I get a sense of deceit and trolling when some nub day old alt claims they are planning to be a candidate for CSM. A role where someone with reasoning and experience is needed to look after the player base interests without any bias.

Show your (real) self fool.

If elected, will you be trying influence CCP to get breasts for male avatars?

Did you seriously just answer with "I have no stances and will give you people whatever you want"?

Pandering ftw.

This prospective CSM member strongly disagrees. Whilst I'm not running for the post of "Jr. Developer" I certainly see it as my role to represent & promote a perspective on and a philosophy of the game. Anyone who votes for me is surely absolutely confident of what voice they're putting forward to speak with CCP.

So what you're saying is you'll use big words in attempts to confuse the masses and hope for the vote of the carebears? I don't get it.

Don't dodge the question, Xeen! They're eating you alive already. Trying to be political here is suicide, just stand up and tell us the truth - you would love for CCP to add female breasts on male avatars, right? I mean who wouldn't??

Be yourself and you'll build a constituency - cater to the masses here, and they'll bury you.

Than you better get a new advisor, your current one will cost you a CSM seat. This stuff is important - no successful candidate has ever run without sharing their ideas about how the game should be improved, even Darius III had more than this for voters to go off of.

What makes you think you are the first candidate in history that does not need to tell people these things? What do you have to offer instead?

Let's see....

No platform......CHECK
Horrible interview.....CHECK
Thrown out of multiple Alliances.....CHECK
Dodges questions.....CHECK


CSM Candidate....NEGATORY

:GETOUT:

1) You've been caught in multiple poorly formed lies over time, why should the player base 1) elect a liar and 2) elect a liar thats not even very good at it?


2) Why are you Mitt Romneying the questions posed to you here?


3) You're clearly unstable, how can we the playerbase ever assume that you the candidate won't go off the reservation at some point?



4) How are we supposed to take you seriously?

Well I would but every time we do you just lie more so theres no actual real point in rehashing what you've already lied about in the past, seeing as you lied, we called you out on it, and you just lied more.


You know very well what I'm talking about, but I'm trying not to bring it all up so that your CSM thread from this year doesn't get locked like the last one you had up.

I'm giving you a very clear chance to simply answer a few questions without embarrassing yourself, its your choice on what path you take here.

You've told some fairly significant lies, I'm giving you the chance to either explain why, recant, or just blow it off and let that stand as part of your platform and do whatever damage it may to your campaign.

Your call sport.

EDIT: And the unstable thing just goes with the habitual lying.

Ok well, that answers my questions as to your ability to answer simple questions about your compulsion for lying. I assume that you won't mind me airing all of your lies during the campaign.

Sorry about the election, better luck next year.

Well thats a nice approach for somebody seeking public office, even if just in a game, I come with serious concerns about a consistent behavior pattern on your part and a simple set of questions and the most you can do is call me names.

You definitely seem electable.

1) You've been caught in multiple poorly formed lies over time, why should the player base 1) elect a liar and 2) elect a liar thats not even very good at it?


2) Why are you Mitt Romneying the questions posed to you here?


3) You're clearly unstable, how can we the playerbase ever assume that you the candidate won't go off the reservation at some point?



4) How are we supposed to take you seriously?

Normally I'd agree with you, but as I'm still tabulating all the logs into one easy pile (some of which I've already actually gone over with Xenuria in the past, and even though several thousand people have called him on the lies he's told he insists its the truth, which makes him either a liar or somebody who can't properly grasp reality) so that I won't have to go over this again and again you'll excuse me if I step outside of the realm of normal.


I was giving him a chance to just say "Yes, I made up (lied) about these things here, it was in the spirit of the game and I realize that these things I've said and done aren't actually real".

Only he didn't do any of that.

He's chosen to play word hockey, so I'm going to put him in the penalty box.

Assuming he decides he wants to come clean before I get this all made up and just do his own laundry I won't have to do it for him in a more painful manner.

So why wait until I point out the specific things that I have dirt on, why not just come clean? Why do you need my list first, you obviously know that there are things that you should probably do that on, and yet while running for office instead of just doing it you're waiting for a specific list.

I'm waiting on 2 logs. Then you'll have your list :)

Though I'm not sure how happy that will make you after you get it.


Remember Xenuria, some people keep chat logs for a very, very long time.

You would be something of an expert on suffering embarrassment through lying wouldn't you Xenuria?

Honest about what exactly? Your vague bs platform or your fabricated past?

Daily reminder that Xenuria was kicked and banned from TEST for linking child **** websites.

it is interesting that a campaign that is supposedly "unapologetic-ally honest" [sic] and "brutally honest" has said absolutely nothing of substance that could possibly be verified in any way, and is instead focused solely on deflection and evasion while saying nothing

please elaborate, in an unapologetic-ally brutally honest manner, the exact circumstances which resulted in your expulsion from TEST for things that even TEST found unacceptable

yeah see that's the sort of deceit and lack of forthrightness that i am discussing

major events in your past shed light on you as a person and as a candidate. you are unwilling to discuss them - or anything else - most likely because you know that anything honest you say would reflect poorly on you because you are a bad and broken person

i am giving you a chance to attempt to discuss these events in your past to demonstrate your claimed honesty actually exists, yet while you proclaim to the skies how honest you are you refuse every chance given to you to demonstrate it

it is relatively easy to draw the necessary conclusion

As a potential voter and a member of TEST, I feel that I ought to know more about this, but I'm too young to have been around for the relevant threads. Considering that this thread should certainly deal with your personality and your past, perhaps you could go over it again or at the very least provide links or quotes from the threads where you've discussed it before.

Please seek help.

No really, X. Get some help. You don't need spaceships right now, you need to see a doctor.

Man I want to post it but the second I do CCP locks his thread and I'm not sure we need that to happen yet, but the short of it basically is that this guy is ok with people being Pedo's and 'understands' how they are.

We posted it in his last CSM thread and they instantly locked it, we keep the post on standby just for days when he might raise his head.

I took Abnormal Psych in college too, and yet I have never been quoted saying pro-pedophilic things. Could you elaborate on exactly what statements you made Grath is referring to, in the spirit of brutal honesty?

You know you're not getting out o this, so why not pony up the information? Stop pussyfooting around.

Behavior like this isn't going to get you elected.

Why did you lie multiple times while you were in Test Alliance?

If I post your post in this thread, CCP will lock your thread.

Do you want it posted here?

9gag users are what redditors would call pubbies if they used that word.

I thank you for your answers. However because you support incursion nerfs and because you do seem to not see AFK Cloaking streaming as clear evidence of how overpowered it is. I am afraid I can't support you in the upcoming election.

If you do happen to get in tho. I hope you will be very tough on CCP when it comes to POS and Moons. CCP continues to give half answers and other delaying actions when it comes to these badly needed changes in my opinion and I think part of that is due to how weak CSM 7 was.

Not to be offensive, but its probably for the best.

You have made it clear in the past, both in opinions, attitude, and outright saying it, that you dont synergize well with people. you may have good ideas sometimes, but more often than not the way you present those ideas can come across as hostile, condescending, and rather forceful. From a realistic perspective, you would most likely have one of the lowest success chances on the CSM.

You're the kinda of person who works better either alone or with absolute dominion over decisions and authority, which would make you a counter-productive addition to the CSM lineup (not that the crrent linep is necessarily overflowing with competence).

FYI, "moved up" is not the same as "moved out"