| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Agent Eunoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
51
   |
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:28:00 -
[1] - Quote
This is one more thread to add to the multitude of threads about the future of Highsec for the purpose of presenting ideas and solutions for the next CSM session. As the elections for a new CSM start to appear on the horizon now is a good time to discuss what is going on in Highsec today and where it 'should' be going.
To that end, the debate got a lively injection of thought and logic today when James 315, the Founder of the New Order of Highsec movement, declared his intention to run for the next CSM. This declaration brings a voice of sanity to what was becoming, in my view, a very "WoW"-centric discussion by potential CSM candidates on the various blogs.
James 315 stands for making Highsec an enjoyable and interactive region of space for all players. A place where players don't feel that to "play" the game they "have" to go AFK. James 315 will bring a vision of Highsec that is clearly articulated and important for the game at its current state of development.
Now is the time for us, the players of EVE, to start looking at the various CSM candidates and to start making some noise about what we are looking for. The future of the game is impacted by the CSM and, in theory, the CSM are chosen by the players to represent the players.
So, this time around, I'm paying attention. I urge everyone else to pay attention as well and to start asking the tough questions of the players who are stepping up and announcing their intentions to run. The earlier in the debate we bring up questions the more thoughtful and useful the answers will be by the time the CSM actually happens.
Cinematic HD EVE Movies: http://www.youtube.com/user/EveEunoli/ |
Demolishar
United Aggression
768
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Voting for CSM is bad isk/hour, IMO. The benefit to me of any possible changes is unlikely to outweigh the time wasted voting. |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
7345
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
James 315 will be crowned "King of CSM" and there will be no other people on CSM
"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |
stoicfaux
2285
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Sansha of Sansha's Nation would be better high-sec CSM representative. James just doesn't have the necessary name recognition to get the high sec vote.
|
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air
The Unthinkables
2815
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Surfin's PlunderBunny wrote:James 315 will be crowned "King of CSM" and there will be no other people on CSM
they will be bumped out of dev range |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
814
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
Earlier this evening, in the Highsec ice system of Brapelille, James 315 announced his candidacy for CSM 8. Since there is nobody better suited to tell the masses of New Eden than James himself, his announcement speech is transcribed below.
n++[ 2013.02.03 21:22:11 ] James 315 > My goodness, so many people. Do I need to deliver a speech? n++[ 2013.02.03 21:23:33 ] James 315 > BillMurray is in Brapelille! Great to see you n++[ 2013.02.03 21:24:12 ] James 315 > You know, it may be fate that we are all gathered in Brapelille, homeland of Agent BillMurray on this Groundhog Day weekend. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:25:14 ] James 315 > On Groundhog Day, everyone wants to know about the future. They want to know if there's going to be six months more of winter, or an early spring. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:25:56 ] James 315 > That's how it is for all of us, isn't it? We want to know if things will get better, or if things will remain the same... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:27:00 ] James 315 > I have gone all across highsec, and I've spoken to many people... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:27:32 ] James 315 > ...and they all ask me the very same thing. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:27:55 ] James 315 > Will EVE improve, or will things continue to get worse? n++[ 2013.02.03 21:28:40 ] James 315 > Things are hard out there for the good people of EVE these days. Nerf after nerf after nerf... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:29:05 ] James 315 > People come to EVE to pursue their dreams. Every one of us has his or her own dream, whether it be scamming, or ganking, or awoxing, or bumping... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:29:30 ] James 315 > But lately, too many people have seen their dreams slipping away from them. They're afraid EVE will lose what makes this place special. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:30:15 ] James 315 > Everyone knows that the way things are going cannot continue. We are on an unsustainable path. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:30:50 ] James 315 > I still believe that we can turn things around. The great spirit of EVE has not gone away, it is merely being suppressed. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:31:19 ] James 315 > But to bring EVE back to the way things are meant to be, is going to require a lot of hard work. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:31:41 ] James 315 > ....And to make that course correction, we need good leadership. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:32:40 ] James 315 > Good leadership.... A change in leadership. As I'm sure we all agree, the current administration just isn't getting the job done. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:33:20 ] James 315 > Just the other day I was speaking to a woman who's concerned about her future. She's working two jobs just to pay the PLEX n++[ 2013.02.03 21:33:43 ] James 315 > EVE, we can do better. I believe in a brighter future. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:34:10 ] James 315 > And that is why... today... in historic Brapelille... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:34:29 ] James 315 > I would like to make an announcement... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:34:44 ] James 315 > An announcement which will affect everyone in EVE... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:35:03 ] James 315 > An announcement which I know will be met with much enthusiasm... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:35:31 ] James 315 > An announcement of a beginning of a new era in EVE... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:36:15 ] James 315 > Today, right here, in this very moment, in this system of Brapelille... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:36:44 ] James 315 > In front of all the wonderful Agents of the New Order, and all of the Code-compliant miners in Brapelille X - Ice Field 1... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:37:10 ] James 315 > It is my privilege, my honour, and my sacred duty to announce... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:37:28 ] James 315 > ...TO ANNOUNCE MY CANDIDACY FOR CSM 8 n++[ 2013.02.03 21:38:16 ] James 315 > I'M RUNNING FOR CSM! n++[ 2013.02.03 21:38:49 ] James 315 > ....AAAAAND I'M NOT RUNNIN' FOR SECOND PLACE! n++[ 2013.02.03 21:40:26 ] James 315 > PEOPLE OF BRAPELILLE, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE NEW ORDER, CAN I COUNT ON YOUR SUPPORT? {General Assent} n++[ 2013.02.03 21:41:27 ] James 315 > A few words, if I may, in conclusion... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:42:01 ] James 315 > I would like everyone to look at the star in the middle of Brapelille system... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:42:21 ] James 315 > As I have bumped and ganked miners in Brapelille and elsewhere, I have often looked at the system's sun... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:42:38 ] James 315 > And as often as I have looked, I have also wondered... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:42:51 ] James 315 > Is that sun a rising sun, or a setting sun... n++[ 2013.02.03 21:43:10 ] James 315 > ...Now at length I have the happiness to know that it is indeed a rising, not a setting sun. n++[ 2013.02.03 21:43:43 ] James 315 > NOW LET'S TAKE BACK EVE!!!! n++[ 2013.02.03 21:44:51 ] James 315 > https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=185148&p=6n++[ 2013.02.03 21:45:13 ] James 315 > THANK YOU... THANK YOU... THANK YOU... {Cheers, general rejoicing. Local was unreadable for several minutes.}
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Generals4
Liandri Covenant
1708
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:34:00 -
[7] - Quote
Agent Eunoli wrote:
James 315 stands for making Highsec an enjoyable and interactive region of space for all players. A place where players don't feel that to "play" the game they "have" to go AFK. James 315 will bring a vision of Highsec that is clearly articulated and important for the game at its current state of development.
Oh look an other james cultist who thinks bumping miners is any better than actually mining.
And no, no sane player who doesn't want to destroy high sec would vote for a person like James 315.
-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air
The Unthinkables
2816
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
if you think about, perhaps the miner bumpers are the real miners...  |
Sala Kyss
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
35
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Who the hell is james and why should I care? |
Shepard Wong Ogeko
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
395
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
James315 now, James315 tomorrow, James315 forever! |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
7346
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:40:00 -
[11] - Quote
Sala Kyss wrote:Who the hell is james and why should I care?
James is the Savior
"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff-á |
Winchester Steele
A Perfectly Normal Corp.
82
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:41:00 -
[12] - Quote
I posted this in Jita Park Speakers Corner, but would like to reaffirm my support in this thread:
The fact of the matter is that James 315 has done more for hi-sec content, new account generation, and old account retention than any other hi-sec candidate we have ever seen. People have flocked to his banner from all across New Eden because of his revolutionary and fresh outlook on Hi-Sec. He has earned their admiration and mine by promoting his views in a thought-provoking and eloquent "true to the sandbox" methodology.
I share his vision of hi-sec where awoxers, scammers, ninja looters and gankers are cherished and respected part of the community (even if its those guys you love to hate) and where no-one is ever "perfectly safe" from player interaction.
I personally think that not only is James 315 the CSM representative we deserve, he is the representative we oh so desperately need to move forward as a community. I fully endorse and support James 315 with all of my accounts.
All hail the Supreme Protector Of Hisec and CSM delegate of our hearts James 315!
|
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Air
The Unthinkables
2816
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:41:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sala Kyss wrote:Who the hell is james and why should I care?
Here's a song that sums it up quite accurately
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
676
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:53:00 -
[14] - Quote
\o/ Hail the savior of Highsec! A glorious new age for Highsec is upon us! |
Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
800
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Winchester Steele wrote:I posted this in Jita Park Speakers Corner, but would like to reaffirm my support in this thread: The fact of the matter is that James 315 has done more for hi-sec content, new account generation, and old account retention than any other hi-sec candidate we have ever seen. People have flocked to his banner from all across New Eden because of his revolutionary and fresh outlook on Hi-Sec. He has earned their admiration and mine by promoting his views in a thought-provoking and eloquent "true to the sandbox" methodology. I share his vision of hi-sec where awoxers, scammers, ninja looters and gankers are cherished and respected part of the community (even if its those guys you love to hate) and where no-one is ever "perfectly safe" from player interaction. I personally think that not only is James 315 the CSM representative we deserve, he is the representative we oh so desperately need to move forward as a community. I fully endorse and support James 315 with all of my accounts. All hail the Supreme Protector Of Hisec and CSM delegate of our hearts James 315!
this is pretty much it in a nut shell. i have nothing to add except that i, too support James 315 for what it's worth.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |
Wescro
Tash-Murkon Amalgamated Security
211
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:56:00 -
[16] - Quote
O Supreme Protector, hallowed be thy name!!!
