| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Leneerra
   |
Posted - 2005.07.10 17:21:00 -
[1]
question, how often can you fire a named lense?
or are we going to find unlimited stacks of non laser ammo? or bpo insterad of loose rounds.. or will the amarr (and other laser users) have this advantage as well where they can fit a extra module that does boost their ship where others cannot?
|
Deja Thoris
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 17:26:00 -
[2]
It does seem a tad unfair that the Amarr get a crystal that does not deteriorate (I think) while the other races get charges that are used up.
|
implanted
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 17:54:00 -
[3]
what are caldari gonna get ? another missile nerf ? |
feiht'd'ero
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:03:00 -
[4]
When ammo becomes as expensive as the 15m of regular crystals a bs needs to carry then complain
|
Xardrix
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:03:00 -
[5]
Our crystals do deteriate, but we are still better than you.
Amarr Loyalist and Patriot
|
Angeeyes
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:04:00 -
[6]
the amarr pay a heavy cap usage on lasers, HEAVY!
|
Leneerra
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:05:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Leneerra on 10/07/2005 18:08:41
Edited by: Leneerra on 10/07/2005 18:05:29
I know the new missiles are way les powerfull then they used to be, learn and adapt..
Missiles as they were were unfair, even if the new seems unfair to you, it is better than it was.
other than that i expect that eventually named missiles will be introduced, making them also last as long as the stack does, while the lense will keep on firing..
as to ammo cost. you buy them once, i have to buy every shot i fire. at an average of 50 isk an medium projectile round that 15M is about 300K rounds... about 1 to 3 months of medium ammo. do you buy new lenses after 3 months?
|
j0sephine
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:08:00 -
[8]
Edited by: j0sephine on 10/07/2005 18:09:13
"the amarr pay a heavy cap usage on lasers, HEAVY!"
Yes, whole 5% more cap on beams than it costs to fire railguns, except they get ~15-20% more damage out of that expense... ;s
(save for the Gallente, lucky hybrid hoes that they are >>;
|
Vilserx
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:09:00 -
[9]
How on earth did this turn into another missile nerf thread? 
---------------------------
VSX EVE Design |
Baddy
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:26:00 -
[10]
 Originally by: Angeeyes
the amarr pay a heavy cap usage on lasers, HEAVY!
lol, right
|
Sirkill
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:32:00 -
[11]
Edited by: Sirkill on 10/07/2005 18:33:06
Originally by: Angeeyes
the amarr pay a heavy cap usage on lasers, HEAVY!
Dosent change the fact you get an infinite amount of faction ammo....
|
Rakasashan Endir
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:38:00 -
[12]
I wouldn't call it a heavy cap penalty. Hell, when I first started, I used lasers on my merlin with no problems at all. Caps pretty close to on par with the blasers, IIRC, just a little more, and longer range, and amo free.
|
Shadowsword
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 18:43:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Sirkill
Edited by: Sirkill on 10/07/2005 18:33:06
Originally by: Angeeyes
the amarr pay a heavy cap usage on lasers, HEAVY!
Dosent change the fact you get an infinite amount of faction ammo....
Are you so sure about that? Have you seen faction cristals? I haven't, and until I see one, I won't rule out the possibility that they may deteriorate.
You think that the devs are blind to this kind of advantage, when they devise a new item?
|
Sirkill
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 19:07:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Shadowsword
Originally by: Sirkill
Edited by: Sirkill on 10/07/2005 18:33:06
Originally by: Angeeyes
the amarr pay a heavy cap usage on lasers, HEAVY!
Dosent change the fact you get an infinite amount of faction ammo....
Are you so sure about that? Have you seen faction cristals? I haven't, and until I see one, I won't rule out the possibility that they may deteriorate.
You think that the devs are blind to this kind of advantage, when they devise a new item?
There is that.
|
Leneerra
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 19:56:00 -
[15]
frankly to answer that Yes i think so, as a method for cristal damage was already planned for lenses at the start, and for mining crystals and.. well the def could have thought it was in there already..
|
Pheonix Grey
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:13:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Vilserx
How on earth did this turn into another missile nerf thread?
just the word missile mentioned nowadays someone will popup and go IT WAS NERFED, etc 
(\_/)
(O.o)
(> <) This is Bunny. Copy Bunny into your signature to help him on his way to world domination. |
Baldour Ngarr
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:48:00 -
[17]
Originally by: Vilserx
How on earth did this turn into another missile nerf thread?
There's a thread on Out of Pod, celebrating the fact that London were awarded the 2012 Olympic Games.
That hasn't turned into a missile nerf thread yet. But give it a couple of days.
_______
"Soon" is an ancient Icelandic word meaning "some time before the next Ice Age." |
Bozse
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 20:51:00 -
[18]
Not complaining about missile changes but u can start to wonder where the faction missiles are.....
|
ErrorS
|
Posted - 2005.07.10 21:25:00 -
[19]
i've not seen any faction missiles yet.. still waiting and hoping.
________
I'm strict Caldari
"The grass is always greener on the other side" - Maybe they're not as uber as you think?
-ErrorS |
Nikolai Nuvolari
|
Posted - 2005.07.11 03:36:00 -
[20]
Is there such thing as faction ammuniton for projectile and hybrid weapons?
Maybe they should drop faction ammo BPO's. That would make it on par with the crystals because it would have one disadvantage (you have to keep building them instead of just HAVING the crystal), but also one advantage (it lets you build them to sell, too)
___________________________________________
^^^***---All things serve the Beam---***^^^
GDBT is recruiting! |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |