Again you havn't answered my question, and continued to skirt around the issue here. So im going to move on to another one here that noone can misconstrue as a dig at your current alliance status.

You regularly invade and evict smaller wormhole corps from w-space either of their own accord or through mercenary contracts. You obviously have a direct input into this practice through being the merc contracts manager and have been involved in a fair few evictions in your own time. You also exclusively live in a high class wormhole and have done for some time. My question to you is, why should the multitude of small-medium wormhole corporations vote for you to represent them, when you could end up evicting them from w-space; also why should these people vote for you, someone from the "c5/6 big boys club" over someone from a class closer to their own, or someone with experience over a range of classes?

We have to agree to disagree here as I think I have answered your question. If not please post a concrete one.

Yes if people vote for me I still might evict them. I don't think that CSM vote should be tied to some sort of security. Votes for non eviction sounds stupid to me. As far as high class living goes - yes I do live in high class but in order to get to places like high sec or low sec I often have to scan through C4-C1 and I often go to high sec for day tripping roams. Which means that even If I live in C6 or C5 I visit all classes of wormhole space. It is a myth that if you live in higher class you always stay there.

Also I have experience in living across most of the classes as I lived in C2, C3, C4, C5 and C6.

Im afraid you appear to misconstrue my question here, im not saying that if people vote for you, they shouldnt get evicted and im pretty certain that the question i asked up there mentioned nothing of the sort. What im saying is that why do you feel the plethora of smaller members of the wormhole community should vote for you, if you make a point of removing them from that community. Im not pvp averse but curbstomping new blood and your electorate out of wormholes seems counterproductive to me

Im glad you agree, perhaps you could answer it for me?

Whilst I accept that I maybe was incorrect in stating that your alliances failcascade every 6 months, you spent the entirity of your answer trying to prove me wrong, and then following that up with some self gratifying fluff about what a sizable impact youve made on wormhole space. In fact, the only part which even comes close to answering my original question is "As far as CSM goes I plan to abandon most of my meta roles in game in order to concentrate on being CSM. " Which only tells me what your not going to do (arguably), rather than what you are going to do; which as Im sure you will agree, tells me absolutely nothing.

Irregardless of whether I was right or wrong, the fact remains that you will have made significant leadership failures during your time in game; in fact, the exhale. name was taken out from under you http://themittani.com/news/exhale-out-breath so please dont try and insult the communities intelligence by passing it off as a change of alliance name; you also hold a sizable position of leadership in exhale. as well. So again I will ask you:

how could we rely on you to not display this failing of leadership as a CSM member
what would you do differently to ensure cohesion among the CSM
why would we have not seen these factors displayed in game in keeping your alliance together

Im sure the rest of your electorate would appreciate an straightforward answer this time instead of uninformative spin.

Thanks

CB

Why are you running for CSM when people are saying that you are going afk for a few months here soon? Can you confirm or deny these rumors?

These are not rumors. My EvE time will decrease from 8 hours to like 4 per day for next few months.

I think 4 hours per day will still be sufficient for CSM.

Indeed, I wouldn't call that AFK at all. 4 hours a day is like a part time job :)

CSM is like a part time job :)

And after a night drinking at Gorillan with devs, you'll wish it came with a Health plan.

being unable to assemble strategic cruisers

+1 vote.


I agree with all others things. T3 are different from othre ships.

Well I think you should be able to assemble them inside wh. You build them in wspace and then you cant even assemble them seems kinda stupid.

I read here if you could choose a theme it would be "exploration" but as far as I see you are very much focusing on wormholes. I lived in a C6 for a while and liked it very much but will go to nullsec now for the time being.
Cause Sov is something almost every candidate identified as problem I'm pretty sure it will get enough attention. But I had a real hard time to find someone who said something on exploration in Nullsec.

So to ask a question: What do you think when someone mentions "exploration in 0.0"?
Given that Odyssey and the next expansions (try to) overhaul Sov etc. and exploration has to be changed will you try to lure the 0.0 explorers into wormholes () or will you also show some love to your exploring fellows in K-Space? ()

P.S.: I hope PvE becoming more like PvP won't make it some kind of PvP Light with less rewards in contrast to higher risk. While bringing both closer together sounds good, some people play EVE to relax and switch off. I think in that case PvE would need a major redesign to stay competitive.

Talked to Bob yesterday. Told me to self destruct more stuff on sun in order to endorse me

Although you're a WH candidate, your stances show a huge +++ for industry issues.

May want to exploit that aspect, as you came in 71% on industry issues...w-a-y higher than the industry platform candidate.