|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
|
CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
300
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
My rival for the title of tallest CCP employee, CCP Tallest, wants to tell you how capital ships will be re-balanced in our winter expansion.
Check out his dev blog right here, and as always...please give us your feedback. CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
7
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:42:00 -
[2] - Quote
Jack Dant wrote:Sounds good, but will this also affect people who log off without aggression, and would normally dissapear within 1 minute? If you have not registered aggression at the point of logoff, you will disappear as normal. This cannot be extended by post-logoff aggression. |
|
|
CCP Zirnitra
CCP Eve Tv
6
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
I AM ZULUPARK! |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
8
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
Confirming that logoff timer change is for all ships and not just capitals. |
|
|
CCP Guard
C C P C C P Alliance
305
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:54:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:CCP Tallest is now even taller.
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!! CCP Guard | EVE Community Developer |
|
|
GM Homonoia
Game Masters C C P Alliance
45
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 16:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
ToXicPaIN wrote:
with what weapon can a Titan and a Dread now fight vs. Sub-Caps ??
The awesome weapon of a buddy in a ship that can hit those targets. GM Homonoia | Info Group | Game Master |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
12
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:xxxak wrote:After further thought, I am more and more disturbed that a super carrier cannot carry a full flight of fighters and FB.
Can a Dev explain why this was considered necessary? preventing SCs from having overly large reserves of fighters/fighterbombers means they can be defanged by shooting their fighters, providing more interesting types of combat
Bingo. That is exactly why. |
|
|
CCP Soundwave
C C P C C P Alliance
27
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 17:22:00 -
[8] - Quote
If you enjoyed these changes and things happening to spaceships IN SPACE I guerantee you'll love the rest of the stuff we have lined up for winter
Keep an eye out for the blogs. |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:26:00 -
[9] - Quote
Regarding Titan gun tracking:
I am well aware of the issue and considered making changes to it. I decided against it for this balancing pass. We are still working on the winter release and this is not completely off the table. There will be public testing of these balancing changes on SISI and we are ready to consider further changes if needed. |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 18:30:00 -
[10] - Quote
Mekia Buelle wrote:CCP Tallest wrote:Regarding Titan gun tracking:
I am well aware of the issue and considered making changes to it. I decided against it for this balancing pass. We are still working on the winter release and this is not completely off the table. There will be public testing of these balancing changes on SISI and we are ready to consider further changes if needed. That sounds good but will you consider the changes to the fighers and carriers in general or that is a final decision?
Yes I will consider it. |
|
|
|
CCP Masterplan
C C P C C P Alliance
13
|
Posted - 2011.10.10 22:05:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lili Lu wrote:Lykouleon wrote:Just to clarify, is the Orca being considered a capital ship by the changes to the DD? Looks to me like they are referring to Rorqual and not Orca Correct. The Rorqual is a valid target, the Orca is not
|
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
37
|
Posted - 2011.10.11 10:51:00 -
[12] - Quote
In this thread, I've read several very good reasons why the fighter change is a bad idea. You are right. Fighters should stay the way they are. The change would be unfair for carriers.
The poor performance of Minmatar capital ships is being looked at and was already being looked at before the blog was posted.
Pointing out flaws and issues with the balancing plan is very much appreciated. I will look into the issues and make changes where they are needed.
Once this hits SISI, I will start a thread in the test server feedback forums. Your concerns will be listened to and acted upon if necessary. |
|
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
1078
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 12:43:00 -
[13] - Quote
This has been a very good discussion so far, with many interesting points.
Off-topic posts removed.
Please continue to stay civil and on-topic, thank you! CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
|
CCP Spitfire
C C P C C P Alliance
1376
|
Posted - 2011.10.12 12:57:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lady PimpStar wrote:The changes to fighters make every wormhole carrier useless for PVE.
Are the fighter changes only effective to Super Caps or effect all capital ships?
As of now we can just barely rep our fighters in time lossing maybe 2 to 5 a site.
If you mean the changes to the fighters' signature resolution, it has been decided not to go ahead with them. Please have a look at this post for more information.
CCP Spitfire | Russian Community Coordinator @ccp_spitfire |
|
|
|
|