EVE Search - Tech II ballistic control systems

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Tech II ballistic control systems

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Lord Morkoth	Posted - 2005.07.08 22:02:00 - [31] Originally by: Hellspawn666 becuase ravens will be too powerful with them pre patch even more so but even post missile balance vs battleships it will slaughter em just because the raven has ALOT of cpu so it can fit alot of bcu 2 and siege and still have a shild tank. I dont want to see ravens running around able to take down a bs in 1 volley and slaughter frigs still jsut ebcause of the insane damge. hahaha, yeah right. Why cant we have t2 dmg mods? You've seen how devistating the geddon can be Shield tank is better today cos it fixes hp fast but has bad cap effiency so shield tankers survive well in todays 10seconds gank all u can battles. Yeah about that u saying raven has alot of cpu; raven has alot cpu just like the apoc has alot pg. We are the Collective. Resistance is futile.
Plasmatique	Posted - 2005.07.08 22:33:00 - [32] Originally by: TomB these will be coming in Greaaat...and we can presume a tech2 variant of the shield booster amp also? ..................................... Proud Owner of a Navy Issue Raven
Weirda	Posted - 2005.07.09 00:21:00 - [33] Originally by: Kyoko Sakoda Originally by: Vishnej Soon(tm) Better than Never(tm) both the above: better then Kali(tm) -- Thread Killer <END TRANSMISSIO
Lord Morkoth	Posted - 2005.07.09 04:24:00 - [34] can we get a eta of the t2 bcu or am i just fantasizing? Wreak vengeance on those who wrong you. The weak have no place in society. Strength is power. Power is gained through strength and held through honor. Be loyal to those who are loyal to you. D
Boonaki	Posted - 2005.07.09 07:11:00 - [35] Hymm, 4-5 sec rof on 6 cruise launchers is gonna be sweet. Hit 80k away for 300+ a shot. It's like 300-400 DPS, my raven bretheren really need to stop complaining, the raven has come into it's golden age of anti-bs warfare. Fear the Ibis of doom.
Lord Morkoth	Posted - 2005.07.09 07:18:00 - [36] Edited by: Lord Morkoth on 09/07/2005 07:19:47 Originally by: Boonaki Hymm, 4-5 sec rof on 6 cruise launchers is gonna be sweet. Hit 80k away for 300+ a shot. It's like 300-400 DPS, my raven bretheren really need to stop complaining, the raven has come into it's golden age of anti-bs warfare. ssssshhh!!! i don't want tomb hearing about that so it won't get nerfed
Zarks	Posted - 2005.07.18 17:26:00 - [37] any more news on this?
Sorja	Posted - 2005.07.18 18:33:00 - [38] Originally by: Dionysus Davinci Perhaps they wanted to see how the new skills would effect missles before they added them. In which case they could forget about tech II BCS and immediately release tech VIII
Aliksr	Posted - 2005.07.19 06:23:00 - [39] don't forget to whine about missile implants too
Talmssar	Posted - 2005.07.19 11:14:00 - [40] Edited by: Talmssar on 19/07/2005 11:15:11 Originally by: TomB these will be coming in Soon (tm)? Anyway, TII BCU, Implants for missiles, TII lauchers, TII & faction missiles... That is all what we need to get even close line to turret users. One issue about BCU II, TI named tend to use more cpu instead less wich is common on other named units. So is TII BCU using less CPU? I just would like to get edge over turret users in some releases for TII. Allso TII (for passive tanks [caldari:P]) med and low slot shield recharge items. - "Whoops" by CCP Talmssar The Fool (Non-Alt)
Zarks	Posted - 2005.08.16 12:17:00 - [41] any time soon?
Dimitri Forgroth	Posted - 2005.08.16 13:25:00 - [42] Zarks - The Ever Hopeful. Don't be a bad loser \| DPS Spreadsheet
Krolas	Posted - 2005.08.25 10:01:00 - [43] Any news about these modules?? Krolas seems to me that the server is up and down more often than the damsel's knickers in that brothel
JoCool	Posted - 2005.08.25 11:44:00 - [44] Riiight, we want these :)
Grey Area	Posted - 2005.08.25 12:00:00 - [45] Originally by: TomB these will be coming in Like saying "the world will end", or "your lottery numbers will come up". Without a WHEN, it's pointless. Any hope of us ever getting any medium slot mods as well, to allow us more setup variation? "Equivalents" to tracking comps for example? And yes, I WILL whinge about implants...a set of hardwirings for missiles wouldn't go amiss. ========================================= * I'm ALLOWED to cheat. I'm a STARSHIP. * =========================================
X'Alor	Posted - 2005.08.25 15:02:00 - [46] Originally by: JoCool Riiight, we want these :) i was thinking more along the lines of "need"
The Shamen	Posted - 2005.08.25 15:08:00 - [47] Originally by: Dionysus Davinci Perhaps they wanted to see how the new skills would effect missles before they added them. Correct. Omfg.
Belshamarothx	Posted - 2005.08.25 15:30:00 - [48] Originally by: The Shamen Originally by: Dionysus Davinci Perhaps they wanted to see how the new skills would effect missles before they added them. Correct. Ermm.. The whole premise of Concept -> Development -> Testing -> Implementation means that the intended effect of the new skills should in theory already have been known. Following from this the next step is evaluation of whether the Implementation (going Live) of the adjustments + introduction of new skills has produced the intended effects. To this end note of the comments posted in these forums should have been taken, with clarification as to whether that was the intended effect - this has been lacking. The absence of official comment implies effects are as intended. Further if the changes require additional modules to be added on the basis of the above path then the modules required should already have been anticipated and introduced at the same time and the overall effects evaluated as to whether as intended, otherwise the implication is that the aforestated premise of concept --> implementation was incomplete further highlighting the lack of any official response.
Kelgen Thann	Posted - 2005.08.25 16:58:00 - [49] Quote: becuase ravens will be too powerful with them pre patch even more so but even post missile balance vs battleships it will slaughter em just because the raven has ALOT of cpu so it can fit alot of bcu 2 and siege and still have a shild tank. I dont want to see ravens running around able to take down a bs in 1 volley and slaughter frigs still jsut ebcause of the insane damge. The T2 BCU's won't allow BS to kill as effectively as you state. Your forgetting Sig radius and speed factors. Frigs will still be laughing at Torps, and Cruise missles. and th BCU2 will be useless to Rockets as the % increases are negligible. However it will make the BS missles more effective against BS and BC.
Pistonbroke	Posted - 2005.08.25 20:24:00 - [50] Originally by: TomB these will be coming in \o/ soon? (tm)
Mitchman	Posted - 2005.08.31 17:40:00 - [51] When? When?
Bane Lord	Posted - 2005.09.01 00:50:00 - [52] well to put this into prespective... TomB made that reply almost 2 months ago... and you know what? They werent seeded last patch, and arent scheduled for the next one EITHER! looks like CCP is giving us the runa'round... again. i might have to start spamming petitions.
Daniel Jackson	Posted - 2005.09.01 01:39:00 - [53] Originally by: Hellspawn666 becuase ravens will be too powerful with them pre patch even more so but even post missile balance vs battleships it will slaughter em just because the raven has ALOT of cpu so it can fit alot of bcu 2 and siege and still have a shild tank. I dont want to see ravens running around able to take down a bs in 1 volley and slaughter frigs still jsut ebcause of the insane damge. why? aint is what exactly your gankageddons do ?, yall do over 5k damage in total includig all lassers per hit, and thats faster then torps can go. so it will be balanced Caldari will once again rise above the Gallente and take back Caldari Prime! Image done by Denrace
Rivek	Posted - 2005.09.01 04:17:00 - [54] Really, the waiting involved in this game. Its unbelievable. TomB,"these will be comming in." Thats great man, can I expect to finally get them in Q2 2006? Please, get off your asses. We dont care about fanfaire, We dont care about Kali. DELIVER on the content promised ages ago. ---------------------------------------------- TunDraGon.com
Jim Raynor	Posted - 2005.09.01 04:28:00 - [55] Originally by: Hellspawn666 becuase ravens will be too powerful with them pre patch even more so but even post missile balance vs battleships it will slaughter em just because the raven has ALOT of cpu so it can fit alot of bcu 2 and siege and still have a shild tank. I dont want to see ravens running around able to take down a bs in 1 volley and slaughter frigs still jsut ebcause of the insane damge. ROFLROFLROFL... give me a break. This is false I am sorry, turret users do way more DPS than a Raven.. or any other Caldari ship for that matter. Why is CCP gimping missile users again? ------ ROBBLE ROBBLE
Darkside101	Posted - 2005.09.01 15:52:00 - [56] Edited by: Darkside101 on 01/09/2005 15:52:20 Any word on missile implants while were here?? yarr DS101
Jennifae	Posted - 2005.09.01 17:04:00 - [57] Originally by: Hellspawn666 becuase ravens will be too powerful with them pre patch even more so but even post missile balance vs battleships it will slaughter em just because the raven has ALOT of cpu so it can fit alot of bcu 2 and siege and still have a shild tank. I dont want to see ravens running around able to take down a bs in 1 volley and slaughter frigs still jsut ebcause of the insane damge. So Raven's weren't f3cked over good enough the first time for you? You want another lick at em?
HippoKing	Posted - 2005.09.01 18:47:00 - [58] why do they hate us so?
Gunstar Zero	Posted - 2005.09.01 19:04:00 - [59] Originally by: HippoKing why do they hate us so? You know all it would need would be someone (TomB) to come say, Caldari ships are like this because <excuse>, perhaps we should re-evaluate them.
Bane Lord	Posted - 2005.09.01 19:10:00 - [60] Originally by: Gunstar Zero Originally by: HippoKing why do they hate us so? You know all it would need would be someone (TomB) to come say, Caldari ships are like this because <excuse>, perhaps we should re-evaluate them. followed by a "We're working on it" and continuing to dodge the question for 4 months, then when people start to catch on, they'll release some half-assed poorly thought out 'fix' which will only exacerbate the problem...

Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.