Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Andus Rowan Valcrest
Envoy Systems Inc.
0
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 06:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
I've tried The Ditanian fleet and every fleet associated with them. They wont even answer my requests.
Looking for a fleet. I've got moderate Macharial skills and the isk to buy one of I do get into a fleet. |
PaNtHeeRa
Rep-X Hashashin Cartel
97
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 06:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Same here, Im on the look out to get into and try incursions... Up all night US times on days off. (work midnights)
|
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
205
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 08:14:00 -
[3] - Quote
Try 'Allied Incursion Public' they might be looking for some rookie DPS, I am assuming you have already tried TVP 'The Valhalla Project' and ISN 'Incursion Shiny Network'.
Reason and logic never wins over Stubborn and Convinced-á (But-áI still try..) |
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
205
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 11:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
All of the Incursion's threads, both for getting in a fleet, and properly fitting a ship were moved to the recruitment threads then buried by the spam that occurs there.
(Don't ask we can't quite figure it out ourselves) Reason and logic never wins over Stubborn and Convinced-á (But-áI still try..) |
|
CCP Affinity
C C P C C P Alliance
950
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 11:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
goldiiee - if you link the threads to me (preferably 1 for getting a fleet and 1 for fits) or make a new thread for each, I can sticky them in recruitment :) CCP Affinity | Follow me on Twitter Content Designer for EVE Online |
|
Kodavor
Jesus saves .
80
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 12:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Affinity wrote:goldiiee - if you link the threads to me (preferably 1 for getting a fleet and 1 for fits) or make a new thread for each, I can sticky them in recruitment :)
You really are putting a lot of work into this %) |
Etheswitha
The Order of the Temple
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 16:13:00 -
[7] - Quote
I can be a lot harder to get into fleets now, with the initial isk laydown and the fleets being cautious because of griefers and gankers.
If you can get a T2 fitted Mach bought and setup (I assume the OP can, because he was looking to spend 5 billion on a toon), for that particular group, I don't see you having a problem getting in fleet. If not, I know some groups will take cheaper ships for fleets just set up after DT.
Good luck and when you get in, enjoy.
|
goldiiee
Tax and War Haven
206
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 18:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
CCP Affinity wrote:goldiiee - if you link the threads to me (preferably 1 for getting a fleet and 1 for fits) or make a new thread for each, I can sticky them in recruitment :) I started a new thread here in missions and complexes I have sent out messages to all the other fc's that dont have me on thier blocked list and i will update it as they come in. Will take a few weeks to get it error free.
Reason and logic never wins over Stubborn and Convinced-á (But-áI still try..) |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
616
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 20:31:00 -
[9] - Quote
Andus Rowan Valcrest wrote:I've tried The Ditanian fleet and every fleet associated with them. They wont even answer my requests.
Looking for a fleet. I've got moderate Macharial skills and the isk to buy one of I do get into a fleet.
What was the issue in TDF? Questions about your fit or getting into fleets? Armour has been bleeding numbers & weekday fleet numbers especially in late USTZ have been disheartening, sorry. Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 |
Chainsaw Plankton
IDLE GUNS IDLE EMPIRE
206
|
Posted - 2013.02.18 22:08:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Affinity wrote:goldiiee - if you link the threads to me (preferably 1 for getting a fleet and 1 for fits) or make a new thread for each, I can sticky them in recruitment :)
ISN thread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=171730 |
|
|
CCP Affinity
C C P C C P Alliance
951
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 09:57:00 -
[11] - Quote
Stickied :) CCP Affinity | Follow me on Twitter Content Designer for EVE Online |
|
Etheswitha
The Order of the Temple
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 12:05:00 -
[12] - Quote
ICU: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2295571 |
|
CCP Affinity
C C P C C P Alliance
951
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 13:45:00 -
[13] - Quote
aaaand done :) CCP Affinity | Follow me on Twitter Content Designer for EVE Online |
|
somthing Lionheart
A Brave New World
0
|
Posted - 2013.04.04 21:01:00 -
[14] - Quote
I am still don't know too much about incursions, but maybe those of you who cant get into fleets we could all form our own fleet and learn how to do incursions by ourselves. I'm pretty sure we all know the basics and if we think together and learn from first hand experience doing them maybe we could start up our own fleets and things like that. A lot of older players and more professional fleets only except faction BS's and you need to have all of this sp etc etc and it is really hard to find fleets for newer players trying to get involved. |
Rukia Taika
Dueces Wyld
15
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 03:10:00 -
[15] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Andus Rowan Valcrest wrote:I've tried The Ditanian fleet and every fleet associated with them. They wont even answer my requests.
Looking for a fleet. I've got moderate Macharial skills and the isk to buy one of I do get into a fleet. What was the issue in TDF? Questions about your fit or getting into fleets? Armour has been bleeding numbers & weekday fleet numbers especially in late USTZ have been disheartening, sorry. After seeing CCP Fozies' proposals for armor changes I can't stop thinking about a CCP bias against Armor fits... especially in PvE: I can't see a single helpful thing that'll help armor Incursion runners.
dude you know what the issue is. the problem is fixing the issue. too many hurt feelings all around. All i gotta say is the more i sit back and enjoy my game the more i hear about TDF from others which only makes me think even more that its becoming more an more like a semi closed community. If you do not tote the party line your banned, if you say the wrong thing your banned, you question smeone your banned.
Thats what many people hear about TDF and do not bother joining the channel. something is broken. something needs to be fixed.
that's my opinion. |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
817
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 06:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
Rukia Taika wrote: dude you know what the issue is.
yES THE REAL ISSUE IS ARMOUR GOT ABSOLUTELY ARSE ****** BY ESCALATION NERF While we can still complete sites in contests we got screwed with no balancing in Assaults or HQ's: shields have all the disadvantage so now armour fleets can only really complete in 1 site: the NCO's and even there it is even. Armour fleets are slowly dying CCP Affinity numbers are dropping are we going to be stuck with the same old Incursion sites for the next year? If not please consider adjusting sites for better armou/shield contests the TE nerf this summer ain't going to balance jack **** in Assaults, HQ's OTA's nor NMCs Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon? |
Kodavor
Jesus saves .
101
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 12:28:00 -
[17] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Rukia Taika wrote: dude you know what the issue is.
YES THE REAL ISSUE IS ARMOUR FLEETS GOT ABSOLUTELY ARSE ****** BY THE ESCALATION NERF While we can still complete sites: in contests we got screwed with no shield/armour balancing in Assaults( in Assaults armour actually became even worselly disadvantaged ) or HQ's: shields have all the advantages so now armour fleets can only really complete in 1 site: the NCO's and even there it is often even. Armour fleets are slowly dying CCP Affinity, armour numbers are dropping. Are we going to be stuck with the same old Incursion sites for the next year? If not please consider adjusting sites for better armour/shield contests... the Tracking Enhancer nerf this summer ain't going to balance jack **** in Assaults, HQ's OTA's nor NMCs Are Incursions going to be ignored again just like Faction Warfare was for so many years?
Lose plates . Get deadspace ENAM ( only 1 on each ship ) . Fit explosive pump and rest fit with damage / tracking / sebo mods . Fit T2 reps on logis . Lose plates from logis . Train pilots to a mindset of working for your isk and not chilling to get paid and you will have quality armor fleets . |
sparta93
Dakka Holding
9
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 13:59:00 -
[18] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=215320 come check us out we have an hi fleet up ever night in us prime time |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
829
|
Posted - 2013.04.05 19:46:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kodavor wrote:DarthNefarius wrote:Rukia Taika wrote: dude you know what the issue is.
YES THE REAL ISSUE IS ARMOUR FLEETS GOT ABSOLUTELY ARSE ****** BY THE ESCALATION NERF While we can still complete sites: in contests we got screwed with no shield/armour balancing in Assaults( in Assaults armour actually became even worselly disadvantaged ) or HQ's: shields have all the advantages so now armour fleets can only really complete in 1 site: the NCO's and even there it is often even. Armour fleets are slowly dying CCP Affinity, armour numbers are dropping. Are we going to be stuck with the same old Incursion sites for the next year? If not please consider adjusting sites for better armour/shield contests... the Tracking Enhancer nerf this summer ain't going to balance jack **** in Assaults, HQ's OTA's nor NMCs Are Incursions going to be ignored again just like Faction Warfare was for so many years? Lose plates . Get deadspace ENAM ( only 1 on each ship ) . Fit explosive pump and rest fit with damage / tracking / sebo mods . Fit T2 reps on logis . Lose plates from logis . Train pilots to a mindset of working for your isk and not chilling to get paid and you will have quality armor fleets .
Shield still have a huge advantage especially in HQ's & Assault contests I fly a plateless Bhaal... Site spawns need somereworking, if not for armour/shield balance then for the sake of not doing the same 10 sites' spawns for years straight. Gimme new content ( that doesn't break the game like the Escalation nerf did that is ) Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon? |
Sturmwolke
391
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 06:42:00 -
[20] - Quote
Kodavor wrote:Lose plates . Get deadspace ENAM ( only 1 on each ship ) . Fit explosive pump and rest fit with damage / tracking / sebo mods. Oversimplistic.
There are 3 key things that tips the balance in favor of shield ships. 1) Instantaneous remote repairs. This advantage is massive in AS/HQ, allowing shield ships to run with almost no buffer or very little buffer. 2) Adaptive invulnerability confers massive bonuses that allows shields to effectively tank what's naturally an armor ship. Broken? You be the judge. 3) Passive shield regeneration bonus. This makes RR even more efficient and the numbers are quite significant (approaching the amount of difference between Meta4 and T2 rep in some cases).
Contrary to popular opinion that shield ships are better because they have more spare low slots for damage mods, armor ships too can be similarly fitted in a such a way. Unfortunately, you'll get an armor build which operates an even lower tank threshold than its equivalent shield build - after you take into account those 3 synergies above. Following through, it'll put an incredible strain on the skill of an armor logi pilots (which exceeds their typical shield logi peers). It can be done, but impractical for the long term.
Now, in the very remote or almost zero possibility that CCP changes the armor RR to instantaneous reps, I can almost guarantee you'll be seeing plates off the menu for most armor parties.
|
|
Kodavor
Jesus saves .
101
|
Posted - 2013.04.06 07:28:00 -
[21] - Quote
Quote: if not for armour/shield balance then for the sake of not doing the same 10 sites' spawns for years straight. Gimme new content ( that doesn't break the game like the Escalation nerf did that is )
That .
Quote:Oversimplistic.
There are 3 key things that tips the balance in favor of shield ships. 1) Instantaneous remote repairs. This advantage is massive in AS/HQ, allowing shield ships to run with almost no buffer or very little buffer. 2) Adaptive invulnerability confers massive resist bonuses that allows shields to a) effectively tank what's naturally an armor ship b) single slot mid tank Broken? You be the judge. 3) Passive shield regeneration bonus. This makes RR even more efficient and the numbers are quite significant (approaching the amount of difference between Meta4 and T2 rep in some cases).
Contrary to popular opinion that shield ships are better because they have more spare low slots for damage mods, armor ships too can be similarly fitted in a such a way. Unfortunately, you'll get an armor build which operates an even lower tank threshold than its equivalent shield build - after you take into account those 3 synergies above. Following through, it'll put an incredible strain on the skill of an armor logi pilots (which exceeds their typical shield logi peers). It can be done, but impractical for the long term.
Now, in the very remote or almost zero possibility that CCP changes the armor RR to instantaneous reps, I can almost guarantee you'll be seeing plates off the menu for most armor parties.
Armor fleet still has t hat shield buffer of 8 - 9k right ? Why not rep that up every time the target is not shot at anymore ? Can be done by drones . Would give you those missing 3 seconds from that rep cycle that differs from the shield reps . |
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
852
|
Posted - 2013.04.07 05:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
Kodavor wrote:[
Armor fleet still has t hat shield buffer of 8 - 9k right ? Why not rep that up every time the target is not shot at anymore ? Can be done by drones . Would give you those missing 3 seconds from that rep cycle that differs from the shield reps .
We do that with shield maintenance drones but it doesn't help much a all. Shield bots take forever ( like a minute or 2) & TBH all its good for is to make sure logi know that someone is being targeted because that shield in armour tanked ships disappears in 3 seconds when a VG spawn alpahas you & ~1 second in an assualt or higher before its stripped Ripard Teg-á for CSM 8 Disclaimer: CCP Bias is a fictional character. In case that some CCP Bias does exist,-áis he an "ex"-Goon? |
Mina Sebiestar
Mactabilis Simplex Cursus
301
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 03:09:00 -
[23] - Quote
funny thing how that works my armor last 3 sec too if they brake my shield due to my stupidity or otherwise. http://i.imgur.com/1N37t.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/KTjFEt6.jpg I dont always fly stabber but when i do...
|
hairy Miromme
Industrial ARC Constructions
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 23:55:00 -
[24] - Quote
Any new advice on getting into incursion fleets? |
Vince Snetterton
290
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 00:50:00 -
[25] - Quote
Andus Rowan Valcrest wrote:I've tried The Ditanian fleet and every fleet associated with them. They wont even answer my requests.
Looking for a fleet. I've got moderate Macharial skills and the isk to buy one of I do get into a fleet.
Frankly. I believe this is just a sideways attack on TDF by someone who has an axe to grind against TDF. But let's give you the benefit of the doubt.
TDF is indeed hurting for pilots. They usually operate at 45% of the pilot base of TVP, so are always looking for pilots.
To get into TDFarmour fleet requires a few things: Trade the Mach in for a Vindicator. While this is a huge problem if you don't have hybrid skills, all other skills, including the battleship skills, are identical.
Fit a tank of approx 50K EHP in armour. You need resists of minimum 70%, IF, ( and this is rare), the fleet has poor or non-existent boosters. If they have good boosters, you can get by with resists of 65%, of course any booster is applied.
After that, post up in TDF and ask for a fit. Some FC's will run an MwD fleet, some don't. Fits have to be adjusted to what the FC wants.
|
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
839
|
Posted - 2013.06.02 06:46:00 -
[26] - Quote
Kodavor wrote:Armor fleet still has t hat shield buffer of 8 - 9k right ? Why not rep that up every time the target is not shot at anymore ? Can be done by drones . Would give you those missing 3 seconds from that rep cycle that differs from the shield reps .
If a ship is exploding in 3 seconds, then it was ****-fit and deserved to explode. If the ships aren't exploding in 3 seconds, then armour and shield logi is identical.
DarthNefarius wrote:YES THE REAL ISSUE IS ARMOUR FLEETS GOT ABSOLUTELY ARSE ****** BY THE ESCALATION NERF While we can still complete sites: in contests we got screwed with no shield/armour balancing in Assaults or HQ's: shields have all the advantages so now armour fleets can only really complete in 1 site: the NCO's and even there it is often even.
I fly a plateless Bhaal...
You don't get to complain about losing contests when you fly in overtanked fleets with 3 logi, frequent T1 battleships with meta4 guns and you personally fly a Bhaalgorn. I know you fly other ships as well, but a Bhaalgorn is a battleship heavy on tank and light on damage. Even with 4 heat sinks and an Energy Burst Aerator you're still only getting 836 DPS (no implants, no drones). Upgrade yourself to a Paladin and you can make that exact same fit do 1100. That's 31% more damage. You even get T2 resists to go with it. heck, upgrade yourself to a Navy Geddon and its goign to be 975. ANYTHING with a damage or RoF bonus is going to be better than your Bhaalgorn.
When you fly tanky ships instead of ganky ships, you are NOT going to win contests against gank-fit, shiny shield fleets.
I explained to you in another thread why Armour Incursions are failing. it has nothing to do with any kind of 'nerf' and everything to do with the kind of ships and fits you have in your fleets. Until that changes, there isn't going to be anything you can do about numbers, and your constant complaints on the forums don't exactly encourage new armour incursion members either. |
Irina Conte
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.03 17:44:00 -
[27] - Quote
Guys this is a necro'd thread... |
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
657
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 18:48:00 -
[28] - Quote
So ******* sick of hearing about the single mid slot tank bullshit. Seriously. There aren't fleets of people running around with a single slot on their ship dedicated to tank, period. Said theorycrafting is repulsive. From: Tommas De'Wins To: Cipher Jones Dude :) I got massives Basi hahahahahahaha |
Bigg Gun
Flying Bags Inc. Bulgarian Space Federation
23
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 00:19:00 -
[29] - Quote
actually ISN loki builds for vanguards are with no slots dedicated to tank. Basically 0 slot tanking, although maybe they had a rig , not sure on that one. |
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
840
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 05:01:00 -
[30] - Quote
Cipher Jones wrote:So ******* sick of hearing about the single mid slot tank bullshit. Seriously. There aren't fleets of people running around with a single slot on their ship dedicated to tank, period. Said theorycrafting is repulsive.
It *CAN* be done however, just as single low slot Paladin fleets are also doable... and much more durable too with slaves. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |