|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 36 post(s) |
Muthsera
   |
Posted - 2005.09.26 04:33:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Muthsera on 26/09/2005 04:33:50
if anybody bothered to check.
The RO alliance is long dead. Cruel own germinate for the last 3-4 weeks now.
And Smash don't despute it.
If 4s or xan want to despute it thats up to them, smash however isn't anywhere to be seen.
SoonÖ
|
Muthsera
|
Posted - 2005.10.03 12:02:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
I'm Curious about the Fountain thing; I assume you guys arent running around trough the Core? I saw a grand total of 1 fountian alliance member during my tour, compared to quite a lot of Xelas with a few Bob mixed in.
Will look around some more soon.
Will look into COE, Cruel, RO situation too 
There will be deltas and some cruel pilots around.
However the numbers will be limited. Also. There is a small pos community in the lower parts that I dunno who is currently. Have not been in germinate for a week. But the RO alliance is no more after some insidents around 1 month ago. FE I think is desputing the easter part of vale whit smash as your map shows. There should be xanadu and 4s pilots in germinate using either bwf or akkio as access routes. I don't know if they plan to despute the region. As we're no longer part of cruel and have only week old info on it. Thats the best picture I can give of the situation.
Unless anyone give any other info to despute it I think you should see if the situation is status que.
SoonÖ
|
Muthsera
|
Posted - 2005.11.11 08:18:00 -
[3]
Mate. I don't want to be a ***** about this. But in the timeframe since last update. Events have come to change several times. This map fails to keep pace whit the changing events in eve. I suddest if your able to. Make a dynamic map. Please. Flash or something similar. It will take some doing. But it will also be much easier to change. I know your working hard to keep the map updated. And I applaude you for that. But do you yourself feel that it's keeping up?
SoonÖ
|
Muthsera
|
Posted - 2005.11.11 12:22:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Joshua Foiritain
If an alliance cant support their claims for 2 weeks, theyre not worth mentioning on the map. Which is exactly why its only updated once every 2 weeks.
I can in large part agree whit that.
But such developments that are really massive that have been going on lately have not been established on the map to follow that development. You can disagree whit the extent that one should be able to claim space. But most notably the span of three weeks that have been, severe situations have occured. The map does not reflect this. Sorry to say. Such as risk disputing branch heavily and the changes during the stain war. Red alliance pushing 5. 5 disputing venal now for two weeks. I'm sorry but it just don't reflect what is going on. It doens't take up development that well either. Justifing it whit "if an alliance isn't able to hold a region for longer than two weeks it's not worth reporting" I think that shouldn't be the goal of the map. It should be to give a clear picture of the situation, as good as it can be. It might not be an objective for an alliance to dispute the region either. It should be the maps responsability to reflect what is doing on. Not just ownership. Others might disagree on that. But if you have a dynamic map you can atleast do the changes you want much more quickly.
I atleast use the map as a situation awareness gathering. I don't take everything there are established facts for the situation right now. I don't let that have the basis of my total info gathering. But it sets the premesisses. I don't want to focus on this better. I just though I voice my opinion about it. It's your choice as a map maker to do the changes if you like. Your doing a good job at it though. Even though I feel it takes a bit long sometimes. 
I'll shut up now. 
SoonÖ
|
Muthsera
|
Posted - 2005.11.11 19:07:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Naurhir
It's his map, not yours, get over it. The map has no responsibilities that the artist / author does not give it.
Well. I don't belive that mate. But feel free to disagree.
SoonÖ
|
|
|
| |
|