.
|

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
925
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 13:47:00 -
[101] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:John E Normus wrote:CSM8?
Seems like a demotion from the Saviour of Highsec. But, if that's what the big guy wants he's got my votes. And probably your money as well. Have to give it to James 315, he hasn't really done anything to bother miners as a whole but he has managed to loot peoples wallets by selling them "shares", that are in reality just a great scam by him. oh and for those of you still gullible enough an actual share is Wikipedia wrote: A share is a single unit of ownership in a corporation, mutual fund, or any other organization. A joint stock company divides its capital into shares, which are offered for sale to raise capital, termed as issuing shares. Thus, a share is an indivisible unit of capital, expressing the proprietary relationship between the company and the shareholder. The denominated value of a share is its face value: the total capital of a company is divided into a number of shares.
In financial markets, a share is a unit of account for various financial instruments including stocks (ordinary or preferential), and investments in limited partnerships, and real estate investment trusts. The common feature of all these is equity participation (limited in the case of preference shares).
The income received from shares is known as a dividend. A shareholder, also known as a stockholder, is a person who owns shares of a certain company or organization, and is thus a part-owner of the company. The process of purchasing and selling shares often involves going through a stockbroker as a middle man.
I wonder if your shares have the words "Non refundable" and "Share is worth no monetary value" on them 
As part of the New Order - a share owner - you regularly feast on such delicacies as chocolate covered egyptian cotton. What benefits the New Order, benefits you. Everyone has a share. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
423
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 14:19:00 -
[102] - Quote
It's also worth noting that, unlike another would-be highsec representitive, James can clearly distinguish between in-game violence of a type well within the rules of Eve, and heinous attacks on women in real life. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
798
|
Posted - 2013.01.31 21:53:00 -
[103] - Quote
Naturally, this will not have escaped the notice of many people, but it is so relevant to this topic that it bears repeating here.
James 315 wrote:This time, however, we had a new experience. CCP said "no".
The carebears were outmatched and outfought on the forums. They were finally rebuffed by CCP, the tool with which the carebears have beaten down so many good and proper game mechanics. The carebears received that measure of disappointment which they have so often meted out to others. Without even waiting for his CSM term to start, James 315 has begun to influence the way in which CCP views highsec. While an official endorsement of the legality of miner bumping may not seem like a huge deal, it marks a great day in the history of EVE Online's development; the day that 'Carebear Creep' was halted and, God willing, began to creep the other way.
If you believe in a highsec that truly represents the ideals upon which EVE is founded, vote for James 315 in this election! Give James the power to truly end the carebear menace!
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
925
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 08:36:00 -
[104] - Quote
admiral root wrote:It's also worth noting that, unlike another would-be highsec representitive, James can clearly distinguish between in-game violence of a type well within the rules of Eve, and heinous attacks on women in real life.
Yes, we need a representative who is capable of distinguishing between a video game and real life, and understands that comparing blowing up spaceships in a game for fun isn't anywhere near comparable to slavery or ****. |

Jimmy Rustler
New Order Logistics CODE.
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.01 16:03:00 -
[105] - Quote
He has my vote! |

Ricky the Rat
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 15:11:00 -
[106] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:James 315 would make a fine representative for highsec players and can be trusted to do what is in their best interests - not merely what they believe is in their best interests. 
Hear-HEAR! To misbelieve that EVE is about complacency, contentment and continuing the status quo is to completely miss the entire point of emergent, sand-box gameplay! Take for example, the recent and now infamous (not only in EVE but the entire global gaming community) battle of Asakai... Is it as literally (for REAL) epic as it was because it was expected, scripted, clean-neat-n-tidy for everyone... or because it was the COMPLETELY out of left field, tempest of an almighty cluster-**** that is was, in all of it's obscene carnage, waste and GLORY! ....no-o-o-www THAT'S what emergent sand-box gameplay is ALL about, ladies and gentlemen! And I'm here to witness that James 315 and his brilliant New Order scenario is the EXACT. SAME. Animal... only in seductive and glamorous bullet-time slow motion. 18+ minutes dilated into months, or dare-I-say, YEARS! Genius! |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
807
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 18:22:00 -
[107] - Quote
Anyone interested in James' candidacy should make it a priority to be in Brapelille at 21:00 EVE Time this evening, where the man himself will confirm or deny the rumours that he intends to stand!
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
422
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 20:01:00 -
[108] - Quote
James would be a great CSM. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
433
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 21:39:00 -
[109] - Quote
Glorious news! The saviour has just announced to a packed Brapelille local that he will run for CSM 8. The crowd is going wild. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
425
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 21:40:00 -
[110] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Glorious news! The saviour has just announced to a packed Brapelille local that he will run for CSM 8. The crowd is going wild.
Highsec has just been saved. If you want instant gratification, go stimulate your genitals. EvE is Hard, deal with it. |

Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
100
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 21:41:00 -
[111] - Quote
Vaju Enki wrote:admiral root wrote:Glorious news! The saviour has just announced to a packed Brapelille local that he will run for CSM 8. The crowd is going wild. Highsec has just been saved.
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
811
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 21:41:00 -
[112] - Quote
It is official! James is running for CSM8 chairman!
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Runeme Shilter
New Order Logistics CODE.
39
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 21:48:00 -
[113] - Quote
This is great news! JAMES 315 will run for CSM - he is the best person for the job! |

Wescro
Tash-Murkon Amalgamated Security
207
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:19:00 -
[114] - Quote
315! This thread is awful and it should be locked. |

Ustrello
Mindstar Technology Fatal Ascension
76
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:28:00 -
[115] - Quote
All hail the savior of high sec |

Lord Mandelor
Caldari State
165
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:33:00 -
[116] - Quote
The Time has Come! Vote James! Knight and Agent of the New Order |

BillMurray
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:33:00 -
[117] - Quote
This is great news! Vote for James 315, Supreme Protector of Highsec! |

Ricky the Rat
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:39:00 -
[118] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Glorious news! The saviour has just announced to a packed Brapelille local that he will run for CSM 8. The crowd is going wild. Fantastic what a singular, committed focus can render into existence! |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
798
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:40:00 -
[119] - Quote
I endorse James 315 for the CSM.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

Ricky the Rat
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:41:00 -
[120] - Quote
 |

SPIONKOP
KILL A CULT
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:49:00 -
[121] - Quote
The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.
I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).
______________________________
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
817
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:53:00 -
[122] - Quote
SPIONKOP wrote:The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.
I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).
______________________________
Can you define 'cyber bully' and 'balanced game', please, and then tell us all how James relates to those two definitions.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Ustrello
Mindstar Technology Fatal Ascension
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 23:00:00 -
[123] - Quote
SPIONKOP wrote:The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.
I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).
______________________________
Bingo pieces for the bingo throne |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
435
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 23:00:00 -
[124] - Quote
SPIONKOP wrote:The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.
Honestly, why do you bother playing a game when the perfectly acceptable in-game actions of other players upset you so much?
SPIONKOP wrote:I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode
While I don't claim to be a space lawyer, didn't CCP state that Mittens would be permitted to run again if he wanted? Also, saying something incredibly insensitive while drunk does not constitute bullying.
SPIONKOP wrote:To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
You don't want a balanced game. You want a game that is radically unbalanced in favour of your own playstyle. A game that would be not-Eve.
SPIONKOP wrote:Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).
One man, no matter how awesome, cannot a cult be. He's a rockstar, you just haven't accepted that you're a fan yet. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |

Ricky the Rat
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:13:00 -
[125] - Quote
SPIONKOP wrote:To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
But a GREAT move for those who want an unbalanced game... Equilibrium eventually decays into stagnation. Think of him as a spoon stirring up the pulp in your morning glass of ice cold orange juice, so that the final gulp doesn't clog your throat and choke you to death... |

Lin Suizei
86
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 04:53:00 -
[126] - Quote
SPIONKOP wrote:The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.
I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).
______________________________
A vote for James is a vote for more quality posting. Do your part for a better Highsec tomorrow - kill an AFK miner today! |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
934
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 08:38:00 -
[127] - Quote
SPIONKOP wrote:The guy is a Cyber Bully, a known scammer and extortionist who continues to scam.
I would suggest that as the The Mittani can't stand due to his very public Cyber Bully episode and ban this person will follow a similar doctrine and encourage Cyber Bullying in Eve and maybe take it to a new level.
To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game.
Anyone But James, he is just a Cult. (I said C U L T, no N in here).
______________________________
For a start, how on earth do you consider him a "bully"? As for "extorting" money from people... so what, that's an intended, legitimate activity in game. You might as well say Candidate X shouldn't be allowed to run for CSM because they fly a drake.
Your arguments range between having no basis to being absolutely absurd.
James 315 for CSM 8! |

Lovely Dumplings
Lambda Mining
60
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 10:24:00 -
[128] - Quote
As a miner who agrees with every part of The New Order, The Code, and James 315, I wholeheartedly support James 315's bid for CSM. I feel that nobody else understands the TRUE issues of highsec, and I shall be proud to call him MY rep!
(seriously, some you industrialists need to think EVE. The more the new order disrupts mining, the more mineral prices will go up. As long as he isn't screwing with you, his actions benefit you. If he IS screwing with you, HTFU.) I support James 315, and mine according to the-áTHE NEW HALAIMA CODE. Vote James 315, the CSM Rep Highsec needs. www.minerbumping.com |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
822
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:57:00 -
[129] - Quote
Ricky the Rat wrote:SPIONKOP wrote:To allow this bully to represent players in Eve would be a bad move for all players who want a balanced game. But a GREAT move for those who want an unbalanced game... Equilibrium eventually decays into stagnation. Think of him as a spoon stirring up the pulp in your morning glass of ice cold orange juice, so that the final gulp doesn't clog your throat and choke you to death... Besides, one person's balance is another's handcuffs... I wouldn't even agree with this - the game should be balanced, but not so that nobody can affect anything that anyone else does. Rather it should be balanced so that there is an effective counter to everything, but it is opt-in and you lose something else when you choose that counter - like warp stabs are a counter for scrams, but you lose the fitting slot.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Keisha Mei Ash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:10:00 -
[130] - Quote
I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.
Anyone but James will be getting my vote! |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
822
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:12:00 -
[131] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.
Anyone but James will be getting my vote! mynnna?
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
442
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:13:00 -
[132] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.
Anyone but James will be getting my vote!
Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks? No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |

Keisha Mei Ash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:22:00 -
[133] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.
Anyone but James will be getting my vote! Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks? Simple. Because that wouldn't get me closer to my goal of making pilots of internet spaceships as butthurt as possible. Duh. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Persona Non Gratis
450
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:28:00 -
[134] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:admiral root wrote:Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.
Anyone but James will be getting my vote! Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks? Simple. Because that wouldn't get me closer to my goal of making pilots of internet spaceships as butthurt as possible. Duh.
Then I commend you for realising that charity begins at home.  No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |

Keisha Mei Ash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:34:00 -
[135] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Keisha Mei Ash wrote:admiral root wrote:Keisha Mei Ash wrote:I fully support the theme-parking of Eve.
Anyone but James will be getting my vote! Wouldn't it be simpler to quit Eve and play one of the eleventy-one other MMOs out there? You know, the ones that are already theme parks? Simple. Because that wouldn't get me closer to my goal of making pilots of internet spaceships as butthurt as possible. Duh. Then I commend you for realising that charity begins at home.  Um...thanks? |

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 18:27:00 -
[136] - Quote
315 4 CSM8!
315 4 CSM8 |

Llort
jawa shipyards
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 18:54:00 -
[137] - Quote
Amazing to see people really argue about the worth of shares in the New Order, I guess it goes to show how much (or rather how little) they understand about James 315 and the New Order.
I support James315 because High Sec needs a change, keep up the current amount of botting iceminers and new players will believe that is all EVE has to offer. The sense of entitlement amongst the botters shows when they file petitions, when they go insane over being bumped and when they seriously try to find out rl data of bumpers in order to stop them.
Play anyway you want, but always keep in mind that EVE is not a single player game, people might interact with you in whatever way they want to play the game. And for the love of all that is holy, keep in mind its a game (did I just say that....) and having a laugh will be much better then going apeshit over lost pixels. |

Ila Gant
Hedion University Amarr Empire
280
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 21:43:00 -
[138] - Quote
Malcanis for CSM 8 |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1703
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 21:47:00 -
[139] - Quote
Llort wrote:Amazing to see people really argue about the worth of shares in the New Order, I guess it goes to show how much (or rather how little) they understand about James 315 and the New Order.
I support James315 because High Sec needs a change, keep up the current amount of botting iceminers and new players will believe that is all EVE has to offer. The sense of entitlement amongst the botters shows when they file petitions, when they go insane over being bumped and when they seriously try to find out rl data of bumpers in order to stop them.
Play anyway you want, but always keep in mind that EVE is not a single player game, people might interact with you in whatever way they want to play the game. And for the love of all that is holy, keep in mind its a game (did I just say that....) and having a laugh will be much better then going apeshit over lost pixels. I will admit it is hell funny that the people he got billions off for these "shares" are the same ones supporting him. Paying for entrance into the cowards club. Well I suppose it is better for your ego than say going to Null and getting splattered like the bugs you are.
There really is one born every minute. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Winchester Steele
A Perfectly Normal Corp.
84
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 23:22:00 -
[140] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Llort wrote:Amazing to see people really argue about the worth of shares in the New Order, I guess it goes to show how much (or rather how little) they understand about James 315 and the New Order.
I support James315 because High Sec needs a change, keep up the current amount of botting iceminers and new players will believe that is all EVE has to offer. The sense of entitlement amongst the botters shows when they file petitions, when they go insane over being bumped and when they seriously try to find out rl data of bumpers in order to stop them.
Play anyway you want, but always keep in mind that EVE is not a single player game, people might interact with you in whatever way they want to play the game. And for the love of all that is holy, keep in mind its a game (did I just say that....) and having a laugh will be much better then going apeshit over lost pixels. I will admit it is hell funny that the people he got billions off for these "shares" are the same ones supporting him. Paying for entrance into the cowards club. Well I suppose it is better for your ego than say going to Null and getting splattered like the bugs you are. There really is one born every minute. 
Or maybe we actually believe in what James stands for. Maybe, just maybe its not a scam and James has an actual well thought out vision for Hi-Sec. If guys like you could get your head out of your ass for 10 seconds and listen to what James has to say you might understand why we as a community have heaped billions of isk and praise on his lap.
Cowards you say? The reality is that some of us live in high-sec because we like high-sec. Its casual and offers lots of short term gameplay options for those of us who are busy. This does not mean that we like our gameplay to be "perfectly safe" as some people espouse. For people like us, like me, where do we turn for representation? Malcanis is an amazing candidate and will surely get elected, but he is not a hi-sec candidate. James 315 is. And while the Supreme Protector plays with a little more flavor than some like, you might be surprised to discover that his official position is intelligent, well thought out and not all that far off from the wisdom of Malcanis.
315 4 CSM 8!! |

Agent Trask
Aliastra Gallente Federation
51
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 05:58:00 -
[141] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:There really is one born every minute. 
There IS an AFK miner born every minute. We have a big job ahead of us correcting them.
Join the New Order, buy your permit today, and follow the code.
www.minerbumping.com |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1704
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 07:29:00 -
[142] - Quote
Agent Trask wrote:Frying Doom wrote:There really is one born every minute.  There IS an AFK miner born every minute. We have a big job ahead of us correcting them. Yes I agree completely, you really need that edge, you should donate all your earnings to James 315 for the cause. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
832
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:04:00 -
[143] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Yes I agree completely, you really need that edge, you should donate all your earnings to James 315 for the cause.  Actually it is best to keep some ISK for yourself, otherwise it just takes longer to donate it, then claim the reimbursements back.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Jonah Gravenstein
The Burning Lotus
5464
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:29:00 -
[144] - Quote
I'm actually in a quandry, there's some very good candidates coming forward for CSM 8. It's pretty much guaranteed that Malcanis and Myanna will be on the the next CSM. Ripard Teg kind of shot himself in the foot with a controversial blog post, while I admire his honesty and regularly read his blog, he isn't in the running where my vote is concerned because of it.
It's time that the CSM had new blood, electing past members is all well and good but their positions are known, I believe that James will do a good job and although he is fond of RP and rhetoric he has the games best interests in mind. Besides, the controversy caused if he does get elected will be absolutely hilarious.
I am Ohm of Borg, Resistance is Voltage/Current. |

Crazey Monkey
Hades Effect
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 04:57:00 -
[145] - Quote
Not only will they be bumped by the saviour of high sec but also the main CSM rep for high sec. I think that is pretty amazing. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
845
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 13:53:00 -
[146] - Quote
Crazey Monkey wrote:Not only will they be bumped by the saviour of high sec but also the main CSM rep for high sec. I think that is pretty amazing. Just wait 'til you see what they think of it.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

Alonzo Harris
Elbflorenz Industries
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 19:39:00 -
[147] - Quote
this thread is clearly about to be taken over by james' personal grunts. have any of you tried to step back a little bit and to look at what he proposes from a distance? stop being such boneheads please. Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/ |

Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 03:07:00 -
[148] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote:this thread is clearly about to be taken over by james' personal grunts. have any of you tried to step back a little bit and to look at what he proposes from a distance? stop being such boneheads please.
Based on your prompting, I attempted to take a look at his proposal from around 20 yards away. It appeared to be a horizontal rectangle, composed of 1 large white vertical rectangle, flanked by 2 smaller and narrower blue vertical rectangles. My head felt as bony as before, neither more nor less bony. All in all, I do not believe that this exercise brings appreciable additional wisdom over the obvious initial task of simply reading the proposal. Perhaps the problem is that you skipped straight to the 20 yard view without bothering to read the proposal first? If this is the case, then I suggest that you step forward a little bit and look at what he proposes from a normal reading distance.
|

Manu Militari
The Scope Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 03:50:00 -
[149] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote:this thread is clearly about to be taken over by james' personal grunts. have any of you tried to step back a little bit and to look at what he proposes from a distance? stop being such boneheads please.
|

Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
333
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 05:43:00 -
[150] - Quote
stoicfaux wrote:IMHO, Sansha would make a better high-sec CSM representative. He may be an NPC, but he has more name recognition than James 315 could ever hope for. Universal popularity is key to consolidating the high-sec vote, IMO.
Sansha Kuvakei is classified as a player character, FYI. Even says hes been playing for 107 years. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1708
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 07:25:00 -
[151] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Yes I agree completely, you really need that edge, you should donate all your earnings to James 315 for the cause.  Actually it is best to keep some ISK for yourself, otherwise it just takes longer to donate it, then claim the reimbursements back. Well you could always sell those shares......Oh wait I saw what happened when someone tried that on another forum Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
847
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 16:58:00 -
[152] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Frying Doom wrote:Yes I agree completely, you really need that edge, you should donate all your earnings to James 315 for the cause.  Actually it is best to keep some ISK for yourself, otherwise it just takes longer to donate it, then claim the reimbursements back. Well you could always sell those shares......Oh wait I saw what happened when someone tried that on another forum  Selling shares is completely acceptable. Of course, you can't really sell them for the same as what you bought them for, otherwise the person would just go directly to James.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
963
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 09:54:00 -
[153] - Quote
I hope James bumps the outrageously awful CSM reps/candidates (trebor, ripard, etc) out of the CSM with the same grace he bumps bots out of belts. |

Heath Major
Eve's Celestial Ninjas
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 01:22:00 -
[154] - Quote
No thanks, James 315 is an idiot, go listen to http://crossingzebras.com/. If people don't play the way he thinks we should play then we should be encouraged to quit. |

Agent Eunoli
BRAB0
63
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 02:07:00 -
[155] - Quote
Heath Major wrote:No thanks, James 315 is an idiot, go listen to http://crossingzebras.com/. If people don't play the way he thinks we should play then we should be encouraged to quit. What a concise position you have.
Perhaps you would care to elaborate why you think James 315 is an idiot?
I also like how you posted the exact same thing in multiple threads. Were you unable to think of more than what you wrote? Cinematic HD EVE Movies: http://www.youtube.com/user/EveEunoli/ |

Amyclas Amatin
EVE University Ivy League
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 08:32:00 -
[156] - Quote
I can respect the new order using force to "Fix" high-sec into what it thinks it should be, but politicking CCP is just low.
Will the game really be better with players being pushed out of high-sec? With high-sec players outnumbering the rest, it probably won't happen. Financially, I don't see how nerfing high-sec would help CCP.
Maybe high-sec players need to be more vocal in politics, but most are casual players who don't give a **** about what goes on in the forums.
Anyway, I fully support high-sec ganking. Do that, and leave the mechanics alone! |

Cyprus Black
The Learning Curve.
661
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 08:39:00 -
[157] - Quote
After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works. Trolling is like art. Anyone can finger paint, but it takes true talent to create a masterpiece. |

Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
538
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 09:04:00 -
[158] - Quote
Cyprus Black wrote:After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works.
A Heath Major alt? I think it could be! Don't worry about posting with your main! -áPost with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7744
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 15:22:00 -
[159] - Quote
IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1205
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 15:38:00 -
[160] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? I do believe he was cleared of any wrong-doing after the fact. I wonder if that still counts in CCP's eyes? If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1205
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 15:45:00 -
[161] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:I can respect the new order using force to "Fix" high-sec into what it thinks it should be, but politicking CCP is just low. How is that low? High-sec is badly in need of balancing. James 315 certainly can't dictate to CCP how things should be done but he would serve as an effective sounding board able to point out bad ideas that would further the current, nearly intolerable imbalance.
Amyclas Amatin wrote:Will the game really be better with players being pushed out of high-sec? With high-sec players outnumbering the rest, it probably won't happen. I can't see where people get this idea that anybody is pushing them around. Even if high-sec were nerfed into oblivion nothing would prevent you from staying there. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 17:46:00 -
[162] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify?
Why don't you petition it. A vote for James 315 is a vote for a stronger EVE!-á VOTE 315 4 CSM8 |

Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
1205
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 17:49:00 -
[163] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:Malcanis wrote:IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. I'm detecting sarcasm, but I should also note that the candidate application period hasn't started yet. We'll know for sure when James 315 sends in his application. If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |

Cyprus Black
The Learning Curve.
663
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 18:16:00 -
[164] - Quote
Lapine Davion wrote:Cyprus Black wrote:After hearing him on the Crossing Zebras podcast, I can say for sure that the guy is a moron and has no clue how this game works, both in player interaction and actual game mechanics. I would sooner vote for a newbie still on his trail account for CSM than James 315. The newbie at least has the balls to admit he doesn't know how the game works. A Heath Major alt? I think it could be! Nobody puts Cyprus in the alt corner! Trolling is like art. Anyone can finger paint, but it takes true talent to create a masterpiece. |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
7752
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 18:26:00 -
[165] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:Malcanis wrote:IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it.
I'm just curious. I disagree with James on some important issues, but I respect his passion for his vision of EVE. However his passion is moot if he's not qualified to run. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

John XIII
The Carnifex Corp
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 21:59:00 -
[166] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:John E Normus wrote:Malcanis wrote:IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it. I'm just curious. I disagree with James on some important issues, but I respect his passion for his vision of EVE. However his passion is moot if he's not qualified to run.
I'm curious what important issues do you disagree with James 315 on? Since you mention it.
I think this will be a helpful exercise.
:allears: |

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
26
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 23:26:00 -
[167] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:Malcanis wrote:IIRC, no one who has been banned for an EULA violation can run for CSM. Does James actually qualify? Why don't you petition it.
No "?" jeez, I suck 
I'd like to thank the EvE community for not busting my chops for that mistake. A vote for James 315 is a vote for a stronger EVE!-á VOTE 315 4 CSM8 |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 20:25:00 -
[168] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Bantara wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: Are there any other reasons[to not vote for James]?
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James has an undeniable and varied knowledge of game mechanics. He spent several years in nullsec, has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
I'm flattered to see that you feel the need to reiterate my own points, but did you have anything to add? Is your sarcasim a passive-aggressive way of disagreeing with my obvious-even-if-indirect point?
Let me point it out for you if you missed it, though I don't actually think you did...
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James...has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
You asked the question, I provided the answer that you yourself listed. |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
916
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 20:55:00 -
[169] - Quote
Bantara wrote:Let me point it out for you if you missed it, though I don't actually think you did... Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote: James...has pulled off one of the largest scams in EVE's history (at the time)...
You asked the question, I provided the answer that you yourself listed. Hardly a reason not to vote for James. Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. It shows that the scammer is in touch with all areas of the game - scamming is a legitimate playstyle too! Secondly, The Mittani is known to have scammed several supercaps, amounting to at least tens of billions of ISK, and he is the exec of probably the alliance with the greatest scamming history in the game. He was hands-down the most effective chairman the CSM has ever had. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 21:14:00 -
[170] - Quote
James' scam was done to highlight the EXACT nature of EIB, and in the end, James was absolutely correct. This highlights that while the man has had his doubters and detractors, he always ends up being shown as right in the end, and is known for maintaining his cool throughout!
315 4 CSM 8! 315 4 CSM 8 |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 21:56:00 -
[171] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. And thus why I laughed. Do not confuse legality with morality.
|

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
921
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:06:00 -
[172] - Quote
Bantara wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Firstly, there's nothing wrong with scamming. And thus why I laughed. Do not confuse legality with morality. You should watch out for confusing actions in a vidya game with morality, too. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

IbanezLaney
the church of awesome Caldari State Capturing
225
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:07:00 -
[173] - Quote
I spend my days mining away in my asteroid eating carebear suit in Hykanima.
Why hasn't James315 come to bump me?
It seems they are not serious about their bumping business which is a good indicator James315 will not be any good at CSM. No point voting for him if he can't deliver on his own services.
Fix this **** See Sea Pea. |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:09:00 -
[174] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:You should watch out for confusing actions in a vidya game with morality, too. You are a human being. I am a human being. Morality is involved.
You don't have to agree. But there it is.
|

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:17:00 -
[175] - Quote
Bantara wrote: You are a human being. I am a human being. Morality is involved.
You don't have to agree. But there it is.
So do I need to turn myself into the police for all the times I played Modern Warfare online and shot other people to death while laughing manically? Or the times I played Counter Strike and planted bombs as a terrorist? Should I repent for all the times I played Left 4 Dead and took glee in the malicious murder of other players? All the team killing I've done? All the jumpkick spam I did in FEAR? Am I to be judged by a jury of my peers for the thousands upon thousands of deaths I've inflicted in a mere day of playing StarCraft?
Thank goodness I'm not to blame for all the griefing I did in Team Fortress 2 against the other team of human beings when I deployed a sentry, though, as the sentry did all that. That would have been too much for me to bear. 315 4 CSM 8 |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
921
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 22:45:00 -
[176] - Quote
Bantara wrote:You are a human being. I am a human being. Morality is involved.
You don't have to agree. But there it is.
You signed up for a game in the full knowledge that someone could and would try to steal your space pixels. I stole your space pixels, as part of the game.
That's like saying I'm an evil person because I asked for my rent in Monopoly. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
22
|
Posted - 2013.02.25 23:14:00 -
[177] - Quote
You guys are taking that too far, that wasn't my point.
Some people are pvp pilots and run on "pvp" platforms. Others live in sov space and run on 0.0 sovereignty platforms. Others are hi-sec dwellers and run on that platform. Others are pirates and run on pirate platforms. You're comfortable with scamming. You find it to be an interesting and unique element of Eve. To you, this is a point in James's favor. But not everyone thinks the same way. What for you is a pro, to another is a con. It's not like you only said, "James has excellent knowledge of how Eve works," something I would hope all players would approve of. You said, "look, James has pulled off huge scams!" and then asked "why wouldn't one want to vote for him?"
It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed.
Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one. |

Alonzo Harris
Elbflorenz Industries
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.26 01:13:00 -
[178] - Quote
and thus, the circlejerk continues... Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/ |

Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 00:30:00 -
[179] - Quote
Bantara wrote:
It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed.
Eve-centrism on the EVE-O forums? Outrageous!
Thus, I laughed.
Quote:Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one.
Where? |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
932
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 12:01:00 -
[180] - Quote
Bantara wrote:It's comical how Eve-culturally-centric and narrow-minded that is. Thus, I laughed. That's like saying that someone running for Chinese president should focus on Ukrainian cultural ideas. Hello, this is an EVE election. It seems fair that we focus on elements of EVE's culture.
Bantara wrote:Anyways, no need to continue this further. Either you get it, or you don't, and James has an official thread which should be bumped more than this one. Actually he doesn't. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

Alonzo Harris
Elbflorenz Industries
1
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:13:00 -
[181] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:*non-related gibberish*
shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you" Power to the People! http://freehighsec.wordpress.com/ |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
932
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 15:42:00 -
[182] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:*non-related gibberish* shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you" Ouch, that hurt.
Since you altered the quote, it's hard to tell what post you're actually referring to, especially as my last post was pretty closely related to the question that I was answering. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
54
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 16:15:00 -
[183] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote: shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"
Calm down, James. There's no reason to be so angry at your own alts.
315 4 CSM 8 |

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
28
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 17:26:00 -
[184] - Quote
Alonzo Harris wrote:Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:*non-related gibberish* shut up james, why dont you at least post with your "main character" ? people are discussing "you" on forum threads without having heard one actual word from "you"
His posts are best seen here.
Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors? Former Knight of the New Order of Highsec.-á I sell N.O. secrets for isk! |

Wodensun
ZeroSec
64
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 16:07:00 -
[185] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests.
/Thread |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
968
|
Posted - 2013.03.14 19:15:00 -
[186] - Quote
Wodensun wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Someone that may have once run a ponzi scheme and nowadays shitposts and bumps miners and 'singlehandedly' runs a personal blog where he sperges biased playground level babble on subjects of no consequence has no relevance representing high-sec interests. /Thread Hardly. Or are the scammers and gankers and bumpers who live and play in highsec not legitimate voters? You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
2
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 16:33:00 -
[187] - Quote
You're at work in real life. There are maybe twenty other people working with you. One of these people is a boring jerk who incessantly takes the **** out of the weakest/strangest person in the room. He often pushes the boat out too far. This jerk could be James 315. 
I have no problem with bumping and suicide ganking. If you use your head these activities can be avoided. It's not hard to do.
I have read James 315's blog a few times and it honestly a load of b******* and boring as well. He makes some of what The Mittani writes interesting. Not that suggest you vote for The Mittani either.
In short James 315 is a joke and obviously not viable as a candidate for the CSM.
|

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 21:12:00 -
[188] - Quote
John E Normus wrote:Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors? To get nominated?
Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1062
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 21:43:00 -
[189] - Quote
Bethan Le Troix wrote:You're at work in real life. There are maybe twenty other people working with you. One of these people is a boring jerk who incessantly takes the **** out of the weakest/strangest person in the room. He often pushes the boat out too far. This jerk could be James 315. 
So wait, highsec is the 1-in-20 minority now? I always thought they were the massive majority and thus needed dedicated catering? "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Khergit Deserters
794
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 22:16:00 -
[190] - Quote
Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? |

John E Normus
New Order Logistics CODE.
33
|
Posted - 2013.03.15 22:31:00 -
[191] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:John E Normus wrote:Why do you think he has to post on EvE-O when his blog is getting so many visitors? To get nominated? Linky please to the official candidacy thread, I seem to have missed it.
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74283
You're adorable. Vote JAMES 315 for CSM8 |

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
89
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 00:16:00 -
[192] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that?
By voting for him. 315 4 CSM 8 |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 01:16:00 -
[193] - Quote
Well, aren't you a special little snowflake?
Linky to *james* candidacy thread.
You know, the one where he throws his hat in the ring...
Otherwise this is just more BS as usual.
Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? Trebor would probably be the troll candidate.
Otherwise, Malcanis for a serious candidate.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
85
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 01:20:00 -
[194] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Well, aren't you a special little snowflake? Linky to *james* candidacy thread. You know, the one where he throws his hat in the ring... Otherwise this is just more BS as usual.
Clearly you didn't read that devblog. It's fairly short and renders all your questions moot. Try reading the part with words, this time.
|

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 03:17:00 -
[195] - Quote
Vin King wrote:Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? By voting for him.
I've received a few questions asking me how this would work. So far, nobody I've replied to has understood the physics involved correctly, so let me try to give a brief explanation. Essentially, according to the Uncertainty Principle, when you want to interfere with the measurement of an object, all you have to do is participate with that object. To disrupt the CSM efforts of the Saviour of HighSec, you can vote for the Saviour of HighSec, and that will disrupt the measurement of his vote to the point that he cannot be elected. This is a surefire way for protesters to ensure his defeat, according to my understanding of particle physics.
If you disagree with my reading, you'd best be prepared to show your educational endorsements on this matter, and if yours cannot defeat mine, you're practically certain to be wrong. 315 4 CSM 8 |

Nathalie LaPorte
Republic University Minmatar Republic
86
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 03:38:00 -
[196] - Quote
Vin King wrote:Vin King wrote:Khergit Deserters wrote:Reading all these candidates' posts is too much work. I just want to vote against James 315. What's the best way to do that? By voting for him. I've received a few questions asking me how this would work. So far, nobody I've replied to has understood the physics involved correctly, so let me try to give a brief explanation. Essentially, according to the Uncertainty Principle, when you want to interfere with the measurement of an object, all you have to do is participate with that object. To disrupt the CSM efforts of the Saviour of HighSec, you can vote for the Saviour of HighSec, and that will disrupt the measurement of his vote to the point that he cannot be elected. This is a surefire way for protesters to ensure his defeat, according to my understanding of particle physics. If you disagree with my reading, you'd best be prepared to show your educational endorsements on this matter, and if yours cannot defeat mine, you're practically certain to be wrong.
This is completely wrong. The uncertainty principle doesn't just state that interaction disrupts measurement, it states that measurement CONSTITUTES disruption, and therefore the granularity of one's measurements are limited by the amount you can limit said disruption, which possesses a distinct lower-bound related to the planck constant. According to this observation, the more votes that are cast, the less uncertainty matters as a ratio, which makes your reasoning incorrect.
However, your macro-level intuition is correct, the best way to vote against James315 is to vote for him. To wit: Everyone is an alt of James315, or of the Mittani. James315 secretly is the Mittani. Therefore, a vote for anyone other than James315, is actually a vote for James315. If you omit James315 from your CSM ballot, you are voting for 14 other people. Those 14 people are all actually James315. Thus, omitting James315 from your ballot, is like voting for James315 14 times. Voting for James315 is therefore superior to not voting for James315. You might ask, what if I don't vote for anyone at all? This calls into question quantum mechanics again...yes, I know you thought we were done with QM once Vin King's use of Uncertainty was called into question, but you were wrong. If you don't vote for anyone, then your vote exists like Schrodinger's Cat, in a hidden box. Your vote in that box is voting for every possible candidate. therefore, not voting, is like voting for 28+ candidates, who are all James315. This is at least twice as bad as actually voting your block, and over 28 times as bad as just voting for James315 directly. |

Lyza Kimbo
Cat Scratch Fever
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 20:00:00 -
[197] - Quote
James315 is a dirtbag of the first and highest level, and those New Order lackeys of his are just pirates in disguise. That protection money scam he and his minions are running in and around Kamio is like something out of 1929 Chicago.
That someone so widely loathed and detested could possibly have any chance of being elected to "represent" the very people he victimizes is a serious indictment of the whole CSM system. |

Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
83
|
Posted - 2013.03.16 20:25:00 -
[198] - Quote
Lyza Kimbo wrote:James315 is a dirtbag of the first and highest level, and those New Order lackeys of his are just pirates in disguise. That protection money scam he and his minions are running in and around Kamio is like something out of 1929 Chicago.
That someone so widely loathed and detested could possibly have any chance of being elected to "represent" the very people he victimizes is a serious indictment of the whole CSM system.
That fact that he can generate such a strong reaction in people, and mostly with his words and ideas, not as much his in-game actions, is a pretty solid reason to put him in that seat. The guy gets things done.
Playing a pretend-cultist political terrorist in a sandbox game is a valid play style and is just as deserving of a CSM spot as a white knight, e-bushido-honoring goodie-two-shoes. |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.17 14:59:00 -
[199] - Quote
A man who (and encourages his corp members also to) effectively grief and oppress the highsec residents as per link below is not someone I want in CSM representing my interests as a highsec industrialists and occasions FW defender of the Caldari State.
http://soundcloud.com/drtylereve/mineteck20130301 |

Powers Sa
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
568
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 05:58:00 -
[200] - Quote
Yo James, how do you feel about tags for sec? http://youtu.be/g3jK-XZ2KnM?t=22m40s I suicide gank, and I would really like a streamlined method for regaining my sec status, but CCP abandoned this idea in the crimewatch patch. Would you champion getting this back into the dev cycle? Vote Nullsec for CSM8 Mynnna Kesper North-á Malc00nis |

admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
495
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 07:45:00 -
[201] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:A man who (and encourages his corp members also to) effectively grief and oppress the highsec residents
While there's no doubt that the New Order is higly effective, we don't grief (CCP said so, so you're utterly wrong) and we only oppress the bot-aspirants and those who would dare to defy the saviour in word or deed. To everyone else in highsec we're protectors of at-the-keyboard gameplay, interaction and assorted kinds of fluffy sweetness. We're the good guys.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:
I like how you completely skip over the part where the guy did it to himself. The Agents who were present tried to resolve a customer complaint and, by pure happenstance, record the legend of the exploding strawberry. We're historians, as well as educators.
You're falling into the same trap that a lot of people fell into when Mittens was the CSM chair - you're confusing James 315, saviour of highsec and target of huge amounts of unreasonable hatred by rabid bot aspirants, with the guy behind the character who seeks election to represent the players to CCP. Anyone who can't distinguish between the two should probably seek psychiatric help. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 10:20:00 -
[202] - Quote
Your reply reads like a lot of the brainwashed dogma that New Order is so agressively peddling in its activities.
Considering that James315 spends a majority of his Eve gametime parading as the "Saviour" of highsec and organising an alliance to further his in game aspirations which is fundementally "highsec is broken" is probably a very good yard stick with which to mesure his intentions. It also reflects the playerbase that will vote for him.
Afterall the Mittani eventually showed his own thoughts and feelings were not to diseperate from his online charecter, particularly after a few beers.
Also to suggest that I also have some difficulty with seperating reality from fantasy from one post also indicates a level of fanaticism on your part that quite frankly is disturbing. Afterall, how do you know I'm not posting as my charecter? |

admiral root
Red Galaxy SpaceMonkey's Alliance
495
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 12:48:00 -
[203] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Considering that James315 spends a majority of his Eve gametime parading as the "Saviour" of highsec and organising an alliance to further his in game aspirations which is fundementally "highsec is broken" is probably a very good yard stick with which to mesure his intentions considering the website
Fact: Highsec is broken.
Fact: James doesn't spend any time "organising an alliance" - I've spent more time organising Code. then he has, which is to say I put the forum together. What he does is dispense justice and mercy, as is appropriate for the saviour of high sec.
Fact: His intentions are to try and persaude CCP that highsec needs their attention sooner, rather than later.
Fact: Punctuation is your friend.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:It also reflects the playerbase that will vote for him.
You mean people who want to see highsec fixed?
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Afterall the Mittani eventually showed his own thoughts and feelings were not to diseperate from his online charecter, particularly after a few beers.
I wasn't there, but my understanding is that it was considerably more than "a few beers". People do and say regrettable things when drunk. The measure of a man is how he conducts himself after sobering up and realising what he's done. The Mittani conducted himself in an honourable way. I'm really not sure what this has to do with James having a vast knowledge of the game and a desire to see CCP address important issues.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Also to suggest that I also have some difficulty with seperating reality from fantasy from one post also indicates a level of fanaticism on your part that quite frankly is disturbing.
I didn't say *you* had difficulty, I was just making a general observation. I seem to have touched a nerve, though. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
715
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 17:43:00 -
[204] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Fact: Highsec is broken. You're confusing subjective opinion for established fact. For you it's correct. For me it's overstatement and hyperbole.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Also to suggest that I also have some difficulty with separating reality from fantasy from one post also indicates a level of fanaticism on your part that quite frankly is disturbing.
admiral root wrote:I didn't say *you* had difficulty, I was just making a general observation. I seem to have touched a nerve, though. Since that last paragraph was a direct response to him, you did actually. Dial back your fan-boi a couple of notches and you'll be fine.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:40:00 -
[205] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Fact: Highsec is broken.
This is an opinion, not a fact, if you are going to state a "Fact" you should support it with evidence. And this is an opinion that I do not agree with. Indeed I find James315 arguments that highsec is broken to be vague and lacking.
admiral root wrote:Fact: James doesn't spend any time "organising an alliance" - I've spent more time organising Code. then he has, which is to say I put the forum together. What he does is dispense justice and mercy, as is appropriate for the saviour of high sec.
While you acting as his forum admin may be "Fact" I will also take it that he is to busy dispensing "Justice" and "Mercy" to actually promote his own CSM campaign and is relying on his co-horts to promote his message... as vague as this message appears to be.
However, I am currently on interview 13 of the Crossing Zebras and I understand James315 one is number 16, so I hope to be proved wrong. But given his lackluster presence on this forum I find it somewhat discouraging.
admiral root wrote:Tiberius StarGazer wrote:It also reflects the playerbase that will vote for him. You mean people who want to see highsec fixed?
As in the people who wish to change highsec into something that a number of highsec residents dont want? Then yes. I feel that James315 vision of Mercy and Justice is one thats not shared by the many. |

Tiberius StarGazer
StarGazer Heavy Industries And Exploration
308
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 18:40:00 -
[206] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Tiberius StarGazer wrote:Afterall the Mittani eventually showed his own thoughts and feelings were not to diseperate from his online charecter, particularly after a few beers. I wasn't there, but my understanding is that it was considerably more than "a few beers". People do and say regrettable things when drunk. The measure of a man is how he conducts himself after sobering up and realising what he's done. The Mittani conducted himself in an honourable way. I'm really not sure what this has to do with James having a vast knowledge of the game and a desire to see CCP address important issues.
I guess I need to expand on the example some more to clarify my rational, The Mittani is the leader of an organisation which are known as Pranksters, Gankers, and Greifers. What amased me was the fact that after he designed, wrote and then presented a Fanfest peice on griefing another player came as a huge surprise. The master of griefers was infact, a griefer himself.
Ultimately, the way you play Eve is what you, as the person behind the computer screen, enjoys doing. Ergo, any chance you have of shaping and moulding the game will be based on the things you, as a player, enjoys doing.
If anyone says this is false is niave at best.
admiral root wrote:I didn't say *you* had difficulty, I was just making a general observation. I seem to have touched a nerve, though.
admiral root wrote:You're falling into the same trap that a lot of people fell into when Mittens was the CSM chair - you're confusing James 315, saviour of highsec and target of huge amounts of unreasonable hatred by rabid bot aspirants, with the guy behind the character who seeks election to represent the players to CCP. Anyone who can't distinguish between the two should probably seek psychiatric help.
Quite clearly by using You Are twice in that paragraph you were adressing me directly, and your blase way of attempting to use mental illness as a derogatory insult with which to attempt to quell my dissent is quite frankly insulting.
As a representative of james315 and a promoter of his policies it reflects very badly. |

Khergit Deserters
796
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 20:17:00 -
[207] - Quote
Tiberius StarGazer wrote: While you acting as his forum admin may be "Fact" I will also take it that he is to busy dispensing "Justice" and "Mercy" to actually promote his own CSM campaign and is relying on his co-horts to promote his message... as vague as this message appears to be.
I'm beginning to suspect that these cohorts are just Jim 315 himself, speaking through his alts. |

Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 22:59:00 -
[208] - Quote
Khergit Deserters wrote:I'm beginning to suspect that these cohorts are just Jim 315 himself, speaking through his alts.
That should seriously go on the miner bingo board.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:This is an opinion, not a fact, if you are going to state a "Fact" you should support it with evidence. And this is an opinion that I do not agree with. Indeed I find James315 arguments that highsec is broken to be vague and lacking.
- Evidence #1: An overwhelming majority of characters live in high-sec.
- Evidence #2: Miner ganking is at historic lows according to the CSM minutes.
- Evidence #3: It's more profitable for a miner to fit for yield and get ganked occasionally, than to fit tank and sacrifice yield.
Conclusion: High sec is either too safe, or too rewarding.
Unlike you, Admiral Root has this information, as do most people who have taken the time to form an informed opinion on the subject.
Tiberius StarGazer wrote:While you acting as his forum admin may be "Fact" I will also take it that he is to busy dispensing "Justice" and "Mercy" to actually promote his own CSM campaign and is relying on his co-horts to promote his message... as vague as this message appears to be.
Now I know you are trolling. Weren't you in the Trebor thread earlier supporting his candidacy? Trebor being a candidate who had to be pushed for 5 pages in his thread before he gave some specifics about what he stands for, and it's still hard to say if anything he says is his opinion or another bout of his devils advocacy.
On the other hand, James positions are far from vague. They are in fact so clear that people like you can form strong opinions against them, while others like myself and root strongly support them. Unlike Trebor, James actually stands for something, instead of promising everything to everyone. |

Ustrello
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 00:50:00 -
[209] - Quote
James is love james is life |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
718
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 00:59:00 -
[210] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:
- Evidence #1: An overwhelming majority of characters live in high-sec.
- Evidence #2: Miner ganking is at historic lows according to the CSM minutes.
- Evidence #3: It's more profitable for a miner to fit for yield and get ganked occasionally, than to fit tank and sacrifice yield.
Conclusion: High sec is either too safe, or too rewarding. Characters =/= players Scouts, traders, haulers and logistics (some or all of them alts of Low-sec/Null-sec/WH players) count against the total. Because ganking is the only pvp in hi-sec  evidence #3 is the same for hi and null sec miners (and possibly low-sec miners as well).
Conclusion: your conclusion (or logic) is flawed.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
972
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 14:58:00 -
[211] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Characters =/= players Scouts, traders, haulers and logistics (some or all of them alts of Low-sec/Null-sec/WH players) count against the total. No, they don't. The fact that almost all nullsec players have alts in highsec indicates that there's something wrong with the balance between nullsec and highsec.
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Because ganking is the only pvp in hi-sec  It's one of the major ones, and decreasing ganking means that PvP overall has decreased a lot. The other two mainstream forms of PvP are duels (lol) and wardecs, which leaves quite a lot of room for improvement.
Asuri Kinnes wrote:evidence #3 is the same for hi and null sec miners (and possibly low-sec miners as well). a) That depends on where you are in nullsec. b) Doesn't mean that highsec isn't broken, it just suggests that both highsec and nullsec need alterations in that regard. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
Vote James 315 for CSM 8! |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 21:05:00 -
[212] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:Tiberius StarGazer wrote:This is an opinion, not a fact, if you are going to state a "Fact" you should support it with evidence. And this is an opinion that I do not agree with. Indeed I find James315 arguments that highsec is broken to be vague and lacking.
- Evidence #1: An overwhelming majority of characters live in high-sec.
- Evidence #2: Miner ganking is at historic lows according to the CSM minutes.
- Evidence #3: It's more profitable for a miner to fit for yield and get ganked occasionally, than to fit tank and sacrifice yield.
Conclusion: High sec is either too safe, or too rewarding.
Wescro2, you are still making a leap from the 3 evidences to the conclusion. It's difficult to define the word "too" off the top of one's head, but what you're saying here is that current conditions are far off from some standard.
Problem is...Where does that standard come from??
In order to declare "hi-sec is broken" as fact, you're going to have to have an objective standard to be making this comparison of off. But as far as I can tell, y'all don't have one. Tell me if I'm wrong. What you have is your opinion as to what hi-sec should look like; that is the standard you are using to declare it broken.
So even though your evidences are fact, your conclusion is still opinion. By no means do I mean to deprive you of the right to your own opinion and standards, but you shouldn't try to pass them off as fact. |

Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics CODE.
130
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 21:12:00 -
[213] - Quote
Bantara wrote: In order to declare "hi-sec is broken" as fact, you're going to have to have an objective standard to be making this comparison of off. But as far as I can tell, y'all don't have one. Tell me if I'm wrong. What you have is your opinion as to what hi-sec should look like; that is the standard you are using to declare it broken.
Can you link us one credible CSM candidate who wishes highsec to remain the way it is? No? Get out. |

Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
90
|
Posted - 2013.03.19 21:30:00 -
[214] - Quote
Bantara wrote:Wescro2, you are still making a leap from the 3 evidences to the conclusion. It's difficult to define the word "too" off the top of one's head, but what you're saying here is that current conditions are far off from some standard.
Problem is...Where does that standard come from??
In order to declare "hi-sec is broken" as fact, you're going to have to have an objective standard to be making this comparison of off. But as far as I can tell, y'all don't have one. Tell me if I'm wrong. What you have is your opinion as to what hi-sec should look like; that is the standard you are using to declare it broken.
Considering that EVE has four flavors of space, and one has 80% of the population, I'd say the standard I'm measuring the current state against is an average distribution. I don't think it's good for the game to have "bastard children," ie, neglected areas that only a few people care about. Especially if that particular area cuts against the theme of the game. Restaurant analogies are popular in some of the other threads so let's put it like this. The current high sec is like a salad bar at a steak house that is threatening to shut down the grill and make the place vegetarian only.
Candidates like James 315 are advocating reducing the salad bar to an appetizer and putting the focus back on the steak. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
718
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 00:10:00 -
[215] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:Considering that EVE has four flavors of space, and one has 80% of the population, I'd say the standard I'm measuring the current state against is an average distribution. You would be wrong: Fanfest: State of the economy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MZD6-vGQms @ 4:29 71% of all population 65% > 5m skill points
Tippia proved several times, in several different threads, why statements like yours are wrong (i.e. - alts). Where the characters are has no provable relation to where the players are (or self identify). As we *all* know, players have alts. The longer one plays, the greater the % chance that player will have an (or several) alts. All we *know* is that during this "snapshot" character distribution looked like the above.
If it *proves* anything it's that "people have alts" and/or, there are a significant % of WH/Low sec/Null sec players who have to OR PREFER to make their money in hi-sec. (you know, in safety).
Wescro2 wrote:I don't think it's good for the game to have "bastard children," ie, neglected areas that only a few people care about. Especially if that particular area cuts against the theme of the game. If what you said was true (80%) it's kinda hard to argue that "only a few people care about" it...
Wescro2 wrote:Restaurant analogies are popular in some of the other threads so let's put it like this. The current high sec is like a salad bar at a steak house that is threatening to shut down the grill and make the place vegetarian only.
Candidates like James 315 are advocating reducing the salad bar to an appetizer and putting the focus back on the steak. wtfisthisIdon'teven...
It's more like the Grill is pissed more people are choosing to eat vegetarian and trying to throw the salad bar out. Nullsec's problems need to be fixed (for sure) but that won't come by making the menu "single choice".
Candidates like j315 are trying to make something look better (it's still fuggly) by making everything else look worse.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
93
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 05:45:00 -
[216] - Quote
You're splitting hairs. The number went down slightly to 71%, it's still disproportionately large. My point stands.
Asuri Kinnes wrote: Tippia proved several times, in several different threads, why statements like yours are wrong (i.e. - alts). Where the characters are has no provable relation to where the players are (or self identify).
Seriously? Characters have no provable relation to players? So if 100% of the characters were in high sec, you wouldn't be able to definitively say that 100% of players were in high sec? Of course there is a relation.
Asuri Kinnes wrote:As we *all* know, players have alts. The longer one plays, the greater the % chance that player will have an (or several) alts. All we *know* is that during this "snapshot" character distribution looked like the above.
If it *proves* anything it's that "people have alts" and/or, there are a significant % of WH/Low sec/Null sec players who have to OR PREFER to make their money in hi-sec. (you know, in safety).
I'm not disputing that that may be the case, but how do you go from your previous statement cautioning against assertions about player distribution, and then making your own assertions about player distribution. That's just a logical disconnect.
The fact that people are sending alts up to make money in high sec is indicative of the problem. There should be viable forms of income where ever a player lives.
Asuri Kinnes wrote:If what you said was true (80%) it's kinda hard to argue that "only a few people care about" it... 
I was referring to the under populated areas as being neglected. This is not hard to follow, are you being purposefully obtuse?
Asuri Kinnes wrote: wtfisthisIdon'teven...
It's more like the Grill is pissed more people are choosing to eat vegetarian and trying to throw the salad bar out. Nullsec's problems need to be fixed (for sure) but that won't come by making the menu "single choice".
Nope. What you said would be true if James 315 wanted to turn all high sec systems in to low or null. It isn't being eliminated. The salad bar will still be there and the menu won't be single choice. Just the 71% of the patrons (or their alts) won't be eating leafy greens at a renowned steak joint.
The excessive safety enjoyed by the high sec resident must come at the cost of lower income. Other wise our brethren in low and null get a raw deal for all their initiative and risk taking. If your idea of a good game is free ISK for everyone for risk-free, inactive play, then yes, James 315 is going to utterly and mercilessly destroy high sec. |

Lin Suizei
120
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 06:14:00 -
[217] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia proved several times, in several different threads, why statements like yours are wrong (i.e. - alts). Where the characters are has no provable relation to where the players are (or self identify). As we *all* know, players have alts. The longer one plays, the greater the % chance that player will have an (or several) alts. All we *know* is that during this "snapshot" character distribution looked like the above.
If it *proves* anything it's that "people have alts" and/or, there are a significant % of WH/Low sec/Null sec players who have to OR PREFER to make their money in hi-sec. (you know, in safety).
Wouldn't that actually reinforce Wescro's point about highsec being too lucrative - so lucrative, infact, that nullsec alts go to highsec to make ISK? Xeros S*** > are you really suprised? im not here to pvp so why the fuc not Xeros S**** > oh go cry somewhere else, im not in fw for the ****** pvp
Welcome to faction war. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 10:56:00 -
[218] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:You're splitting hairs. The number went down slightly to 71%, it's still disproportionately large. My point stands. I've never seen a reference stating that 80% of the players *lived* in Hi-sec, reference please? Or is that just more hyperbole?
Wescro2 wrote:Seriously? Characters have no provable relation to players?  So if 100% of the characters were in high sec, you wouldn't be able to definitively say that 100% of players were in high sec? Of course there is a relation. If 100% of all characters were in hi-sec, then yes, there would be relation. They don't.
Let me lay it out for you (in simple terms). I have 3 accounts and frequently dual or triple box. On all three accounts I have 7 characters, all trained > 2M skillpoints. At any one time I might have two or three logged in. I have not *lived* in hi-sec since November, 2008. None of my characters could possibly be considered "hi-sec'ers" - and yet, if they were online when the snapshot was taken (because no-one knows *when* that happens) it's very possible that all of my logged in toons would be seen in hi-sec, but I am not a hi-sec player.
Toons for scamming, trading, hauling and scouting are all based out of hi-sec (or, depending on circumstance) Low-sec, but there is *no way* to determine that, of the characters I have logged in, they belong to a WH resident. I know I'm *not* the only one who does things this way.
Hell, have you ever logged in an alt to do something in hi-sec and left the game open (forget to log them out)? *YOU* might be one of those counted as a "hi-sec" resident, which might be completely untrue!
If you know *anyone* with hi-sec alts, you can deduce that not all the characters in hi-sec are *players* who live there. Since CCP doesn't draw a distinction between the *player* and *alts* it's actually impossible to say how many *players* actually live in hi-sec because it's a snapshot of character distribution and not *player* distribution.
Wescro2 wrote:I'm not disputing that that may be the case, but how do you go from your previous statement cautioning against assertions about player distribution, and then making your own assertions about player distribution. That's just a logical disconnect. It's not a logical disconnect when you *know* that many of the "residents of hi-sec" are alts of residents of the other areas, i.e. Alts =/= players. No disconnect whatsoever.
Wescro2 wrote:The fact that people are sending alts up to make money in high sec is indicative of the problem. There should be viable forms of income where ever a player lives. Absolutely unassailable statement about game design, in this we both agree. However, one thing to keep in mind is that there will *always* be some who prefer to make their cash where they *can't* be bothered (or the degree of interruption is mitigated by game mechanics).
When Nullsec had the anom nerf, it was because it was a gushing faucet, and got nerfed. Incursions, same thing for hi-sec. The reason hi-sec Incursions got nerfed so hard was because it was a *broken* faucet, *in hi-sec*. The reason they didn't catch on universally in Null-sec and low-sec (Incursions *were* run there, but not universally like hi-sec) was the ability to interrupt/disrupt activities in that space. So it stands to reason that being interrupted is unacceptable to some players, and they *will* move their money making to space where it is less likely to be interrupted.
What degree of change is going to be necessary to encourage those low-sec or null-sec residents to move their money making back to null/low, when they've demonstratively proven they prefer not to be interrupted by moving to hi-sec?
Answer: Pre-Nerf Null Anomaly levels, apparently.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 11:02:00 -
[219] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:I was referring to the under populated areas as being neglected. This is not hard to follow, are you being purposefully obtuse? Nope, tired - didn't follow.
I do disagree however, that CCP can make nullsec/lowsec attractive enough to move a significant proportion of "hi-sec" players *out* of hi-sec - so far as I know the %'s have been floating around the same points (population wise) for years. As a matter of fact, one of the things Dr. E says in the linked video is about the "law of large numbers" (paraphrasing here) "all change will be gradual and small". It may be possible to move null-sec residents money making alts (*some*) out of hi-sec and back to null, but they've already voted with their feet once, even with null-sec anoms, exploration and WH's still available.
I think that buffing it to levels where those alts would be willing to move back to null will break the game in the other direction...
Wescro2 wrote:Nope. What you said would be true if James 315 wanted to turn all high sec systems in to low or null. It isn't being eliminated. The salad bar will still be there and the menu won't be single choice. Just the 71% of the patrons (or their alts) won't be eating leafy greens at a renowned steak joint.
The excessive safety enjoyed by the high sec resident must come at the cost of lower income. Other wise our brethren in low and null get a raw deal for all their initiative and risk taking. If your idea of a good game is free ISK for everyone for risk-free, inactive play, then yes, James 315 is going to utterly and mercilessly destroy high sec. Again, you miss the point - Some people are always going to prefer not to be interrupted/bothered. The degree of buff required to make them "vote with their feet" back out to null sec again has been proven (from the Anoms in null previously) to be too high. The *only* way to make that more attractive would be a degree of safety and ease of access that I don't think null sec residents want... (well, *some* of them don't want).
IMHO - Hi-sec income is already lower than null-sec income, ease of access and safety are the major differences.
Six of my friends and I jumped into an empty Null-system (from a wormhole) and found anoms/complexes and exploration sites out the ying/yang. After one hour of running said anoms (and a 10/10 site) we had all made in excess of 300m/hour (haven't gotten the final numbers yet, because some of the loot is still being moved, but we live in WH's, we're used to delayed gratification). Is that *always* viable? Probably not for the numbers of people in nullsec/system. But to say that "hi-sec" is the entirety of the problem is disingenuous at best.
And to say "j315" will do x, y, z is not supported by any statements by him (as I don't bother reading his blog because self-congratulatory :smug: isn't interesting to me). He needs to lay out his CSM platform (which to the best of my knowledge, he has not done).
Waiting to see *his* ideas.
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 11:03:00 -
[220] - Quote
Lin Suizei wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:Tippia proved several times, in several different threads, why statements like yours are wrong (i.e. - alts). Where the characters are has no provable relation to where the players are (or self identify). As we *all* know, players have alts. The longer one plays, the greater the % chance that player will have an (or several) alts. All we *know* is that during this "snapshot" character distribution looked like the above.
If it *proves* anything it's that "people have alts" and/or, there are a significant % of WH/Low sec/Null sec players who have to OR PREFER to make their money in hi-sec. (you know, in safety). Wouldn't that actually reinforce Wescro's point about highsec being too lucrative - so lucrative, infact, that nullsec alts go to highsec to make ISK? Not necessarily, see my above.
What *is* obvious is that there are many, many Null-sec (and low-sec) residents who make their isk the same way Hi-sec'ers do, and for many of the same reasons.
Ease of access and risk (or the mitigation thereof).
Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
1131
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 12:11:00 -
[221] - Quote
The balance between risk/reward with high, low, null and wh definitely needs fixing. I say that just in the sense that the current balance is just stupid from a design point of view, rather than saying it in the hopes of luring more people out of highsec into those other areas because I don't think even the most extreme nerfs to highsec and buffs to the other areas would make a huge difference to amount of players in highsec - I'm sure it'd attract a decent number people to these areas, and curb the alts-in-highsec-for-isk thing, but overall I wouldn't expect it to be a big difference, many people live in highsec because they're completely risk averse, and for a lot of them no amount of reward would tempt them into risky situations. |

Bantara
Corp 54 Curatores Veritatis Alliance
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 16:33:00 -
[222] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:The excessive safety enjoyed by the high sec resident must come at the cost of lower income. I asked this once on minerbumping and got no response that I'm aware of, but I'll ask again: Can you point out to me where in James 315's "platform" he supports your statement here? James does not seem to be for reducing hi-sec reward alone, but reducing hi-sec reward and increasing risk.
|

Primary Me
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
51
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 17:12:00 -
[223] - Quote
Asuri Kinnes wrote:And to say "j315" will do x, y, z is not supported by any statements by him Apart from all the ones on his blog. Ah, but then again you can't be bothered to read that, so therefore, anything you can't be bothered to read doesn't exist? At least now we can see where your narrow viewpoint comes from.
James 315 for CSM 8. A voice for hi-sec, a voice for reason. |

Pap Uhotih
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.20 19:15:00 -
[224] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:The balance between risk/reward with high, low, null and wh definitely needs fixing.
Is risk and reward equal across all of high sec or all of low sec or all of null?
Are risk and reward actually related?
What would be a more appropriate name for high security space if it wasn't highly secure? |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:17:00 -
[225] - Quote
Primary Me wrote:Asuri Kinnes wrote:And to say "j315" will do x, y, z is not supported by any statements by him Apart from all the ones on his blog. Ah, but then again you can't be bothered to read that, so therefore, anything you can't be bothered to read doesn't exist? At least now we can see where your narrow viewpoint comes from. Gee, if only there was some place where we could go to see the platforms of all the candidates.....

Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Keisha Mei Ash
Republic University Minmatar Republic
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:17:00 -
[226] - Quote
Aaaand James has dropped out of the CSM race.
An awful lot of hot air on the blog that basically translates to he doesn't want to risk a non-Icelandic seat that came with an NDA.
He'd rather sit on Minerbumping and ***** about how CCP is killing his PVP sandbox. Lol. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 00:46:00 -
[227] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:Aaaand James has dropped out of the CSM race.

Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Wescro2
New Order Logistics CODE.
95
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 01:08:00 -
[228] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:He'd rather sit on Minerbumping and ***** about how CCP is killing his PVP sandbox. Lol.
Because engaging the community in a daily updated blog is a bad thing. 
Great leaders don't necessarily have to get in office to do good, though they would no doubt make good representatives. Think Martin Luther King jr. |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep Silent Requiem
69
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 01:34:00 -
[229] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:Keisha Mei Ash wrote:He'd rather sit on Minerbumping and ***** about how CCP is killing his PVP sandbox. Lol. Because engaging the community in a daily updated blog is a bad thing.  Great leaders don't necessarily have to get in office to do good, though they would no doubt make good representatives. Think Martin Luther King jr.
However he's just going to be ignored by everyone again now. So that point is invalid. |

Asuri Kinnes
Adhocracy Incorporated Adhocracy
719
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 01:34:00 -
[230] - Quote
Wescro2 wrote:Because engaging the community in a daily updated blog is a bad thing.  Great leaders don't necessarily have to get in office to do good, though they would no doubt make good representatives. Think Martin Luther King jr.

Interdict Hi-Sec - it's the only way to be sure... |

Frying Doom
1995
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 02:12:00 -
[231] - Quote
While I can't stand his idea and think this lot act like a bunch of cowards.
I must salute someone dropping out of the CSM race in protest to the fact that all CSMs will now follow in the foot steps of CSM7. They were brown nosers and they have allowed and agreed with a change that will mean CCP can reward the CSM members who brown nose the most.
So maybe we should not use numbers but shades of brown to describe the CSMs now, instead of CSM7 we have CSM walnut brown.
o7 We all thought CSM 6 was a war crime with it's massive Null Presence CSM7 topped it by selling out our Council to CCP, don't let it happen again. Vote or next time Incarna is your fault. Stupid Signature Broke
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8239
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 07:55:00 -
[232] - Quote
It's not like it was a secret that CSMs have to agree to sign an NDA; indeed, it's pretty much the whole point of the CSM that they work with NDA material. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
973
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 08:55:00 -
[233] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:It's not like it was a secret that CSMs have to agree to sign an NDA; indeed, it's pretty much the whole point of the CSM that they work with NDA material. James' point was that CCP now gets to decide who is allowed to attend their meetings, so there's a good chance that he'll get NDA'd and still not be able to meaningfully contribute to the CSM.
Not that I approve, but that's his reasoning. You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric
|

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8239
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 09:37:00 -
[234] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Malcanis wrote:It's not like it was a secret that CSMs have to agree to sign an NDA; indeed, it's pretty much the whole point of the CSM that they work with NDA material. James' point was that CCP now gets to decide who is allowed to attend their meetings, so there's a good chance that he'll get NDA'd and still not be able to meaningfully contribute to the CSM. Not that I approve, but that's his reasoning.
The members of CSM 7 made it pretty clear that all the CSM can attend meetings via video conferencing or at least voice. I agree that it's preferrable to be there in person, but that's hardly being "excluded".
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Apricot Baby
caldariprimeponyclub
21
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:23:00 -
[235] - Quote
Regardless of the reasons why someone drops out, the general population will only see someone dropping out. Why not keep running and try to get in and then get them to fix the problem?
the irony of this statement coming from me is somewhat bittersweet :|
CSM Participation Reward Program - www.tinyurl.com/caldariprimeponyclub Earn rewards for taking part in this year's CSM Elections |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1077
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 10:24:00 -
[236] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:The members of CSM 7 made it pretty clear that all the CSM can attend meetings via video conferencing or at least voice. I agree that it's preferrable to be there in person, but that's hardly being "excluded".
Before, when the 7 attending members were the top 7 voters, you'd be 100% right. Now, when CCP is essentially directly choosing 5 of the 7 seats themselves, I think asking yourself whether or not they'd value your opinion at all - if they truly did, why wouldn't they have picked you?
There's no solid answer to that, of course, but it's a very valid question to ask, particularly when it's in relation to signing a year of your time away for unpaid work. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
8240
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 11:25:00 -
[237] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Malcanis wrote:The members of CSM 7 made it pretty clear that all the CSM can attend meetings via video conferencing or at least voice. I agree that it's preferrable to be there in person, but that's hardly being "excluded". Before, when the 7 attending members were the top 7 voters, you'd be 100% right. Now, when CCP is essentially directly choosing 5 of the 7 seats themselves, I think asking yourself whether or not they'd value your opinion at all - if they truly did, why wouldn't they have picked you? There's no solid answer to that, of course, but it's a very valid question to ask, particularly when it's in relation to signing a year of your time away for unpaid work.
Bottom line though, is that he quit because he was afraid he wouldn't win.
Very disappointing. Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1077
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 11:27:00 -
[238] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Bottom line though, is that he quit because he was afraid he wouldn't win. Very disappointing.
You see "afraid", I see "not worth the downsides if he can't get Top 2". Potato-Potatoe I guess. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

Prince Kobol
668
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 13:21:00 -
[239] - Quote
I'm going for the tinfoil option which is he knew that if he got elected then his real name would be published and we would all find out that he is really (insert name here) alt  |

Pap Uhotih
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 14:49:00 -
[240] - Quote
Snow Axe wrote:Malcanis wrote:The members of CSM 7 made it pretty clear that all the CSM can attend meetings via video conferencing or at least voice. I agree that it's preferrable to be there in person, but that's hardly being "excluded". Before, when the 7 attending members were the top 7 voters, you'd be 100% right. Now, when CCP is essentially directly choosing 5 of the 7 seats themselves, I think asking yourself whether or not they'd value your opinion at all - if they truly did, why wouldn't they have picked you? There's no solid answer to that, of course, but it's a very valid question to ask, particularly when it's in relation to signing a year of your time away for unpaid work.
If I remember my maths then in a 14 person team there are 91 lines of communication, if itGÇÖs just 7 then they internally only have 21 lines of communication, the smaller group can be much more effective. Making the team ever smaller improves this further but there is a point where you cannot maintain quality and reduce size. At that point if I wanted to make that group even more effective then I would change its makeup, make it more focussed.
If the intention were to focus on new players over the next year then it wonGÇÖt help CCP to talk to seven people who have played for ten years. If the intention is to develop wormhole space then it's not going to be useful for them to talk to seven Hi-sec care bears. That is not to say that in any case wild card opinions should be entirely excluded but there is little point in having a focus group that is irrelevant. It should never be the case that the CSM is useless to CCP, it is not meant to be a one sided relationship. CCP will always decide what is possible and what is reasonable, CCP cannot tell us what they are thinking or share the information that drives their decisions - such things are commercially sensitive. We therefore cannot make entirely informed decisions when voting; it makes sense in this case that CCP makes the best of what we offer them. Ultimately the CSM is part of a development process. The classic cartoon is http://keremkosaner.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/softwaredevelopment.gif and CCP have to take some steps to overcome those problems. By selecting the most 'useful' of the candidates we put forward CCP are able to mitigate the problem in the first cell. Our aim is to get to the last cell, not to make a stand for the principles of democracy. You should also remember that CCP will consider the people that are entirely absent from the process, the CSM is not the only source of input for the development process. I think James would be foaming at the mouth if he ever realised that.
James seems to make clear that he considers his organisation to be an ego massage device. We can see here on these forums that there are plenty of vocal members of his organisation eloquent enough to maintain its ramblings in his absence; the only difference would be that he wasnGÇÖt the centre of attention. As for the NDA it seems hard not to be bound by one and be on the internet these days, as with any agreement it services both sides, they do provide certain restrictions but it is perfectly possible to express yourself without breaching them. James seems to complain that he would be unable to post publically if he doesnGÇÖt like something that is in development, as if he hasnGÇÖt realised the point of the position or the constraints of how it has to work. He attempts to claim that making no difference at all is better than making some, with that attitude it is clear that a vote for him would have been a waste anyway so by stepping aside he has at least made it more likely that his supporters will have some representation.
|

Smallevils
Universal Secuirty Solutions
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 15:21:00 -
[241] - Quote
Now, i don't normally post , mainly because their are to many troll and flamers.
However, i feel quite strongly about James315 or James 666 as i like to refer to him.
Let me make this clear. Him and the New Order and Code, and not the saviors of HS. They are not on some moral crusade to rid HS of Mining bots.
What he and his organisations run for the most part is a protection racket. In every system i have encountered them, they have been demanding isk for Permits to mine, thereby somehow proving they aren't bots. Failure to pay means your are ganked. Some members of code, don't even bother with that. They simply kill mining barges or any other easy ship, and post their kill in locals with some stupid drivel about The New ORDER.
This guy does not represent the views of a majority of HS. And although botting is a continued issue, blwoing up every miing barge you find isn't goign to help this, and Charging people for permits to mine in system he controls is simple a protection racket. An although eves sandbox supports these kind of scams, that doesn't mean we want someone who organised them sitting on CSM say he talks for hs .....
And no, i am not a miner, before anyone jumps on that band wagon.
Bottom dollar, do not vote for this twerp, he is a crock and vain egotist standing on a soap box spewing drivel and propaganda to get himself into CSM
Troll/Flame away. |

Snow Axe
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1078
|
Posted - 2013.03.21 20:51:00 -
[242] - Quote
Pap Uhotih wrote:wall of text
This all makes absolute sense if you only view the CSM as a tool of CCP, rather than a tool of CCP AND the players.
The CSM is basically two-pronged: The first is what CCP wants - volunteer consultants. They want people to bounce their own ideas off of, and to help sell said ideas to the players. This purpose applies directly to everything you've said, and you're right about it.
The second, however, is what the players get - 7 advocates/lobbyists to personally go to Iceland twice a year. Not just a proverbial seat at the table, the literal seat. This is the voting players' best chance to actually get their views represented, as the 7 representatives are chosen directly by the players themselves.By changing the system this way, CCP's removed the majority of that voice from the players - instead of 7 advocates, we now have 2, as the other five are chosen by CCP themselves, and they're naturally only going to want people that will fulfill what they want from the CSM. Their choices of who goes and who doesn't also carries a lot of weight insofar as how much they'd listen to your voice - as I said, if they didn't choose you to go, why would you think they wanted your opinion?
Now how does this relate to James vs. any other candidate? It hinges on the last question - do you feel that doing the work is worth it for what could be a diminished chance to have your voice heard? There's no easy answer to that. James just seems like he decided that the seat at the table was the only reason he wanted to do this, and now that he was most likely not going to get one, it wasn't worth it to him, hence he's not running in the end. Could he have figured all of this out before the last day? Absolutely, but deadlines are funny that way - when it's do or die time sometimes you'll start to see things in a light you didn't before.
Just as an aside, I understand why CCP changed the "who goes to Iceland" rules. Having the top 7 voters go was honestly a pretty ****-poor way of deciding. I can totally see why they'd want some control over who goes and who doesn't. The fact that they took the majority of the seats away from the players is what should be giving people pause. "Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread[" |

dark heartt
I Own Four Sheep Silent Requiem
72
|
Posted - 2013.03.23 01:39:00 -
[243] - Quote
Smallevils wrote:Wall of text about James 315 being the devil or ****** or something.
It's ok bro, he made a post on his blog a full day before you posted this to say he's not going to run. So now you don't need to worry about it ok. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 :: [one page] |