| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
534
   |
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
Dave stark wrote:[quote=Frying Doom]Well kind of explains why Null minerals are so cheap.
For years it was botters in hi-sec and those minerals worth nothing, now it is Null that is full of bots and Alliance leaders profiting off them.
Ban the bloody lot of them, if they are botting ban them
If they knowingly profited of botting, ban them.
Take all the assets that they bought and stuff them in EvE central bank.
If they used bot money for Sov, strip them of the Sov.
Botting is crap and has damaged this game for so many years, get out your ban hammer CCP.
eh, it doesn't really explain why null minerals are so cheap. unless i missed something in that article? it seems all the botters are running l4s in high sec for the isk, not mining in 0.0.
[quote]
I'm curious how much the new AI slamed this type of bot
Ironic-áfact: In the future the pirates and PVPers will likely have no bounties on them, while the risk averse carebears will run around with "wanted" marked across their face. |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
534
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 01:27:00 -
[2] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:CCP Sreegs wrote:Oh I also want to mention in case anyone is paying attention that if you really care about this issue this is the polar opposite of how to get a result.
We'll use the security world as an example because that's what I'm most familiar with. If I discover a vulnerability on a website it is completely irresponsible for me to go and publish that vulnerability in the public without first notifying the responsible parties and giving them time to act.
In this case you're basically telling these people someone's watching them and you think they'll continue doing bad things if they think we're going to look into this?
This is completely irresponsible and in the future if you honestly care about an issue you will report it to me and give us time to look into it before telling the world about it. I'm not saying not to write about it at all, but saying we've been notified and publishing all the potatoes without giving us an opportunity to look into it is more than a bit disingenuous. This needs to be said again.
Yep attack the messenger when a story is true.
Ironic-áfact: In the future the pirates and PVPers will likely have no bounties on them, while the risk averse carebears will run around with "wanted" marked across their face. |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
534
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 02:36:00 -
[3] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:
Yep attack the messenger when a story is true.
The messenger just alerted the bad guys they are being watched before CCP started watching them.
Well the article did state CCP was sent the info
Quote:
However, with checkable logs and related information sent to them (our readers will kindly understand that certain names and chat-log details could not be published here, but were sent to CCP Sreegs when the source agreed)GǪ perhaps it would be in the best interest of CCP Games to set an example?
So if they were not under the eye already then ... when?
Looks like Riverini gave CCP alot more heads up then the Goons gave CCP with the FW expoit which they told CCP only after ~5 trillion profit so that others wouldn't be able to do the same expoit. On top of that the Goons got a PLEX for bringing the expoit to CCP will Riverini be getting a PLEX for his work uncovering of these botters?
Ironic-áfact: In the future the pirates and PVPers will likely have no bounties on them, while the risk averse carebears will run around with "wanted" marked across their face. |
| |
|