| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cosmic Dragon
   |
Posted - 2005.06.20 12:14:00 -
[1]
ok now before i get flamed this hasd nothing to do with ganking or pirating or war i like them as they are.
What i suggesting tho is we add a new system in station where you can advertise you want to pvp with people and certain ship types like for example you could post this.
Willing to PVP 1 frig V 1 frig
then check a list saying you only want frigs allowed
also chech that one other person is only allowd to enter gate noone else.
what happents then is if someone accepts this then the npc corp makes a bookmark in both players memory each bookmark is in the same system and leads to a deadspace gate each [ 2 seperate gates ] tehn when they go to warp in to the combat zone the gate only allows the ship choices chosen by the one who posted the PvP request for example it only allows a single frigate in this example. Then when both players are at the deadspace zone they can then fight it out. Also somehow it might be good to add the option to disalow pod killing too not sure if this is possable too tho so ill let the devs decide this one.
Well i look foward to your opinions.
|
Ajunta LEE
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 12:48:00 -
[2]
well like concord could support such a self destructive and antiproductive activity and provide you tools to make it 'even' i think we should push this idea forward a little more both player should have their skill tree tailored on the weakest one's , ships should be exactly the same and modules as well, ecm forbidden , and when one wins all the modules of the winning ships deactivate to avoid laying the final blow.....
in all extent this is a gimmick to give pvp to those who can't accept that losing at pvp can have financial consequenses and that pvp was meant to be unequal since the beginning in all arrays, economy, finance, combat, research, reward....
i strongly disagree with the principle that lays behind that if people want to sparr they can already gang together,
making that a sport why not but then lets order people on a ladder and create an arena where people can gamble, lets make the 2 duellist pay an inscription fee of several millions winner takes all minus 20 percent that goes to the arena owner.
lets make people gamble on the results of the top ten duellists.
lets cap the number of sport pvp to one fight per day per pilot.
BUT consesual pvp with no cost and no risks, consesual pvp to turn eve into space counterstrike i say.... NO.
|
Cosmic Dragon
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 13:19:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Ajunta LEE
BUT consesual pvp with no cost and no risks, consesual pvp to turn eve into space counterstrike i say.... NO.
You lose your ship and clone it also gives you the opertunity to fight a non corp member or someone you dont know so therefore you meet new combat setups tactics etc
|
Cosmic Dragon
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 13:22:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ajunta LEE
well like concord could support such a self destructive and antiproductive activity and provide you tools to make it 'even' i think we should push this idea forward a little more both player should have their skill tree tailored on the weakest one's , ships should be exactly the same and modules as well, ecm forbidden , and when one wins all the modules of the winning ships deactivate to avoid laying the final blow.....
you are getting a bit over the top here and this thread is for constructive critisism not flaming. and just to make it clear both peeps can warp out when the winning conditions are met as in when there is only one ship or gang left with there ship or ships intact.
|
StellarSheep
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 13:46:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Ajunta LEE
BUT consesual pvp with no cost and no risks, consesual pvp to turn eve into space counterstrike i say.... NO.
LoL. If u dont want fight. Dont do it. No one force u to do that.
________________________________________________
StellarSheep
Fury Corporation member
|
Deja Thoris
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 14:16:00 -
[6]
There was an idea on "duels" a while back that I thought had a lot of merit.
This is similar.
Doesnt even have to be through a gate, just consented to kill ach other with no Concord involvement.
|
Ajunta LEE
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 14:41:00 -
[7]
we alrfeady have a gang system that allows people to do tasteless sparring, sorry for you carebears but pvp is something risky, space counterstrike is not, i want that pvp stays what it is something people dont do 24 hours a day because it is very expensive.
i dont want to see carebears in 3 month whine on the forums to have prices reductions on ships because they cant duel enough, or a gimmick that atificially stops duel just before the final blow because it is consentual pvp.
pvp means something in eve destroying a ship is destroying someone else hours of playing and investment.
you want pvp come get some where it is and stop hiding in yulai with your ideas of protected duels and other childish abominations.
|
Cosmic Dragon
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 15:10:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Ajunta LEE
we alrfeady have a gang system that allows people to do tasteless sparring, sorry for you carebears but pvp is something risky, space counterstrike is not, i want that pvp stays what it is something people dont do 24 hours a day because it is very expensive.
i dont want to see carebears in 3 month whine on the forums to have prices reductions on ships because they cant duel enough, or a gimmick that atificially stops duel just before the final blow because it is consentual pvp.
pvp means something in eve destroying a ship is destroying someone else hours of playing and investment.
you want pvp come get some where it is and stop hiding in yulai with your ideas of protected duels and other childish abominations.
Please stop flaming if you dont have something CONSTRUCTIVE to say or some Real reason why it couldnt be implimented beyond the fact you dont want to do it yourself then pls dont post 
|
Deja Thoris
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 16:03:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Ajunta LEE
we alrfeady have a gang system that allows people to do tasteless sparring, sorry for you carebears but pvp is something risky, space counterstrike is not, i want that pvp stays what it is something people dont do 24 hours a day because it is very expensive.
i dont want to see carebears in 3 month whine on the forums to have prices reductions on ships because they cant duel enough, or a gimmick that atificially stops duel just before the final blow because it is consentual pvp.
pvp means something in eve destroying a ship is destroying someone else hours of playing and investment.
you want pvp come get some where it is and stop hiding in yulai with your ideas of protected duels and other childish abominations.
I think its a roleplay thing. No RL person could be such a tard
|
Bowcaster
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 16:12:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Ajunta LEE
we alrfeady have a gang system that allows people to do tasteless sparring, sorry for you carebears but pvp is something risky
They patched that already, gang system doesn't allow you to pvp non-corpies anymore.
|
Cosmic Dragon
|
Posted - 2005.06.20 16:34:00 -
[11]
my underlying reason for this idea is to provide more options to pvp i pvp in 0.0 in frigs and cruisers but id love to do a 1v1 bship fight but no way can i trust someones word in 0.0 that is all it would be now could i so to have a way of having a more trustworthy system of dueling would be a good idea for the sake of choice also i dont belive this would kill regular pvp afrter all it is going to be even more fun because of the unpredicability of it.
Also roleplay wise its a good idea good way of settiling arguments it is.
|
Ajunta LEE
|
Posted - 2005.06.21 03:26:00 -
[12]
thats exactly what i am against, in eve you can t trust anybody and it is thrilly, trust is something that is built overtime and i dont want to see a workaround to that in eve in any manner because it would give an easy way to make things. to consume pvp.
i dont like the idea behind concord enforced pvp because it spoils the taste of pvp. pvp in eve is something that the game designer wanted to be serious and not a laughing matter a thing you toy with. i abide by this idea and thats why i play eve, i dont want to see such mechanics appear because that would neither be constructive nor exiting.
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |