|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
ijustTOOKyourMONEY
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
0
   |
Posted - 2013.02.05 17:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
Per: http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=74231
Dragoon is used the least amount and is only 25% used and maybe even lower of what the other new destroyers is used by count.
TRULY pathetic ship, slow as hell, short-range, everything dies too quickly, only 2 mids!!!
Way to create balance, always amarr ships getting the end of the shaft. Oh and drone ship for PvP? I lol'd
Who agrees? |
ijustTOOKyourMONEY
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 17:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Here's the numbers to back it up. CLEARLY Dragoon is not being USED AT ALL!!
PvP in December 2012
Number of Ships Destroyed in PvP
4,959 - Algos
1,800 - Dragoon
- Percentage of PvP Losses
1.7% - Algos
0.6% - Dragoon
Number of Ships Destroyed by NPCs
1,597 - Algos
333 - Dragoon
Final Blows in PvP Made by Ship Type
3,121 - Algos
862 - Dragoon
- Percentage of Final Blows
1.1% - Algos
0.3% - Dragoon
|
ijustTOOKyourMONEY
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 17:47:00 -
[3] - Quote
Misspi en Divalone wrote:I'll give you a famous quote: "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." Just because a ship or ship type is used less then others does not automatically mean it's bad. And besides the numbers show it actually is being used so your statement: Quote:CLEARLY Dragoon is not being USED AT ALL!! is kinda lousy as an argument isn't it? The next time you might want to back up these kind of requests with a little more and definitely better arguments other then pointing to statistics. Consider it might just be that players just haven't found out how to best use the Dragoon or it is best used as a more supportive destroyer so you don't need or even want the majority of destroyers/ships in gang being Dragoons. It's unique features kinda point to that is my personal view.
Dude your a fool. Speaking statistics to me, I know the dragoon is not being used. I have mains in null sec in big alliances when i see a ship type dragoon in overview i wouldn't know what it is because I RARELY see 1. Maybe seen it once if ever. So from my perspective + the dev post I can guarantee you and even wager all my money it is the least used period.
And least used is not good, Dev's make a ship asset that's not used at all, good job CCP |
ijustTOOKyourMONEY
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2013.02.08 17:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
So conclusion: Out of ALL the new dessy's this is the worst and could use adjustment PERIOD. |
ijustTOOKyourMONEY
Athra Imperial Academy
6
|
Posted - 2013.02.13 19:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Merdaneth wrote:Zarnak has the right idea here. However, I still think the Dragoon is subpar considering the opponents it usually faces. It is good against brawling frigs, but then again, so are most destroyers.
Can it beat its own class at their game (assuming opponents of equal skill)? Thrasher, Corax, Talwar, Coercer, Algos?
Its lack of mobility and poor range make it a bad fleet ship. Incidentally, Zarnak, normally I would suggest to replace the AB with a webifier, the poor speed/mass of the Dragoon makes the webifier more effective.
I do exactly the reverse of what Zarnak does, I go all-out gank with it. No neuts at all. Close to 400dps with about 10k EHP outganks/tanks other destroyers.
So you have a fit you can share for that gank fit? and how does it fare? |
|
|
| |
|