Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off
763
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 05:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
So as anyone who follows the industry will know, intellectual property battles are getting so ridiculous that we can expect the entire software sector to come to a grinding halt at some point in the next 5 years.
However, this one really made me facepalm. BBC is reporting that Games Workshop is actively perusing companies who have products about "Space Marines".
That's right... Space Marines. Marines, in space.
Like Dust 514.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21380003 |

Karrl Tian
Exiled Assassins
183
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 05:38:00 -
[2] - Quote
Only if they pronounce it "Spess Mahreenz" like THQ did. |

Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
334
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 06:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Games Workshop can take, and its IP rights, and shove them so far up their collective asses that they taste the ink.
seriosuly, i started WH40K tabletop, for 3 eyars i put up with the bulshit fo playing rokz/eldar even tried playing Tau once, but EVERY update of the codexes gave absolutely dozens of fan-**** for marines, OP army lists FOR MARINES, you could throw eldar into star wars, calll them eldar, and GW woudlnt give a ****, but use their ****-material and OHMEHGERD COPYRIGHTS.
had to stop playing 40k 6 months ago because of just getting tired with the **** games workshop puts out, it aint even sci-fi, its just space-knights versus non-space-knights and space-knights always win.
sorry aboutt her ant, but seriosuly, games workshop sucks so much. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
806
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 06:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
it's a trademark, and this is how trademarks are defended
Quote:Games Workshop is actively perusing companies
oh is it now
e: imma not be insulting, i apologise |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
806
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 07:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
I don't think this has anything to do with DUST, though. The contension is over the term 'space marine', not the idea of superdudes in armour. A lot of trademark claims appear riduculous on the face but defending them is a necessity to maintain a a certain image your competitors don't |

Cotic
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 07:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
They don't have a trademark for the term 'Space Marine'. That's the problem.
The article at escapist magazine covers it in quite good detail.
|

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
3791
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 08:02:00 -
[7] - Quote
Game Workshop are the same who chose Mythic Entertrainment to completely ruin a possibly awesome MMO.
They are also the same who deliver some of the most asinine IP bulks of papers.
Karma will really give them back one day.
Auditing | Collateral holding and insurance | Consulting | PLEX for Good Charity
Twitter channel |

Sentient Blade
Walk It Off
763
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:01:00 -
[8] - Quote
Cotic wrote:They don't have a trademark for the term 'Space Marine'. That's the problem. The article at escapist magazine covers it in quite good detail.
Thanks for the link. I hadn't seen that one. |

Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
307
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:18:00 -
[9] - Quote
Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine. |

Lister Vindaloo
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
As an ex-GW employee I can state with a degree of certainty they will pursue this simply because they have the money, they have defended their niche at every turn, all that needs to happen is for CCP to find a reference to Space marines that predates GW's use. I would personally suggest CCP use the term space mariner, in the true nautical sense, and refer to 'space marines' as a colloquial affectation, btw astro jar heads is still copyright free. GW is litigation happy and as much as you/we don't like it there are ways to work around it. When I worked for them the very mention of a computer version of their games was anathema and discussing it with a customer was grounds for dismissal. From memory (which is old and addled) there is a reference to space marines in the Alien films, which was never pursued by GW. TL;DR GW is throwing their weight around, another kind of smurf isn't going to affect their income.... |

Trdina Rasputin
Man-dingo
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:28:00 -
[11] - Quote
Who was first? Aliens 2 or workshop marines?
REFERENCE :D
They are BIG part of that movie. |

Mars Theran
Red Rogue Squadron
1626
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:38:00 -
[12] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:I don't think this has anything to do with DUST, though. The contension is over the term 'space marine', not the idea of superdudes in armour. A lot of trademark claims appear riduculous on the face but defending them is a necessity to maintain a a certain image your competitors don't
Space - Cannot trademarked
Marine - Cannot be trademarked
Space Marine cannot be trademarked. Not because it is two different words, or even because it is a phrase using two different words, but because it is a generic phrase. I couldn't care less if Games Workshop wants to trademark it; I very much doubt anyone is going to let them do that.
Maybe they will, but then that will mean they are incredibly lacking in foresight. Intel shouldn't even have copyright over x86 architecture imo, let alone 64 which was developed by AMD. The only reason they have both is because some short-sighted individual gave them patent rights over x86 without realizing that it was quite possibly the only way to do it effectively, and those patent rights gave them control over all products and architectures designed off of that architecture.
The fact is, x86-64 is dominant in the world market simply because it controls the software development required to create OS and applications for use on them, and companies like Microsoft produce one of the leading OS on the world market. Even Apple had to move to x86-64 architecture simply because they couldn't get any more out of the PowerPC processor with different architecture.
Some things have a very limited design architecture in order to work. CPUs are one of them. Microsoft, Linux, and MAC all function now on that architecture and limit the ability to develop a new architecture. Tablets and the like open some doors in that they use a variety of much less capable architectures that may move beyond x86-64 at some point, but currently have limited market.
The point of all that, is to provide a precedent for patent laws that conflict with technological advancement and restrict progress while creating monopolies for the holders. Space Marines is similar, though it impacts the world in a very different way.
By limiting the use of such a phrase through trademarking, you are preventing a generic term from being used descriptively in other places. Limiting creativity, as mentioned in the last part of that article.
Starship Troopers Dust 514 - Less affected than you might think, but nevertheless it applies. Any other content that has marines in space, or soldiers in space. Marine because space typically involves ships, which implies a navy, and thus any soldiers serving on them, or with them, must then be marines, and they are in space. Hence, Space Marines.
You can't rightfully copyright, trademark, or register as your own or belonging to a limited company a descriptive term, even if it is capitalized. Anyone who granted this would be a fool. zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

ACE McFACE
Holy Amarrian Battlemonk I Whip My Slaves Back and Forth
1122
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:40:00 -
[13] - Quote
Silk daShocka wrote:Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine. More like Games Workshop pursuing the US Marines, and the Royal Marines, and any other countries' Marines. DUST514 isn't on PC because CCP wants 2 different communities influencing each other, not people tabbing out to give themselves Orbital Strikes. (Also they don't want to cannibalise their existing playerbase) |

Mars Theran
Red Rogue Squadron
1626
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:40:00 -
[14] - Quote
ACE McFACE wrote:Silk daShocka wrote:Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine. More like Games Workshop pursuing the US Marine, and the Royal Marines, and any other countries Marines.
Don't forget outboard motors; they use it too.  zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
808
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:41:00 -
[15] - Quote
Lister Vindaloo wrote:As an ex-GW employee I can state with a degree of certainty they will pursue this simply because they have the money, they have defended their niche at every turn, all that needs to happen is for CCP to find a reference to Space marines that predates GW's use. I would personally suggest CCP use the term space mariner, in the true nautical sense, and refer to 'space marines' as a colloquial affectation, btw astro jar heads is still copyright free. GW is litigation happy and as much as you/we don't like it there are ways to work around it. When I worked for them the very mention of a computer version of their games was anathema and discussing it with a customer was grounds for dismissal. From memory (which is old and addled) there is a reference to space marines in the Alien films, which was never pursued by GW. TL;DR GW is throwing their weight around, another kind of smurf isn't going to affect their income.... it's a trademark, not a copyright, whoever used it first doesn't matter as much as who's using it now. games workshop wasn't making movies at the time of alien iirc and space marines are hardly the selling point of the film
trademarks are defended in courts, that's how it goes. let someone else use your trademark for long enough and you're letting go of it, it becomes theirs vOv
dust has no mention of 'space marines' in it so this has nothing to do with dust |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
808
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:45:00 -
[16] - Quote
Mars Theran wrote:Space Marine cannot be trademarked. Not because it is two different words, or even because it is a phrase using two different words, but because it is a generic phrase. I couldn't care less if Games Workshop wants to trademark it; I very much doubt anyone is going to let them do that. they, uh, already have a registered trademark, i think
they're pursuing an unregistered trademark (ie in digital books) now from what i can tell?
and i don't think they're going after the concept of space marines (marines in space), that's undefendable, just the phrasing |

Silk daShocka
Greasy Hair Club
307
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:46:00 -
[17] - Quote
Trdina Rasputin wrote:Who was first? Aliens 2 or workshop marines?
REFERENCE :D
They are BIG part of that movie.
Aliens 1 was first if i'm not mistaken, in 1986. Space marines has been used in literature since the 30s however, so Games workshop is being rather silly on this matter really.
BTW the person who GW made the trademark claim against, has had her e-book returned to the amazon.com collection. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
808
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 09:50:00 -
[18] - Quote
Silk daShocka wrote:BTW the person who GW made the trademark claim against, has had her e-book returned to the amazon.com collection. i agree with those who say companies like amazon and apple and google are too quick to comply with takedown requests and all that, it's not fair that just a polite email to some office can have someone's work ruined :( |

Dheeradj Nurgle
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
219
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 10:01:00 -
[19] - Quote
This thread is missing a lot of Boreale! |

Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
438
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 10:01:00 -
[20] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:So as anyone who follows the industry will know, intellectual property battles are getting so ridiculous that we can expect the entire software sector to come to a grinding halt at some point in the next 5 years. However, this one really made me facepalm. BBC is reporting that Games Workshop is actively pursuing companies who have products about "Space Marines". That's right... Space Marines. Marines, in space. Like Dust 514. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21380003
They are acting like typical 'Interlectual Property Trolls', pushing around little guys.
However the EFF just got in their face. PI Profitability spreadsheet
|

Kate stark
46
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 11:07:00 -
[21] - Quote
on the one hand i hate hearing "space marine" then digging deeper and finding out that the "space marines" aren't actually anything like the 40k space marines, because that's what i expect to find when i hear that term.
on the other hand, free advertising.
*shrug* i think it's all a bit of a nothing but i guess if i were GW i'd have done the same. |

Corey Fumimasa
Royal Caldari Imperial Guard Imperium Directive
93
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 12:55:00 -
[22] - Quote
TL;DR
Putting "mkay" in the thread, well please don't do that.
This is a youtube playlist going over my first 30 ship losses. Video sucks but the audio came out well.There are some good lessons, and if you know the game there's some funny stories. |

Aracimia Wolfe
Fade To Darkness
169
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 14:00:00 -
[23] - Quote
We're fine guys they'll have to get past the colonial marines first. Those guys are hardcore. I like my coffee like I like my men. In a plastic cup http://aracimia.blogspot.co.uk/ |

stoicfaux
2322
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 14:35:00 -
[24] - Quote
If you trust wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_marine
Quote:The earliest known use of the term "space marine" was by Bob Olsen in his short story "Captain Brink of the Space Marines" (Amazing Stories, Volume 7, Number 8, November 1932), a light-hearted work whose title is a play on the song "Captain Jinks of the Horse Marines", and in which the protagonists were marines of the "Earth Republic Space Navy" on mission to rescue celebrity twins from aliens on Titan. Olsen published a novella sequel four years later, "The Space Marines and the Slavers" (Amazing Stories, Volume 10, Number 13, December 1936), featuring the same characters using a spaceship with active camouflage to free hostages from Martian space pirates on Ganymede.[2]
A more widely known early example was E. E. Smith's Lensman series. While the first story, Triplanetary and most later sequels (Second Stage Lensmen, Children of the Lens and The Vortex Blaster) do not mention them, passing mentions of marines are made in Galactic Patrol[a] (Astounding Stories, September 1937GÇôFebruary 1938) and Gray Lensman[b][c] (Astounding Stories, October 1939GÇôJanuary 1940), and a more direct mention is made in First Lensman (1950): "Dronvire of Rigel Four in the lead, closely followed by Costigan, Northrop, Kinnison the Younger, and a platoon of armed and armored Space Marines!". The phrase "space marines" appears in Robert A. Heinlein's "Misfit"[d] (1939) and is again used in "The Long Watch"[e] (1941) which is referenced in his later novel Space Cadet (1948), in all cases before Smith had used the phrase. Heinlein's Starship Troopers (1959) is considered the defining work for the concept, although it does not use the term "space marine". The actors playing the Colonial Marines in Aliens (1986) were required to read Starship Troopers as part of their training prior to filming.[3] Heinlein intended for the capsule troopers of the Mobile Infantry to be an amalgam of the shipborne aspect of the US Marine Corps relocated to space and coupled with the battlefield delivery and mission profile of US Army paratroopers.
Space Marines from Warhammer 40,000. As a gaming concept, space marines play a major role in the Warhammer 40,000 miniatures wargame, in which they are genetically altered super-soldiers and the most powerful fighting forces available to the Imperium of Man. In computer games, playing a space marine in action games was popularized by id Software's Doom series, first published in 1993. It is a convenient game back-story as it excuses the presence of the character on a hostile alien world with little support and heavy weaponry. Some critics have suggested it has been overused to the point of being an action game clich+¬.[4]
edit: added moar |

stoicfaux
2322
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 14:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Game Workshop are the same who chose Mythic Entertrainment to completely ruin a possibly awesome MMO.
They are also the same who deliver some of the most asinine IP bulks of papers.
Karma will really give them back one day.
I think Karma will be in the form of 3D printers. The miniatures industry isn't something I would make long term investments in. (However, I would invest in copyright law firms.)
|

NEONOVUS
Saablast Followers
324
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 15:03:00 -
[26] - Quote
Already been done GW decided that it owned the rights to them. Even when they look nothing alike. Also an easy way to fix this is to make spurious and false claims carry a nice fine. And dismiss the whole, but we didnt know factor. Currently they could blanket issue takedowns and people would comply and unless challenged its assumed you are guilty. Which kind of violates common law something fierce. Besides it would be a great way to make governments solvent again.
Oh and because it cant be repeated trademark != copyright Very important and carry very different rules. |

Felicity Love
STARKRAFT
228
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 15:30:00 -
[27] - Quote
Good luck to them with that. They didn't have much luck before.

|

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2719
|
Posted - 2013.02.10 15:39:00 -
[28] - Quote
Oh god they'll sue all the space merpeople !!! O_O Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |

Shan'Talasha Mea'Questa
The Perfect Harvesting Experience
84
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 18:39:00 -
[29] - Quote
Silk daShocka wrote:Next will be the U.S. Marines Corps pursuing games workshops for using the term "Marine" I would imagine.
US Marine Corps is part of the newbies in the field... a quick scan over the wikipage showed me that USMC was created in 1775, while the UK Royal Marines (1664) and the Dutch "Koninklijke Marine" (1665) are more than a century older.
Top of the list that I have found so far: The Spanish Navy Marines (Infanter+ˇa de Marina) are the oldest existing marine force in the world, as they were established on February 27, 1537, by Charles I when he permanently assigned the Compa+¦+ˇas Viejas del Mar de N+ípoles (Naples Sea Old Companies) to the Escuadras de Galeras del Mediterr+íneo (Mediterranean Galley Squadrons). |

Nuela
Beacon Light Corporation Beacon Light Alliance
144
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 18:42:00 -
[30] - Quote
Sentient Blade wrote:So as anyone who follows the industry will know, intellectual property battles are getting so ridiculous that we can expect the entire software sector to come to a grinding halt at some point in the next 5 years. However, this one really made me facepalm. BBC is reporting that Games Workshop is actively pursuing companies who have products about "Space Marines". That's right... Space Marines. Marines, in space. Like Dust 514. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21380003
You young whippersnappers may not know but after Star Wars came out, Lucas thought he pretty muched owned 'Space'. Any movie in Space had to contend with Lucas's Lawyers. Battlestar Galactica had loads of issues with them. |

Shan'Talasha Mea'Questa
The Perfect Harvesting Experience
84
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 18:45:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nuela wrote:You young whippersnappers may not know but after Star Wars came out, Lucas thought he pretty muched owned 'Space'. Any movie in Space had to contend with Lucas's Lawyers. Battlestar Galactica had loads of issues with them.
Did he also sue Ronald Reagan for naming his private money sink after his beloved movie? |

Jonah Gravenstein
Gordian Knot Holdings
5786
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 18:51:00 -
[32] - Quote
Marines in space is a popular theme in Science Fiction, tbh GW haven't got a leg to stand on
To add to the literary references above there's also the Honorverse series of books, all of which feature Marines as ground assault and ship boarding troops attached to Naval units in space. The author even refers to them as a throw back to historical Earth based naval terms and tactics (he calls it wet navy) and keeps their command structure as it exists today.
Eve in a nutshell, it's me vs the universe, and everybody in it. |

Joran Dravius
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
67
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:16:00 -
[33] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:I don't think this has anything to do with DUST, though. The contension is over the term 'space marine', not the idea of superdudes in armour. A lot of trademark claims appear riduculous on the face but defending them is a necessity to maintain a a certain image your competitors don't Yes, the image of being a greedy bully who abuses the trademark system for financial gain.
Nuela wrote: You young whippersnappers may not know but after Star Wars came out, Lucas thought he pretty muched owned 'Space'. Any movie in Space had to contend with Lucas's Lawyers. Battlestar Galactica had loads of issues with them.
To be fair, it's hard not to notice how much the BSG ships look like x-wings. |

Davith en Divalone
Plate of Beans Incorporated
74
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:32:00 -
[34] - Quote
At least according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, descriptive trademarks that use common, everyday words associated with an object are weak and often unenforceable. You probably can't enforce a trademark on a soft drink named "soda" or a yogurt named "creamy." |

Jonah Gravenstein
Gordian Knot Holdings
5787
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:34:00 -
[35] - Quote
Davith en Divalone wrote:At least according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, descriptive trademarks that use common, everyday words associated with an object are weak and often unenforceable. You probably can't enforce a trademark on a soft drink named "soda" or a yogurt named "creamy."
Unless you're Apple, then you can trademark anything that contains the words "Pod" or "Phone" even if there is good evidence of prior use. Money talks, so does bullshit.
Eve in a nutshell, it's me vs the universe, and everybody in it. |

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
1169
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 19:52:00 -
[36] - Quote
Trademarks are either defended, or they're lost. If everyone uses them, without license, they become 'generic terms'. Hoover have a problem here. As do Xerox. And Bandaids.
And there's no real concept of prior art with them.
They are, however, specific.
Trademark space marine, and you don't get 'star marine','colonial marine' or anything along those lines.
(I'm not saying GW are right here. But if they think they have a relevant mark, they pretty much /need/ to act) FuzzWork Enterprises http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Blueprint calculator, invention chance calculator, isk/m3 Ore chart-á and other 'useful' utilities.As well as mysql and CSV/XLS conversions of the Static Data Extract. |

Darvaleth Sigma
196
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 20:59:00 -
[37] - Quote
Nariya Kentaya wrote:Games Workshop can take, and its IP rights, and shove them so far up their collective asses that they taste the ink.
[Big load of anger, sorely lacking in the grammar department].
I'm sorry, but just because you were bad at the game doesn't mean it was purposefully biased against you. Any army can be led to success if the general is good; if they're awful, then their record will reflect that. Please don't spout eye-offending butthurt just because you sucked.
Mars Theran wrote:
Space - Cannot trademarked
Marine - Cannot be trademarked
Space Marine cannot be trademarked.
Really? What about "Death Star"?
Death - Cannot be trademarked
Star - Cannot be trademarked
Death Star - "HERPDERP everyone steal Lucas' idea, 'cause you can't trademark the word "death" or "star"!" Give a man a match and you warm him for a day.
Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life! |

Nariya Kentaya
Tartarus Ventures Surely You're Joking
354
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 03:54:00 -
[38] - Quote
Darvaleth Sigma wrote:Nariya Kentaya wrote:Games Workshop can take, and its IP rights, and shove them so far up their collective asses that they taste the ink.
[Big load of anger, sorely lacking in the grammar department]. I'm sorry, but just because you were bad at the game doesn't mean it was purposefully biased against you. Any army can be led to success if the general is good; if they're awful, then their record will reflect that. Please don't spout eye-offending butthurt just because you sucked. Mars Theran wrote:
Space - Cannot trademarked
Marine - Cannot be trademarked
Space Marine cannot be trademarked.
Really? What about "Death Star"? Death - Cannot be trademarked Star - Cannot be trademarked Death Star - "HERPDERP everyone steal Lucas' idea, 'cause you can't trademark the word "death" or "star"!" ive actually won tournaments, only ones ive lost are when i end up against a space marine player in the finals/semifinals, cause anyoen smart enough to havea half-decent space marine setup already ahs their opponent gimped for not having tehir own half-decent space marine army. |

dark heartt
Space Truckers Assoc
11
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 04:09:00 -
[39] - Quote
So now the author can enjoy all the free advertising for her book that GW just provided. Clearly GW was trying to do her a favour haha. |

Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
918
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 04:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
Well it's a good thing that EvE doesn't use any terms like "warp drive" and "cloaking device" or Star Trek would sue. EvE Forum Bingo |

Davith en Divalone
Plate of Beans Incorporated
76
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 04:31:00 -
[41] - Quote
Darvaleth Sigma wrote:
Really? What about "Death Star"?
Currently a dead trademark according to the USPTO, except as a translation for some tequilas. The dead trademark filed by 20th Century Fox in 1978 only applied to board game equipment.
The trademarks filed by Games Workshop in the United States only apply to games, toys, models, and paint.
|

Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts Hegemonous Pandorum
93
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 08:02:00 -
[42] - Quote
in b4 OOPE
Not as bad as the fact that Superhero is trademarked and held by Marvel and DC. That is Superhero, Super Hero, Super-Hero, etc.
GW does have a strong case that they own a trademark on Space Marine. And they do need to pursue this otherwise the case will be used to errode their Trademark in all areas they use it, which they don't particularly want. |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
347
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 13:08:00 -
[43] - Quote
As a long-term Warhammer 40.000 player, I still think GW is being very silly. I expected better of them. |

Jame Jarl Retief
Murientor Tribe Defiant Legacy
1039
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 13:41:00 -
[44] - Quote
Well, you can't have it both ways.
Either greed is good, and thus anything Games Workshop has claimed can't be used without their permission, or everything is fair and everything belongs to the people and we're heading into the bright communist future. Take your pick, because you can't have both.
|

ITTigerClawIK
Galactic Rangers R O G U E
234
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 13:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Space marine just means a marine... in space, im sure folks will start calling marines that are based in space somewhere in the not to distant future will be called space marines, just maybe not in fancy 3-4cm thick power armor lol :-P |

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
975
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 14:32:00 -
[46] - Quote
This reminds of the sue happy era that happened at TSR (former maker of the Dungeons and Dragons line) in the late 80's early 90's. The company changed ownership and decided to get crazy suing fans of the game for releasing ANY fan based material even loosely based on the game.
Then they got sued by the Tolkien estate for lifting some of their IP for one of their expansions and that pretty much shut them up for a while.
I could understand if the author had marketed her book as being about the GW brand space marines, or based in that world, or used more of their terminology - trademarks are intended to protect again brand dilution or confusion among consumers. This case clearly has none of those markers, and I doubt seriously that GW will pursue it any further. But that's just my opinion.
(Also, no, not a lawyer, before anyone asks, but I have published a couple of books, so I do have some basic knowledge of IP laws - you have to these days, if you plan to write a book or anything else, just to be able to defend against this kind of stupid). The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

Nuela
Beacon Light Corporation Beacon Light Alliance
147
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 14:49:00 -
[47] - Quote
De'Veldrin wrote:This reminds of the sue happy era that happened at TSR (former maker of the Dungeons and Dragons line) in the late 80's early 90's. The company changed ownership and decided to get crazy suing fans of the game for releasing ANY fan based material even loosely based on the game.
Then they got sued by the Tolkien estate for lifting some of their IP for one of their expansions and that pretty much shut them up for a while.
I could understand if the author had marketed her book as being about the GW brand space marines, or based in that world, or used more of their terminology - trademarks are intended to protect again brand dilution or confusion among consumers. This case clearly has none of those markers, and I doubt seriously that GW will pursue it any further. But that's just my opinion.
(Also, no, not a lawyer, before anyone asks, but I have published a couple of books, so I do have some basic knowledge of IP laws - you have to these days, if you plan to write a book or anything else, just to be able to defend against this kind of stupid).
Yup.
It got so bad that the Tolkien estate tried to forbid them to us e the word 'ring'.
In TSR's Magazine (The Dragon) there was a comic strip about this showing TSR's office and people saying things like:
"Would somebody answe the phone...it's metallic circular banding"
"I just got engaged! Come see my engagement metallic circular band!"
This actually happened in late 70's/early 80's. TSR getting sue happy happened about when you said.
"Doctor says I have Tinitis...it's metallic circular banding in the ears"
You get the idea :) |

Davith en Divalone
Plate of Beans Incorporated
76
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 14:51:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jame Jarl Retief wrote:Well, you can't have it both ways.
Either greed is good, and thus anything Games Workshop has claimed can't be used without their permission, or everything is fair and everything belongs to the people and we're heading into the bright communist future. Take your pick, because you can't have both.
The common-sense middle ground between these two alternatives is to recognize that trademarks serve to prevent confusion and fraud within a specific market for a specific class of products. Perpetual or universal government-granted monopolies serve to suppress free-market dynamics as well.
|

De'Veldrin
East India Ore Trade The East India Co.
975
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 14:56:00 -
[49] - Quote
Nuela wrote:De'Veldrin wrote:This reminds of the sue happy era that happened at TSR (former maker of the Dungeons and Dragons line) in the late 80's early 90's. The company changed ownership and decided to get crazy suing fans of the game for releasing ANY fan based material even loosely based on the game.
Then they got sued by the Tolkien estate for lifting some of their IP for one of their expansions and that pretty much shut them up for a while.
I could understand if the author had marketed her book as being about the GW brand space marines, or based in that world, or used more of their terminology - trademarks are intended to protect again brand dilution or confusion among consumers. This case clearly has none of those markers, and I doubt seriously that GW will pursue it any further. But that's just my opinion.
(Also, no, not a lawyer, before anyone asks, but I have published a couple of books, so I do have some basic knowledge of IP laws - you have to these days, if you plan to write a book or anything else, just to be able to defend against this kind of stupid). Yup. It got so bad that the Tolkien estate tried to forbid them to us e the word 'ring'. In TSR's Magazine (The Dragon) there was a comic strip about this showing TSR's office and people saying things like: "Would somebody answe the phone...it's metallic circular banding" "I just got engaged! Come see my engagement metallic circular band!" This actually happened in late 70's/early 80's. TSR getting sue happy happened about when you said. "Doctor says I have Tinitis...it's metallic circular banding in the ears" You get the idea :)
Thanks for the correction. Glad I'm not the only one that remembers those dark days. The Margin Trading Scam: If you fell for it, it's your own damned fault. Malcanis for CSM 8
Eve Online: The full-contact sport for your brain. |

Maxpie
Metaphysical Utopian Society Explorations
251
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 16:33:00 -
[50] - Quote
If Tolkien (or his estate or whomever) had taken this attitude, they probably would have had to set up special courts just to handle all the cases. |

Fredfredbug4
The Scope Gallente Federation
433
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 16:44:00 -
[51] - Quote
Well the Amarr Empire is basically Warhammer 40k's Imperium of Mankind. They even had an Emperor that was on a life support device similar to that of WH40Ks "The Golden Throne" which has been keeping the God Emperor in a state of barely living for 10,000 years.
Games Workshop's Warhammer 40k has inspired almost every sci-fi setting for the past 30 or so years now. Starcraft outright copied almost everything from WH40k. Other science fiction universe like Halo draw inspiration from them as well. You can't really blame GW for wanting to sue people because these franchises are getting very popular on ideas that are either identical to or the same as the ones GW came up with.
GW is only suing for similarities to Space Marines though because those are the Poster-boys of the franchise. The Adeptus Astartes or the Space Marines are easily the most recognizable figures in the WH40k universe.
Though I don't think this is the way GW should be protecting their interest. Suing everyone won't really accomplish much other than making them look like a ****. They will rarely have a case and when they do they won't make any significant gains. GW should just stay focused on their own franchise rather than what everyone else is doing. WH40k is very different than every other sci-fi universe out there right now. As long as it keeps it's own identity, WH40k will grow in popularity.
Really the only thing I can think of that GW could win a case in is if they sue blizzard for Starcraft's Terran Marines. If you look at a Terran Marine from Starcraft, and then at a Space Marine from WH40k it's very clear that blizzard copied the design. Really the only thing they changed was the helmet.
Also, I think DUST 514 shouldn't have any problems. None of the soldiers act or look anything like the iconic Space Marines. I accidentally my assets, is this bad?-á |

Vin King
State War Academy Caldari State
48
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 17:05:00 -
[52] - Quote
Companies have to defend their property, or they'll have been implied to have allowed the use of it. Anyone unfamiliar with how this works should probably read up on it. It may seem like a bullying tactic, but the mechanism at play also protects the little guys from having their stuff stolen by big guys. Any author who is publishing works independently may encounter issues they're not prepared to handle. If the author is considering to continue writing, she may want to get an agent and publisher, at which point they can help provide the legal protections she may need moving forward. 315 4 CSM 8 |

Davith en Divalone
Plate of Beans Incorporated
76
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 17:11:00 -
[53] - Quote
Fredfredbug4 wrote:Games Workshop's Warhammer 40k has inspired almost every sci-fi setting for the past 30 or so years now.
As someone who actually READS science fiction, practically everything in Warhammer 40K strikes me as shallow and derivative of much better fiction, emperor included. For them to claim ownership over a term that originated in the 30s pulps and was substantially developed by Heinlein and others is ridiculous.
I don't have a problem with them pissing around their tiny little corner in the sandbox tabletop gaming and miniatures. But you don't get to improvise off of Herbert, Heinlein, Doc Smith, Moorcock, and Lovecraft and then play the schoolyard bullies when other people do the same. |

Vilnius Zar
Ordo Ardish
747
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 17:34:00 -
[54] - Quote
Perhaps we should find out where WG HQ is and bomb it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure. Amat victoria curam. Excellence in everything.
Some guides that may be useful to you: http://www.youtube.com/user/OrdoArdish |

Eli Green
The Arrow Project
497
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 17:37:00 -
[55] - Quote
3 pages because the OP read Mercenaries as Marines? Jeez wumbo |

Yazzinra
Scorpion Ventures Rim Worlds Protectorate
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 17:45:00 -
[56] - Quote
Trdina Rasputin wrote:Who was first? Aliens 2 or workshop marines?
REFERENCE :D
They are BIG part of that movie.
doesn't matter. the marines in the alien universe are Colonial Marines, not space marines.
also, its just Aliens. Alien, Aliens and Alien 3. we don't talk about ::censored:: |
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |