It doesn't look good when four out of the first five commenters are from your alliance. Just sayin'.

---

In the context of the battle of Asakai and recent tensions between Goonswarm and TEST, how well would you say nullsec is performing at the moment?

What's your stance on the 'carebear creep', to use Poetic's phrase? Do you feel that some players should be able to play in highsec with no danger at all?

Can you be specific on the issues/approaches of mine that you disagree with?

Do you feel that the increasing sizes of wormhole coalitions is a problem? If so, what can be done to discourage it?

It doesn't look good when four out of the first five commenters are from your alliance. Just sayin'.

---

In the context of the battle of Asakai and recent tensions between Goonswarm and TEST, how well would you say nullsec is performing at the moment?


What's your stance on the 'carebear creep', to use Poetic's phrase? Do you feel that some players should be able to play in highsec with no danger at all?

In response to your questions,

1) As far as the nullsec performance overall[...]

[...]concerns, and questions and provide feedback and results.

Again, thank you for your questions.

Thanks for your answers.

On another note, might it be worth asking your alliance mates to stop spamming the thread now? Surely they could express their well-wishes in private, rather than filling up the thread with fairly useless comments, as well as causing a lot of notification spam.

What are your thoughts and feelings regarding stews; post your go-to stew recipe for impressing friends and family alike.

Chitsa I suggest that you ignore this barbarous philistine who has no conception at all of what food ought to be. He really isn't worth the effort it takes to read his posts.

You mention T3 rebalancing in your list of issues.
What are your actual views on the role(s) of T3s and how they are currently being used in WHs and elsewhere?
Do you agree with the initial plans CCP has talked about regarding T3s? or would you push a different approach?

What are your thoughts and feelings regarding stews; post your go-to stew recipe for impressing friends and family alike.

/support

To be a bit more constructive to this thread however... Chitsa could you perhaps discuss your thoughts on lower class w-space. Specifically I've seen some of the CSM threads bemoaning what they see as a lack of representation compared to the c5/c6 crowd. Do you have experience in the lower class w-space and what do you think they have any specific issues seperate from c5/c6 alliances.

Additionally what are your thoughts on the current conflict drivers in w-space and how would you like to see them altered if they do need alteration.

There are people you run across in life that you just know are straight shooters, Chista Jason and Night Beagle are two of those type people and I would put my trust in either one.

Chista has always kept his word to me and treated me with respect even though I have been difficult to deal with at times. He is genuine, thoughtful and I truly believe he cares about this game. I also believe he is about all of WH space and not just the big alliances and would represent the lower class holes equally. If he is elected I am sure he would do a very good job!

However Chista I have committed my vote to Night Beagle.
Good luck!

Very interested in your campaign. The issues you raised in your response to two step are very similar to my feelings on the matter.

You and James seem to be the primary candidates for a large portion of the high class WH corporations. What separates you from him? Why should someone pick Chitsa over James?

PS also please check your sub thread in wormholes I would like you to answer those as well.

So Chitsa tell me do you think its OK that guns ignores ships signature size and uses it only as multiplier for lesser tracking. And while target ship is webified to zero by Loki`s fleet dreads rapes them in PvP and PvE whatsoever ;) Also this makes semi and non-gun dread platforms usage embarrassing. Of course some may say that fleets will use more TP but is it this what we want :) more EW less DPS = more tactics.

Also what do you think of WH stabilization with help of deployable warfare? Is it right for such specific place as unknown parts of eve and its PvP warfare? If yes then what concept is in your mind, if no then why it should be done?

And last but not least, Chitsa tell us about what randomness do you talk about in WH and specially in what level? Should it be only sites related or maybe whole system? Like empire space has their incursions maybe WH should have their own driven by sleepers or cataclysm which gets worse and worse and WH inhabitant should leave it, or get all their friends and kick sleeper madness off to survive. Also I think now WH is more or less the same and effects are just to weak, yes they impact PvP but not as drastic as they should. And finally I think some systems should have more to offer in same Class than other so they are worthy of fighting for and evicting inhabitants for treasures that this specific systems could give for such brave and bold alliances :)

So Chitsa tell me do you think its OK that guns ignores ships signature size and uses it only as multiplier for lesser tracking. And while target ship is webified to zero by Loki`s fleet dreads rapes them in PvP and PvE whatsoever ;) Also this makes semi and non-gun dread platforms usage embarrassing. Of course some may say that fleets will use more TP but is it this what we want :) more EW less DPS = more tactics.

Also what do you think of WH stabilization with help of deployable warfare? Is it right for such specific place as unknown parts of eve and its PvP warfare? If yes then what concept is in your mind, if no then why it should be done?

And last but not least, Chitsa tell us about what randomness do you talk about in WH and specially in what level? Should it be only sites related or maybe whole system? Like empire space has their incursions maybe WH should have their own driven by sleepers or cataclysm which gets worse and worse and WH inhabitant should leave it, or get all their friends and kick sleeper madness off to survive. Also I think now WH is more or less the same and effects are just to weak, yes they impact PvP but not as drastic as they should. And finally I think some systems should have more to offer in same Class than other so they are worthy of fighting for and evicting inhabitants for treasures that this specific systems could give for such brave and bold alliances :)

I think that T3 ships are mostly in the right spot. They have great tanks and good dps if fitted correctly. If you loose a T3 you loose skill points and bunch of isk.

The issue right now is that there are few fits for every T3 (especially for WHs). There are many underused subsystems. I mean I rarely see hybrid Tengu, drone Proteus, scanning Legion or missle Loki. I would love to see statistics for underused subsystems and change their roles or buff them so we see more variations in how people fit T3 ships.

Boosting T3s should be on field to provide boosts in my opinion.

I like the idea that T3s are worse than specialized ships mostly in electronics department (proteus point long but arazu has it better, ECMTengu good but Falcon is just better) .

I would disagree with CCP that T3s needs tank or speed nerf. People would just start to use AHACs instead of T3s for most of WH combat which is bad for wormhole economy and even better for moon mining cartels.

As far as T3 usage outside of Wspace. I think it is decent. People quite often die in them. Though it is not my area of expertise.

Jack I am sure that you might have even better ideas than me regarding T3 ship balancing as far as I know you. If you have anything smart to share please let me know and I will try to include it in my platform.

You mentioned additional content in W-space. What, more specifically, do you think should be added? Or do you think that CCP should add more content and you are waiting to see just what ideas they come up with? Do you feel that W-space residents should be able to live independently from K-space when you are thinking about additional content?


You mentioned SD'ing while in POS forcefield. I don't really care either way on the matter, though I do lean toward keeping it as it is as a method for the targets to grief the aggressors at significant cost to themselves. Is your stance on this issue perhaps based on the hope that more loot would drop from POS bashes or that it would encourage more people to start shooting POSes, or do you have something else in mind?


You bring up an interesting point about the economy of T3 ships; thank you for introducing that particular incentive to minimize the nerfing of T3s "to the ground". Along those lines, do you agree that the ability to farm NPC sites (both sleepers and NPC missions) multiple times over the course of multiple days is an unintended game mechanic that is negatively affecting the related economies as well?


Regarding Dreads, what do you see as their particular niche or role in battle? Do you feel they should be the anti-structure or anti-capital ships, or should they be more jack-of-all-trades and have an effective use against subcap ships as well?


Do you think that ECM as it stands, an all-or-nothing result, is an ideal situation? If not, what alternatives might you be inclined to propose or support? Related, do you feel that POS ECM is currently acceptable or should that be adjusted in some way during the discussion of new-POSes? If so, how?


Thank you for all these great questions. It is 13.00 AM here right now so I will go to sleep but I will answer them as soon as I wake up. Can not do them right now as I am quite tired.

You mentioned additional content in W-space. What, more specifically, do you think should be added? Or do you think that CCP should add more content and you are waiting to see just what ideas they come up with? Do you feel that W-space residents should be able to live independently from K-space when you are thinking about additional content?


You mentioned SD'ing while in POS forcefield. I don't really care either way on the matter, though I do lean toward keeping it as it is as a method for the targets to grief the aggressors at significant cost to themselves. Is your stance on this issue perhaps based on the hope that more loot would drop from POS bashes or that it would encourage more people to start shooting POSes, or do you have something else in mind?


You bring up an interesting point about the economy of T3 ships; thank you for introducing that particular incentive to minimize the nerfing of T3s "to the ground". Along those lines, do you agree that the ability to farm NPC sites (both sleepers and NPC missions) multiple times over the course of multiple days is an unintended game mechanic that is negatively affecting the related economies as well?


Regarding Dreads, what do you see as their particular niche or role in battle? Do you feel they should be the anti-structure or anti-capital ships, or should they be more jack-of-all-trades and have an effective use against subcap ships as well?


Do you think that ECM as it stands, an all-or-nothing result, is an ideal situation? If not, what alternatives might you be inclined to propose or support? Related, do you feel that POS ECM is currently acceptable or should that be adjusted in some way during the discussion of new-POSes? If so, how?

Chitsa, I hope you take me up on the Election Interview I am offering every CSM8 candidate on Crossing Zebras. Details can be found here http://crossingzebras.com/post/40699271518/electioninterviews

The list of candidates and interviews carried out so far can be found here http://crossingzebras.com/CSM8

I could argue that no matter what you do, whether disallowing SD in POS shields, or moving L4 missions to Lowsec, you will not suddenly convince a truly risk-averse person to fight, but that is a different discussion for another thread. Thank you for your answer (and all the other answers) :)


Ultimately, it is indeed CCP who adds the additional content to the game. However, like any other game developer, CCP solicits ideas from its playerbase; a larger group is more likely to come up with more varied ideas than a smaller group. CCP has the ability to choose from among player suggestions, if any are useful, to supplement their own plans. I'm hoping one reason that they have delayed the POS updates is to take into account user feedback and suggestions before they roll it out, instead of after the fact as was the situation with the Unified Inventory.

With that in mind, revisiting the questions about ideas and content that have been asked in this thread in particular, what might you suggest if CCP is asking for suggestions? I'm not intending to start a flamefest, though undoubtedly some may try -- just as others might also say you were dodging the questions. Personally, I want to try to determine for myself that you might actively push for causes that you and the community feel are important, ready to supply suggestions when the opportunity arises, instead of coasting along in a purely reactive role just to get free trips to Iceland to party :)

Naturally, we would hope that you'd faithfully represent the community and present the ideas raised by the majority when they make sense even when they differ from your own ideas; presenting two opposing viewpoints might generate useful discussion as well. By sharing with us the ideas, dreams, or visions that you personally have for EVE, it can give us a little more insight into how you might represent the community in unexpected situations.

As CSM and representative of the community, you would also have closer access to CCP devs than the rest of us, which gives your thoughts and opinions a little more weight than ours.

Knows a lot about the game and is a real workhorse .

You've got that right. This one time, we were doing stuff. Chitsa was doing at least 10 times more stuff than anyone else.

I interviewed Chitsa as part of the Crossing Zebras CSM8 Election Interviews. You can check it out here:

http://c-z.me/csm8chitsajason

I did not endorse you.

and will surely send Chitsa nothing but C4/C4 Black Hole chains for his insolence

He was referrng to Bob the Wormhole God, who is displeased and will surely send Chitsa nothing but C4/C4 Black Hole chains for his insolence. Bob has of course already endorsed James Arget.

Thats not what Bob told me :/

I honestly don't see a problem with the Black Hole effects. You got to has a ghetto.

No, seriously, having spent a year in a C4 Black Hole, you learn to drop gyros for TE's, precision for rage, and rig your domis effectively. You lol at Cynabals whizzing about at 8km/s and slingshotting off a wormhole. You fit up a Dampstar with blasters and LOL at the foes reduced to a 5km lock range unable to hit your POS. There's nothing wrong with it, not like the Magnetar hack. People are just dumb and adhere too much to FOTM nanofag doctrines or hug their Pulsar and Wolf-Rayet and Magnetar bonuses.

Red Giant is the class which needs a look at. Sure, C5-6 Red Giant provides hilarity and broken ISK via smartbombing, but the other classes are shite.

I'll reserve my judgment. I don't know you have the chutzpah to advicate and agitate properly for the rest of EVE aside from wormholes. I mean, wormholing is in my blood and I love it dearlly, and it would be nice to have a WH CSM. But Two Step's done jack for WH's and the game has bigger problems (nulllsec, tech moons, etc) so fixing them is more important than catering to 5% of the gaming population in a non-broken sector of the game.

My 2c.

There are a lot changes coming for eve. While I live in w-space, one of the most interesting for me personally will be to see how nullsec will change / evolve. For exemple, there's ideas that sov should be based on activity and not based on who owns certain structures. Another is beeing able to build/shape a system, placing your mark on it for everyone to see when they jump into the system. I can see some mechanics like that working in wspace to.

I would like to know your views on this. Both from a nullsec persepective and from a wspace persepective, and do you think this increase interaction between nullsec/wspace systems or not. If so, would you consider it good or bad.

I'll post the same question in a couple of other csm-topics to.

You can defo have some great fun in black holes for sure with the speed and all , but for pve, sites take longer to do because of the negative system effects, and your isk per hour is lower, so most of them are not occupied, simple fact. I like to do the minimum amount of pve possible, so stay clear of blackholes, it just takes too long to do sites. Given the choice, would you grind for longer or shorter?

For PVP, any good wh corp / alliance will usually have a range of different fleet doctrines that cover all of the different wh system effects, including that of blackholes. All of the other wormhole effects are perfectly fine (in my opinion), each has advantages and disadvantages, dont underestimate the use of smartbombs, helps to get rid of those pesky ecm drones in pvp

If you think two step did jack all for wh's, you are so wrong mate - should look him up properly, he has probably been one of the best CSM's for both the wh community and everyone else too.

You gotta remember that some of the issues that effect wh guys, also effect most other people in the game too, e.g. POS's, Alliance bookmarks etc. etc. and those are the things an elected wh CSM would probably concentrate on first, the things that effect everyone.

Wormhole space is not broken, agreed. But, most of W-space is empty - and there is always room for improvement, and i think a lot of people are really missing out you know

Hello there!

I would like to name several situations that I feel are detrimental to the game. Give a solution and ask you for your stance on both. I do need answers to all the situations for my vote(s)

POS those three letters bring nightmares to just about anyone having the misfortune of having to operate one. The solution in the long term is obviously modular POS. Yet CCP seems to be backpedaling on implementing this despite the MANY benefits. What is your stance on the possibility of a near term bandage of a form of player POS that is only designed to be the equilivant of a Secure Container for ships until modular POS is ready?

Overpowered passive cloaking. It is now to the point where people are now beyond AFK cloaking but running Twitch.tv streams of enemy stations and systems! Would you support balancing cloaking to punish those who go AFK (Eventually able to be scanned down for decloak) while maintaining the benefits to people actively cloaking (Remaining at their keyboard)

Lack of Ring Mining. Again with the CCP backpedaling despite the many benefits for nullsec and other areas for the game. What is your stand on the crap that is moon mining?

The silly push by some in the community to end or delay "Local" or any effective means for those in a nullsec system to determine if a hostile or unknown is in system in them. This obviously needs no solution but I want your thoughts.

The horrible state of missions in hisec. The solution in my opinion is a complete rewrite to allow for a more incursion like approach that rewards those who want to train up logistic frigs and cruisers or be a specific role in a fleet. Also providing a way for newer players to experience group play in EVE.

Incursion suckage. With the nerfs to Incursions fleets have slowed to a trickle and it was sad to see CCP willing to spend more development time nerfing entire expansions instead of doing what was right being making other aspects of EVE better. Modular POS and Ring mining need dev time sooner so I will admit this ought to be looked at later however I wanted to get your views on them and have this to be some context to the next aspect of Logi.

Logi suckage. Logis do not have the tools to do their job. They need to be able to tell who is locked and taking damage and in large fleets the watchlist can't handle that leading to dependence on broadcasts that most of EVE seems to not know or refuse to use right. Look at any average HQ incursion fleet where people don't broadcast right stressing out logi or in fleet fights where following FCs orders makes it harder to broadcast properly. A solution is a logi only screen that is completely configurable to show who is taking the most DPS and who has the most locks in fleet.

Logi Suckage #2 Reps don't get you on mails? Wut? Solution obviously is to have repping those in fleet land you on killmails generated from fleet.

What is your stance on AFK skill training?

How do you intend to hold a position in the CSM and work effectivly as part of that group, when you are seemingly incapable of holding your own alliance together? You seem to have a proven track record of being unable to resolve alliance level disputes which ultimately result in a good old fashioned failcascade, which you seem to have every 6 months, so my question to you is how could we rely on you to not display this failing of leadership as a CSM member, what would you do differently to ensure cohesion among the CSM and perhaps most importantly, why would we have not seen these factors displayed in game in keeping your alliance together for more thana few months at a time?

Thx

CB

I see everyone is Polarized. on this issue. Hahaha.

That is a good question.

Im glad you agree, perhaps you could answer it for me?

Whilst I accept that I maybe was incorrect in stating that your alliances failcascade every 6 months, you spent the entirity of your answer trying to prove me wrong, and then following that up with some self gratifying fluff about what a sizable impact youve made on wormhole space. In fact, the only part which even comes close to answering my original question is "As far as CSM goes I plan to abandon most of my meta roles in game in order to concentrate on being CSM. " Which only tells me what your not going to do (arguably), rather than what you are going to do; which as Im sure you will agree, tells me absolutely nothing.

Irregardless of whether I was right or wrong, the fact remains that you will have made significant leadership failures during your time in game; in fact, the exhale. name was taken out from under you http://themittani.com/news/exhale-out-breath so please dont try and insult the communities intelligence by passing it off as a change of alliance name; you also hold a sizable position of leadership in exhale. as well. So again I will ask you:

how could we rely on you to not display this failing of leadership as a CSM member
what would you do differently to ensure cohesion among the CSM
why would we have not seen these factors displayed in game in keeping your alliance together

Im sure the rest of your electorate would appreciate an straightforward answer this time instead of uninformative spin.

Thanks

CB

(Blathering)

Dude, do you have your tinfoil hat on?

Chista was never the creator of exhale. nor its leader. He was a diplomat and a damn good one at that.

This has been under talks for quite some time now. This was an issue long time discussed. It was a democratic decision. No one at any point ever made any decsion without first running it by the leadership and voted on. Some were against it others for it, but once the decsion was made, everyone was on board.

Where do you come off implying this was a result of a lack of leadership by Chitsa? This was a group decision. All the way down to the new alliance name. The implication that Chitsa's failure to lead was the cause of this is absolutley false. We have great respect for the exhale. alliance and we will work with them whenever they need. and they with us. Contrary to popular belief, there is no bad blood between us.

To suggest that Chitsa's failure in leadership was the cause of us leaving is ****. It was voted on alliance wide, among the corps that wanted to fly under their own banner that was created. If anything I'd say this absolutely proves that Chitsa is not a power hungry mongrol or a dictator. He is a team player, and everyone had the oportunity to say what they wanted to get off of their chest if something was bugging them.

It is exciting, something new, and it is only building momentum. As far as player base everyone that was in J142528 is staying in that system. We are just flying under a new banner, our creation, and we are excited about it.

I'm not trying to insult the communities intelligence...just yours...you are an idiot because of the conclusion you have jumped to and the assumptions you have drawn. They have no merit and are false.

To throw around the words "failcascade" and "lack of leadership" carelessly says alot about your character, especially when it is clearly obvious that you are speculating. I for one was there, and I know exactly how it went down. There was no failcascade or lack of leadship, on Chitsa's or anyone in Exhale. or Polarzied.


Stop trying to make it out to be more than it is.

EDIT: Also, maybe post with your main and not hide behind an alt.

So it appears that rather than give a straight answer to a fairly straightforward question, Chitsa first dodges it, then a couple of whiteknights come riding in to discredit me for asking an honest question, aparantly because its not a question he wanted to answer. If it makes it easier for you, I can clarify, lets remove the whole polarized thing from the equation and the questions still stand. Anyone in any leadership position would make mistakes and i simply wish to know how Chitsa intends to use past mistakes to inform his actions during a CSM term.

Yes this is a certainly a very hard question to answer, but I would have expected someone intending to represent the whole of w-space to have actually answered it and not have his corpmates come shitposting to the rescue. If Chitsa can't answer a difficult question from me on the forums, then how can we expect you to handle difficult questions and debate as a CSM?

So it appears that rather than give a straight answer to a fairly straightforward question, Chitsa first dodges it, then a couple of whiteknights come riding in to discredit me for asking an honest question, aparantly because its not a question he wanted to answer. If it makes it easier for you, I can clarify, lets remove the whole polarized thing from the equation and the questions still stand. Anyone in any leadership position would make mistakes and i simply wish to know how Chitsa intends to use past mistakes to inform his actions during a CSM term.

Yes this is a certainly a very hard question to answer, but I would have expected someone intending to represent the whole of w-space to have actually answered it and not have his corpmates come shitposting to the rescue. If Chitsa can't answer a difficult question from me on the forums, then how can we expect you to handle difficult questions and debate as a CSM?

I have no problems with tough questions. I think difficult questions tell alot about a person. If you would have had the situation semi-accurate I would have kept my opinion to myself. But you weren't, so I didn't. As far as removing the whole polarized thing from the equation. That was why you posted the questions. You speculate that it was a flaw in leadership, then cited the new alliance as your proof. You assume Chitsa and Chitsa alone held the reins to exhale and it was not the case. You're calling me a shitposter and a white knight to chitsa, but get your facts straight first.

Don't worry, I'm not a corp/alliance mate. I'd rather shoot you guys and I've never been a huge Awoxer fan :)

And for the hard-of-understanding, the Diplomat is not the Corp or Alliance CEO, just like your country's ambassador to other nations is not your country's leader. Diplos have input sure, maybe more than regular members though not necessarily, but they do not necessarily set policy or function as the glue to hold different groups together unless the CEO -is- the Diplomat.

The CSM members act more as Diplomats than they do Corp or Alliance CEO. They certainly can't tell CCP what to do, and they have the uncomfortable position of trying to express CCP-think in terms that the rest of us fortunate enough not to have to be involved with them can understand. So just in that, I would rather not have a CEO who is used to dictating policy on the CSM.

CSM members are the messengers. We shoot them because we can't shoot CCP.

Again you havn't answered my question, and continued to skirt around the issue here. So im going to move on to another one here that noone can misconstrue as a dig at your current alliance status.

You regularly invade and evict smaller wormhole corps from w-space either of their own accord or through mercenary contracts. You obviously have a direct input into this practice through being the merc contracts manager and have been involved in a fair few evictions in your own time. You also exclusively live in a high class wormhole and have done for some time. My question to you is, why should the multitude of small-medium wormhole corporations vote for you to represent them, when you could end up evicting them from w-space; also why should these people vote for you, someone from the "c5/6 big boys club" over someone from a class closer to their own, or someone with experience over a range of classes?

We have to agree to disagree here as I think I have answered your question. If not please post a concrete one.

Yes if people vote for me I still might evict them. I don't think that CSM vote should be tied to some sort of security. Votes for non eviction sounds stupid to me. As far as high class living goes - yes I do live in high class but in order to get to places like high sec or low sec I often have to scan through C4-C1 and I often go to high sec for day tripping roams. Which means that even If I live in C6 or C5 I visit all classes of wormhole space. It is a myth that if you live in higher class you always stay there.

Also I have experience in living across most of the classes as I lived in C2, C3, C4, C5 and C6.

Im afraid you appear to misconstrue my question here, im not saying that if people vote for you, they shouldnt get evicted and im pretty certain that the question i asked up there mentioned nothing of the sort. What im saying is that why do you feel the plethora of smaller members of the wormhole community should vote for you, if you make a point of removing them from that community. Im not pvp averse but curbstomping new blood and your electorate out of wormholes seems counterproductive to me

Im glad you agree, perhaps you could answer it for me?

Whilst I accept that I maybe was incorrect in stating that your alliances failcascade every 6 months, you spent the entirity of your answer trying to prove me wrong, and then following that up with some self gratifying fluff about what a sizable impact youve made on wormhole space. In fact, the only part which even comes close to answering my original question is "As far as CSM goes I plan to abandon most of my meta roles in game in order to concentrate on being CSM. " Which only tells me what your not going to do (arguably), rather than what you are going to do; which as Im sure you will agree, tells me absolutely nothing.

Irregardless of whether I was right or wrong, the fact remains that you will have made significant leadership failures during your time in game; in fact, the exhale. name was taken out from under you http://themittani.com/news/exhale-out-breath so please dont try and insult the communities intelligence by passing it off as a change of alliance name; you also hold a sizable position of leadership in exhale. as well. So again I will ask you:

how could we rely on you to not display this failing of leadership as a CSM member
what would you do differently to ensure cohesion among the CSM
why would we have not seen these factors displayed in game in keeping your alliance together

Im sure the rest of your electorate would appreciate an straightforward answer this time instead of uninformative spin.

Thanks

CB

Why are you running for CSM when people are saying that you are going afk for a few months here soon? Can you confirm or deny these rumors?

These are not rumors. My EvE time will decrease from 8 hours to like 4 per day for next few months.

I think 4 hours per day will still be sufficient for CSM.

Indeed, I wouldn't call that AFK at all. 4 hours a day is like a part time job :)

CSM is like a part time job :)

And after a night drinking at Gorillan with devs, you'll wish it came with a Health plan.

being unable to assemble strategic cruisers

+1 vote.


I agree with all others things. T3 are different from othre ships.

Well I think you should be able to assemble them inside wh. You build them in wspace and then you cant even assemble them seems kinda stupid.

I read here if you could choose a theme it would be "exploration" but as far as I see you are very much focusing on wormholes. I lived in a C6 for a while and liked it very much but will go to nullsec now for the time being.
Cause Sov is something almost every candidate identified as problem I'm pretty sure it will get enough attention. But I had a real hard time to find someone who said something on exploration in Nullsec.

So to ask a question: What do you think when someone mentions "exploration in 0.0"?
Given that Odyssey and the next expansions (try to) overhaul Sov etc. and exploration has to be changed will you try to lure the 0.0 explorers into wormholes () or will you also show some love to your exploring fellows in K-Space? ()

P.S.: I hope PvE becoming more like PvP won't make it some kind of PvP Light with less rewards in contrast to higher risk. While bringing both closer together sounds good, some people play EVE to relax and switch off. I think in that case PvE would need a major redesign to stay competitive.

Talked to Bob yesterday. Told me to self destruct more stuff on sun in order to endorse me

Although you're a WH candidate, your stances show a huge +++ for industry issues.

May want to exploit that aspect, as you came in 71% on industry issues...w-a-y higher than the industry platform candidate.

At this time I would like to ask the candidates to think carefully about any endorsements that they give.

By putting other candidates on your ballot you are effectively giving them any excess votes you may have if you become elected or all of your votes if you are knocked out of the election.

So the choice of who you endorse and in what order you endorse them on your proposed ballot is very important.

Remember that these people are voting for you and a lot of people will rely on your proposed ballot.

-¦-ï-+-+ -¦-ï -+-¦ -+-+-+-à-+ -+-¦ -Ç-â-ü-ü-¦-+-+ -+-+-¦-+-ü-¦-â-é-+-Ç-+-¦-¦-é-î -+-¦ -ì-é-â -é-¦-+-â

I strongly endorse this candidate! Good luck!!

Issler

I also endorse Chitsa very strongly

We got the mail!!!

You got my vote Buddy, my 1st preference. Choose the Talocan dude second preference maybe he can fix wh too, I'm sure you would do better job though .

Fix WH's & Poses and I'll move back in :)

VOTE Kasparas Jasiukenas!!!!!

You got my vote Buddy, my 1st preference. Choose the Talocan dude second preference maybe he can fix wh too, I'm sure you would do better though .

Fix WH's & Poses and I'll move back in :)

VOTE Kasparas Jasiukenas!!!!!

If they don't go past last years percentage after all of this, they really need to scrap the STV system. With this amount of publicity we should be pushing 30%

Considering last year's election was on the back of the Summer of Rage I think CSM6's turnout would be a more realistic minimum measure. If it doesnt break CSM6 election turn out, that's pretty ****.

Now it SHOULD break CSM7 turnout to keep the streak going of every election increasing turnout since CSM4's election. But I am concerned it might not happen due to last year's unusual circumstances.

If the turnout lands in between CSM6 and CSM7, I'd say it's par for the course, neither impressive improvement or abject failure.

Congratulations, Chitsa! Great victory for the wormholers to get two on.