Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 12:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
When a CEO can drop corp instantly and remake a new one after being war decced it's a problem - Taking the responsibility of CEO should be a big decision and responsibility rather than treated as lightly as it is.
CEO's are responsible for making Eve as great as it is, making the player experience better and keeping them motivated. If we have more CEO's that dedicated themselves to the art of building up their team, we'd have a better Eve.
In my opinion good place to start is: A: Making the CEO unable to skip corp quickly..........There should be a timer delaying a CEO from dropping corp and instantly starting a new one simply to dodge a war dec.
B: When a corp is formed officers should be designated, maybe give these officers an acceptance screen for them to accept the responsibility of the position before a corp actually comes into being.
This would reduce the number of junk corps and high sec 1 person incursion corps setup to dodge NPC corp tax that you can't war dec cuz they can simply drop corp and start a new one.
I feel it would improve the quality of corporations in eve which would improve the chances of a new player finding a good corp and keep him active and playing Eve. Also it would make it so the war dec mechanic is more meaningful. If you can't destroy your corp instantly and start a new one, then there is a chance for the war dec timer to cut in and some pew to actually happen.
Any thoughts? |

Zan Shiro
Alternative Enterprises
107
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 13:34:00 -
[2] - Quote
I take it you have never had a ceo just say screw it, I am done before.
You really don't want a CEO who just does not give a f..... anymore running your corp. He wants out now, its in your best interest to want him out now as well.
In a best case you get a good bye e-mail, a final farewell in comms and after that you jsut don't see them. Maybey they will even give thier stuff to corp or a trusted friend. Bills need paid, they run the wallet, well them bills ain't getting paid if they jsut say I am done but the account still lingers around.
In a worst case you get say the famous kartoon emo rage quit of doom. He basically said there were the pubbies and the core goons worth a damn. The latter were a very small part of of goons a few years ago. The pubbies...he shafted, with a vengeance. Granted this at alliance level but same princible applies....when you top person jsut does not give 2 craps anymore, they need to be ousted ASAP. If you like keeping any corp assets, well corp assets that is anyway. If they are willing to drop like a stone, it really is for the best.
Rest of this stuff...dead horse leave empire. Going back to kartoon times. I was in delve in IT on one char. I forget the day goons imploded and died. I will pull wednesday out of thin air and say this was the day it happened (someone can correct me with the right day if they want to lol). On Tuesday we had a dec with goons, we shot them they shot us. Wednesday kartoon says screw it, lets purge this cesspool...we still shot each other. And on on the following days when the goon alliance was no more (hence the war dec no longer valid), we shot them.
No longer war targets mind you. They shattered into lots of splinter crews. It take billions to war dec em all . Enter NBSI. yay its solodrakbansolosolodrakbansolodrakbansolo. You shot them for 2 reasons. They were neuts, and the damn name screwed up formatting on these boards something fierce.
Moral of the story....hate people avoiding war dec, go to a place where only one color is safe, blue (well its green and purple in there too...but you get the point). |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 16:53:00 -
[3] - Quote
Please don't write a novel if only 1% of my post pertains to you |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
41
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 17:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:In my opinion good place to start is: A: Making the CEO unable to skip corp quickly..........There should be a timer delaying a CEO from dropping corp and instantly starting a new one simply to dodge a war dec.
B: When a corp is formed officers should be designated, maybe give these officers an acceptance screen for them to accept the responsibility of the position before a corp actually comes into being.
Any thoughts?
A: There is a 24 hour timer when any member of a corp has roles assigned to them.
B: Any member may manually remove their own roles and also set their character to not accept any new roles.
Thank you. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 17:01:00 -
[5] - Quote
And there are other mechanics for ousting CEOs - this has nothing to do with that. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 17:11:00 -
[6] - Quote
War dec is a high sec game mechanic to allow corps to seek to punish others who blow their mouths off, steal or whatever then hide behind concord. Now gentlemen if a person uses a alt corp in high sec to make isk for himself. The CEO and often only member can simply drop corp to duck a war dec and be back isking under a new corp in no time.
There! Spelled out! |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
2281
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 17:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:War dec is a high sec game mechanic to allow corps to seek to punish others who blow their mouths off, steal or whatever then hide behind concord. Now gentlemen if a person uses a alt corp in high sec to make isk for himself. The CEO and often only member can simply drop corp to duck a war dec and be back isking under a new corp in no time.
There! Spelled out!
And the current corp mechanics is a way to legitimately punish war deccers using non-consensual denial of legitimate pvp...
The deccers can re-deck the new corp.
I don't see the problem... Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk! |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 17:30:00 -
[8] - Quote
Do you guys play Eve? How much does it cost to dec a corp? Do you even know?! If you did THEN you would see the problem. Look it up |

Sol Weinstein
Lunatic Warfare Federation
41
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 17:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:Do you guys play Eve? How much does it cost to dec a corp? Do you even know?! If you did THEN you would see the problem. Look it up
50 million ISK to make a declaration of war towards a PRC.
And what do you do when the "CEO" just says "eff it" and goes into an NPC corp until you get bored?
No. What you propose is not a good solution to the problem. It forces people to stay in a corp they don't want to. It forces them to play with an identity they don't want to.
What you want is a personal declaration of intent to harm on one pilot. This is the idea you should start discussing as it will solve many problems, including the one you listed.
But forcing a person to stay in a corp or play under a flag they don't want to is not a good idea at all.
Thank you.
|

Listain Kurvorra
Zoltus Nebula Border World Enterprises
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 18:56:00 -
[10] - Quote
Zan Shiro wrote:I take it you have never had a ceo just say screw it, I am done before.
You really don't want a CEO who just does not give a f..... anymore running your corp. He wants out now, its in your best interest to want him out now as well.
In a best case you get a good bye e-mail, a final farewell in comms and after that you jsut don't see them. Maybey they will even give thier stuff to corp or a trusted friend. Bills need paid, they run the wallet, well them bills ain't getting paid if they jsut say I am done but the account still lingers around.
In a worst case you get say the famous kartoon emo rage quit of doom. He basically said there were the pubbies and the core goons worth a damn. The latter were a very small part of of goons a few years ago. The pubbies...he shafted, with a vengeance. Granted this at alliance level but same princible applies....when you top person jsut does not give 2 craps anymore, they need to be ousted ASAP. If you like keeping any corp assets, well corp assets that is anyway. If they are willing to drop like a stone, it really is for the best.
Rest of this stuff...dead horse leave empire. Going back to kartoon times. I was in delve in IT on one char. I forget the day goons imploded and died. I will pull wednesday out of thin air and say this was the day it happened (someone can correct me with the right day if they want to lol). On Tuesday we had a dec with goons, we shot them they shot us. Wednesday kartoon says screw it, lets purge this cesspool...we still shot each other. And on on the following days when the goon alliance was no more (hence the war dec no longer valid), we shot them.
No longer war targets mind you. They shattered into lots of splinter crews. It take billions to war dec em all . Enter NBSI. yay its solodrakbansolosolodrakbansolodrakbansolo. You shot them for 2 reasons. They were neuts, and the damn name screwed up formatting on these boards something fierce.
Moral of the story....hate people avoiding war dec, go to a place where only one color is safe, blue (well its green and purple in there too...but you get the point).
Ian Harms wrote:Please don't write a novel if only 1% of my post pertains to you You asked for an opinion and he gave it to you, don't be rude about it just because you do not agree with the fact that he wrote a novel for you. |
|

sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
696
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 18:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
CCP Dev: "You dec the corp, not the player"
/thread Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |

Listain Kurvorra
Zoltus Nebula Border World Enterprises
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 18:59:00 -
[12] - Quote
There is a feature called Shares in a corp, you can buy 6% of the shares and take over CEOship from the current CEO once it has been put to a vote and passed this may not work for 1 man corps but if they are one man corps then they should have the option to leave, I do not agree with taking away that ability, however I do think that it should inflict a punishment timer that bars you from making your own corp for 24 hours that would make it fair and if your corp was stupid enough to Dec a one man corp in the first place then they deserve to lose that money for the dec. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Listain Kurvorra wrote:There is a feature called Shares in a corp, you can buy 6% of the shares and take over CEOship from the current CEO once it has been put to a vote and passed this may not work for 1 man corps but if they are one man corps then they should have the option to leave, I do not agree with taking away that ability, however I do think that it should inflict a punishment timer that bars you from making your own corp for 24 hours that would make it fair and if your corp was stupid enough to Dec a one man corp in the first place then they deserve to lose that money for the dec.
Finally! one man gets it! except it isn't stupid to war dec a 1 man incursion alt corp - it keeps them from being able to make iskies as incursion fleets won't accept war decced people into their ranks.
But there should be at least a 24 hrs timer! |

sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
699
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:24:00 -
[14] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:Listain Kurvorra wrote:There is a feature called Shares in a corp, you can buy 6% of the shares and take over CEOship from the current CEO once it has been put to a vote and passed this may not work for 1 man corps but if they are one man corps then they should have the option to leave, I do not agree with taking away that ability, however I do think that it should inflict a punishment timer that bars you from making your own corp for 24 hours that would make it fair and if your corp was stupid enough to Dec a one man corp in the first place then they deserve to lose that money for the dec. Finally! one man gets it! except it isn't stupid to war dec a 1 man incursion alt corp - it keeps them from being able to make iskies as incursion fleets won't accept war decced people into their ranks. But there should be at least a 24 hrs timer!
Again, you dec the corp, not the player, as CCP stated. Current mechanics is working as intended to keep you from following and griefing a specific player through wardec. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:46:00 -
[15] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Ian Harms wrote:Listain Kurvorra wrote:There is a feature called Shares in a corp, you can buy 6% of the shares and take over CEOship from the current CEO once it has been put to a vote and passed this may not work for 1 man corps but if they are one man corps then they should have the option to leave, I do not agree with taking away that ability, however I do think that it should inflict a punishment timer that bars you from making your own corp for 24 hours that would make it fair and if your corp was stupid enough to Dec a one man corp in the first place then they deserve to lose that money for the dec. Finally! one man gets it! except it isn't stupid to war dec a 1 man incursion alt corp - it keeps them from being able to make iskies as incursion fleets won't accept war decced people into their ranks. But there should be at least a 24 hrs timer! Again, you dec the corp, not the player, as CCP stated. Current mechanics is working as intended to keep you from following and griefing a specific player through wardec. tl;dr: Wardec mechanics is designed to keep you from doing exactly what you 're trying to do. If you're mad, it's working. 
Except for one thing buddy - you CAN NOT war dec a NPC corp - so if some poor unfortunate player is dumb enough to incure the wrath of better players - you should be allowed to war dec his incursion corp which is simply a tax dodge to save the isk that an NPC corp would take out of his wallet during incursions! So if some poor unfortunate can't managed to keep from stabbing others in the back, then he should hide in NPC corps and can run his incursions UNMOLESTED!
I don't think creating corporations in Eve only to dodge NPC taxes was CCP's intention for that mechanic!! Do you? |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:49:00 -
[16] - Quote
In 0.0 you **** someone off we come take your sov, in W-space we burn your wormhole down, in low sec we camp your station, what the hell am I supposed to do with a high sec war dec that costs 50 MILLION ISK to wage when in 30 seconds its useless?!! the mechanic is broken and people are exploiting it |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
If you want to argue that you war dec the corp not the player fine!!!.....I agree, if they are a corp then they should be a corp not "a" (a being one single) player! - If they want a corp for financial benefits I'm cool with coming and fighting all of them together! note this would then be pvp and not griefing correct?
I've always considered myself a pvper and my record shows it. I am not malicious just annoyed with the inability to get back at people who deserve it because a "game mechanic" can be exploited |

sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
701
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:57:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:In 0.0 you **** someone off we come take your sov, in W-space we burn your wormhole down, in low sec we camp your station, what the hell am I supposed to do with a high sec war dec that costs 50 MILLION ISK to wage when in 30 seconds its useless?!! the mechanic is broken and people are exploiting it
That is why 85% of Eve playerbase is in highsec, genius. I'd say highsec is working as intended. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1303
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 20:58:00 -
[19] - Quote
This would seem to be aimed at one man corps specifically, as those with more players involved would be less likely to skip to NPC corps as quickly or easily.
It seems the current system is designed to discourage what you suggest. This is why it costs to file a war dec, instead of being a free thing.
Rearranging the system to suit you, when the devs obviously do not share your views, seems rather selfish.
In short, why should a single player, (granted one in a one man corp for whatever reason), need to let you target them with impunity in high sec? This is not a carnival game where you insert ISK for consequence free attacks. If that was the case, bounty hunting would be how this would be handled.
I am unconvinced, so it's a NO from me. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:15:00 -
[20] - Quote
And I argue that Corps are meant to be more than one player, to benefit more than yourself, and to create one simply to benefit your own wallet by ducking the NPC taxes is simply selfish and not the purpose of creating a corp.
It does not benefit the social structure of Eve to have hundreds of one man corps running around dodging NPC corp taxes. And if there where more than one player in corps which couldn't be dissolved in a flash of a moment, then there would be more fights in high sec which equals more ships bought and sold AND more people learning to pvp in a rather safer environment than Low/Null/W-space
So tell me how can this really be a bad thing? it doesn't prevent individual players from making isk in high sec, as they can do that activity in an NPC corp, it doesn't even prevent them from having their own 1 man corp!!! just if they make a corp they can't instantly drop it and restart a new one within 5 seconds!!
Why is this such a bad thing? |
|

Daichi Yamato
Swamp Bucket Swamp Bucket Empire
635
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nikk Narrel wrote:This would seem to be aimed at one man corps specifically, as those with more players involved would be less likely to skip to NPC corps as quickly or easily.
It seems the current system is designed to discourage what you suggest. This is why it costs to file a war dec, instead of being a free thing.
Rearranging the system to suit you, when the devs obviously do not share your views, seems rather selfish.
In short, why should a single player, (granted one in a one man corp for whatever reason), need to let you target them with impunity in high sec? This is not a carnival game where you insert ISK for consequence free attacks. If that was the case, bounty hunting would be how this would be handled.
I am unconvinced, so it's a NO from me.
u can dec whatever new corp he makes until he gets the picture and joins an NPC corp and pays appropriate tax. or u can follow him into an incursion and gank his pimped incursion ship. may even make some money if u scoop fast enough. |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1304
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:21:00 -
[22] - Quote
Daichi Yamato wrote:Nikk Narrel wrote:This would seem to be aimed at one man corps specifically, as those with more players involved would be less likely to skip to NPC corps as quickly or easily.
It seems the current system is designed to discourage what you suggest. This is why it costs to file a war dec, instead of being a free thing.
Rearranging the system to suit you, when the devs obviously do not share your views, seems rather selfish.
In short, why should a single player, (granted one in a one man corp for whatever reason), need to let you target them with impunity in high sec? This is not a carnival game where you insert ISK for consequence free attacks. If that was the case, bounty hunting would be how this would be handled.
I am unconvinced, so it's a NO from me. u can dec whatever new corp he makes until he gets the picture and joins an NPC corp and pays appropriate tax. or u can follow him into an incursion and gank his pimped incursion ship. may even make some money if u scoop fast enough. Absolutely. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1307
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:26:00 -
[23] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:And I argue that Corps are meant to be more than one player, to benefit more than yourself, and to create one simply to benefit your own wallet by ducking the NPC taxes is simply selfish and not the purpose of creating a corp.
It does not benefit the social structure of Eve to have hundreds of one man corps running around dodging NPC corp taxes. And if there where more than one player in corps which couldn't be dissolved in a flash of a moment, then there would be more fights in high sec which equals more ships bought and sold AND more people learning to pvp in a rather safer environment than Low/Null/W-space
So tell me how can this really be a bad thing? it doesn't prevent individual players from making isk in high sec, as they can do that activity in an NPC corp, it doesn't even prevent them from having their own 1 man corp!!! just if they make a corp they can't instantly drop it and restart a new one within 5 seconds!!
Why is this such a bad thing? It has no impact on the social structure.
Do you assume these players have some compulsory need to chatter and be social, and they automatically participate based on whether they are in an NPC corp or player run corp?
They created an incentive to leave the NPC corp, likely to balance the cost / benefit analysis some players may have been doing. But, if they are determined to play solo and avoid contact, we do not have the right to dictate their limits in the game beyond what we can shoot at them. And with shooting there may be consequences. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

Daichi Yamato
Swamp Bucket Swamp Bucket Empire
637
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:27:00 -
[24] - Quote
ha, i must have quoted the wrong person or missed the 'reply' button. i cant remember.
must be time for another coffee |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:53:00 -
[25] - Quote
[/quote] u can dec whatever new corp he makes until he gets the picture and joins an NPC corp and pays appropriate tax. or u can follow him into an incursion and gank his pimped incursion ship. may even make some money if u scoop fast enough.[/quote]
So how often would you war dec at 50mil a pop to get no results? |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1309
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:59:00 -
[26] - Quote
u can dec whatever new corp he makes until he gets the picture and joins an NPC corp and pays appropriate tax. or u can follow him into an incursion and gank his pimped incursion ship. may even make some money if u scoop fast enough.[/quote]
So how often would you war dec at 50mil a pop to get no results?[/quote] Waves hand.... "This is not the game mechanic you are looking for...."
Considering the act of declaring war to be in itself a form of economic PvP, you should consider cutting your losses and changing to more successful tactics, like suicide ganking. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

sabre906
Old Spice Syndicate Sailors of the Sacred Spice
705
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 21:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:
So how often would you war dec at 50mil a pop to get no results?
Why don't you just give up chasing after this one guy in order to grief him? You do realize Eve mechanic is designed intentionally to prevent you from doing just this? Judging from the whine, I'd say it's working as intended. Standings Improvement Service https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=19454 |

Zan Shiro
Alternative Enterprises
109
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 22:58:00 -
[28] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Ian Harms wrote:
So how often would you war dec at 50mil a pop to get no results?
Why don't you just give up chasing after this one guy in order to grief him? You do realize Eve mechanic is designed intentionally to prevent you from doing just this? Judging from the whine, I'd say it's working as intended. 
this basically. If you hate them corp that much well then 50 mil a pop is the price you have to pay to feed that fire.
Not worth 50 mil a shot to keep them tied up, well then let the water run under that bridge. Or gank em.
Most of what this dude is saying is why this is in place. This is war dec to avoid sec hit for ganking. the bit about the sad state of one man corps and the evil bears.....can sell that crap to the tourists. I learned to make 1 mans in 0.0. Hell I was told to. Instructions were real clear. If we see any of you tards dying to privateers in jita with an in corp/alliance char bad things will happen. 1 man alt/npc corp hauler aye sir.
As I always say in these threads, its a sad world where I can look to a ganker with respect, they are honest in their dealings. they want your hulk/uber fittings on that BS they jsut go for it. Even have a shot clock for this...how fast till concord says hi.
Also worth noting ganking is a much better way to teach that bear a lesson if that is the intent. Its the suddenness of the ship kill imo. If I have the daft idea to go to jita with a war dec, I know its a question of when, not if, I meet a red along the way. I prepare for this encounter as best I can.
If get my ass jumped cold, no warning, in a .5 system however I see more effectively jsut how cold a place eve is. |

Listain Kurvorra
Zoltus Nebula Border World Enterprises
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 23:03:00 -
[29] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:Ian Harms wrote:In 0.0 you **** someone off we come take your sov, in W-space we burn your wormhole down, in low sec we camp your station, what the hell am I supposed to do with a high sec war dec that costs 50 MILLION ISK to wage when in 30 seconds its useless?!! the mechanic is broken and people are exploiting it That is why 85% of Eve playerbase is in highsec, genius. I'd say highsec is working as intended.  ^ This |

Listain Kurvorra
Zoltus Nebula Border World Enterprises
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 23:08:00 -
[30] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:And I argue that Corps are meant to be more than one player, to benefit more than yourself, and to create one simply to benefit your own wallet by ducking the NPC taxes is simply selfish and not the purpose of creating a corp.
It does not benefit the social structure of Eve to have hundreds of one man corps running around dodging NPC corp taxes. And if there where more than one player in corps which couldn't be dissolved in a flash of a moment, then there would be more fights in high sec which equals more ships bought and sold AND more people learning to pvp in a rather safer environment than Low/Null/W-space
So tell me how can this really be a bad thing? it doesn't prevent individual players from making isk in high sec, as they can do that activity in an NPC corp, it doesn't even prevent them from having their own 1 man corp!!! just if they make a corp they can't instantly drop it and restart a new one within 5 seconds!!
Why is this such a bad thing? Actually corps are meant as whatever the player wants it to be, this is a sandbox game, that is why there are pirate corps, if someone wants to dodge tax then let them, to me this seems like what other people have said and I quote "a way to try and grief one player" CCP has implemented a corp design that works, and it works because of the sandbox options, if you take out those options then you might as well pay 15 bucks a month to play W.o.W. |
|

Listain Kurvorra
Zoltus Nebula Border World Enterprises
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.11 23:17:00 -
[31] - Quote
I feel like there is just someone raging about the fact that he can't gank someone in a high sec corp, as I said before the corps have been implemented in a fashion that works really well the corps have not changed to much over the years and for good reason, changing the war dec mechanics to suit your corp is not fair to the game and would take away the element of sandbox gaming. Rather then raging about the fact that you lost out on 50mil to dec someones individual player corp why don't you apply that isk more constructively and dec a corp that is not just one man, sure you may keep a single player from joining incursions in that corp but the fact of the matter is that as you said they can leave an create a new corp for you to deck all over again, this will never change and your idea will not be supported. I personally think the corp mechanics of the game are fine so my answer is a definite NO. There is no point in chasing one man corps off so use that time more constructively and go after real corps to make it worth your time. |

EI Digin
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
474
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 02:21:00 -
[32] - Quote
sabre906 wrote:CCP Dev: "You dec the corp, not the player"
/thread There is no practical difference between Ratting Corp1 and Ratting Corp2, both one man corps run by the same player. Likewise, there is no difference between for example a mining corp with 20 members and a corp with 1 member in it, with 19 ex-member "friends and allies" in npc corps talking to eachother and forming fleets, etc. during a wardec then having a recruitment spike when the wardec ends.
You can play dumb all you want, everyone knows what's really going on.
I'm sure when CCP planned the wardec revamp they all got together in a room and asked themselves, how can we make sure the majority of players never have to deal with the mechanic we have been working on for months? |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:02:00 -
[33] - Quote
I invite the you all to try deccing and incursion corp someday. You don't get a chance to meet them on the way to Jita because 5 minutes after you dec them they destroy the corp - your 50mil is wasted. However the suicide gank is definitely in the works, I just wish I could hit this guys from all sides (when it's a noob I trained for years and he betrays my trust I pretty much come at him at all angles providing the game mechanics allow it, which they don't in current form) |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1312
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:08:00 -
[34] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:I invite the you all to try deccing and incursion corp someday. You don't get a chance to meet them on the way to Jita because 5 minutes after you dec them they destroy the corp - your 50mil is wasted. However the suicide gank is definitely in the works, I just wish I could hit this guys from all sides (when it's a noob I trained for years and he betrays my trust I pretty much come at him at all angles providing the game mechanics allow it, which they don't in current form) You are perfectly welcome to pursue them by legitimate game means. I advise caution that this does not cross over into griefing, as that is simply taking things too far.
As for the rest, the game mechanics are specific to discouraging attacks against specific individuals being easy. Put a bounty on them, something you think would pay for the ship being used in a suicide gank.
As to changing the game, in particular addressing the obstacles to targeting a specific player, they are there for a reason. Please respect that. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:31:00 -
[35] - Quote
I have yet to hear a very good reason why a CEO who is the most responsible and accountable member in any group can simply drop his corp and responsibilties in a flash |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1312
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 16:46:00 -
[36] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:I have yet to hear a very good reason why a CEO who is the most responsible and accountable member in any group can simply drop his corp and responsibilties in a flash Your responsibilities as a CEO are to the people in your corp exclusively.
If you are the only person in your corp, you are only responsible to yourself.
So long as all corp members have no objection to the CEO's actions, they are valid. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 17:18:00 -
[37] - Quote
So as long as you be a CEO with no people in your corp you can have all the financial benefits with no consequinces for your actions eh? On top of that all it benefits is YOU and you aren't really serious about being a CEO, just using the mechanics to enrich yourself? And you think this is good? |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1312
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 17:24:00 -
[38] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:So as long as you be a CEO with no people in your corp you can have all the financial benefits with no consequinces for your actions eh? On top of that all it benefits is YOU and you aren't really serious about being a CEO, just using the mechanics to enrich yourself? And you think this is good? Why not?
This is not something EVE invented, it is a real world business model as well. And while real world items do not justify EVE mechanics, they do set an example that people can expect, barring good reasons not to. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |

Ian Harms
Tenichigo Kaigun Ikusaro
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 17:41:00 -
[39] - Quote
Because it's a player using one mechanic to make another mechanic useless.
In high sec the war dec mechanic is there to allow players a means of retribution if they are willing to pay the price. So you think it's okay for me to pay the 50mil isk to war dec or corp, risk it getting allies, but instead just have the CEO duck corp and restart a new one minutes after the dec mail notifies him? Somehow I don't think so |

Nikk Narrel
Infinite Improbability Inc Unclaimed.
1312
|
Posted - 2013.02.12 18:24:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ian Harms wrote:Because it's a player using one mechanic to make another mechanic useless.
In high sec the war dec mechanic is there to allow players a means of retribution if they are willing to pay the price. So you think it's okay for me to pay the 50mil isk to war dec or corp, risk it getting allies, but instead just have the CEO duck corp and restart a new one minutes after the dec mail notifies him? Somehow I don't think so He is allowed to surrender or just take a dive or run away.
The war dec was a challenge. He is under no obligation to accept that challenge.
Running from conflict is valid play, if somewhat disappointing for you in this context. Cloaking being on a ten minute manual cycle timer? (Author: Bree Okanata) Fine. As long as there is a ten minute timer for being docked in a station. Also, you can't stop moving in the game. Just add in a way so every ten minutes you are randomly warped to the nearest other player. Keeps people from going AFK. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |