| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2276
   |
Posted - 2013.01.04 15:05:00 -
[1] - Quote
Taharqua10 wrote:Did I say this- forgive me because I must have gone blind or am suffering from amnesia. The issue is not one of being bored, being scared of using the ship or any other reason. This post is about being tied into a ship type which is unique only to 2 classes of ship in Eve. Do not stand on your soap box because you still have the choice of being able to dock & change ship & tactics.
I'm not complaining about any of this and as I said it is down to choices but I wish CCP would relax a little & perhaps look at making our lives a bit more palatable.
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Capital_Ship_Maintenance_Array
You're welcome.
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2278
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 15:45:00 -
[2] - Quote
Taharqua10 wrote:Park ship in array........go do shopping......oh dear.......POS is reinforced.......can't get back into ship.......can't rep POS back up in time......Oh dear.....hostile fleet is back......POP............goes looking for a new ship......mmmmm..... that worked well but thanks for your help.
Oh, so you want risk and effort free storage for the supercapital that you bought knowing full well that you couldn't dock it. I see.
It's also clear that you don't know how POSes work under RF. Read the description of the CSMA again.
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2279
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 16:43:00 -
[3] - Quote
Taharqua10 wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Taharqua10 wrote:Park ship in array........go do shopping......oh dear.......POS is reinforced.......can't get back into ship.......can't rep POS back up in time......Oh dear.....hostile fleet is back......POP............goes looking for a new ship......mmmmm..... that worked well but thanks for your help.
Oh, so you want risk and effort free storage for the supercapital that you bought knowing full well that you couldn't dock it. I see. It's also clear that you don't know how POSes work under RF. Read the description of the CSMA again. Don't really matter whether I know or not....I'm not parking my ship in one-EVER-so up yours Mr. Smart Ar*e
Well that's your choice. You asked for a way to park your Titan, a way to do park it is available, and you're whining because you're choosing not to use it. So... what's this thread about now?
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2280
|
Posted - 2013.01.04 16:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ptraci wrote:Yeah, call me when you manage to park a titan in one, Mr. pedant.
EDIT: Just for clarification I am given to understand they will not hold supers and titans, only "capital ships".
A CSMA can store 155 million m3 of ships. A Titan has a volume of 155 million m3.
A regular Carrier can easily be stored in a normal SMA. An SMA doesn't require Sov (like most things related to supers) and doesn't paint a "there's a Super here" bullseye on the POS it's in.
Just like CSAAs are for building Supercapital Ships (X-Larges are for normal caps), CSMAs are for storing Supercapital ships.
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |
RubyPorto
SniggWaffe
YOUR VOTES DON'T COUNT
2287
|
Posted - 2013.01.05 16:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Pohbis wrote:Before they we nerfed into niche roles, you could just pour more on the field and remove the sub-cap risk, they weren't any more at risk back then The killboards say otherwise.
If there is a 10% chance of losing something in combat, and you use it 100 times, the killboards will show ~10 losses.
If there is a 20% chance of losing something in combat, and you only use it 25 times, the killboards will only show ~5 losses.
It is quite possible that the use of Titans/Supers in combat has become riskier at the same time that the usage of Titans/Supers has decreased (due to nerfs to their usefulness), leading to an overall reduction in the number killed.
I'm not saying that's true, because I don't have the experience to comment, but "fewer Titans killed" is not strong evidence for "Titans are less risky to field."
If you wanted good evidence that Titans/Supers are less/not-more risky to field, you could compare the number of Titan/Super Lossmails to the number of non-structure Killmails they got on, providing a rough indication of losses/activity.
This is EVE - Everybody Versus Everybody.
Guess Who's Back. -á Back Again. |
| |
|