This thread is awful and it should be locked. |
HVAC Repairman
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
386
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 22:57:00 -
[17] - Quote
James 315, bringing New Eden a better tomorrow... tomorrow.
Follow me on twitter |
Not Politically Correct
Veerhouven Ventures
136
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 23:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Never met James315. Have met Billmurray. I wouldn't let my ex-wife's dog go on a date with him without an armed chaperone. |
Captain Tardbar
NEWB ALERT
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.03 23:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
I don't think James 315 representing hi-sec will go over too well with the average hi-sec player.
That said, I was under the impression that CCP doesn't actually comply with CSM wishes on most occasions.
Serious question though. I have played EvE off and on for the past few years and I am rather new to forums compared to some people and was seriously wondering how and when do we get to vote for CSM?
Also where do the canidants generally get together to make their case?
"Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby".
If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |
Lord Mandelor
Caldari State
167
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:03:00 -
[20] - Quote
I'm glad. James 315 will give the high-sec miners the voice they've needed!
Knight and Agent of the New Order |
Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
774
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;)
EvE isn't game, its style of living. |
SPIONKOP
KILL A CULT
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
How many lemmings James threads we going to have the next few weeks?
|
Lin Suizei
86
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:19:00 -
[23] - Quote
One Highsec, one Code, one Saviour!
James has demonstrated a solid understanding of the problems facing New Eden today, as well as a solid track record of strong leadership - highsec could ask for no better candidate. A vote for James is a vote for a better EVE!
Do your part for a better Highsec tomorrow - kill an AFK miner today! |
Wescro
Tash-Murkon Amalgamated Security
212
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:21:00 -
[24] - Quote
Tarvos Telesto wrote:James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;)
It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is?
That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat...
Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =)
This thread is awful and it should be locked. |
Beatrice Wankmeister
United Systems Industry
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:26:00 -
[25] - Quote
I'm so tired of seeing these random posts by obvious alts and James315 followers on their knees with their lips wrapped firmly around his jewels. I wouldn't vote for him solely on that fact.
If you're really interested in running for CSM, try to stop annoying everyone on the forums.
I couldn't care less about your miner bumping or how you want to play the game. I'm just sick of reading your stupidity.
Take care. |
Len Ross
The Scope
Gallente Federation
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:40:00 -
[26] - Quote
CSM a total joke. you think CCP puts its profits in the hands of players. dream on.
James315 even more a joke. vote for somone who has his minions bumping your mining ship continually asking for isk to stop. That isnt inovation thats harrasment. |
Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
478
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:41:00 -
[27] - Quote
First of all James315 solution to make hisec afk mining "interactive" is to charge miners 10 mil per year to be able to afk mine LOL
(BTW AFK Ice mining THE ONLY WAY to ice mine, unless you're on medication and enjoy watching ice mining lasers turn over every half hour)
The problem in Eve is NULL sec, not Hisec, Hisec is the Engine that keeps the Eve economy going, wreck the engine, you wreck the game.
The Massive Monopolies in Null are the real problem, sucking Trillions in Isk with absolutely ZERO risk from Gankers etc, something Hisec dwellers have to live with each day.
Fix Broken Nullsec, , Hisec working Much better than Null.
Evelopedia;-á
The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion -áGÇá-á-á |
Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
775
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:44:00 -
[28] - Quote
Len Ross wrote:CSM a total joke.
Nuff said.
EvE isn't game, its style of living. |
Alana Charen-Teng
Tash-Murkon Amalgamated Security
241
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:47:00 -
[29] - Quote
Not Politically Correct wrote:Never met James315. Have met Billmurray. I wouldn't let my ex-wife's dog go on a date with him without an armed chaperone.
Your ex-wife's dog must be really vicious! |
Ustrello
Mindstar Technology
Fatal Ascension
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:50:00 -
[30] - Quote
Peter Raptor wrote:First of all James315 solution to make hisec afk mining "interactive" is to charge miners 10 mil per year to be able to afk mine LOL
(BTW AFK Ice mining THE ONLY WAY to ice mine, unless you're on medication and enjoy watching ice mining lasers turn over every half hour)
The problem in Eve is NULL sec, not Hisec, Hisec is the Engine that keeps the Eve economy going, wreck the engine, you wreck the game.
The Massive Monopolies in Null are the real problem, sucking Trillions in Isk with absolutely ZERO risk from Gankers etc, something Hisec dwellers have to live with each day.
Fix Broken Nullsec, , Hisec working Much better than Null.
Yeah because towers cant be reffed or taken away. |
Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
212
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:55:00 -
[31] - Quote
Well, I spun the empty rum bottle on a makeshift "Wheel of Fortune" hastily scribbled on the back of a pizza box.... and the most common result was... LET IT BURN.
Not wishing to seem fatalistic, I will instead blame it on the lump of mozzarella cheese the empty rum bottle seemed to get stuck on more often than not.
It always comes down to "cheese".  |
Mars Theran
Red Rogue Squadron
1620
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 00:58:00 -
[32] - Quote
I have to say, I haven't been particularly impressed with the CSM representation this round. Hopefully the next one will be better. I'm really not interested in having EVE turned into an arcade game. To me, it seems that, (outside of continuous spiteful infighting), the CSM this term has been very focused on a different EVE. One that doesn't really seem particularly EVE-like at all.
Am I the only one that sees this? No idea really, but that is how it appears to me, and I'm not talking about WiS development or Skinning ships either. I just feel like they want it to be a cartoon series.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |
Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
775
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
Wescro wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;) It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is? That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat... Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =)
Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula.
Here we go with eula.
1.
You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: petitioning with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or petitions; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.
4.
You may not use GÇ£role-playingGÇ¥ as an excuse to violate these rules. While EVE Online is a persistent world, fantasy role-playing game, the claim of role-playing is not an acceptable defense for anti-social behavior. Role-playing is encouraged, but not at the expense of other player. You may not create or participate in a corporation or group that habitually violates this policy.
EvE isn't game, its style of living. |
Jonah Gravenstein
The Burning Lotus
5331
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:12:00 -
[34] - Quote
Tarvos Telesto wrote:
Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula.
Here we go with eula.
1.
You may not abuse, harass or threaten another player or authorized representative of CCP, including customer service personnel and volunteers. This includes, but is not limited to: petitioning with false information in an attempt to gain from it or have someone else suffer from it; sending excessive e-mails, EVE-mails or petitions; obstructing CCP Employees from doing their jobs; refusal to follow the instructions of a CCP Employee; or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee.
4.
You may not use GÇ£role-playingGÇ¥ as an excuse to violate these rules. While EVE Online is a persistent world, fantasy role-playing game, the claim of role-playing is not an acceptable defense for anti-social behavior. Role-playing is encouraged, but not at the expense of other player. You may not create or participate in a corporation or group that habitually violates this policy.
Well it's a good job that you don't get to decide what is and what is not a violation of the the EULA then, the only people that get to do that are CCP and so far it seems that James 315 and the New Order do not, and have not violated the EULA as far as they're concerned. If you really feel that the EULA has been violated then raise a petition.
By the way your statement "Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;)" is in itself a possible violation of the "or implying favoritism by a CCP Employee" clause. Should I raise a petition about that? (hint: I'm not that petty)
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's a goonspiracy. |
Ustrello
Mindstar Technology
Fatal Ascension
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:18:00 -
[35] - Quote
Tarvos Telesto wrote:Wescro wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;) It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is? That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat... Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =) Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula. Here we go with eula. Read point 1 and 4, where you can see that (James 315 "role-playing" playing cant be used as excuse) http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp
Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula. But try harder |
Varius Xeral
Galactic Trade Syndicate
390
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:20:00 -
[36] - Quote
Great, now I can't decide between malcanis or james...
Thanks, Obama! |
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
5108
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:20:00 -
[37] - Quote
Agent Eunoli wrote:
James 315 stands for making Highsec an enjoyable and interactive region of space for all players. A place where players don't feel that to "play" the game they "have" to go AFK. James 315 will bring a vision of Highsec that is clearly articulated and important for the game at its current state of development.
Now is the time for us, the players of EVE, to start looking at the various CSM candidates and to start making some noise about what we are looking for. The future of the game is impacted by the CSM and, in theory, the CSM are chosen by the players to represent the players.
James 315 is nothing more than a Barracuda.
James 315 has promoted a lot of Heartless actions towards high security citizens.
James 315 would have been dusted a long time ago If Looks Could Kill.
James 315 is gonna have to Even It Up a lot before he get's high security votes.
DMC |
Lipbite
Express Hauler
605
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
Doesn't matter because CSM has nothing to do with high-sec - as well as with democracy and game development.
It's meta-game invented by CCP for for giant null and low alliances to keep their leaders busy in the game instead of leaving for other games along with hundreds / thousands of subscribers - by bribing them with free rides to Iceland and fanfest. Nothing to see here. |
Tarvos Telesto
Blood Fanatics
775
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:32:00 -
[39] - Quote
Ustrello wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:Wescro wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;) It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is? That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat... Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =) Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula. Here we go with eula. Read point 1 and 4, where you can see that (James 315 "role-playing" playing cant be used as excuse) http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula. But try harder
Miners bumping is ok because EvE is santbox where people can do what they want, end even harassmen is against eula CCP alow this kind of harassment, because lack of definition what is good or what is bad, hovewer like you mention here for sure hundreds of petitions form people who feel that somone harrasing them.
I can compare "Give me isk or you wont be able to play EvE" to give me isk or i spam your mailbox everyday and every day i will spam your private message window, exept it never happens because of block mechanic which protect people from idiots.
EvE isn't game, its style of living. |
Ustrello
Mindstar Technology
Fatal Ascension
78
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 01:45:00 -
[40] - Quote
Tarvos Telesto wrote:Ustrello wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:Wescro wrote:[quote=Tarvos Telesto]James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;) It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is? That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat... Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =) Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula. Here we go with eula. Read point 1 and 4, where you can see that (James 315 "role-playing" playing cant be used as excuse) http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula. Miners bumping is ok because EvE is santbox where people can do what they want, end even harassmen is against eula CCP alow this kind of harassment, because lack of definition what is good or what is bad, hovewer like you mention here for sure hundreds of petitions form people who feel that somone harrasing them. I can compare "Give me isk or you wont be able to play EvE" to give me isk or i spam your mailbox everyday and every day i will spam your private message window, Thank God it never happens because of block mechanic which protect people from idiots.
Well you can move to another system, seeing how you are given a lot of forewarning to when they are coming. Or yoy can go to a wh or a more novel idea pay the ten mil and watch your competition disappear |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
677
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 02:42:00 -
[41] - Quote
Tarvos Telesto wrote:Ustrello wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:Wescro wrote:Tarvos Telesto wrote:James 315 broke eula rules long time ago, wonder he still here, things like " pay me virtual goods or you wont be able to play eve" is harresment and action against eula, ofc is my opinion.
Ps.Im not miners defender and im not against idea to make miners life in eve harder etc, hovewer i think his behavoir broke meny eula points, as you see you can avoid eula if CCP decide to give you VIP status ;) It's your opinion that asking for ISK in exchange for not ganking is against the EULA? How is that an opinion? Do you know what an opinion is? That's like me saying it's my opinion that the Earth is flat... Moreover, if you think asking payment in return for safety is harassment, I'd love to hear what you have to say about straight up ganking, no negotiations involved. =) Kamikaze atacks are ok, they are part of game and part of risk, while harrasing people by forcing them to pay isk because i do x thing to you are totaly against eula, stalking and harassment are agains eula. Here we go with eula. Read point 1 and 4, where you can see that (James 315 "role-playing" playing cant be used as excuse) http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/terms.asp Well seeing how ccp said miner bumping is ok and have not acted on hundreds of petitions pretty sure it isn't againt the eula. But try harder Miners bumping is ok because EvE is santbox where people can do what they want, end even harassmen is against eula CCP alow this kind of harassment, because lack of definition what is good or what is bad, hovewer like you mention here for sure hundreds of petitions form people who feel that somone harrasing them. I can compare "Give me isk or you wont be able to play EvE" to give me isk or i spam your mailbox everyday and every day i will spam your private message window, Thank God it never happens because of block mechanic which protect people from idiots.
I challenge you to provide one example of James 315 or the New Order ever preventing someone from playing EVE. We've stopped a lot of miners from mining, but never interfered with their right to sit in station and spin their ship.
On the contrary, many Highsec dwellers played EVE for their very first time due to James 315 and the New Order.
James 315 for CSM 8! |
Hannah Flex
laissez-faire economics
200
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 02:55:00 -
[42] - Quote
How much isk/hr would i make by voting and can it be done AFK?? |
Christopher Caldaris
Caldaris Enterprises LLC
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 03:00:00 -
[43] - Quote
This is quite possibly the worst idea in the history of bad ideas. |
Karrl Tian
Exiled Assassins
Equestria Alliance
175
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 03:34:00 -
[44] - Quote
There was a CSM rep from highsec, "Ankdrivesamini" or something like that. If I recall right, she, wanted to see pirates lose SP, sec status loss be permanent and then got booted off the council for breaking a NDA.
Anyway, Highsec doesn't need a rep, they vote with their wallets.  . |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3358
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 03:40:00 -
[45] - Quote
Galaxy Pig wrote:I challenge you to provide one example of James 315 or the New Order ever preventing someone from playing EVE. We've stopped a lot of miners from mining, but never interfered with their right to sit in station and spin their ship.
On the contrary, many Highsec dwellers played EVE for their very first time due to James 315 and the New Order.
James 315 for CSM 8!
Exactly, James 315 actually was making them play EVE. Left alone they would not have played EVE, instead being afk.
James 315, the candidate highsec needs.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 04:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
315 4 CSM8.
I can't think of a better candidate. James has taken so much of his free time to make sure that the miners of HiSec have a chance to be welcomed, meet new friends, and feel like part of something. The New Order is a gracious group of people, willing to help new players out, and go out of their way to spread friendship throughout all of HiSec.
HiSec is a better place for having who cares so much about the people in it. Seeing the democratically elected Savior of HiSec in the CSM is one of the best things that could happen to this community. |
Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
479
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 04:28:00 -
[47] - Quote
Vin King wrote:315 4 CSM8.
I can't think of a better candidate. James has taken so much of his free time to make sure that the miners of HiSec have a chance to be welcomed, meet new friends, and feel like part of something. The New Order is a gracious group of people, willing to help new players out, and go out of their way to spread friendship throughout all of HiSec.
HiSec is a better place for having who cares so much about the people in it. Seeing the democratically elected Savior of HiSec in the CSM is one of the best things that could happen to this community.
I think Im gonna puke 
Evelopedia;-á
The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion -áGÇá-á-á |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
939
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 05:34:00 -
[48] - Quote
Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.
Decisions...
If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |
Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
2208
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 07:12:00 -
[49] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.
Decisions...
Go half & half. Malcanis & James 315 are both great candidates.
I'll probably-ábe banned for this |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
Casoff
774
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 08:24:00 -
[50] - Quote
Yeah, unless someone pretty bloody amazing begins campaigning I'll be voting for James and Malcanis, too.
I've been reading James' writing since Manifesto Two. When he announced his taking of the Halaima system I didn't think much of it - who could have imagined his New Order thing would catch on and become as powerful as it is today? I want to vote for him because I love his blog and I think voting for him would be funny, but I also believe he could do a great job if he wanted to. James believes in the highsec and emergent gameplay I want to see in EVE. He's intelligent and capable.
Although I'm still not sure how seriously he'd take the CSM if he was voted up, which is a bit of a worry vOv |
Ghazu
540
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 09:39:00 -
[51] - Quote
DeMichael Crimson wrote:Agent Eunoli wrote:
James 315 stands for making Highsec an enjoyable and interactive region of space for all players. A place where players don't feel that to "play" the game they "have" to go AFK. James 315 will bring a vision of Highsec that is clearly articulated and important for the game at its current state of development.
Now is the time for us, the players of EVE, to start looking at the various CSM candidates and to start making some noise about what we are looking for. The future of the game is impacted by the CSM and, in theory, the CSM are chosen by the players to represent the players.
James 315 is nothing more than a Barracuda. James 315 has promoted a lot of Heartless actions towards high security citizens. James 315 would have been dusted a long time ago If Looks Could Kill. James 315 is gonna have to Even It Up a lot before he get's high security votes. DMC
idgi
http://www.minerbumping.com/
lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984 |
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate
1032
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:20:00 -
[52] - Quote
Hahaha
Nice troll |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
820
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:22:00 -
[53] - Quote
Akrasjel Lanate wrote:Hahaha Nice troll
I'm at a loss as to your reasoning. Why is this a troll?
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
7554
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:53:00 -
[54] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.
Decisions...
Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?
Vote for Malcanis for CSM8
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=192717&find=unread |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
Casoff
774
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:59:00 -
[55] - Quote
You mean James? He has. |
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics
CODE.
105
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:59:00 -
[56] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.
Decisions... Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?
http://www.minerbumping.com/2013/02/james-315-for-csm-campaign-opens-with.html
Edit: I have been beaten  |
Jonah Gravenstein
The Burning Lotus
5353
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 14:08:00 -
[57] - Quote
Looks like we're getting some decent candidates for CSM this year, as a single account holder I'm somewhat torn between Malconis and James 315.
Looks like we're living in interesting times.
Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's a goonspiracy. |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
941
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:23:00 -
[58] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.
Decisions... Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...?
Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this.
If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
822
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:31:00 -
[59] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Malcanis wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Do I have time to sub a few more accounts to vote for James 315? As it stands, I'm torn on this. As a shareholder, I feel it is my duty to vote for James 315 and a better high-sec. As a non-AFK player of the game, I feel my votes are best spent on Malcanis and a better high-sec.
Decisions... Why not defer your decision until the man himself announces he's running...? Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this.
You don't make a speech in front of a crowd of several hundred capsuleers to announce your candidacy unless you're actually serious about running.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
941
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:55:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Karl Hobb wrote:Whether James gets my second vote really comes down to how serious he is about his candidacy, so I'll be voting pretty late. Besides, I may just make a deal with a friend to resub his two accounts for a month and not have to worry about this. You don't make a speech in front of a crowd of several hundred capsuleers to announce your candidacy unless you're actually serious about running.
I quite agree. Perhaps I should have said "how serious he is about his possible CSM seat." Unlike a lot of "casual" players, I take the CSM seriously because I see real value in it. No insults meant here, I am just as serious about a James vote.
If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
827
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:00:00 -
[61] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:I quite agree. Perhaps I should have said "how serious he is about his possible CSM seat." Unlike a lot of "casual" players, I take the CSM seriously because I see real value in it. No insults meant here, I am just as serious about a James vote.
Honestly it can be quite difficult to tell - Kelduum Revaan, for example, seemed fairly serious about the CSM last year but has apparently hardly paid the slightest attention this year. I think that James will certainly be serious about the campaign - after all, if he can get onto the CSM it will be a source of endless tears from the carebears, even if he does nothing else - but it is harder to tell what he'd want as a member of the CSM.
On the other hand, if there's one thing that we can be sure of it is that he will fight the carebear creep, and personally, that's enough to get my vote.
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
941
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:after all, if he can get onto the CSM it will be a source of endless tears from the carebears, even if he does nothing else
Much as I enjoy "tears", they are hardly a reason to vote someone into an advisory position.
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:On the other hand, if there's one thing that we can be sure of it is that he will fight the carebear creep, and personally, that's enough to get my vote.
Hard to argue with that, and he's been playing EVE for quite some time... Well, we'll just have to wait and see.
If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Persona Non Gratis
450
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:41:00 -
[63] - Quote
Karl Hobb wrote:Hard to argue with that, and he's been playing EVE for quite some time... Well, we'll just have to wait and see.
Not only has be been playing a long time, James has also played in different areas of the game. He has a solid grasp on how high, low and nullsec are interdependant on each other, and can give CCP sound advice on proposed highsec changes.
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |
Keisha Mei Ash
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:47:00 -
[64] - Quote
Yeah, he's been playing a long time.
He's also quit four times.
That's dedication for ya. |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
827
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:Yeah, he's been playing a long time.
He's also quit four times.
That's dedication for ya.
Citation?
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Karl Hobb
Stellar Ore Refinery and Crematorium
941
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 16:51:00 -
[66] - Quote
Keisha Mei Ash wrote:Yeah, he's been playing a long time.
He's also quit four times.
That's dedication for ya.
I took a couple of months off from playing EVE when my child was born, what's the significance of James taking a break? Real life happens, you certainly can't fault a CSM candidate for having one. If anything, focus on his platform and what he represents rather than stupid arguments like this.
If you're not already part of a bloc, this is the best guy for CSM8. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
3363
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 07:37:00 -
[67] - Quote
Kainotomiu Ronuken wrote:Keisha Mei Ash wrote:Yeah, he's been playing a long time.
He's also quit four times.
That's dedication for ya. Citation?
Wow, if he's lost EVE so much, I can't help but admire his ability to stick with the game.
I myself have not such an impressive record in losing eve.
Those who cannot adapt become victims of Evolugalbugaslugakjlwsdhvbzxd
Click for old school EVE Portraits: http://jadeconstantine.web44.net/Maison.htm |
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
2315
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 07:54:00 -
[68] - Quote
I think this song is even better for this crazy thread
315 get over yourself
As the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves.
Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks.
Issler |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
Casoff
781
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 08:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
that's pretty rude |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
829
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:02:00 -
[70] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:As the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate
Ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahah
*Breath*
Ahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahaha...
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Kainotomiu Ronuken
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
829
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:12:00 -
[71] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks.
Also, two things;
a) This isn't James' thread. It's about him. If you go back to the first page, you can see that the OP is actually one Agent Eunoli.
b) I'm not sure why you think that your posting here is in any way relevant to anyone? After all, you've pretty much avoided any CSM duty thus far; surely that makes you no more important than as any other forum poster?
You have become the pubbie, Mittani. Yours is the temple whose technetium-clad tables are at risk of being overthrown, whose seats need mixing. You're the one who fears war. -- Sadleric |
Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility
Casoff
781
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
more like the csm rudeness candidate |
Singular Snowflake
New Order Logistics
CODE.
106
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:16:00 -
[73] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I think this song is even better for this crazy thread 315 get over yourselfAs the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves. Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks. Issler
Hahahaahaa. What? Are you not one of the, if not THE most useless CSM member we have ever had? You may be the closest thing to a "AFK botter" candidate though, as you have been, you know, not there.
James can do infinitely better job in representing the honest people living and working in highsec than you. By the way, those people include the "emergent game play losers". |
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics
CODE.
686
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:41:00 -
[74] - Quote
Issler = tabbed out representative |
admiral root
Red Galaxy
Persona Non Gratis
453
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:03:00 -
[75] - Quote
It's almost a shame she isn't running again, just so we could destroy her. :)
No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Vote 315 for CSM 8 |
Jonah Gravenstein
The Burning Lotus
5464
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:19:00 -
[76] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I think this song is even better for this crazy thread 315 get over yourselfAs the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves. Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks. Issler
ROFL, you are quite possibly the most absent/useless member of the current CSM, you don't appear to have done anything since your election (not a personal slight, 99% of politics is inaction and lies). If you were truly the closest thing to a high sec candidate you would realise that highsec isn't just carebears (I am one) but gankers, awoxers, scammers, PvPers and everything else that one can do in Eve. Mittens has done more for highsec than you , and regrettably he's not even on the CSM.
I am Ohm of Borg, Resistance is Voltage/Current. |
John E Normus
New Order Logistics
CODE.
21
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 18:11:00 -
[77] - Quote
I think this song is even better for this crazy thread
315 get over yourself
As the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves.
Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks.
Issler[/quote
Stay classy Issler. |
Vin King
State War Academy
Caldari State
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 21:07:00 -
[78] - Quote
CSM tears are trading in better volume today than miners tears!
315 4 CSM8 |
Wescro
Tash-Murkon Amalgamated Security
220
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:22:00 -
[79] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:
Get over yourself.
Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me"
Issler
Oh God the irony, it burns.
Issler who? Oh my apologies, how could I not recognized the fabled alternate who managed to sneak into the CSM after Mittanis resignation and Vile Rats passing. 12th place is nothing to scoff at guys!!!
Nice to see you piggy-backing of the saviors thread for attention.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I point to this badposting by current CSM to point out just how bad things have gotten. The anti-sandbox, anti-emergent-gameplay, and I argue, anti-EVE players have been allowed to "represent" us? No wonder high sec is in decay, in its rotting corruption CSM bites the hand that feeds it, for it is emergent gameplay which gave birth to election and their player council positions. For shame.
I don't agree with Trebor, but I can see his side of the argument. Issler is another deal, there is no argument, simply contempt for player action. Oh saviour we need thee to deliver us from this evil!!!
James 315-á-áis the only pro-sandbox candidate running for CSM 8. Resist the theme-park invasion from dying MMOs like WoW! Keep the only sandbox MMO alive! Vote 315 4 CSM8!!! |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
1045
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 03:03:00 -
[80] - Quote
Singular Snowflake wrote:Issler Dainze wrote:I think this song is even better for this crazy thread 315 get over yourselfAs the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves. Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks. Issler Hahahaahaa. What? Are you not one of the, if not THE most useless CSM member we have ever had? You may be the closest thing to a "AFK botter" candidate though, as you have been, you know, not there. James can do infinitely better job in representing the honest people living and working in highsec than you. By the way, those people include the "emergent game play losers".
James 3:15 can probably do a infinitely better job of writing speeches that is for sure. But what else does he offer?
But who knows, I am sure some players will come to his future CSM thread, for the baptism and to receive the salvation that only he has. I will go for the speeches and drama, and its fifty fifty if I learn something.
Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne |
Crazey Monkey
Hades Effect
12
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 06:13:00 -
[81] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I think this song is even better for this crazy thread 315 get over yourselfAs the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves. Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks. Issler
Buy a permit. |
Arkady Vachon
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
197
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 07:11:00 -
[82] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I think this song is even better for this crazy thread 315 get over yourselfAs the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves. Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks. Issler
Don't particularly care about James 315 or his minions, don't particularly feel inclined to vote for him, either.
But seriously, Issler, you have about as useful on the CSM as a dingleberry hanging from a dog's keister.
The sooner your time wasting space on the CSM is over and you are out of there, the better.
Nothing Personal - Just Business...
Chaos Creates Content |
Shamus O'Reilly
Gungnirs' Point
I Know Right
77
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:11:00 -
[83] - Quote
As much as i hate to say it...
with all this moaning and whining about James 315... who else would be a candidate for hisec? i havent seen any others yet. Though i havent seen all the threads in JPSC name others who would run for it (that would actually do hisec and the game as a whole any good..) or anyTHING at all |
Winchester Steele
87
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:35:00 -
[84] - Quote
Issler Dainze wrote:I think this song is even better for this crazy thread 315 get over yourselfAs the closest thing to the CSM "high sec" candidate, I wish these "emergent game play" losers would just get over themselves. Good news J315, I did post in your "please pay attention to me" CSM thread so maybe you can declare victory. Just don't expect that small victory to have you eating a nonni's on CCP's isks. Issler
Pretty rude speech for a CSM. I know one thing for certain: You will never see James' talk to people like this. And frankly, while we're on the subject, I have never seen you represent anything in the CSM, let alone Hi-Sec.
Hi-Sec needs a CSM rep with Courage, Dignity and Conviction. In these dark and trying times we need a man of action to represent our interests and protect the sanctity of our sandbox. That man is James 315 and his time is now. 315 for CSM 8! |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |