It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is?

That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat...

Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =)

Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula.

Here we go with eula.

1.

You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: petitioning with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or petitions; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.

4.

You may not use GÇ£role-playingGÇ¥ as an excuse to violate these rules. While EVE Online is a persistent world, fantasy role-playing game, the claim of role-playing is not an acceptable defense for anti-social behavior. Role-playing is encouraged, but not at the expense of other player. You may not create or participate in a corporation or group that habitually violates this policy.

Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula.

Here we go with eula.

Read point 1 and 4, where you can see that (James 315 "role-playing" playing cant be used as excuse)
http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp

James 315 stands for making Highsec an enjoyable and interactive region of space for all players. A place where players don't feel that to "play" the game they "have" to go AFK. James 315 will bring a vision of Highsec that is clearly articulated and important for the game at its current state of development.

Now is the time for us, the players of EVE, to start looking at the various CSM candidates and to start making some noise about what we are looking for. The future of the game is impacted by the CSM and, in theory, the CSM are chosen by the players to represent the players.

Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula. But try harder

Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula.
Miners bumping is ok because EvE is santbox where people can do what they want, end even harassmen is against eula CCP alow this kind of harassment, because lack of definition what is good or what is bad, hovewer like you mention here for sure hundreds of petitions form people who feel that somone harrasing them.

I can compare "Give me isk or you wont be able to play EvE" to give me isk or i spam your mailbox everyday and every day i will spam your private message window, Thank God it never happens because of block mechanic which protect people from idiots.

Miners bumping is ok because EvE is santbox where people can do what they want, end even harassmen is against eula CCP alow this kind of harassment, because lack of definition what is good or what is bad, hovewer like you mention here for sure hundreds of petitions form people who feel that somone harrasing them.

I can compare "Give me isk or you wont be able to play EvE" to give me isk or i spam your mailbox everyday and every day i will spam your private message window, Thank God it never happens because of block mechanic which protect people from idiots.

I challenge you to provide one example of James 315 or the New Order ever preventing someone from playing EVE. We've stopped a lot of miners from mining, but never interfered with their right to sit in station and spin their ship.

On the contrary, many Highsec dwellers played EVE for their very first time due to James 315 and the New Order.

James 315 for CSM 8!

315 4 CSM8.

I can't think of a better candidate. James has taken so much of his free time to make sure that the miners of HiSec have a chance to be welcomed, meet new friends, and feel like part of something. The New Order is a gracious group of people, willing to help new players out, and go out of their way to spread friendship throughout all of HiSec.

HiSec is a better place for having who cares so much about the people in it. Seeing the democratically elected Savior of HiSec in the CSM is one of the best things that could happen to this community.

Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...

James 315 is nothing more than a Barracuda.

James 315 has promoted a lot of Heartless actions towards high security citizens.

James 315 would have been dusted a long time ago If Looks Could Kill.

James 315 is gonna have to Even It Up a lot before he get's high security votes.





DMC

Hahaha
Nice troll

Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.

Decisions...

Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?

Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?

Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this.

You don't make a speech in front of a crowd of several hundred capsuleers to announce your candidacy unless you're actually serious about running.