EVE Search - Anonymity For CSM: Common Sense And Safety.

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

Anonymity For CSM: Common Sense And Safety.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2417	Posted - 2013.01.30 15:01:00 - [1] - Quote I don't care what you call yourself in the mirror, if I meet you in person then I am going to call you Noah or Greg or Robert or Alex or Josh or whatever your actual name is. If you're going to represent a real community about a real video game that has real problems, you should probably expect that the company will want you to use your real name too. v0v CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2417	Posted - 2013.01.30 15:04:00 - [2] - Quote Malcanis wrote: If anyone is planning to stalk me, I hope they have a very high boredom threshold. On the other hand, trolling someone so hard that they try and murder me... Can I stalk you? A / S / L? CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2422	Posted - 2013.01.30 18:36:00 - [3] - Quote Of the many things to type ~words~ about, time has proven that this is a subject that will get nowhere. This isn't about a game mechanic or something; it's a whole different area of discussion. CCP isn't going to change this rule; the CSM is set up the way it is for a reason. That's not my opinion, it's just the way it is. v0v CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2423	Posted - 2013.01.30 19:33:00 - [4] - Quote Snow Axe wrote: Seleene wrote: Of the many things to type ~words~ about, time has proven that this is a subject that will get nowhere. This isn't about a game mechanic or something; it's a whole different area of discussion. CCP isn't going to change this rule; the CSM is set up the way it is for a reason. That's not my opinion, it's just the way it is. v0v Quoting this to make sure that everyone sees the attitude their voted advocacy group chair takes towards relevant issues because holy ***** I'll quote you quoting me. I'm perfectly fine with it because this is not a new issue and it's been discussed ad nauseum with CCP Xhagen in the past. All I'm doing is relaying what CSM after CSM has been told over and over. CCP has proven to be completely inflexible on this issue for reasons that make sense to them. That is their prerogative since the CSM is a real life 'thing' and they choose to run it in the way they run it. You can call it me having an attitude if you like, but it doesn't change the reality of what is. Scooter McCabe wrote: Seleene wrote: Of the many things to type ~words~ about, time has proven that this is a subject that will get nowhere. This isn't about a game mechanic or something; it's a whole different area of discussion. CCP isn't going to change this rule; the CSM is set up the way it is for a reason. That's not my opinion, it's just the way it is. v0v Please tell me your not advocating maintaining the status quo for the sake of the status quo. Please tell me people did not vote for you to say "Well CCP set it up that way so that's the way it is." How many things has the CSM pushed CCP to change because the initial set up was flawed? I absolutely hate bringing this up but how many social justice issues ran into apologists saying "it's just the way it is" and I only ask that for you to seriously consider what you've just said. Nope, I'm not advocating anything, just passing along that this subject has come up nearly every election season and at multiple summits as well. CCP's response has always been the same. I have no reason to believe it will EVER change. As my first comment in this thread states, I also happen to agree with it. Scooter McCabe wrote:** If CCP Xhagen wants to make the argument that a person's character somehow determines their effectiveness as at consultation and administration he is welcome to put forward that logical fallacy. No problem. I'll shoot him an email with a link to this thread in a few minutes and ask him to reply to it when he can. That way we can stop arguing amongst ourselves and you can discuss it with the man himself. How is that for advocacy? Fair nuff? CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2425	Posted - 2013.01.30 19:49:00 - [5] - Quote Trebor Daehdoow wrote: Snow Axe wrote: Trebor Daehdoow wrote: If it is truly your position that a candidates RL experience and qualifications are irrelevant to the question of whether or not they will be an effective CSM, then I fear you will have great difficulty convincing CCP Xhagen of the merits of your case. So you're saying it's impossible to tell people what you do without having your first and last name published? It is shocking, I know, and hard to believe, but I have it on reliable authority that anonymous people on the Internet have been known to misrepresent their qualifications. Damnit, I just bought this Sarcasm Meter!!! Now I have to get another one!! CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2427	Posted - 2013.01.31 06:11:00 - [6] - Quote La Nariz wrote: Seleene wrote: I don't care what you call yourself in the mirror, if I meet you in person then I am going to call you Noah or Greg or Robert or Alex or Josh or whatever your actual name is. If you're going to represent a real community about a real video game that has real problems, you should probably expect that the company will want you to use your real name too. v0v You are literally ****** if you think being an unpaid volunteer video game consultant should mean you give up your own personal safety. But that's just the thing - I've never felt like my personal safety was at stake over this video game. The idea that someone would be that deranged is more **** than anything IMO. This feels like a strange FOX News segment tbh, where the other side literally starts to pull out an axe to make their point... CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!
Seleene Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion 2427	Posted - 2013.01.31 17:31:00 - [7] - Quote Malcanis wrote: I can't say that I'm all that happy about having my RL name published but I can't help feeling that you're making a bigger deal out of this than it actually is. I'm pretty sure you won't need to hire body guards unless you start stealing titans or giving speeches at the summit advocating for more money in CCP's Incarna Fashion budget. CSM 7 Chairman My Blog - Where I say stuff Follow Seleene on Twitter!

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.