Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 11:22:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hello there, MD Lurkers.
Some of you might've seen the bond I am currently running, which is running as intended making the profits it should make. However, having run this bond for two weeks now and running the numbers, I have also began making spreadsheets for production. According to these spreadsheets, after a ton of research, I should be able to make a good sum of extra profits running these near jita at a 23.5/7 rate.
To set this up, I would need to set up an IPO to raise the capital required for these activities. Where I am at right now is one bond running smoothly and as intended, with still enough free time to freighter stuff around and meanwhile running reactions on a seperate character. These activities are all things that are slowly bringing me to the point where I am involved in most of the secondary activities of production, except for the production part myself.
Now, I would like to ask the opinion of the public on the IPO as I am contemplating it. Please note, this is not the actual setting up of the IPO, but more served as a basis on which I will decide wether or not this is a good idea.
[The IPO]
Shares: 20000 (5000 Shares will go to me as a management fee) Share Value: 850K / Share Total IPO Value: 17B
- Monthly - Dividend: 20% of profit Capital Increments: 80% of profit
After the first month I will allow the buyback of shares, which will allow people to pull out their money if they ever need it for other purposes. As I will throw back 80% of the profits into the corporation, share value will increase accordingly.
- Intentions - I intend to purchase 5b worth of researched BPO's, and build modules and ships that have shown great promise in my trading. I will have to purchase a moon near jita, costing another 300-600m. Also, I'll need to buy a POS, which is another 1.3b ISK including fuel. The remainder will go into minerals for the production itself, enough to build several modules for several weeks.
According to my spreadsheets, the profits will range anywhere from 6b to 14b per month, depending on the ferociousness of the market. Either way, there will be some items that are jumping up and down which will need some more precision on when to sell, giving more profit, and some items that will make a more steady profit as they are settled around a profitable price.
Because I always have one character in jita on which I control all my trading, I will easily be able to sell at sale price, instead of having to sell to buy orders, which means I will always get the maximum value for the items. As well as I will be buying minerals according to buy prices, lowering the initial cost of minerals all together.
I would love to hear comments on what I am planning, as I do want to make it work for all parties involved! |

SellOrder Forum
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 12:22:00 -
[2] - Quote
Why share all your profits with investors?
Use you profits to fund private operations, resulting in 100% profit for you. You can then avoid all the SCAM claims.
If you can make billions why would you need/want to give them away? |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 12:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
SellOrder Forum wrote:Why share all your profits with investors? Use you profits from to fund private operations, resulting in 100% profit for yu. You can then avoid all the SCAM claims. If you can make billions why would you need/want to give them away?
My intentions with this are to use the accumulated wealth of multiple seperate people to make myself a little bit of money, while making it worthwhile for others to give me the capital required. It allows me to make much more money for myself than I would when I would do this all with my own capital.
The capital I have myself is tied up in other activities, such as WH Gas reactions and trading. That's why I want to look at the option of setting up an IPO. |

Razor Rocker
Ellis Research
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 14:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
Well I'll more than likely invest in this endeavor. I've been content with the way you've ran your last bond, and I can see you being successful in this as well.
Although, I may be starting my own as I've been toying with the idea of going back into manufacturing. Keep me posted if you do decide to start this IPO.
Cheers,
-Razor |

SellOrder Forum
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 15:37:00 -
[5] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote:
My intentions with this are to use the accumulated wealth of multiple seperate people to make myself a little bit of money, while making it worthwhile for others to give me the capital required. It allows me to make much more money for myself than I would when I would do this all with my own capital.
The capital I have myself is tied up in other activities, such as WH Gas reactions and trading. That's why I want to look at the option of setting up an IPO.
Fair enough, but 20bil is pocket change for anyone like yourself who knows a thing or 2 about the markets, seems an awful lot of work for the pay off. each to their own of course, good luck with your endeavour. |

Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
96
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 19:39:00 -
[6] - Quote
Unless you are planning to fully collateralize the IPO value. This is for all intents and purposes a scam. |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
58
|
Posted - 2013.02.04 23:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
I've been having an intense communication with Sav about this venture. I have also recommended to put VV to work with this stuff, hehe :D
As I personally think it's a great idea. Just for the sake of fun. Share aspect in EVE is very badly executed, but it's still there and it's up to us if we actually want to make it work even with the bumps and risks it may present.
I would definitely expect a scam from a person who doesn't know what he's doing, e.g. contract scammers that "borrowed" the idea from someone else and spamming Jita to death only cause they don't know what to do with their initial 5mill isks.
Now in Sav's case, he actually knows what he's doing and he probably could have gotten away with his current assets / profits and made it on his own. While this would net him a slightly better income this would remove the social aspect of being part of something. (e.g. VV running charity is something that deserves attention, does it make VV any money? no. Reputation? double-yes.)
I'm yet to see an unhappy person from those who are participating in Sav's bond. And mostly, people forget that the game is not about having the most money there is, but to have a decent community around you and to have respect for achievements you make. In this case, the successful running of this venture would bring Sav and people building this small community that may grow to a large production / marketing block enough of fame and fortune.
EVE is advertised as a "make friends, conquer the sandbox" while in reality it's about being paranoid. Now I'm not into mental conditions, so it's in our hand to make it other way around. Possibly it's a bit naive, but that's the game I wanna play and not the game "make another billion and hide it away to flush on plex later on".
My two cents. And I'm fully supporting this idea and mindset of bringing a new level of intelligent pl - and don't invest something you can't afford to lose. :-)
DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
47
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 00:42:00 -
[8] - Quote
Exactly how much experience in Production do you have?
An IPO from someone who has been doing it for years, through different patches & changes etc. is perfectly plausable.
I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 01:20:00 -
[9] - Quote
Alex Grison wrote:Unless you are planning to fully collateralize the IPO value. This is for all intents and purposes a scam. Quote:But what about the legitimate bond I ran? Doesn't that show an established and legitimate buisness?? No. For all anyone here knows your plan is to build trust with a bond, and then move into an IPO where you will bag the money. Unless every single share is fully collateralize. Your credibility, legitimacy, value and trust is at 0 These are my comments :D
I do understand where you come from, but I can't provide the collateral many people here want to see. I do provide a good return on their money, and I hope to gain their trust by being as transparent as can be. I know that EVE is a game where trust is hard to earn, yet I do believe that by being fair by giving a high return and transparency in the operations it is possible to achieve certain goals.
Candy Oshea wrote:Exactly how much experience in Production do you have?
An IPO from someone who has been doing it for years, through different patches & changes etc. is perfectly plausable.
I have experience through the years, though I have been hopping on and off for months on end due to school or work. However, my current schedule allows for longer periods of time in which I can play. Through the years I have been in production and wormhole activities, and I have a certain love for spreadsheets which is... beyond words.
I believe that combining my knowledge of the market with these experiences will make this IPO work. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3770
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 01:39:00 -
[10] - Quote
I have been contacted by Savtrader for an audit. He's been quite detailed in what he wants to do, but I had to decline (Iike I am doing with everyone else) due to me preparing for moving home overseas. I suggested to start an IPO discussion to see if it can be ironed out without excessive arguments. I may eventually (if asked) do a quick check just to see if he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs but that's all I can do before wrapping up my netbook (which is the thingie where my auditing programs are located). Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
47
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 01:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote: I have experience through the years, though I have been hopping on and off for months on end due to school or work. However, my current schedule allows for longer periods of time in which I can play. Through the years I have been in production and wormhole activities, and I have a certain love for spreadsheets which is... beyond words.
I believe that combining my knowledge of the market with these experiences will make this IPO work.
An Existing production operation would already have, POS, multiple profitable BPO's etc.... Your OP says you need to buy it all with IPO ISK..................So, sorry if i do-not believe you & what you say about your experience. Its one thing making ammo in a station, its quite another running a pos and having to pay interest.
IMO production IPO's must be secured by a 3rd party. And it can be done very easily with minimal risk to the investors. But since you need to actually buy the BPO's essentially leveraging nothing of your own, afraid ppl will think the "worst".
Post an Eveboard link of the character you plan to build with, if you could. one of "saveritrader" or w/e character you are using for your current bond. may help to show, that at the very least you are skilled correctly to make the job & then sell it.
thanks. I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
47
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 01:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I have been contacted by Savtrader for an audit. He's been quite detailed in what he wants to do, but I had to decline (Iike I am doing with everyone else) due to me preparing for moving home overseas. I suggested to start an IPO discussion to see if it can be ironed out without excessive arguments. I may eventually (if asked) do a quick check just to see if he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs but that's all I can do before wrapping up my netbook (which is the thingie where my auditing programs are located).
in his OP, he is using the IPO isk to actually buy the BPOs........ I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 02:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:I love Saveritrader! He's awesome! His bond is super sweet! There's nothing wrong with trying to build a reputation on MD! How else can you actually get funding for a large IPO? And besides, capitalism isn't about making money, it's abou COMMUNITY and FEELINGS and EMOTIONS!
..Wow Claire, I never figured you for a shill. This brings back memories. Claire is SencneS, that's for sure. I can't figure out if Saveitrader is Ray McCormack or Amarr Citizen 155 yet. Guess only time will tell!
|

Razor Rocker
Ellis Research
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 03:17:00 -
[14] - Quote
Candy Oshea wrote:Saveritrader wrote: I have experience through the years, though I have been hopping on and off for months on end due to school or work. However, my current schedule allows for longer periods of time in which I can play. Through the years I have been in production and wormhole activities, and I have a certain love for spreadsheets which is... beyond words.
I believe that combining my knowledge of the market with these experiences will make this IPO work.
An Existing production operation would already have, POS, multiple profitable BPO's etc.... Your OP says you need to buy it all with IPO ISK..................So, sorry if i do-not believe you & what you say about your experience. Its one thing making ammo in a station, its quite another running a pos and having to pay interest.
You make it sound like running a profitable manufacturing op is difficult. With a spreadsheet, a basic working knowledge of the game mechanics, and the tens of tools available within the community, it is rather straight forward.
However, that being said, it is a shame that he doesn't already have the BPOs in stock. Perhaps there is a way to provide a bit more security to this IPO. For instance, I know in the past that 3rd parties have offered to lock down BPOs. Perhaps if the 3rd party was given the ISK, had an alt in the CEO seat, bought the BPOs via contract and locked them down. Would this alleviate some fears of the prospective investor? The BPOs wouldn't cover the cost of the entire IPO, but it is at least something. |

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
47
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 03:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
Razor Rocker wrote: You make it sound like running a profitable manufacturing op is difficult. With a spreadsheet, a basic working knowledge of the game mechanics, and the tens of tools available within the community, it is rather straight forward.
Well, that's kinda the point, if it is so easy, Wheres the existing Pos, BPO's and slot/isk/hour calculations? no-where in the OP he mentions how many slots, and a minimum isk/per slot he is going to go for. Does his calc's include fuel costs for e.g. (Admittedly the calc for fuel cost became alot easier when fuel blocks came about.)
The buzzword "spreadsheet" has been mentioned alot, as well, why bother with a spreadsheet with all those Tools available? ANY production type worth his salt knows the programmes and uses them. Althouigh a spreadsheet does the job, someone "in the know" would be aware of them at the least.
I'd much rather say these things here than spoil his actual IPO, call me negative or w/e. if its not me, it'll be several others.
Its a bit like me going out and buying a new Drag Race car, all it does is go in a straight line right?
I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 03:59:00 -
[16] - Quote
..Don't most production bonds/IPOs have a secure third party lock down the BPOs in the manufacturing corp and allow the investee to produce from them?
Saveritrader, would you be willing to go forward with this IPO utilizing this traditional fashion? Why/why not?
|

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
47
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 04:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Don't most production bonds/IPOs have a secure third party lock down the BPOs in the manufacturing corp and allow the investee to produce from them?
Saveritrader, would you be willing to go forward with this IPO utilizing this traditional fashion? Why/why not?
Razer Rocker:
That model works, if the Host intends to leverage existing assets.
Owned BPO's locked down, and leveraged/borrowed (with an MD loan/bond/ipo) against them, for the minerals/parts to build,
In the event of a scam, only the leveraged minerals are at risk, the players investing, if scam happens can re-coup something from the 3rd party sale of the BPO assets.
Thats a model, i would invest in. (in the hope for cheap, investor discounts ) I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 06:20:00 -
[18] - Quote
..Thanks Candy.
So Saveritrader, how do you like that idea? Instead of leveraging your profitable name garnered from the apparent success from your first bond, why not *gasp* start a bit smaller and procure the BPOs with own funds?
I'll do you a favor and lay the ground work for your IPO:
Allocate 5b of your own isk for this venture. Purchase BPOs. Take 1-2b and set up a POS. Run your production lines profitably for at least two months. Then come to MD and ask for funds, for a SECURED bond.
Saveritrader, are you willing to handle this venture via this method? Why/why not?
Something has gotten me thinking "ruh roh Shaggy."
I want and looked over Saveritrader's thread where he successfully raised enough funds for his bond. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=195432&find=unread
It looks like Claire was the first to bite, on the condition that Sav supplied his API. He said he did, Claire liked it, and promptly invested 2b.
shar'ra matcevsovski then asked for the API also, which Sav said he provided.
At this point many other posters posted that they have sent Sav isk, but none asked for APIaccess. Assumably because of Claire's positive returns and her overall happiness with how the bond was going. I would say that because of this, and Clair's amount of fame as a regular MD poster, gave other MD lurkers confidence in the bond.
And now rabbit hole
On 2013.2.2 at 16:01 I sent Sav a mail via evegate stating my interest in investing 1b, on the condition that I receive access to the APIs.
On 2013.2.3 at 00:14 Sav informed me that he did not "have room for it right now" but he had plans for expanding in the upcoming week.
Sav accepted what looks like another 1b via his bond thread on 2013.2.2 at 13:15. He did state to Erialor, who sent 500m, that his portion of the invested isk would run for an additional week.
On 2013.2.4 at 01:03 poster Kazuma Gaterau posted that he had sent Sav 100m. At the time of this writing Sav hasn't confirmed or denied that 100m investment.
Summery: Itlooks like Claire is the only "investor" to have been granted access to the API. My request for API with intentions to invest was denied. On the same day that my money was turned down, Sav gladly accepted isk from posters who did not request API. Claire Coffee, the only poster who appears to have the API, which I'm assuming is just a ruse, is Sav's #1 cheerleader in this thread.
I will not be investing with Saveritrader.
All of this post is pure speculation. If I am wrong, I apologie to Sav and to Claire. At any rate, this wild paranoia exercises my ability to keep my isk in my wallet.
|

Tom Hagen
Twilight Empire Blazing Angels Alliance
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 07:32:00 -
[19] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:Stuff
I liked your post, not necessarily because it is true. But because it shows what in Eve is a healthy dose of paranoia 
@Saveritrader I see a new business opportunity here for you, make Candy pay you for not smearing her reputation in MD  |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 07:39:00 -
[20] - Quote
Tom Hagen wrote:Syds Sinclair wrote:Stuff I liked your post, not necessarily because it is true. But because it shows what in Eve is a healthy dose of paranoia  @Saveritrader I see a new business opportunity here for you, make Candy pay you for not smearing her reputation in MD 
..Keen eye Hagen! I would have thought Clarie (not Candy) would have charged more of a primum the 17b/2. Her rep, with the right proposal, could have netted her much more then 8.5b. |
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
62
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 08:19:00 -
[21] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:. If I am wrong, I apologie to Sav and to Claire. At any rate, this wild paranoia exercises my ability to keep my isk in my wallet.
TL;DR at the end of the post.
Accepted, cause you are. As I said, MD is heavy driven by paranoia. Nothing bad in that, it's just you can't deny it's a condition. I presume other investors received API too since I doubt that 2-5b investments fly in without prior private communications or API checks. I'll leave it to other investors to comment on that matter.
And I was the "first to bite" cause safe carebearish investments (secured and whatnot) are filled almost instantly, while newcomers without any collateral have no entry point into market and serious trading. While collateral is a massive security instrument, those possessing it are merely in need of liquidity but not financial support. They might as well dump the stuff and start the venture. With lesser interest provided + keeping stuff they might need in future, it's a definite win-win (at least for them.) I'm not going to comment on people looking to play it safe for miserable return.
But what would you suggest to someone starting up in trading? Grind lvl4?
I've been there myself and I could have started trading years ago and I wish I did have the assets I do now to get into trading, but due to my personal beliefs instead of going for IPOs and Bonds in 2008-2009, I went another way of earning for my EVE living.
Eventually, all this brings me to this point where I do some trading (finally) and started to invest into new to trading people and enjoy other aspects of the game. I should mention that I have been locked in C6 for quite a while to keep any more agonizing paranoia going on. If you're familiar with c6 income figures you may figure out how much time of 2 Moros hanging out with sleepers with 2 cap escalations added to that equals to 2b I invested into Sav Trading. I'm not chest-beating or something, just a reminder that investing even risky ones is something I can actually afford to do. And yes I'm freaking happy when someone is using my investments to a great result and actually not being staggered by current success not to think of new ideas and expansions. You may call it shill on my part, but whatever.
I'll skip your post with quote-jerking, but to let you know the reason I'm doing what I'm doing is to have fun and support people who are starting in marketing.
I agree, that this "Share" thing is a whole different thing comparing to trading, and I already told Sav in our first correspondence, that the whole idea will be supported by people with an already established manufacturing process. And I should point out that this thread is a DISCUSSION of possibilities and not an IPO, as far as I can see. And I would like to see good ideas for improvements I could implement in my personal ventures.
TL;DR: Please contact Alex Grison for paranoia medication. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
62
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 08:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
Tom Hagen wrote:I see a new business opportunity here for you, make Candy pay you for not smearing her reputation in MD 
Yeah, you probably were talking about me. Well, I don't have any reputation here, nor I need one, since I'm not going for IPOs or Bonds  I'm just checking the mental health of this cute subdivision of forums. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
50
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 08:34:00 -
[23] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote: While collateral is a massive security instrument, those possessing it are merely in need of liquidity but not financial support. They might as well dump the stuff and start the venture.
We discussed this in the thread, the owner of a BPO can leverage it, using the model on page 1, and still build from it. essentially they can profit of the BPO, without owning it.
Some Supercapitol Bpo's sell for Under NPC costs. would you rather sell it for 14b, or pay soeme interest & get a few builds of it. If the build cost isn't there, you can use the isk to trade, to make an income from it until such time as it reaches useful.
Some BPO's will take a few weeks/months to sell at the price u want, so a sell order thread can be made, and a 3rd party asset sale can go on while you leverage against it from MD. (Hey idiots sell freighters to buy orders everyday, it happens)
Or need research done, thats how i got my catalogue of BS BPO;s researched. i leveraged them with a 3rd party researcher, and launched a public bond, traded with the isk, made money while my asset gained value... etc etc
I could go on.
But lets talk about the C6 and how jelly i am 
I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
62
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 09:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
I'm keeping notes on stuff being said. 
C6 is about getting a severe case of claustrophobia. That's about it  DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 09:47:00 -
[25] - Quote
Candy Oshea wrote:Razor Rocker wrote: You make it sound like running a profitable manufacturing op is difficult. With a spreadsheet, a basic working knowledge of the game mechanics, and the tens of tools available within the community, it is rather straight forward. Well, that's kinda the point, if it is so easy, Wheres the existing Pos, BPO's and slot/isk/hour calculations? no-where in the OP he mentions how many slots, and a minimum isk/per slot he is going to go for. Does his calc's include fuel costs for e.g. (Admittedly the calc for fuel cost became alot easier when fuel blocks came about.) The buzzword "spreadsheet" has been mentioned alot, as well, why bother with a spreadsheet with all those Tools available? ANY production type worth his salt knows the programmes and uses them. Althouigh a spreadsheet does the job, someone "in the know" would be aware of them at the least. I'd much rather say these things here than spoil his actual IPO, call me negative or w/e. if its not me, it'll be several others. Its a bit like me going out and buying a new Drag Race car, all it does is go in a straight line right?
Honestly, I love the input you're giving me. This was exactly what I wanted to go for with this thread, because you are unknowingly giving me good tips in what I am actually behind on more 'established' industrialists. For that I thank you!
I do try to get the best out of my operations, and I am not saying I am a flawless person, so even with that there can be some error. However I do my calculations based on isk/day because it gives you a better view if you calculate the max amount of cycles per day, multiplied by the net profit per cycle. Because there are certain times the production may lay still for whatever reason, so I believe profit for production would better be calculated over the amount of actual modules and ships made, minus the cost of the minerals.
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Don't most production bonds/IPOs have a secure third party lock down the BPOs in the manufacturing corp and allow the investee to produce from them?
Saveritrader, would you be willing to go forward with this IPO utilizing this traditional fashion? Why/why not?
This is something VV has also suggested me, and it is something that would most definite be worth looking at. However, as it has indeed been noticed, my plan is still to buy the actual BPOs with money from the IPO. So yes, I do like the idea as it does give more 'security' (as the 3rd party is STILL an EVE player, however a more established one) for the investors.
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Thanks Candy.
So Saveritrader, how do you like that idea? Instead of leveraging your profitable name garnered from the apparent success from your first bond, why not *gasp* start a bit smaller and procure the BPOs with own funds?
TL, Did read
All of this post is pure speculation. If I am wrong, I apologie to Sav and to Claire. At any rate, this wild paranoia exercises my ability to keep my isk in my wallet.
I completely understand where you're coming from, however I had never thought someone would actually analyze my post so detailed. It's great to see how others operate!
*Edit: I totally forgot about that when I was so busy typing... Anyway, as for the billion you wanted to invest in my bond. When you contacted me, I hadn't conduct the repayment yet, so at that point I had quite enough ISK to fund my trading. However, as time passes, I did start buying extra modules, see if that would guarantee somewhat higher profits. At this point I had repaid the first 20%, leaving me with just under 8B of the bond filled. Erialor asked on the forums if he could invest another 500m in the bond, and as he is a current investor, I do like to give them somewhat priority over newer investors. So I allowed it, since I had the room for it.
Please know that I did not do this for any other reason than that, what ever you may think of it. If this discomforts you, then I am truly sorry.*
Now as for what also has been pointed out, MD is a forum filled with paranoia and distrust. That is one thing that will never change, because of all the major scams that are allowed in the EVE universe. But I am just trying to do my thing, work my angle, and learn from this thread. I can't get rid of all the bad things, but just trying to do the good thing is a good (but small) step forwards.
Now as for this thread, I love all the angles you are all playing at, and I am indeed toying around with this idea, it is in no way certain I will start this up. I do get more ideas on how not just the IPO should work, and for that I thank you all! |

SellOrder Forum
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 10:26:00 -
[26] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote: (but small) step forwards. following a smaller step  , to be followed by a slightly larger step  followed by a big step  . Followed by a leap over the horizon  never to be seen again (well posing as Saveritrader anyhow)
Fixed |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 10:28:00 -
[27] - Quote
SellOrder Forum wrote:Saveritrader wrote: (but small) step forwards. following a smaller step  , to be followed by a slightly larger step  followed by a big step  . Followed by a leap over the horizon  never to be seen again (well posing as Saveritrader anyhow) Fixed
Right... Maybe I'll be posting with my main, Saveritas, then. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3772
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 10:30:00 -
[28] - Quote
Candy Oshea wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:I have been contacted by Savtrader for an audit. He's been quite detailed in what he wants to do, but I had to decline (Iike I am doing with everyone else) due to me preparing for moving home overseas. I suggested to start an IPO discussion to see if it can be ironed out without excessive arguments. I may eventually (if asked) do a quick check just to see if he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs but that's all I can do before wrapping up my netbook (which is the thingie where my auditing programs are located). in his OP, he is using the IPO isk to actually buy the BPOs........
Yes but you did not have a convo in game detailing more stuff of what's been said in the OP. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Candy Oshea
Techfree Investment Group
51
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 10:59:00 -
[29] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Yes but you did not have a convo in game detailing more stuff of what's been said in the OP.
And?
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I may eventually (if asked) do a quick check just to see if he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs.
From OP:
Saveritrader wrote: - Intentions - I intend to purchase 5b worth of researched BPO's, and build modules and ships that have shown great promise in my trading. I will have to purchase a moon near jita, costing another 300-600m. Also, I'll need to buy a POS, which is another 1.3b ISK including fuel. The remainder will go into minerals for the production itself, enough to build several modules for several weeks.
Must have been some conversation, talking about 2 different things in this here thread. I realise you may/may not have spoken to the guy, but that is irrelevant. All we know is what is written here from the OP, and thats what most of us have based our comments on.
Saveritrader wrote:Now as for this thread, I love all the angles you are all playing at, and I am indeed toying around with this idea, it is in no way certain I will start this up. I do get more ideas on how not just the IPO should work, and for that I thank you all!
eveboard links? you already mentioned the name of the other one.
The actual isk/day calc instead of spin about how u prefer to calculate it that way.?
You have made the thread, and there is some real positive feedback going on here, A few have gone out on a limb whiteknighting you for you even, it would be nice to see some of the real questions answered. I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next **** could spell disaster.
iCandy |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3773
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:08:00 -
[30] - Quote
Candy Oshea wrote: Must have been some conversation, talking about 2 different things in this here thread. I realise you may/may not have spoken to the guy, but that is irrelevant. All we know is what is written here from the OP, and thats what most of us have based our comments on.
I'll let the OP deal (and learn from) his IPO proposal (I am not a fan of hand holding), he'll eventually talk more details if he feels like so.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 11:16:00 -
[31] - Quote
First of all, there are some things not mentioned in this thread because I at the time just didn't have it cross my mind, though which I did bring up when conversating with VV. So I reckon that would have to be my fault, however I wasn't intending this to somewhat more of a hearing because this thread is to discuss the possibility of running an IPO with the initial set up. Now, it is clear that that isn't how people in general want to see it go down, because of a mixed feeling of (or, a lack of) security.
Now I understand why you're so keen on seeing eveboards from all my characters, including API details, including a list of all assets I currently own that would aid me in this IPO. However, this is not a thread in which I will clarify these details. If and when this IPO actually comes about, I will gladly share those details, as they are relevant then. For now, I was looking for more building comments as I have had in the first two pages (Such as getting the BPOs stored at a 3rd party or running this later on when I have full collateral).
As for my characters involved, these characters names are Saveritas, Saverithos and Saveritrader. I'm not sure how this would help you, yet that's as open as I deem necessary for this particular post. If we were talking about my bond, I'd gladly share the api details of the characters involved in that (Which would be this one.) |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:10:00 -
[32] - Quote
..Sav and Claire - What an awful lot of words that mean absolutely nothing. I really like how within all those words you didn't answer any useful question in detail, even accidentally!
My favorite part is when Sav says "I know having the BPOs as collateral would make this bond secure, but even so, my plan is to use Isk from the IPO to buy BPOs". Well that's just dandy Sav.
And now I think we all have our answers. Claire is without a doubt SencneS, and Sav is Ray. Except Reithe. Sorry about mixing two different MD memes.
TL;DR version:
Anyone reading this thread, and anyone who reads the actual official IPO thread (that is if Sav and Claire can do a good job with damage control from this thread) do not invest in this IPO. Do not send any Isk to Sav, and do not trust Claire.
In my book this is a very pitiful scam attempt. Even with all of the charitable work you do in between making trillions of ISK in your C6 Claire.
"The TL;DR was TL;DR". Fine.
Heres the TTL;DR,WTL;DR version:
I believe this is a scam. I advise you to not invest in this IPO or give any money to Saveitrader or trust Claire Coffee. You have been warned. |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:19:00 -
[33] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Sav and Claire - What an awful lot of words that mean absolutely nothing. I really like how within all those words you didn't answer any useful question in detail, even accidentally!
My favorite part is when Sav says "I know having the BPOs as collateral would make this bond secure, but even so, my plan is to use Isk from the IPO to buy BPOs". Well that's just dandy Sav.
And now I think we all have our answers. Claire is without a doubt SencneS, and Sav is Reithe. Sorry about mixing two different MD memes.
TL;DR version:
Anyone reading this thread, and anyone who reads the actual official IPO thread (that is if Sav and Claire can do a good job with damage control from this thread) do not invest in this IPO. Do not send any Isk to Sav, and do not trust Claire.
In my book this is a very pitiful scam attempt. Even with all of the charitable work you do in between making trillions of ISK in your C6 Claire.
"The TL;DR was TL;DR". Fine.
Heres the TTL;DR,WTL;DR version:
I believe this is a scam. I advise you to not invest in this IPO or give any money to Saveitrader or trust Claire Coffee. You have been warned.
Just a small thing of note: Your TL;DR is longer than your normal version.
I actually don't know how to respond to this... I can hardly believe how you think I am someone who I am not. I would gladly talk to you on teamspeak or any other form of actual communication, because it is just bollocks to say I, or Claire, are people we aren't.
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
63
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:24:00 -
[34] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Sav and Claire - What an awful lot of words that mean absolutely nothing. I really like how within all those words you didn't answer any useful question in detail, even accidentally!
My favorite part is when Sav says "I know having the BPOs as collateral would make this bond secure, but even so, my plan is to use Isk from the IPO to buy BPOs". Well that's just dandy Sav.
And now I think we all have our answers. Claire is without a doubt SencneS, and Sav is Reithe. Sorry about mixing two different MD memes.
TL;DR version:
Anyone reading this thread, and anyone who reads the actual official IPO thread (that is if Sav and Claire can do a good job with damage control from this thread) do not invest in this IPO. Do not send any Isk to Sav, and do not trust Claire.
In my book this is a very pitiful scam attempt. Even with all of the charitable work you do in between making trillions of ISK in your C6 Claire.
"The TL;DR was TL;DR". Fine.
Heres the TTL;DR,WTL;DR version:
I believe this is a scam. I advise you to not invest in this IPO or give any money to Saveitrader or trust Claire Coffee. You have been warned.
Your perception of reality is worrisome. First of all, it's not an IPO but a discussion. Secondly I have nothing to do with any IPO except the part I may play as an investor and maybe harvest some ideas and ways of execution for myself.
Now while you like accusing and assuming all your way, you're just another person being hit by paranoid fairy. The fun part is that it doesn't help anyway in any way.... no back to your "searches of meaning", what kind of meaning do YOU present? Community protection against possible scam according to your assumption? Well, okay, what does it have to do with this discussion? More to that, what does it have to do with me? I have my opinion and it's your problem if it makes your imagination travel to hawaii and get stoned there. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:40:00 -
[35] - Quote
this Isn't even MD's final form
@OP, what these nice ppl are telling you is go get some collateral, no-ones gonna give 20b to some joker that built ammo when he was a noob, when he isn't capable of putting anything on the line.
relax guys the coffee gimmick account has a c6 income, he can spare it, let him get fleeced, plenty of red flags all over this. scrubs like that deserve to be scammed, natural progression.
op got what thing right, even using a 3rd party its still just an eve player, you can sperg all you want about how your trustworthy but thats all rubbish, look at that VV white knighting these jokers. & getting butthurt when called out about it lol. im amazed you got isk in the first place (cash out now)
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
63
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
It's funny how civilized "Presumption of Innocence" is called white-knighting here. Well may you never fall into disputable court case, hehehe.
DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 13:52:00 -
[37] - Quote
Hm, it's a shame that a normal topic in which I tried to ask the MD people for some advice first turned into a thread in which I'm called out to be a scammer, people that have invested in me are called out scammers.
I feel like you guys are just ranting for the sake of ranting. And that actually is quite troublesome.... Either way, let's leave this topic where it is at and stop pointing fingers and call out names in which you have no clue of what you are saying. I will continue with my bond, and do this IPO when I feel the time is right.
If you still feel like ranting then, go ahead. But the point has been made in this topic, I have heard what I needed to hear, got some good advices on the case and will review my own personal stance on this. |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 14:11:00 -
[38] - Quote
calling people paranoid is ******** the game is advertised to theives/wannabe theives. ccp made a video how to steal **** from corp gius hurr hurrr
welcome to the sandbox, emergent forum gameplay, if you hadn't have posted, this scrub would have sunk alone, but since you stepped in and wrote him a reference,.....
claire coffee your gimmick account will be now taken to the butt doctor for futher analysis
butt doctor verdict: uncomforatorable |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
13
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 14:14:00 -
[39] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote:Syds Sinclair wrote:.. .."The TL;DR was TL;DR". Fine.
Heres the TTL;DR,WTL;DR version:
Just a small thing of note: Your TL;DR is longer than your normal version. I actually don't know how to respond to this... I can hardly believe how you think I am someone who I am not. I would gladly talk to you on teamspeak or any other form of actual communication, because it is just bollocks to say I, or Claire, are people we aren't.
..I took care of my TL;DR being longer then the actually body of the post. I'll call your attention to my "TTL;DR,WTL;DR" section. It stands for "The too long didn't read was too long didn't read" I expect this new abbreviation to go viral on all popular interwebs.
As for how to respond to this...No I don't want to talk to you on teamspeak. Why? Because that's what you want. To make this IPO and discussion personal. It doesn't have to be personal, it just has to be factual.
I would much rather invest in a lifeless pilot who make a thread here with no personality but solid facts and numbers then a smooth talking pilot who avoids any and all questions. I.E. you.
Claire Coffee wrote:...what kind of meaning do YOU present? Community protection against possible scam according to your assumption? Well, okay, what does it have to do with this discussion? More to that, what does it have to do with me?...
..On the topic of meaning I present to the Community: Not interested in "community protection against possible scam"." I mean I don't want to see anyone scammed, sure. But on that not, I really don't care what people do with their ISK. They can all shove it down Somer Blink for all I care.
What I am interested in, and quite skilled at, in game or otherwise is, calling BS out as being BS. I may not know the correct way/method of doing X, but I can sure spot a wrong way. And I can also surely point out that wrong way. So this is just a little hobby of mine I enjoy doing.
On the toping of "What does what I'm saying have to do with Claire Coffee." Simple. I am calling you out as a scammer. I believe that you and Sav are cohorts and you are attempting to cash in some of your rep for ISK.
Claire Coffee wrote:It's funny how civilized "Presumption of Innocence" is called white-knighting here.
Claire, this is Eve. As you and all pilots should know, when meeting a new pilot/poster/investor/investee/corp mate, there should in fact be a healthy dose of "Presumption of Guilt and/or Intent to Harm."
Now I know you know this. SO it makes me even further question why you are such a cheerleader for Sav.
Saveritrader wrote:Hm, it's a shame that a normal topic in which I tried to ask the MD people for some advice first turned into a thread in which I'm called out to be a scammer, people that have invested in me are called out scammers.
..Saveritrader there is advice to be had from this thread. The same advice I gave you on page one.
Use a bit of your own funds to secure BPOS. Use a bit of your own funds to set up a POS. Run your lines profitably for approx. two months. Come to MD with figures, numbers. profit margins, and most of all, collateral.
I've asked you before why you do not want to do it this way.
It looks like you just wont be happy until you get unsecured ISK from MD. I wonder why that is??
|

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 14:44:00 -
[40] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote: It looks like you just wont be happy until you get unsecured ISK from MD. I wonder why that is??
Now you're just making stuff up. Please read properly before accusations.. This is a thread in which I asked for tips, you gave me tips, and I have been grateful for that. After those tips, you just rant about how I intend to scam you or any other potential investor. I already specified in my previous post that I will NOT be setting up the IPO as suggested in the OP, yet will revise it according to tips given and see where I stand at that point.
If I give you that feeling, that's pretty odd. Since this isn't an actual IPO at all, and I'm not asking for any kind of investment whatsoever in this thread. |
|

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:21:00 -
[41] - Quote
..Ok awesome.
So here for the record. You have just said that any future production IPO will not be in the method that you outlined in your OP.
As the only contested point is the lack of locking down the BPOs for collateral. I, as well as many other investors, would fill such a bond without any other information.
Let me clear. No other point matters in an IPO like this.
So here for the record, will you, Saveritrader, agree that the next production IPO you release will be fully collateralized via locked down BPO's? |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:26:00 -
[42] - Quote
If I ever were to start up an IPO that is intended for production, I will provide sufficient security for the IPO to work. Wether that be using a 3rd party to lock up my own BPOs or use IPO money to let the 3rd party buy and hold the BPOs while I run the actual production from my own capital, that is still a point I am looking in to. Either way, a 3rd party will hold security if I ever were to set up an IPO. |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:32:00 -
[43] - Quote
..Awesome. Hear it now, Saveritrader has stated any future production IPO's will be 100% secure. Thank you Sav. |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
..Point of interest.
Last night I Eve-Mailed shar'ra matcevsovski and asked him if Sav had sent the APIs that he requested.
shar'ra replied and said that Sav did send his API.
shar'ra has stated that the API is no longer valid at the time of this writing.
Strange thing for Sav to do, cancel his API during an active bond.
Even stranger that Claire, an "investor" with the keys, has not brought this piece of info up, questioning Sav as to why he caned those APIs, denying him to further acces while his ISK is still at risk. I wonder why that is?
Almost like Sav and Claire are working together. And they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids! |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 15:52:00 -
[45] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Point of interest.
Last night I Eve-Mailed shar'ra matcevsovski and asked him if Sav had sent the APIs that he requested.
shar'ra replied and said that Sav did send his API.
shar'ra has stated that the API is no longer valid at the time of this writing.
Strange thing for Sav to do, cancel his API during an active bond.
Even stranger that Claire, an "investor" with the keys, has not brought this piece of info up, questioning Sav as to why he caned those APIs, denying him to further acces while his ISK is still at risk. I wonder why that is?
Almost like Sav and Claire are working together. And they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids!
That's bollocks, the API is still up to date and is set to non-expire. |

Razor Rocker
Ellis Research
38
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:12:00 -
[46] - Quote
Just posting here to confirm that I received Sav's API a couple weeks before committing any ISK, furthermore I've been following his trading via EveMentat. Received the API on 2013.01.19 at 18:43.
I understand the questioning of the security of his bond, as this is just a logical constant in the Eve universe. But I can confirm, however much my word means, that his API isn't expired or false.
|

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
14
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:22:00 -
[47] - Quote
..I did get the mail that Sav posted about. It looks like I am wrong about the API in question. I still hold firm on all of my other speculations and statements. |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:26:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sure thing. It tells me enough that you wildly accuse people without any actual proof.. However, my previous point stands. This IPO won't take off without a 3rd party involved. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3776
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 17:14:00 -
[49] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:this Isn't even MD's final form
op got what thing right, even using a 3rd party its still just an eve player, you can sperg all you want about how your trustworthy but thats all rubbish, look at that VV white knighting these jokers. & getting butthurt when called out about it lol. im amazed you got isk in the first place (cash out now)
So, it's that time of the year, when you resub, create the upteenth "Pepridge" alt and make MD look like CAOD or GD.
Before I deal with you like I have done with the Pepridges of the past years, I'd like to point out that:
1) I don't know nor particularly care about the OP, he's one of the 2-3 guys who daily contact me about investing in them, asking for audits and whatever.
2) I don't have the time neither to audit him nor to invest in him (and in anyone else) due to my known RL current stuff. The only point where I am not totally "neutral" is that I feel for him going in the slaugtherhouse and not to be scrutinized but to be trolled = useless = I hoped other guys would have posted. A Bad Bobby or similar other informed player would have done wonders. Because in my never ending pledge to help people improve themselves, those informed players can teach others a LOT. And no, I am not telling about teaching them to scam, but how to deal with situations and how to be "ready" to deal with all forms of inquires.
3) This is a special kind of "audit" I have put him in: the test of MD vs an IPO. If he does not get mad in the least secured kind of public investment (ISK request upfront, possibly share rewards after months) then he'll be at least prepared for the next round.
4) Your (nor a portion of Syd) posts are not useful, because the real MD "investigators" are guys like Estel Arador and MMe Pinkerton / Vera / I keep forgetting the names (:pulls hairs:). The former is possibly the guy who most posted against me at every possible opportunity, but he *researched* his stuff first, he made logic rebuttals, he did some detective work. I'd have given him a 80 / 100 quality. MMe is even better, because he really does an awesome data drilling job while posting better and more constructively than me, if there was an auditor to take my place I'd vote him for sure.
Syd seems still at the "early days", a bit more work on getting factual evidence (the nastiest one to slam in a pretend-investor face, believe me!) and s/he is set. Pepridge instead, is good for "giggles" for those who like his humor but not *useful* to an investment. And as he seem to never change, evidently he does not want to "evolve" into either an investor or a value MD partecipant. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Barakach
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
148
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 18:51:00 -
[50] - Quote
Razor Rocker wrote:Candy Oshea wrote:Saveritrader wrote: I have experience through the years, though I have been hopping on and off for months on end due to school or work. However, my current schedule allows for longer periods of time in which I can play. Through the years I have been in production and wormhole activities, and I have a certain love for spreadsheets which is... beyond words.
I believe that combining my knowledge of the market with these experiences will make this IPO work.
An Existing production operation would already have, POS, multiple profitable BPO's etc.... Your OP says you need to buy it all with IPO ISK..................So, sorry if i do-not believe you & what you say about your experience. Its one thing making ammo in a station, its quite another running a pos and having to pay interest. You make it sound like running a profitable manufacturing op is difficult. With a spreadsheet, a basic working knowledge of the game mechanics, and the tens of tools available within the community, it is rather straight forward. However, that being said, it is a shame that he doesn't already have the BPOs in stock. Perhaps there is a way to provide a bit more security to this IPO. For instance, I know in the past that 3rd parties have offered to lock down BPOs. Perhaps if the 3rd party was given the ISK, had an alt in the CEO seat, bought the BPOs via contract and locked them down. Would this alleviate some fears of the prospective investor? The BPOs wouldn't cover the cost of the entire IPO, but it is at least something.
Using the ISK/HR program, almost nothing is profitable for manufacturing when using Jita prices for materials.
The only thing worth while is finding under-priced items and reprocessing them to sell the materials. |
|

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 19:03:00 -
[51] - Quote
..Thanks for the advice Vaerah. I pretty much agree with your statements. I do like to season my posts with a healthy dash of instigation!
My goal is to find any skeletons in the closet via a swat team, rather then shinig a flashlight on them.
At any rate, your opinion has value to me.
As for pepperidge, if my memory serves me, any unsecured audit that Vaerah has performed as resulted in these select outcomes:
IPO issuer does/does not have the required skills/assets/experience/ track record to complete said IPO.
As far as I remember, the best summery from Vaerah for an unsecured loan has been - highly risky investment due to the nature of unsecured loans.
Not an ounce of selling out there. |

Vurt Konne
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 19:59:00 -
[52] - Quote
Why do you need a POS? Why do you intend to buy researched BPOs when you're gonna get a POS anyway? Will you mostly be producing t1 stuff or t2? If t2, why researched BPOs at all? Do you intend to strike deals with Corps for constant supply on some items or will you only sell on the market? Will you only sell in Jita/the big trade hubs, or will you also sell in mission hubs/lowsec/nullsec? What will you do with the POS in times of war?
|

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 20:06:00 -
[53] - Quote
Vurt Konne wrote:Why do you need a POS? Why do you intend to buy researched BPOs when you're gonna get a POS anyway? Will you mostly be producing t1 stuff or t2? If t2, why researched BPOs at all? Do you intend to strike deals with Corps for constant supply on some items or will you only sell on the market? Will you only sell in Jita/the big trade hubs, or will you also sell in mission hubs/lowsec/nullsec? What will you do with the POS in times of war?
- The POS is to profit of the 0.75% time multiplier assembly arrays offer. Logistically I will be able to manage it.
- I will be mostly producing T1, yet T2 is something I will be working towards
- I will also be providing the ships for my alliance. For the rest I will sell it on the market as it currently stands.
- I will most likely sell most in jita, while other trade hubs are a possibility as I do run a freighter around.
- In times of war the POS will be without any valuables and loaded with guns! If it goes down, the valuable stuff will be sitting in the station where I will resume production, just a bit slower. |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 20:55:00 -
[54] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote:
- I will be mostly producing T1, yet T2 is something I will be working towards
- I will also be providing the ships for my alliance. For the rest I will sell it on the market as it currently stands.
- In times of war the POS will be without any valuables and loaded with guns! If it goes down, the valuable stuff will be sitting in the station where I will resume production, just a bit slower.
..T2 invention/production is risky. Is this a T1 production IPO or a T2 invention/production IPO?
How much of a discount are you going to be giving you alliance? How will that affect shareholder profits?
A pilot or group of pilots that want your POS dead will get it dead. There goes 1-2b of shareholder ISK. Why wouldn't you simply take the POS down and then put it back up after the war deck? |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
63
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 21:26:00 -
[55] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..I did get the mail that Sav posted about. It looks like I am wrong about the API in question. I still hold firm on all of my other speculations and statements.
You're wrong about mostly everything in this thread. May I suggest you going to C&P and creating a post there will all your accusations towards me and explaining your role of MD detective and how you think things will turn out for everyone doing business with me. I think opinions of people may turn out to be useful and they might even suggest you to fit Raven differently 
EDIT: Oh and I'm out of here. I guess this thread served its purpose. Theory-crafting and stuff just ain't my thing. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

shar'ra matcevsovski
white knightess
336
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 21:49:00 -
[56] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote:Syds Sinclair wrote:..Point of interest.
Last night I Eve-Mailed shar'ra matcevsovski and asked him if Sav had sent the APIs that he requested.
shar'ra replied and said that Sav did send his API.
shar'ra has stated that the API is no longer valid at the time of this writing.
Strange thing for Sav to do, cancel his API during an active bond.
Even stranger that Claire, an "investor" with the keys, has not brought this piece of info up, questioning Sav as to why he caned those APIs, denying him to further acces while his ISK is still at risk. I wonder why that is?
Almost like Sav and Claire are working together. And they would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for those pesky kids! That's bollocks, the API is still up to date and is set to non-expire. Ask shar'ra to forward you the mail and check for yourself. * I also forwarded you the same mail. As you don't trust me, feel free to compare it with shar'ra and check the api for yourself.
just for the record
Quote: From: shar'ra matcevsovski To: Syds Sinclair [quote]ID: XXXXXXXX vCode: YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
however I did not have the oprtunity to check them, yet (im at home on max 5. days a month) and its way to much hassle to check it via my cellphone.
apologies, I guess the "oportunity" was a bit ambiguous here, my bad.
nonetheless I`d never tell anyone to invest in a uncollateralized bond that is not secured by trusted escrow service.
shar'ra phone home |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 22:09:00 -
[57] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:
..T2 invention/production is risky. Is this a T1 production IPO or a T2 invention/production IPO?
How much of a discount are you going to be giving you alliance? How will that affect shareholder profits?
A pilot or group of pilots that want your POS dead will get it dead. There goes 1-2b of shareholder ISK. Why wouldn't you simply take the POS down and then put it back up after the war deck?
This is a T1 production IPO, yet I will be training my alt to do everything regarding production so I don't exclude T2 in the future. My alliance will be given slight discount, yet the consumption is little to disregardable in all fairness.
Regarding the POS; yes, getting it down would be a much better idea. But that depends wether I will have enough time on the day itself. The POS will however never contain any more than is being produced at any given moment, so there isn't anything to gain from a wardec. |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 23:08:00 -
[58] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
So, it's that time of the year, when you resub, create the upteenth "Pepridge" alt and make MD look like CAOD or GD.
Before I deal with you like I have done with the Pepridges of the past years, I'd like to point out that:
1) I don't know nor particularly care about the OP, he's one of the 2-3 guys who daily contact me about investing in them, asking for audits and whatever.
Stop talking BS, you said you spoke to the OP, the white knighted when the candy gimmick account called you out on it.
of the 2-3 conversations? you are not serious, surely you can remember who is who? are you kidding me? lmao please do share the other 2-3 guys convo's.
you were in on it, no doubt about it. your "audit" is an MD enabler.
we have argued before about this exact thing, like when you audited a few scams (enabling them) a few years back.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: 2) I don't have the time neither to audit him nor to invest in him (and in anyone else) due to my known RL current stuff. The only point where I am not totally "neutral" is that I feel for him going in the slaugtherhouse and not to be scrutinized but to be trolled = useless = I hoped other guys would have posted. A Bad Bobby or similar other informed player would have done wonders. Because in my never ending pledge to help people improve themselves, those informed players can teach others a LOT. And no, I am not telling about teaching them to scam, but how to deal with situations and how to be "ready" to deal with all forms of inquires.
you don't have time to audit, but you have the time to write this wall of text. lol, Audit, its p hard to punch API keys into any number of softwares available, but no, keep your time for writing, Stupid candlestick threads where "double Shoulders" & other "words" to make you seem smarter than you are, & writing butthurt rebuttals (this wall of text is a butthurt rebuttal)
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: 3) This is a special kind of "audit" I have put him in: the test of MD vs an IPO. If he does not get mad in the least secured kind of public investment (ISK request upfront, possibly share rewards after months) then he'll be at least prepared for the next round.
Great idea, make an MD hurr durr i need isk thread, that'll go down well, great advice.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: 4) Your (nor a portion of Syd) posts are not useful, because the real MD "investigators" are guys like Estel Arador and MMe Pinkerton / Vera / I keep forgetting the names (:pulls hairs:). The former is possibly the guy who most posted against me at every possible opportunity, but he *researched* his stuff first, he made logic rebuttals, he did some detective work. I'd have given him a 80 / 100 quality. MMe is even better, because he really does an awesome data drilling job while posting better and more constructively than me, if there was an auditor to take my place I'd vote him for sure.
My posts, aren't meant to be useful, i like to call out scrubs for who they are & the scrubs who whiteknight for them.
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Syd seems still at the "early days", a bit more work on getting factual evidence (the nastiest one to slam in a pretend-investor face, believe me!) and s/he is set. Pepridge instead, is good for "giggles" for those who like his humor but not *useful* to an investment. And as he seem to never change, evidently he does not want to "evolve" into either an investor or a value MD partecipant.
You heard it hear folks. Syds Sinclair needs work gaining facts according to this guy, yet he(VV) whiteknighted the thread after a Convo on which Facts were not Facts VV was under the assumption OP had BPO's and got called out.
don't take any advice from this guy too seriously folks.
|

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 23:45:00 -
[59] - Quote
..I'll own up to shar'ra matcevsovski's post.
I didn't want to out shar'ra for giving me Sav's API. So I took that API and ran it, and it said that it was not active.
Another poster stated it was active, so I'm assuming the fault and error is mine on the part of looki g up that API.
So that one is on me.
But even still, I stand by all of my speculation and statements. I'm also glad hat I got Sav to agree on a fully secured future production IPO. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3776
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 01:49:00 -
[60] - Quote
Only replying to what's not unrecoverable drivel:
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: Stop talking BS, you said you spoke to the OP, the white knighted when the candy gimmick account called you out on it.
of the 2-3 conversations? you are not serious, surely you can remember who is who? are you kidding me? lmao please do share the other 2-3 guys convo's.
Every game I play for some reason people start trusting me. Then they share things with me that don't want to necessarily tell to everybody. In this case the OP told me basically what's posted here plus a little detail that makes his proposal a bit more valuable. I did not want to talk about the detail because some idiot would easily mistake it for endorsement. Don't be that idiot.
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: you were in on it, no doubt about it. your "audit" is an MD enabler.
Whoever believes that my comments = MD enablers, is a fool and WILL lose his money. Luckily I have yet to find anyone who believes that, except you.
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: we have argued before about this exact thing, like when you audited a few scams (enabling them) a few years back.
Really? Any link? My website has a searchable listing of my audits and is well indexed on Google, should be fairly easiy to find them.
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: you don't have time to audit, but you have the time to write this wall of text. lol, Audit, its p hard to punch API keys into any number of softwares available, but no, keep your time for writing, Stupid candlestick threads where "double Shoulders" & other "words" to make you seem smarter than you are, & writing butthurt rebuttals (this wall of text is a butthurt rebuttal)
An average, simple audit takes long hours, you apparently believe that entering an API key is it, right? Vera Algaert could have 2 or 3 words with you about that.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 01:56:00 -
[61] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Every game I play for some reason people start trusting me. Then they share things with me that don't want to necessarily tell to everybody. In this case the OP told me basically what's posted here plus a little detail that makes his proposal a bit more valuable. I did not want to talk about the detail because some idiot would easily mistake it for endorsement. Don't be that idiot.
try again.
for someone so "thorough" and mess up major details, only leads to one thing.
You thought OP had BPO's & were ready to check them in the future, when his OP says he is buying researched prints.
drivel? if want to read that, please read your candlestick thread.
|

Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
101
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 01:59:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Every game I play for some reason people start trusting me. Then they share things with me that don't want to necessarily tell to everybody. In this case the OP told me basically what's posted here plus a little detail that makes his proposal a bit more valuable. I did not want to talk about the detail because some idiot would easily mistake it for endorsement. Don't be that idiot.
try again. for someone so "thorough" and mess up major details, only leads to one thing. You thought OP had BPO's & were ready to check them in the future, when his OP says he is buying researched prints. drivel? if want to read that, please read your candlestick thread.
Drivel is a good word, and people should use it more. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:03:00 -
[63] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: Every game I play for some reason people start trusting me. Then they share things with me that don't want to necessarily tell to everybody. In this case the OP told me basically what's posted here plus a little detail that makes his proposal a bit more valuable. I did not want to talk about the detail because some idiot would easily mistake it for endorsement. Don't be that idiot.
try again. for someone so "thorough" and mess up major details, only leads to one thing. You thought OP had BPO's & were ready to check them in the future, when his OP says he is buying researched prints. drivel? if want to read that, please read your candlestick thread.
We had a discussion about his lack of BPOs and how ideally these IPOs are done by locking BPOs at a 3rd party. The OP can confirm this point.
The rest - of course - you throw statements without having been there but that's not unexpected off yours. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:06:00 -
[64] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: We had a discussion about his lack of BPOs and how ideally these IPOs are done by locking BPOs at a 3rd party. The OP can confirm this point.
The rest - of course - you throw statements without having been there but that's not unexpected off yours.
no, you didn't, you may have had a discussion about some BPO's but thats not public record is it?
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs
read it how you want.
op is your alt for all we know, OP cannot confirm anything. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:11:00 -
[65] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs read it how you want. op is your alt for all we know, OP cannot confirm anything.
Lol that was an EXAMPLE and was completely unrelated with this IPO 
I have NO idea if the OP can factually manufacture even a Rifter. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:11:00 -
[66] - Quote
when you put yourself in the public spotlight and expect ppl to trust you as a 3rd party, you shouldn't post lies, or rush your posts, ppl are excpecting the truth from so-called 3rd parties, not a bunch of rubbish when you get called out.
chribba/grendall is a good one to follow, i suggest getting posting lessons from them. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:20:00 -
[67] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:when you put yourself in the public spotlight and expect ppl to trust you as a 3rd party, you shouldn't post lies, or rush your posts, ppl are excpecting the truth from so-called 3rd parties, not a bunch of rubbish when you get called out.
chribba/grendall is a good one to follow, i suggest getting posting lessons from them.
I did not tell any lie nor rush anything. What the investees tell me is their only choice to make it publicly detailed or not. Nor I am going to detail how / if / when they had / have / will have BPOs unless they allow me to, all those informations can be used against them by competitors. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Scion Lex
LEX Investments
31
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:32:00 -
[68] - Quote
Sounds like a circus to me. Post your API and link your spreadsheets or don't ask the public for money. If this was real, he wouldn't even ask people he doesn't have relationships with. No one would, it wouldn't make sense. People don't spread the wealth. Especially when the wealth is more than what they have or would stand to make. Until CCP implements changes to the way shares function the only measuring stick of trust is your personal relationship with the individual running the fund. Anything else, including the entire 'secondary market' is and always will be a scam by default. |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:32:00 -
[69] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I did not tell any lie nor rush anything. What the investees tell me is their only choice to make it publicly detailed or not. Nor I am going to detail how / if / when they had / have / will have BPOs unless they allow me to, all those informations can be used against them by competitors.
well, your post, mislead more than just me (i didn;t call you out on it originally, did I), when read in conjunction with the OP there is an obvious mistake. He didn't have a pos/BPO/characters, nor any idea how to manufacture , from the read of the OP & the subsequent responses,
Your post implies he does, thus putting you in the precarious position, that you are in now, defending accusations of being in leagues with OP.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:41:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I did not tell any lie nor rush anything. What the investees tell me is their only choice to make it publicly detailed or not. Nor I am going to detail how / if / when they had / have / will have BPOs unless they allow me to, all those informations can be used against them by competitors.
well, your post, mislead more than just me (i didn;t call you out on it originally, did I), when read in conjunction with the OP there is an obvious mistake. He didn't have a pos/BPO/characters, nor any idea how to manufacture , from the read of the OP & the subsequent responses, regardless of how confident & detailed your conversation was. Your post implies he does, thus putting you in the precarious position, that you are in now, defending accusations of being in leagues with OP. you posted without reading the offer.
He posted the offer after I told him to, so I am quite aware of what he wants to do. Now try running some imagination and figure out how somebody could be checked for BPOs (existance, research done so it's not a total fake etc) even without having them in his "immediate ownership". I won't say more, because that'd really go against his privacy. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:44:00 -
[71] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: He posted the offer after I told him to, so I am quite aware of what he wants to do. Now try running some imagination and figure out how somebody could be checked for BPOs (existance, research done so it's not a total fake etc) even without having them in his "immediate ownership". I won't say more, because that'd really go against his privacy.
we don't need to check for BPO's
its in his OP, his business plan is to buy BPO's, not be checked for them, no-where in the OP he mentions an existing production line. which is again, what only you (not OP) are inplying.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 02:58:00 -
[72] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: we don't need to check for BPO's
its in his OP, his business plan is to buy BPO's, not be checked for them, no-where in the OP he mentions an existing production line. which is again, what only you (not OP) are inplying.
I am quite sure the Investors would like to have BPOs checked even if it's not "needed", since it's a "step ahead" compared to a full total nothing. All my post content was not in the original prospectus which was thought before the in game convo (so of course there's no mention of it) and is optional and only if I get asked for it. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
63
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 03:00:00 -
[73] - Quote
I LIED! I can't skip this thread :(
While Jerry is being a fail alt of Syds who tends to lose badly fit Ravens while being a null-sec pet running around pointing fingers at anyone possessing better ideas and income than his own I declare invalidity of his points further on.
I shall seal this statement with RECTANGULAR *hint-hint* ribbon on his foreheads shall I meet him in person, which I doubt will ever happen, therefore you'll have to take my "reputable" word for that.
/thread? :-) DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 03:09:00 -
[74] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:I LIED! I can't skip this thread :(
While Jerry is being a fail alt of Syds who tends to lose badly fit Ravens while being a null-sec pet running around pointing fingers at anyone possessing better ideas and income than his own I declare invalidity of their points further on.
I shall seal this statement with RECTANGULAR *hint-hint* ribbon on their foreheads shall I meet them in person, which I doubt will ever happen, therefore you'll have to take my reputable word for that.
/thread? :-)
a wh bear calling a nullsec player a pet.
heres the thread by the way VV
took me a while to remember the name.
google cosmoray + VV name
i was posting under my old old troll alt, misty mcginnity, who got recycled so i could pass an api check. |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 06:07:00 -
[75] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:I LIED! I can't skip this thread :(
While Jerry is being a fail alt of Syds who tends to lose badly fit Ravens while being a null-sec pet running around pointing fingers at anyone possessing better ideas and income than his own I declare invalidity of his points further on.
I shall seal this statement with RECTANGULAR *hint-hint* ribbon on his foreheads shall I meet him in person, which I doubt will ever happen, therefore you'll have to take my "reputable" word for that.
/thread? :-)
..My small ammount of time in nulsec on this pilot doesn't mean much to this topic of conversation.
But I will tell you what means much: you taking time out of your day to find tidbits about me. I'm assuming you we're looking for scams or scam attempts. Hell, I bet you would have been happy to find serious accusation thrown at me. But alas, all of your snooping only yielded a few silly Raven fits I lost in nulsec. Sorry Claire.
And another thing that matters. Saveritrader has publicly stated that any future production IPO's will be fully secured.
Chalk one up for the good guys! Lets look at the scoreboard, shall we?
Watchdogs - 1 Shills - 0
VV, Pepridge is doing what he has set out to do: make ridiculous statements and then spend all effort required to defend those ridiculous statements.....by saying more ridiculous statements.
VV, I think you and a majority of MD know what you are and what you stand for.
|

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 06:19:00 -
[76] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote: VV, Pepridge is doing what he has set out to do: make ridiculous statements and then spend all effort required to defend those ridiculous statements.....by saying more ridiculous statements.
lol, i like it, ridicuous is calling vv out for what he is is it? pop calling kettle black lmao?
interesting, did you look up the old cosmoray threads? where MD "audited" him & he went on to scam right? no-one seems to care now, coz the MD of then has quit only a few left.
ridiculous is calling OP & claire coffee the same person, you come on so strong in first few posts, but quickly turned into another buttkisser, just like the rest.
making it as hard as possible for others(by w/e means neccessary), and making it as easy as possible for me + friends.
you call it ridiculous, i call it emergent gameplay |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 06:30:00 -
[77] - Quote
..Jerry.
Don't take the portion about you in my post as an insult. I like what you do. Your antagonistic just for its own sake. Problem is, everyone knows it and for the most part disregards your posts. I just think it doesn't serve any purpose other then to give you and a few other readers some amusement. Which is cool if that's your thing.
On that note, I also like what I LIKE IT does. I like his corp name also. I'd like I see his character more fleshed out in the upcoming weeks. It would be great if some of the people he invested with would post his mails.
|

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 07:11:00 -
[78] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Jerry.
Don't take the portion about you in my post as an insult. I like what you do. Your antagonistic just for its own sake. Problem is, everyone knows it and for the most part disregards your posts. I just think it doesn't serve any purpose other then to give you and a few other readers some amusement. Which is cool if that's your thing.
kk, plenty read do though, for some reason ppl sending me likes, what is this? lol
thanks for geting the repsonses u got, made thread extra funny too lol
look at me going all soft. |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 09:26:00 -
[79] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: interesting, did you look up the old cosmoray threads? where MD "audited" him & he went on to scam right? no-one seems to care now, coz the MD of then has quit only a few left.
How does it relate with "we have argued before about this exact thing, like when you audited a few scams (enabling them) a few years back." I only read that a guy (who used to be hugely trusted more than me newbie at the time) decided to breach the TOS and post his full API key on his own initiative.
Edit:
Also, for what I know there's no way for an audit to prevent a scam. It's entirely possible that a guy makes himself "formally OK" by training the required skills and creating API activity records by doing what he claims. All I (or anyone else) can do is to read the records and see if they match the claims, if he fabricated his legitimacy it's not something anyone can know. Until CCP starts delivering mind reading APIs at least. But since you seem to keep sand in your vag for so long to recall and misrepresent years old threads, then you should also be able to recall the dozens of threads where this trite dead horse (audits = information and deterrant, audits <> security) has been flamed at heart. Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3777
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 10:21:00 -
[80] - Quote
Not sure why this post has been deleted from the forums but I try reposting it:
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: interesting, did you look up the old cosmoray threads? where MD "audited" him & he went on to scam right? no-one seems to care now, coz the MD of then has quit only a few left.
How does it relate with "we have argued before about this exact thing, like when you audited a few scams (enabling them) a few years back." I only read that a guy (who used to be hugely trusted more than me newbie at the time) decided to breach the TOS and post his full API key on his own initiative.
Edit:
Also, for what I know there's no way for an audit to prevent a scam. It's entirely possible that a guy makes himself "formally OK" by training the required skills and creating API activity records by doing what he claims. All I (or anyone else) can do is to read the records and see if they match the claims, if he fabricated his legitimacy it's not something anyone can know. Until CCP starts delivering mind reading APIs at least. But since you seem to keep sand in your vag for so long to recall and misrepresent years old threads, then you should also be able to recall the dozens of threads where this trite dead horse (audits = information and deterrant, audits <> security). Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
67
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 12:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:
..My small ammount of time in nulsec on this pilot doesn't mean much to this topic of conversation.
But I will tell you what means much: you taking time out of your day to find tidbits about me. I'm assuming you we're looking for scams or scam attempts. Hell, I bet you would have been happy to find serious accusation thrown at me. But alas, all of your snooping only yielded a few silly Raven fits I lost in nulsec. Sorry Claire.
And another thing that matters. Saveritrader has publicly stated that any future production IPO's will be fully secured.
Chalk one up for the good guys! Lets look at the scoreboard, shall we?
Watchdogs - 1 Shills - 0
VV, Pepridge is doing what he has set out to do: make ridiculous statements and then spend all effort required to defend those ridiculous statements.....by saying more ridiculous statements.
VV, I think you and a majority of MD know what you are and what you stand for.
Yet again, your perception of reality is better locked away for good. Yeah, I spent 0 minutes 23 seconds to dig through your KB, then I had a solid 5 minutes of rolfing so it was worth it. And for your info, EVERY WH player will instantly search for KB of person in question. I'm surprised hard knocks inc. didnt' teach you that. 
About security requirement I told Sav before he even created this thread and therefore much before you even opened your mouth. I also recommended contacting VV cause I'm in no way an expert on shares, which apparently brought a lot of trouble to VV. Ouch 
And as for watchdogs Thanks for the laughs you're giving. You've missed two real scams last week and ASSUMED and ACCUSED a legit businessman to boredom. Yeah, go, go, watchdogs... chasing your own tail. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 12:33:00 -
[82] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:
About security requirement I told Sav before he even created this thread and therefore much before you even opened your mouth.
In Sav's OP he states there will be no security. He makes the same statement a few posts later.
So eh though you told him "before he even created this thread," it wasn't until I, and other posters, opened our mouths that he changed his mind.
Me - 1 Shill - 0
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
67
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 14:10:00 -
[83] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:Claire Coffee wrote:
About security requirement I told Sav before he even created this thread and therefore much before you even opened your mouth.
In Sav's OP he states there will be no security. He makes the same statement a few posts later. So eh though you told him "before he even created this thread," it wasn't until I, and other posters, opened our mouths that he changed his mind. Me - 1 Shill - 0
This was a discussion and it's okay to suggest things / change minds / take different courses of action (my statements were based on info I have which was noted in the post that caused your erection, and it's not my problem with you having less info), but you're seeing scammers everywhere, pointing fingers, accusing and insulting people you don't even know. Your standard are low and you're deemed unworthy of continuation of further discussion.
dismissed, dog. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 14:30:00 -
[84] - Quote
..I don't have to know the people. My perception of a person has no bearing on a topic such as this. All I need to know for an IPO like this is the business plan and the amount of security.
Yes I did point fingers. I pointed them at an IPO proposal which leaves 17b of investor ISK at risk. I also pointed fingers at a person who is acting like a shill and acting like he's/(she's) in cahoots with the originator of a risky IPO. I don't see a problem wih either of those actions. Why do you?
My standards are high, as you should take notice of the high standard of IPO quality I encourage originators to comply with. You, Claire, seem to be okay with low quality IPOs.
And finally Claire, this is Eve. Better yet, this is the MD forum of Eve. There ARE scammers everywhere. Maybe you should go watch the "Eve is real" video by CCP. |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
67
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 14:49:00 -
[85] - Quote
I'm not sure why I keep replying, but whatever.
I know what is the risk of investments, I actually do invest, do you? I don't invest something I can't afford to lose. did you read that part in THAT post? There are scammers around, but there are a lot of decent people around too that don't get fingers pointed at them and screamed at "LOOK, HIS IS A GOOD GUY". - you call it being a Shill, I call it having high standards and supporting worthy people.
If a person is doing good, follows agreements, achieving stuff, I have NO problem recommending this person. Especially if the person is new to trading and marketing. If the person decides to take another course of action, then I will not be able to recommend that person again. And probably will not be recommending anyone else. But so far, I'm yet to slip. Hopefully not at all.
This is EVE but there are living and breathing people behind the wheels. Some are good, some are bad. But calling someone good or bad based on assumption is not my style of doing things.
Thanks. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 15:07:00 -
[86] - Quote
..I didn't call the person good or bad. I called the iPO plan bad.
Not on assumption. My claims were based in facts.
On the topic of people.
You Claire seem like a cool person. You post a lot and create content. Your posts are good reads. As for Saveritrader, he's seems like a cool dude also. Well formed posts and polite.
I wouldn't have a problem with flying with either of you, or discussing different areas of conversation. I don't think either of you are bad people.
The IPO, however. Your adamant defense of Sav, however. That I don't care for. |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 22:43:00 -
[87] - Quote
Wow this thread has really took a turn to the negative. It was quite supposed to be a somewhat constructive thread in the first place, with a little back and forth on some points.
I am sorry for ever asking about this, to be quite honest. |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
16
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 22:49:00 -
[88] - Quote
..Sav, I think you have a problem seeing the forest through the trees.
What you call negative IS the constructive back and forth. |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:02:00 -
[89] - Quote
Yeah I am more talking about Jerry and VV's back and forth about investigations and blaming eachother. I do have to say that in the conversation with VV, it has been brought up that the BPOs should be locked by a 3rd party. The fact that jerry thinks I'm an alt of VV, that I can confirm is not the case.
Make it however you want to believe me, but honestly... Paranoia has gone a bit too far with some.
I also don't know where jerry got the idea that I can't manufacture anything from, because stating as my posts I do not need to put out an eveboard link because this is not an IPO. This is a discussion thread. All I can say is that whatever I plan on manufacturing, I am fully capable of doing as such. Why else would I even bring up the point of setting up an IPO in production, if I was not capable of doing so?
I am sorry if I caused any trouble, because that was not my intention. I do however think that this case is pretty much closed already, since my future production IPOs will be secured. |

Syds Sinclair
Aliastra Gallente Federation
17
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:09:00 -
[90] - Quote
..Oh I see, yeah the Jerry and VV thing should have been handled in its own thread.
But ignoring that, it looks like this bread accomplished exactly what you wanted it to: ironing out a solid IPO plan. So awesome, good job.
I'd like to see this venture launched. If I were you, I'd start a some conversations with Grendel, Chib, and maybe VV so see what they can do as far as locking the BPO's down. |
|

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:14:00 -
[91] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Oh I see, yeah the Jerry and VV thing should have been handled in its own thread.
But ignoring that, it looks like this bread accomplished exactly what you wanted it to: ironing out a solid IPO plan. So awesome, good job.
I'd like to see this venture launched. If I were you, I'd start a some conversations with Grendel, Chib, and maybe VV so see what they can do as far as locking the BPO's down.
For now, I'll give this plan a rest and update it frequently. I will concentrate on filling my current bond and go from there. |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
10
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:26:00 -
[92] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..Oh I see, yeah the Jerry and VV thing should have been handled in its own thread.
the you & claire coffee sperg could use its own thread as well. he seems to hate the word shill, but its a good word
Saveritrader wrote:Yeah I am more talking about Jerry and VV's back and forth about investigations and blaming eachother. I do have to say that in the conversation with VV, it has been brought up that the BPOs should be locked by a 3rd party. The fact that jerry thinks I'm an alt of VV, that I can confirm is not the case.
i didn't say u an alt of vv,
Saveritrader wrote: Make it however you want to believe me, but honestly... Paranoia has gone a bit too far with some.
I also don't know where jerry got the idea that I can't manufacture anything from, because stating as my posts I do not need to put out an eveboard link because this is not an IPO.
pretty obvious you don't have the skills for it, there is only "a motive" to not post it.
your thread was stomped by 2nd rate trolls on page 1/2 the rest of it is just sperg |

Saveritrader
Sav Trading Invictus Void
7
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:40:00 -
[93] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: We had a discussion about his lack of BPOs and how ideally these IPOs are done by locking BPOs at a 3rd party. The OP can confirm this point.
The rest - of course - you throw statements without having been there but that's not unexpected off yours.
no, you didn't, you may have had a discussion about some BPO's but thats not public record is it? Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs read it how you want. op is your alt for all we know, OP cannot confirm anything.
It's the last line that I'm getting at. |

Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
101
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:44:00 -
[94] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote:Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: We had a discussion about his lack of BPOs and how ideally these IPOs are done by locking BPOs at a 3rd party. The OP can confirm this point.
The rest - of course - you throw statements without having been there but that's not unexpected off yours.
no, you didn't, you may have had a discussion about some BPO's but thats not public record is it? Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:he got the characters manufacturing skills and the BPOs read it how you want. op is your alt for all we know, OP cannot confirm anything. It's the last line that I'm getting at.
Yes or no.
If you were VV on an alternate account. It would be impossible to prove. |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.06 23:48:00 -
[95] - Quote
Saveritrader wrote: It's the last line that I'm getting at.
ah ok, well that isn't a statement, its just a generalization of a known fact.
there is simply no distinguishable API proof that any 2 different characters are actually 2 different real life players.
wasn't trying to personal attack. sorry if u misread.
this thread is over anyway, read candy gimick post and re-do, if u got colateral no-one gonna argue.
although even locking down bpo's with s 3rd party its always a risk, albeit a small one.
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
67
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 01:05:00 -
[96] - Quote
Syds Sinclair wrote:..I didn't call the person good or bad. I called the iPO plan bad.
Not on assumption. My claims were based in facts.
On the topic of people.
You Claire seem like a cool person. You post a lot and create content. Your posts are good reads. As for Saveritrader, he's seems like a cool dude also. Well formed posts and polite.
I wouldn't have a problem with flying with either of you, or discussing different areas of conversation. I don't think either of you are bad people.
The IPO, however. Your adamant defense of Sav, however. That I don't care for.
Now I'm happy that we've come to this :-) No hard feelings and I hope no one gets out of here murdered a little inside. Except Jerry  
@Jerry: I actually like the word Shill. It's quite lovely. Just not my case as I'm not THAT much emotional, but I'm definitely supportive while there are many troll-ponnies like you around. Oh and troll-pony is a lovely word too. 
P.S.: I apologize to VV and Sav actually, cause it was my suggestion to make a thread here. Should have known what was to come  DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
12
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 04:21:00 -
[97] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:@Jerry: I actually like the word Shill. It's quite lovely. Just not my case as I'm not THAT much emotional, but I'm definitely supportive while there are many troll-ponnies like you around.  Oh and troll-pony is a lovely word too.  P.S.: I apologize to VV and Sav actually, cause it was my suggestion to make a thread here. Should have known what was to come 
nothing personal either claire, call me what u want, just dont call me late for dinner! |

Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
102
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 04:47:00 -
[98] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:Claire Coffee wrote:@Jerry: I actually like the word Shill. It's quite lovely. Just not my case as I'm not THAT much emotional, but I'm definitely supportive while there are many troll-ponnies like you around.  Oh and troll-pony is a lovely word too.  P.S.: I apologize to VV and Sav actually, cause it was my suggestion to make a thread here. Should have known what was to come  nothing personal either claire, call me what u want, just dont call me late for dinner!
Wait. When was dinner?
nobody here told me when dinner was :(
So I ate some noodles like an irritated gorilla. |

Jerry T Pepridge
Meta Game Analysis and Investment INC.
13
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 05:59:00 -
[99] - Quote
haha pretty funny guy here |

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
68
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 06:15:00 -
[100] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote: nothing personal either claire, call me what u want, just dont call me late for dinner!
Of course... Once I dump bodies from previous fondue-party *shifting eyes from side to side* DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |
|

Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
105
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 23:03:00 -
[101] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:Jerry T Pepridge wrote: nothing personal either claire, call me what u want, just dont call me late for dinner!
Of course... Once I dump bodies from previous fondue-party *shifting eyes from side to side*
>_>
<_<
What Bodies? |

Tesal
184
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 23:45:00 -
[102] - Quote
Jerry T Pepridge wrote:haha pretty funny guy here
I declare thee to be a troll most foul.
|

Claire Coffee
Coffee Inc
70
|
Posted - 2013.02.07 23:49:00 -
[103] - Quote
Alex Grison wrote:
>_>
<_<
What Bodies?
Well, I tried to poke those with a stick and none of them... oh wait!!!... one is moving... BRB!
EDIT: now... what was I saying? Ah, yes.. I'm an awesome chef by the way. DRINK COFFEE Do stupid things Faster with More Energy |

Alex Grison
Grison Interstellar
111
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 16:32:00 -
[104] - Quote
Claire Coffee wrote:Alex Grison wrote:
>_>
<_<
What Bodies?
Well, I tried to poke those with a stick and none of them... oh wait!!!... one is moving... BRB! EDIT: now... what was I saying?  Ah, yes.. I'm an awesome chef by the way.
*checks the "Attempted to administer medical aid" on clipboard.*
Well we've done all we can here. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 :: [one page] |