| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Warp Planet6
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:38:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hello my fellow eve players,
I was thinking about that duelling mode aka "1 vs 1" feature that will come to hisec soon-ish.
There are many posts about pros and cons. And there are many demands for "arenas" based on that duelling mode as a restricted environment to shoot people in hisec, which is called "consensual pvp".
I for myself believe that, besides war declarations and the current ways to use Concord reaction time as a mitigation, the designated pvp-spaces lowsec and nullsec could suffer here. Or else: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
Now I am asking you, a part of the community who actually uses the forums, about your opinion on this. Are duels, arenas etc. as a game mechanic to do "consensual pvp" a good thing in this unique sandbox MMO called EVE Online? |

Othran
Route One
436
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
You answered your own question.
May as well scrap low-sec if it happened. |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
1188
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote: the designated pvp-spaces lowsec and nullsec could suffer here. Or else: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
There are NO designated pvp spaces in Eve, pvp is only handled differently in each security state. Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Destination SkillQueue
Are We There Yet
3962
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
If it's player organized, has real losses, it doesn't offer any NPC/CCP provided rewards and it can be interfered with(no instancing) it's all ok. That is just providing tools for the players to do and organize their own fun. Remove one or more of those conditions and I'd say it doesn't belong in EVE and can cause serious harm to the normal PvP activities and the wider game. |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
291
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
I think such an option could privide some fun. Imagine two dudes duelling, with a third biding his time to carry out a gank as soon as one of the duelists is below 20% shields. AFAIK a dueling option doesn't have to be more difficult then generating a LE between two players when they both consent. |

Luke Visteen
Apostasy Prime
188
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:47:00 -
[6] - Quote
that dueling option is just a quality of life feature ... you can still get blaped by 3rd parties, it does not give you any immunity and you will lose your ship, if I understood it correctly. I don't always do. But when I do - I do. |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1115
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
I especially liked the part where you created a whole new thread after admitting there were already plenty on the topic.
Good job. Darwin Award winner. "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." -á --- Sorlac |

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
1188
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 15:49:00 -
[8] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:I
Good job. Darwin Award winner.
He DIED? My god, Im staying off the forums if you die when badposting.
Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Warp Planet6
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
10
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:06:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:Warp Planet6 wrote: the designated pvp-spaces lowsec and nullsec could suffer here. Or else: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec? There are NO designated pvp spaces in Eve, pvp is only handled differently in each security state.
Agreed. I have expressed myself in a bad way here.
So, question still is: How does that arena-pvp thing affect the open influence structure of eve, especially pvp-wise?
|

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din Dark Therapy
1188
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:10:00 -
[10] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:Rico Minali wrote:Warp Planet6 wrote: the designated pvp-spaces lowsec and nullsec could suffer here. Or else: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec? There are NO designated pvp spaces in Eve, pvp is only handled differently in each security state. Agreed. I have expressed myself in a bad way here. So, question still is: How does that arena-pvp thing affect the open influence structure of eve, especially pvp-wise?
It wont tbh, people who want 'competition' style pvp will use the arenas (if tehy ever happen) and dueling mechanics. The people who fight for power and gain (most alliances) will carry on as normal.
Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing. |

Wacktopia
Noir. Black Legion.
443
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
To be honest, Arena PvP in EVE seems a little moot.
Part of the thrill and excitement of PvP in EVE is that at any given moment you might get unexpected outcomes and parties to your fight. This makes the experience emergent and exciting.
If a group want an "Arena" for fighting then there is a test server, which is ideal for tournament-style play because you can find a private system easily and all the items cost 100 ISK.
CCP market EVE on the basis of fighting for a reason - just look at pretty-much every release trailer video. I believe they would better-spend time working out cool ways of finding good reasons to fight rather than just sticking in an arena. The bottom line is that now I have one of those annoying signatures. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12765
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:31:00 -
[12] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:I for myself believe that, besides war declarations and the current ways to use Concord reaction time as a mitigation, the designated pvp-spaces lowsec and nullsec could suffer here. GǪexcept, of course, that low and null are no more Gǣdesignated pvp-spacesGǥ than highsec are.
The request for arenas has been around since roughly forever, and it has been rejected for just as long for the simple reason that it doesn't fit with the theme of EVE. The new duel mode has nothing to do with arenas, and is simply a replacement mechanic for what was lost with the introduction of the new Crimwatch flagging system. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Reppyk
Yarrbear Inc. BricK sQuAD.
328
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:32:00 -
[13] - Quote
Rico Minali wrote:He DIED? My god, Im staying off the forums if you die when badposting.
I don't have to die to win a Darwin Award.  |

Karrl Tian
Exiled Assassins Equestria Alliance
161
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:I think such an option could privide some fun. Imagine two dudes duelling, with a third biding his time to carry out a gank as soon as one of the duelists is below 20% shields. AFAIK a dueling option doesn't have to be more difficult then generating a LE between two players when they both consent.
Scenario. A mach and a nightmare are dueling, both go deep into structure. Finally the mach wins and CCP's dueling systme stops the duel at 1hp (just like the WoW model they want to emulate for some weird reason.) But scarcely do they have time to exchange GFs before a dozen catalysts warp in and pop them both. |

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
1500
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:40:00 -
[15] - Quote
Karrl Tian wrote:A mach and a nightmare are dueling, both go deep into structure. Finally the mach wins and CCP's dueling systme stops the duel at 1hp (just like the WoW model they want to emulate for some weird reason.) But scarcely do they have time to exchange GFs before a dozen catalysts warp in and pop them both.
If they were at 1hp a single rookie ship could pop them both. 
Don't see how or why everyone thinks they're trying to copy WoW, though. It means more ship combat on top of all there already is. They're not making things safer or more noob friendly in any way. "The nice thing about quotes is that they give us a nodding acquaintance with the originator which is often socially impressive." ~Kenneth Williams |

Merouk Baas
450
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:43:00 -
[16] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
Unfortunately, many don't go into lowsec at all, they just stay in high-sec, and this isn't aimed at lowsec or null PVP'ers.
It's like the local supermarket having a bartender/server there to open alcohol beverages for you to taste. It ain't a night club / high end bar, and it's not $1000 Bottle Service; celebrities won't come. But the regular supermarket shoppers might, just might, flock to it. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
3255
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:54:00 -
[17] - Quote
Karrl Tian wrote:Inxentas Ultramar wrote:I think such an option could privide some fun. Imagine two dudes duelling, with a third biding his time to carry out a gank as soon as one of the duelists is below 20% shields. AFAIK a dueling option doesn't have to be more difficult then generating a LE between two players when they both consent. Scenario. A mach and a nightmare are dueling, both go deep into structure. Finally the mach wins and CCP's dueling systme stops the duel at 1hp (just like the WoW model they want to emulate for some weird reason.) But scarcely do they have time to exchange GFs before a dozen catalysts warp in and pop them both. Then I guess we need to make them invulnerable for a while after the duel. Long enough to warp. Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
538
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 16:55:00 -
[18] - Quote
if that duelling bullshit hits tq....I really not know what to do then... Fixing something crimewatch broke with another broken mechanic...I just wait for duelling flags appear out of nowhere and a scenario were both fighters keep their ships. If you cut a board and it is still too short you probably should not have become a carpenter.
WOW it down further and a lot of people will just leave.
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|

Lipbite
Express Hauler
599
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 17:00:00 -
[19] - Quote
Arenas won't make EVE PvP more attractive for me though they will allow to burn more ships - which is good for economy. So I think it's ok.
And if low-sec will be less populated as a result of arenas implementation - it's ok for me too because it will make exploration more accessible. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1056
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 17:04:00 -
[20] - Quote
Eugene Kerner wrote:if that duelling bullshit hits tq....I really not know what to do then... Fixing something crimewatch broke with another broken mechanic...I just wait for duelling flags appear out of nowhere and a scenario were both fighters keep their ships. If you cut a board and it is still too short you probably should not have become a carpenter.
WOW it down further and a lot of people will just leave.
Not exactly sure how it's a broken mechanic when it does exactly what it says it will do. You're the one expecting it to snowball into WoW duels.
|

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
538
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 17:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Arenas won't make EVE PvP more attractive for me though they will allow to burn more ships - which is good for economy. So I think it's ok.
And if low-sec will be less populated as a result of arenas implementation - it's ok for me too because it will make exploration more accessible.
Says empty
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|

Roime
Shiva Furnace
1734
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 17:19:00 -
[22] - Quote
Why do we need games inside a game?
Why do we have to turn the one, unique aspect of this sandbox into a meaningless sport, served at the comfort of hisec?
-á- All I really wanted was to build a castle among the stars - |

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
406
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 18:27:00 -
[23] - Quote
I for myself wait for the ability to fly through "dangerous" space safely because I haven't set my pvp flag. Consensual pvp and all... _______________________________________ Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |

Google Voices
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 18:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:Hello my fellow eve players, I was thinking about that duelling mode aka "1 vs 1" feature that will come to hisec soon-ish. There are many posts about pros and cons. And there are many demands for "arenas" based on that duelling mode as a restricted environment to shoot people in hisec, which is called "consensual pvp". I for myself believe that, besides war declarations and the current ways to use Concord reaction time as a mitigation, the designated pvp-spaces lowsec and nullsec could suffer here. Or else: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec? Now I am asking you, a part of the community who actually uses the forums, about your opinion on this. Are duels, arenas etc. as a game mechanic to do "consensual pvp" a good thing in this unique sandbox MMO called EVE Online?
What were you thinking about? They are simply reintroducing the can flipping option. It's not dueling when other people can and will interfere....
I am the voices of Google! Want answers? Learn to read...... |

Kalanaja
Dog Nation United PNG Associates
27
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 19:09:00 -
[25] - Quote
It just makes it so two people can fight. As the poster above me said. It reintroduces the can flip fighting from before. Dueling does not mean the fight is over when one person or the other is at structure or 1hp left. Like normal, the duelists can still blow each others ships up. They did not add any wowish mechanics to stop a fight before the ships would actually explode. And someone can still come up and conduct ganking operations if they so wish with the normal mechanics of consequences applying. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
193
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 20:02:00 -
[26] - Quote
The duelling thing is horrible.
As open world PvP EvE never had specific areas designed for combat or not. What changes are the consequences of it for the player according to the system security status. So is a blunt and objective mechanics: no matter who you are, no matter what you want, if you aggress illegaly Concord blow you up, your sec status get a penality and so on...
Duelling system slightly shift the focus of this from an objective logic to the players decisions and consent; it's an inverion of the previouslogic; it's a little step closer to consneual PvP.
Next step will be the already announced duelling system for fleets. Then everything will be ready for the change.
|

Sarah Schneider
PonyWaffe Test Alliance Please Ignore
1828
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 20:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Destination SkillQueue wrote:If it's player organized, has real losses, it doesn't offer any NPC/CCP provided rewards and it can be interfered with(no instancing) it's all ok. That is just providing tools for the players to do and organize their own fun. Remove one or more of those conditions and I'd say it doesn't belong in EVE and can cause serious harm to the normal PvP activities and the wider game. This. Not empty quoting.
If Eve "arenas" met these requirements, I'm fine with it. Otherwise, it's a huge no no. "I'd rather have other players-áget shot by other players than not interacting with others" -CCP Soundwave |

FourierTransformer
8
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 20:11:00 -
[28] - Quote
-Structured 1v1's already exist. See RvB. -Structured 1v1's have not destroyed other forms of pvp. Again, see RvB. -Duel 1v1's are not without risk. Both parties can receive neutral reps at the cost of suspect status for the reppers. Both parties are susceptible to all forms of high sec ganking e.g. tornado alpha fleets popping shiny expensive ships.
The proposed 1v1's are scarcely any different from the can flipping 1v1's available in expansions prior to crimewatch. You could get neutral reps and ganks in those as well. And the PvP community at large was FINE with can flipping for the most part.
The proposed changes are not adding a new feature, they are re-instituting an old one.
The ONLY thing that changed is the obfuscation of mechanics. The new dueling system will be more transparent then the old one, and transparency is a good thing, particularly for newer players. |

Google Voices
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 20:22:00 -
[29] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:The duelling thing is horrible.
As open world PvP EvE never had specific areas designed for combat or not. What changes are the consequences of it for the player according to the system security status. So is a blunt and objective mechanics: no matter who you are, no matter what you want, if you aggress illegaly Concord blow you up, your sec status get a penality and so on...
Duelling system slightly shift the focus of this from an objective logic to the players decisions and consent; it's an inverion of the previouslogic; it's a little step closer to consneual PvP.
Next step will be the already announced duelling system for fleets. Then everything will be ready for the change.
This has been in game for years....it's called "can flipping".....
All they are doing is reintroducing an already broken mechanic that they broke with the crimewatch patch.... I am the voices of Google! Want answers? Learn to read...... |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
1646
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:05:00 -
[30] - Quote
CCP, when are you implementing Pandas? Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Merouk Baas
452
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:11:00 -
[31] - Quote
In the summer, actually. Didn't they announce they are re-modeling all the Gallente ships? Dominix will look like a Panda in space, rather than its current model. |

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2609
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:12:00 -
[32] - Quote
first they put in a 'duel mechanic' next they put in a mechanic to make the concord waiver expire when one of the ships enters structure to ensure honoure combat among the 'duelling community'. after that will be gradual phasing out/non-iteration of highsec PvP because 'PvPers can duel each other if they want to PVP, i want to mine ore' |

Renzo Ruderi
State War Academy Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:28:00 -
[33] - Quote
It'd be nice if people who want to play World of Tanks simply went and played World of Tanks, instead of constantly trying to shoehorn that crap into EVE. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
1527
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
1) To claim a valuable moon for moon mining 2) To defend a system or area from interlopers so you can do your own stuff in there 3) Because you prefer more unpredictable PvP to setup "fair" situations 4) Because you are -10 and cannot enter high sec 5) To interfere with supply lines going to other groups in low sec, or null sec 6) Because arenas in high sec will not allow you to PvP with carriers or other capital ships http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12773
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:39:00 -
[35] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:first they put in a 'duel mechanic' next they put in a mechanic to make the concord waiver expire when one of the ships enters structure to ensure honoure combat among the 'duelling community'. after that will be gradual phasing out/non-iteration of highsec PvP because 'PvPers can duel each other if they want to PVP, i want to mine ore' Well, so far it's been nearly a decade between the first and the second step in that chain of eventsGǪ and it may well be another ten before it actually happens. That would put that phase-out on schedule for 2050 or so. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

Frying Doom
Zat's Affiliated Traders
1650
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 21:45:00 -
[36] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:first they put in a 'duel mechanic' next they put in a mechanic to make the concord waiver expire when one of the ships enters structure to ensure honoure combat among the 'duelling community'. after that will be gradual phasing out/non-iteration of highsec PvP because 'PvPers can duel each other if they want to PVP, i want to mine ore' Well, so far it's been nearly a decade between the first and the second step in that chain of eventsGǪ and it may well be another ten before it actually happens. That would put that phase-out on schedule for 2050 or so. Did you miss the CSM minutes?
This is the new and improved CCP
so probably 2045 Vote for Malcanis for CSM8 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread
|

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air The Unthinkables
2610
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 22:08:00 -
[37] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:first they put in a 'duel mechanic' next they put in a mechanic to make the concord waiver expire when one of the ships enters structure to ensure honoure combat among the 'duelling community'. after that will be gradual phasing out/non-iteration of highsec PvP because 'PvPers can duel each other if they want to PVP, i want to mine ore' Well, so far it's been nearly a decade between the first and the second step in that chain of eventsGǪ and it may well be another ten before it actually happens. That would put that phase-out on schedule for 2050 or so. "literally all changes must be put in perspective within EVE's 10 year span" - some idiot |

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
40
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 22:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
Why does two same sex consenting adults consenting to pvp affect your ability to beat your lawful wife?
It's not like people are going to say "Well I was going to go lowsec and hope no one shoots me, but instead I'll stay in hi-sec and duel."
The logic. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby" |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
195
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 22:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
Because...
Because if you decide to live in high sec with all the advantages, safety and benefits of high sec you have to renounche to something; cannot have everything for free.
As well as people living in low, null, or WH renounce to some high sec benefits.
More safety = less freedom
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
196
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 22:36:00 -
[40] - Quote
Google Voices wrote:This has been in game for years....it's called "can flipping"..... All they are doing is reintroducing an already broken mechanic that they broke with the crimewatch patch.... 
This is not true.
- Can flipping is still there and usable exactly in the same way. Only, the new flag system made it a bit more "uncomfortable" to use in high sec. Yes, now is not wise to use can flipping on Rens undock, just go in safe spot in a quiet system
- Can flipping for duels never been a feautere or a game mechanic. It was only a "trick" used by players to set up duels without Cncord jumpin in. It's still perfeclty usable so. Duelling system is a brand new feauture ADDED to this, to introduce in EvE something new: consensual, safe duels policied by game mechanics and flag system. Not managed by players.
|

Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
40
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 22:46:00 -
[41] - Quote
Sura Sadiva wrote:Warp Planet6 wrote: Why should I go to the dangerous lowsec when I can pewpew in hisec?
Because... Because if you decide to live in high sec with all the advantages, safety and benefits of high sec you have to renounche to something; cannot have everything for free. As well as people living in low, null, or WH renounce to some high sec benefits. More safety = less freedom
Its like arguing piracy reduces sales. Sure it might in some cases, but chances are those people would not have bought the product anyways.
Why would hi-sec dweller go to low-sec because he can't duel in hi-sec?
Carebear: "Herp! Derp! Because of all those duels in hi sec that I am not participating in, I don't want to take my mining barge to low-sec!!"
Seriously, do you think people are going to avoid lowsec any more than they do now because they can duel?
People are going to avoid lowsec just as much as they did before.
You're just mad they can lose ships without your involvment.
Does hi-sec corp wars make you mad too?
[edit]
WTF was I thinking. Duels can exist now between two corporations in hi sec as long as they pay the fees.
Technically that is the whole point between Red vs Blue (and they have a gentleman's agreement not to pod each other).
Does the fact that exists make you mad?
Why does adding the simple feature letting people consent to blow each other up in hi sec make you mad?
They can do it already if they want and it only makes sense to make it easier, quicker, and less costly to duel. "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby" |

Silivar Karkun
Electronic Research Team Ing
30
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 22:58:00 -
[42] - Quote
i totally aprove organizated duels, i know eve is about non consensual PvEpeen, but hey, as long as i can battle in a rookie without having to travel to low/null.....i go for it. |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
291
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:04:00 -
[43] - Quote
Karrl Tian wrote:Inxentas Ultramar wrote:I think such an option could privide some fun. Imagine two dudes duelling, with a third biding his time to carry out a gank as soon as one of the duelists is below 20% shields. AFAIK a dueling option doesn't have to be more difficult then generating a LE between two players when they both consent. Scenario. A mach and a nightmare are dueling, both go deep into structure. Finally the mach wins and CCP's dueling systme stops the duel at 1hp (just like the WoW model they want to emulate for some weird reason.) But scarcely do they have time to exchange GFs before a dozen catalysts warp in and pop them both.
Thats why I believe this WoW arena type thing isn't gonna work. All I want is a way to say OK, we'll fight without convoluted can mechanics. I don't mind sending you a voucher with a secure location if we want to dance in private. I do mind having to litter Hek like a drunken bum to get a simple 1-vs-1 going on. I just want a way to set up an LE, a let's dance button, but in some way that it doesn't mess with your UI like a chat invite. I dunno, display one of those new fancy icons or so. If you hover over it with your mouse you see a list of people who are open for LE invites or whatever. Once both consent, initiate LE. That would be an application at a base level. I wouldn't be surprised if we ever get 'tournament' tools to generate LE's between larger consending parties, and even less so if you can rig them to hell and back (we honour our prize winners...honestly!). |

Ayuren Aakiwa
Wyvern Operations
55
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:31:00 -
[44] - Quote
This is a terrible idea, as op said why leave high sec when you can safely pvp there. Eve pvp is great because of al the sneaky tactics, chasing, baiting etc arenas are just plain dumb in this game.  pew pew 24/7 |

Agonizing Mining
BLACK LUNG MINERS.
0
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:42:00 -
[45] - Quote
The arena has been around for years it's called alliance tourney. Also it would be great. No more idiots camping undock with cans. You can also make wagers based on odds. Fight outside of your class and get good rewards or pack back on bets. |

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
196
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:52:00 -
[46] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote: Technically that is the whole point between Red vs Blue (and they have a gentleman's agreement not to pod each other). Does the fact that exists make you mad?
Yes, but the main point is just this: RvB is a player created and player driven content. So is for people arranging duels using can flipping (that still can be done) and so on. Are all agreement, or pratices developed and built by players and their interactions. An integrated duelling system erase and replace all this with premade mechanics.
And believe me, I think people should play where fit better to their playstyle. I don't want people moving in low sec, it's already too crowded for my taste.
But also I think that high, null, low, Wh are be part of the same universe and same game and adding mechanics that progressively split us is not good for the game in general.
|

Renzo Ruderi
State War Academy Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:53:00 -
[47] - Quote
Agonizing Mining wrote:The arena has been around for years it's called alliance tourney. Also it would be great. No more idiots camping undock with cans. You can also make wagers based on odds. Fight outside of your class and get good rewards or pack back on bets.
Those same idiots would still be camping undock with cans. WoW has always had dueling, but foam-at-the-mouth PvPers will still sit their characters under quest markers hoping someone will right click on them. The problem isn't the system, it's the people.
EDIT: When I say "foam-at-the-mouth PvPers" I mean the subset of PvPers who would find more happiness in Call of Duty than in EVE Online. The sort who don't want the MMO called EVE, just the F1 button. |

Super spikinator
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:53:00 -
[48] - Quote
I wouldn't mind seeing tournaments being added to EvE, heck it would be nice if you could specify the ruleset. However, any changes should not be made that would exempt any tournament from the normal ruleset of eve. I would see about the only exemptions being either mass limit or class limit since those two exist (wormholes and some accel gates respectively). That is, people can gate crash it, people have to bring their own ships and ships of course blow up. Podding can be optional since podding is the teabag of EvE. If you want a low risk tourney, set it up in high (CONCORD ho!). Which would make it more amusing since people with -5 can be killed without concord so there would be instances of brawls in the audience and other fun things.
|

Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
196
|
Posted - 2013.01.21 23:55:00 -
[49] - Quote
Silivar Karkun wrote:i totally aprove organizated duels, i know eve is about non consensual PvEpeen, but hey, as long as i can battle in a rookie without having to travel to low/null.....i go for it.
Do not believe who says you cannot have fights in high sec. you can. And do not trust who try to scare you with fancy tales about traveling trough New Eden: they only want to cut your wings and keep you caged in high sec.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
12774
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:18:00 -
[50] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:"literally all changes must be put in perspective within EVE's 10 year span" - some idiot Well, if you don't want to be compared to an idiot, don't use that length perspective.
The fact remains: a duel mechanic was put in place in this game pretty much right out the gate. Ten years later, we have still not arrived at the second step if your slippery slope, and for all we know, it may take another ten years before we do. If that's the pace of change, then your three-step evolution will take at least 40 yearsGǪ
Of course, the real problem here is that you are being dishonest in trying to paint duel mechanics as anything other than ancient in EVE. That's where the real idiocy comes in. Vote Malcanis for CSM8. |

FourierTransformer
9
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:24:00 -
[51] - Quote
For 9 years, hisec had can flipping duels. During that time Nullsec Empires rose, fell, rose, and fell again. Lowsec thrived, and became a depopulated wasteland, and thrived again.
Honestly, I think 9 years of evidence proves the naysayers wrong. |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1118
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:35:00 -
[52] - Quote
FourierTransformer wrote:For 9 years, hisec had can flipping duels. During that time Nullsec Empires rose, fell, rose, and fell again. Lowsec thrived, and became a depopulated wasteland, and thrived again.
Honestly, I think 9 years of evidence proves the naysayers wrong.
wtf does one have to do with the other!?!??! "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." -á --- Sorlac |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1061
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:39:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:FourierTransformer wrote:For 9 years, hisec had can flipping duels. During that time Nullsec Empires rose, fell, rose, and fell again. Lowsec thrived, and became a depopulated wasteland, and thrived again.
Honestly, I think 9 years of evidence proves the naysayers wrong. wtf does one have to do with the other!?!??!
Duels didn't lead to the loss of pvp going on in other sectors.
|

FourierTransformer
9
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:40:00 -
[54] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:FourierTransformer wrote:For 9 years, hisec had can flipping duels. During that time Nullsec Empires rose, fell, rose, and fell again. Lowsec thrived, and became a depopulated wasteland, and thrived again.
Honestly, I think 9 years of evidence proves the naysayers wrong. wtf does one have to do with the other!?!??!
In response to comments like this one:
Ayuren Aakiwa wrote:This is a terrible idea, as op said why leave high sec when you can safely pvp there. Eve pvp is great because of all the sneaky tactics, chasing, baiting etc... Arenas are just plain dumb in this game. 
It does help to read the entire thread for context before typing "wtf!?!?!?111elevntyone11!!" |

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
407
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:42:00 -
[55] - Quote
So what's wrong with duels in lowsec? _______________________________________ Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |

Super spikinator
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:43:00 -
[56] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:So what's wrong with duels in lowsec?
There is nothing wrong with duels in lowsec. There is a problem with duels in high sec since the mechanic that has been used to initiate them was taken away.
|

FourierTransformer
9
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:47:00 -
[57] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:So what's wrong with duels in lowsec? There's nothing wrong with duels in lowsec, just like there's nothing wrong with hi-sec can flipping duels that have been around for 9 years that are being reinstated with more transparent mechanics .
Hisec duels don't have to be dysfunctional for lowsec duels to exist and vice versa, both existed for 9 years with no major problems. |

Rengerel en Distel
Amarr Science and Industry
1061
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:48:00 -
[58] - Quote
My only wonder is why a corp hasn't set up an "arena channel" where they create gated sites (missions/ded/whatever) that restrict ship sizes in low sec. The corp is the one that keeps the area safe for the combatants, and others can enter in rookie ships to watch/bet. Any other ships that enter get blapped by the corp. You could set up 1v1, 2v2, whatever. Battles could be sponsored, champions could be crowned and win rewards, etc.
Of course, in eve fashion, other pirates or whatever could do their best to pop people entering the system. They could try and crash the gate to screw up the matches, etc. It would be up to the host corp to fend them off, or move to another spot.
|

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
407
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 00:48:00 -
[59] - Quote
So you can have it in lowsec, but want it in hisec. But why? _______________________________________ Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |

FourierTransformer
9
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 01:03:00 -
[60] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:So you can have it in lowsec, but want it in hisec. But why? You're question makes no sense.
I could just as easily say: So you can have it in nullsec, but want it in lowsec. But why?
Or better still: So you can have it in wormhole space, but want it in nullsec. But why?
The answer to all three questions is actually the same. Because having more options is preferable to having fewer options. Especially when one such option worked demonstrably well for 9 years. |

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
411
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 01:53:00 -
[61] - Quote
FourierTransformer wrote:Rordan D'Kherr wrote:So you can have it in lowsec, but want it in hisec. But why? Your question makes no sense. I could just as easily say: So you can have it in nullsec, but want it in lowsec. But why? Or better still: So you can have it in wormhole space, but want it in nullsec. But why?
The answer is really easy:
Lowsec - no concord Nullsec - no concord WH-space - no concord
Why do you want it in hisec so desperately? Looking at this I find it even more alienating to the game to have "no concord" in hisec. I could understand if it would be a kind of mini-wardec (with same mechanic), but this casual-pvp in a safe environment is really... not so Eve. _______________________________________ Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime. |

FourierTransformer
9
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 02:22:00 -
[62] - Quote
Rordan D'Kherr wrote:FourierTransformer wrote:Rordan D'Kherr wrote:So you can have it in lowsec, but want it in hisec. But why? Your question makes no sense. I could just as easily say: So you can have it in nullsec, but want it in lowsec. But why? Or better still: So you can have it in wormhole space, but want it in nullsec. But why? The answer is really easy: Lowsec - no concord Nullsec - no concord WH-space - no concord Why do you want it in hisec so desperately? Looking at this I find it even more alienating to the game to have "no concord" in hisec. I could understand if it would be a kind of mini-wardec (with same mechanic), but this casual-pvp in a safe environment is really... not so Eve.
That's false.
If I was so inclined I could make a safe in jita or any other system, drop a can, have someone loot the can, get suspect flag, shoot suspect, no concord. So:
Hisec (between 2 consenting parties) - no concord Lowsec - no concord Nullsec - no concord WH-space - no concord
The only thing that CCP is doing is making an existing feature transparent. The only real difference between the proposed changes, the current system, and the can flip system that was around for a decade is transparency.
And transparency is universally a good thing. No one likes obfuscated mechanics. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1340
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 04:08:00 -
[63] - Quote
Honour duels are stupid. |

Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
390
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:14:00 -
[64] - Quote
Warp Planet6 wrote:Now I am asking you, a part of the community who actually uses the forums, about your opinion on this. Are duels, arenas etc. as a game mechanic to do "consensual pvp" a good thing in this unique sandbox MMO called EVE Online? They were in EvE since 2005 or 2006 AFAIK and got removed in the Retribution expansion. CCP is merely putting back what they removed, this time providing proper interface instead of jetcan tossing.
This is for everyday "consensual PvP". For "arenas", they were in the game for quite some time too, Alliance tournaments are that way -->
Nothing to discuss here. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
3379
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 06:24:00 -
[65] - Quote
The honor duel mechanic bringing back the ability to pick a fight we had before is fine... but that's probably as far as it should go.
If you really want an arena, the open tournaments (that are going to become much more frequent) should be your goal... with the added perk of having a streaming audience and prizes. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Colonel Xaven
Decadence. RAZOR Alliance
246
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 07:00:00 -
[66] - Quote
SmilingVagrant wrote:Honour duels are stupid.
At least a hello kitty mechanic behind it is.
www.facebook.com/RazorAlliance |

TheBlueMonkey
Don't Be a Menace That Red Alliance
365
|
Posted - 2013.01.22 12:12:00 -
[67] - Quote
If you want "arena's" in EVE then go find a place and set it up.
That's the beauty of eve, all the tools to do these things are there and in lace already. You just need to make it so.
Hell, go talk to CVA and I'm sure they'd let you do it in their space, that way, no one takes a sec hit. |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
295
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 14:21:00 -
[68] - Quote
It seems CCP is going with the most simple and sensible option.
http://eve-ru.com/upload/userpics/january2013/duel_dialog_1.png
|

Karrl Tian
Exiled Assassins Equestria Alliance
166
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 17:33:00 -
[69] - Quote
Should read, "Accept this challenge and we will dock/redock over and over with neutral logi alts while the ninjas cluster around us like vultures." |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |