Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 8 post(s) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 13:06:00 -
[1] - Quote
:( you screwed my favorite BC in EVE, thanks guys...... Now all i can use is turrets, idc if you can do faster dps with turrets. Thats why there was other ships, like the DRAKE, the drake is the most ugly ship ever why give it launchers..... Now if i want launchers i have to stair at that ugly ass ship all day while i fly....... Not trying to ***** about everything but jesus.... I like some of the other things but why the FEROX......... I understand making roles etc BUT noooo, ferox was a bad ass if you outfitted it right. |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 13:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Listain Kurvorra wrote:Give me back my Battlecruisers they were fine the way they were =(
Agree, GIVE THEM BACK! you screwed the BC I intentionally did not use the drake because it is so damn ugly....... They really where fine the way they were.. There was no reason to do what you did..... I am even hearing ( reports ) of DPS even being lower on Drake now also.. So now it sucks and DPS is lower... |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 14:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
HOT PATCH!
GOGOGOGOGOGO |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 15:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
Rommiee wrote:Listain Kurvorra wrote:Steijn wrote:NEONOVUS wrote:Oh you cool people. Missile impacts cause screenshakes now. CCP, how do you turn this off? Agreed, This should have it's own option that is seperate from the rest of the missile effect options. Are you mad ???? You know that CCP hate giving players options. That would result in players being able to adjust settings to what suits them, and not what suits CCP. It will never catch on.
Damit iceland!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Thaw out! |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 15:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:oh nooo, there's no way to get a symmetrical turret layout on the Ferox :( the harbinger's lower and upper turrets (models) can't be filled anymore, either That's not exactly a big deal, though. The bug stopping tier three BC appearing on the custom overview is unfortunate, but at least it's solvable. I can use the autopilot thing to identify stars, too. It's not useful but it's a bit of fun  I like it
:( CCP ATLEAST GIVE PEOPLE THE OPTION TO HAVE LAUNCHERS IF THEY WANT AGAIN>>>>>........ |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 16:02:00 -
[6] - Quote
Rommiee wrote:White Tree wrote:The only thing I want is those waypoint lines on the starfield a bit more visible, I love them.
This is a good patch, and everything is fine, and anyone who disagrees is an autistic, pants-shitting child. LOL CCP alt detected
lol Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 16:04:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jaangel wrote:improvements what improvements ??? all i can see is wastes of time and look im a dev nerf bat swining. Another awful patch.
Agree... Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 16:10:00 -
[8] - Quote
Rommiee wrote:White Tree wrote:The only thing I want is those waypoint lines on the starfield a bit more visible, I love them.
This is a good patch, and everything is fine, and anyone who disagrees is an autistic, pants-shitting child. LOL CCP alt detected
Leads me to believe that most CSM leaders are CCP alts.... Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 19:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1
Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke.
http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp
Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining.
That's not the point. I don't want to be forced to use only a certain type ship to do what i need to at that time. The thing that brought me to this game ( years ago ) was the fact that so many options are available on so many ships that you could outfit to your liking. The whole curtailed and role set mindset that all these mmo's are taking as of late is just bad business for us, good for them. As people would just be able to hurry look up the best outfit and just get that then doing research and outfitting to there need for what they are doing. People are slowly being forced to use only a certain type setup to be-able to compete with other setups or you are left behind if you choose not to use that certain setup. I am not going to get into the argument about how this ship is better or that can be better if you do that, that is the whole point for having options so you can choose for yourself what you think is better, even if others think it's not. Not pre ordained rules. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:25:00 -
[11] - Quote
Nadzieijko Andrastile wrote:If you actually do the math, you'll see a more level playing field than before. It's really not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be. They took away what you knew, now you need to think of a new way to fit your ship, or just wait for someone to make a new cookie cutter fit.
Pitting several high SP accounts against each other in newly modified battlecruisers has been more fun and actually provides a challenge. Sorry you can't bring your Drake to everything.
Being able to refit and choose what and how you like to set things up is great! I am all for it, but not being forced into a certain setup on a certain ship of not my own choosing. I am sure some will agree with me and some will not, that is the great thing about having options and choices! But they are all slowly getting turned into ( "cookie cutter fit" ) that's all good, but what is the point if you can just look up the best fit put it on and call it good? so you can go out and fight and kill other ships that have the same cookie cutter setup? will that not get boring when you know every fight will be the same> and everyone will have the same fit? do you get what i am saying? it's hard to see and watch choices slowly get ripped away from being a long time player like myself. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 20:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Jalen1 wrote:cant fit a missile launcher to Ferrox since upgrade. Is that part of the re-balancing? or a bug?
Jalen1 Nah man they screwed BC owners, I am caldari myself and i use both drake and ferox, i always preferred ferox for reasons but used drake on occasion. Now i WILL not use drake and ferox is crap. People may argue that it is better or change is good. Well why fix it if it is not broke as the saying goes. So they fixed it because it was not broke. http://community.eveonline.com/updates/patchnotes.asp I already told you that the drake does more damage now than before. Stop whining. That's not the point. I don't want to be forced to use only a certain type ship to do what i need to at that time. The thing that brought me to this game ( years ago ) was the fact that so many options are available on so many ships that you could outfit to your liking. The whole curtailed and role set mindset that all these mmo's are taking as of late is just bad business for us, good for them. As people would just be able to hurry look up the best outfit and just get that then doing research and outfitting to there need for what they are doing. People are slowly being forced to use only a certain type setup to be-able to compete with other setups or you are left behind if you choose not to use that certain setup. I am not going to get into the argument about how this ship is better or that can be better if you do that, that is the whole point for having options so you can choose for yourself what you think is better, even if others think it's not. Not pre ordained rules. All ships are have always been made for specific roles, these rules are simply being made more defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. You still have plenty of options. In fact you have more options than you did before. You seem to be complaining that one ship can do slightly less than it could before... well that ship WAS broken. Get over it.
As someone running for CSM you really need to listen to and read what the people want and or say. Maybe it is just me, if so and others say so i will not say anymore. But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you should not be in a position of CSM as you already made up your mind and do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:12:00 -
[13] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same. I'm not running for the CSM. I'm advocating someone else who is. Besides, the Drake being broken is a pretty objective assessment, seeing as until recently it was so overpowered there was almost no reason to use any other BC (except for maybe the Hurricane).
Yeah i noticed that, i was not paying attention so i edited it. derp... I just liked being able to have the option before with the Ferox in particular, I could run 1-2 all day long with kestrel and 3s no problem with Ferox outfitted right. But i could also refit for pvp if i wanted, I am not saying it was the best but it held it's own. My point is being able to refit like that was great! so many options. Now if i would like to use missiles i am forced to use drake and so on. That does limit my options. I understand about the OP of the drake but that could have also been taken care of by just changing around the bonuses at first including the ferox if they decided it to was unbalanced, not a complete remake. Start small and move up as it were. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:But the "defined and delineated to help ensure that some ships aren't made obsolete by others. and the "well that ship WAS broken." type comments just shows that you do not look at everything objectively as you should. I am just worried and trying to voice my opinion about the changes that i see happening to this great game that is a kick starter to a bad game. You must not be ignorant to the facts of countless other MMO's that have gone the same route, I care about the route that EVE goes as it is slowly doing just the same. I'm not running for the CSM. I'm advocating someone else who is. Besides, the Drake being broken is a pretty objective assessment, seeing as until recently it was so overpowered there was almost no reason to use any other BC (except for maybe the Hurricane). Yeah i noticed that, i was not paying attention so i edited it. derp... I just liked being able to have the option before with the Ferox in particular, I could run 1-2 all day long with kestrel and 3s no problem with Ferox outfitted right. But i could also refit for pvp if i wanted, I am not saying it was the best but it held it's own. My point is being able to refit like that was great! so many options. Now if i would like to use missiles i am forced to use drake and so on. That does limit my options. I understand about the OP of the drake but that could have also been taken care of by just changing around the bonuses at first including the ferox if they decided it to was unbalanced, not a complete remake. Start small and move up as it were. If you ask me having five unbonused launchers on the Ferox doesn't really count as an "option".
Personally i would run 4 launchers and 2 turrets or mix it up depending on what i was doing. Again that was my own personal choice, you get where I am going with this? I now only have the choice to use a bonused drake for missiles. And only because they changed the bonus higher. i think ferox was 10% to hybrid / and 5% to shield per level. And I think drake was 5 and 5 to shield and missiles. I originally chose Ferox due to drake being so ugly, but i still had the option to run launchers if i wanted to. Why because it is not a bonus should it be taken away? should the orca just be a freighter and not a miner also as the covetor has 4% better yield on strip miners and can do the same thing minus cargo? just saying/// Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:33:00 -
[15] - Quote
Da Dom wrote:Kewl patch guys. The routes in space look awesome and really make me feel like I am in a VR universe. Do you intend on seeding the BPO's for the AAR's anytime soon? Can't find them anywhere, not even in Jita 
Agree!! Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2013.02.19 21:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Flag Bravo wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:
Being able to refit and choose what and how you like to set things up is great! I am all for it, but not being forced into a certain setup on a certain ship of not my own choosing. I am sure some will agree with me and some will not, that is the great thing about having options and choices! But they are all slowly getting turned into ( "cookie cutter fit" ) that's all good, but what is the point if you can just look up the best fit put it on and call it good? so you can go out and fight and kill other ships that have the same cookie cutter setup? will that not get boring when you know every fight will be the same> and everyone will have the same fit? do you get what i am saying? it's hard to see and watch choices slowly get ripped away from being a long time player like myself.
Exactly. Being now forced into zhit fits is no fun at all. The fun was in the freedom to build and experiment, now its "put piece A into hole A, shove dongle B up orifice B" and so forth. Dull.
Exactly my freaking point haha, They are simplifying the game because people complain it is to hard. Well if anyone was around playing World of warcraft back when it first started and the 3nd expansion people started complaining about how hard the game was having to do this little thing or compare things or experiment etc. Well 2 expansions later you log on to the game and you don't even have to do anything to get everything in the game anymore. and i quote "just by playing you get everything"..... The people ruined the game because there was always something wrong or to many options it took to long to do this or that etc. Now everyone is starting to leave the game. I know because i own shares in Activision the parent company of Blizzard. They tried to carter to the players to keep and or make there stocks rise and it screwed the players in the end. In no way am i saying EvE is remotely close to WoW in a playing sense but don't forget money and greed corrupts and if left unchecked will screw the bread givers. Just my opinion as I have seen it from the other side as well as the game side. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 01:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:DeeKz0r wrote:Everything looks good with the exception of 1 thing.
- "With really good skills, NPC corp standing and a 50% base output NPC station you can now actually get a 100% refinery output."
That kinda irks me, as I just recently spent 150 million on an implant that will allow me to get 100% refining. Yes, 150 million isk is peanuts. But the fact that a previously neccesary item is now mostly obsolete seems quite silly. Why bother getting refining implants at all? The only people who will be worried about their refining rates enough to quibble over a few percentages will be people that have millions of ore to refine, and of those people probably 99.9% of them will be heavy industry skilled anyways.
Coles notes: - Refining implants = useless. I have lost count of the number of times CCP has either neutered a ship to hell or rendered a skill useless over the years. The only feedback to which CCP listens is that of your wallet closing on their sticky fingers. Unsubscribe if you want to send CCP a message.
We need another massive sub quit to send a damn message again! Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:Jeinvay Kunsu wrote:Banirtal Cadelanne wrote:Cant update past 21.85MB. Tried on 4 different computers, I had the same problem with the last update, had to re-download the client manually and re-install. Loosing training time here! Last time lost 3 days, only received an apology. I have 15 accounts, if I loose time this time round I will cancel all accounts! No. of people who care that you're leaving: Very few. Then let your accounts go dormant. The most powerful statement that you can make is to not give CCP your hard earned wages (or buy PLEX from some other punter to keep your accounts active). There's a ton of very entertaining games available for either a one-time fee or for free, these days. Check out one of those if you are an avid gamer. Or go outside and breath fresh air whilst CCP does without your currency.
I'm thinking i might make another thread unless someone else does to see how many people will be willing to do this till they fix it.
this has happened before do not forget CCP. Remember who and what you are doing this game for! If not i look forward to some hub smashing again and petitions! http://www.polygon.com/features/2013/1/24/3754594/at-war-with-fans-eve-onlines-fall-and-rise-from-infamy Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 02:39:00 -
[19] - Quote
Bubbleboylol wrote:Hakaru Ishiwara wrote:Jeinvay Kunsu wrote:Banirtal Cadelanne wrote:Cant update past 21.85MB. Tried on 4 different computers, I had the same problem with the last update, had to re-download the client manually and re-install. Loosing training time here! Last time lost 3 days, only received an apology. I have 15 accounts, if I loose time this time round I will cancel all accounts! No. of people who care that you're leaving: Very few. Then let your accounts go dormant. The most powerful statement that you can make is to not give CCP your hard earned wages (or buy PLEX from some other punter to keep your accounts active). There's a ton of very entertaining games available for either a one-time fee or for free, these days. Check out one of those if you are an avid gamer. Or go outside and breath fresh air whilst CCP does without your currency. I'm thinking i might make another thread unless someone else does to see how many people will be willing to do this till they fix it. this has happened before do not forget CCP. Remember who and what you are doing this game for! If not i look forward to some hub smashing again and petitions! http://www.polygon.com/features/2013/1/24/3754594/at-war-with-fans-eve-onlines-fall-and-rise-from-infamy
I have made a separate thread, so you can tell how pissed off you really are? or is it something you will let pass? it is titled
Don't Forget why you you are making this game....
It is not meant to start anything bad but everyone needs to be heard and if we all ban together and you really do not like these problems then come voice them over here so it can not get passed over by CCP. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:08:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ghar Atu'ur wrote:Personally, I think what was done to Battle Cruisers is shameful. The Battle from the name was ripped off ...only cruiser is left now. Simply makes no sense. Battle Cruisers gained mass but lost a lot of EHP and turrets. Makes no sense at all. It seems now that with every Patch more and more ships and modules are nerfed. I personally no longer look forward to new updates because the first thing that comes to my mind is what will be nerfed instead of what new and wonderful items and improvements will be introduced. Update by update, my enjoyment of the game is lessening... I no longer am sure if I will sign up for another year. The Summer Rebalancing of Ships fills me with dread...
go read my thread
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unread
help me make a difference. We need to pressure CCP like in the past or they will just do it again. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:15:00 -
[21] - Quote
Flag Bravo wrote:Well we had a nice long period of CCP sensibility. Now it looks like they are drifting back into looney tunes mode.
I really hate what they have done to my BC's. To put it bluntly, it's **********g stupid.
As I see it I am left with only two options. 1- Let my subs run dry and wait until the loons leave the asylum. 2- Change my sex and become Amarr.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unread
Group up lets threaten a petition again. This is crap...... Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.02.20 09:16:00 -
[22] - Quote
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:Bubbleboylol wrote:Ghar Atu'ur wrote:Personally, I think what was done to Battle Cruisers is shameful. The Battle from the name was ripped off ...only cruiser is left now. Simply makes no sense. Battle Cruisers gained mass but lost a lot of EHP and turrets. Makes no sense at all. It seems now that with every Patch more and more ships and modules are nerfed. I personally no longer look forward to new updates because the first thing that comes to my mind is what will be nerfed instead of what new and wonderful items and improvements will be introduced. Update by update, my enjoyment of the game is lessening... I no longer am sure if I will sign up for another year. The Summer Rebalancing of Ships fills me with dread... go read my thread https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=207455&find=unreadhelp me make a difference. We need to pressure CCP like in the past or they will just do it again. Lol you made that post in a forum where people intentionally put stuff they want to NEVER be read or considered.
Well please make one yourself ( were you think it should go ) and get people to read and or group up threaten a petition again etc! At least i am trying... I will go to your thread and yell right along with you and help spread the word... Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
18
|
Posted - 2013.02.21 20:20:00 -
[23] - Quote
Caldari Citizen 20120308 wrote:The only thing about the lines in space that I would like to see improved upon is the lines start from the first gate you jump through. Kind of odd seeing lines directly behind the gate I'm jumping through.
I noticed that the system you are in the lines do not show up and i would imagine for good reason as you should know what system you are in right? It took me awhile to figure it out but that makes perfect sense as it should only show next route inline from current route. Don't forget how big systems are ;) Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
BlackWater Mercenarys
24
|
Posted - 2013.02.27 23:51:00 -
[24] - Quote
Is it just me or does is anyone else getting this problem>?
When pinning a window you can still move it.? I used to not be able to move it as i thought before it was just to keep it on the screen... maybe it is working right now? lol Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
BlackWater Mercenarys
24
|
Posted - 2013.02.28 00:46:00 -
[25] - Quote
Roseline Penshar wrote:search at general setting the option to lock it
ty. Just noticed that. Has been so long since i re-installed eve that i forgot what options there was. 0.o Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |

Bubbleboylol
BlackWater Mercenarys
24
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 04:37:00 -
[26] - Quote
FleetAdmiralHarper wrote:you want feed back in your feed back thread? ok... i fully expect to get banned for this because thats how you Russians, and FM's operate.
you broke the ferox and a number of other ships, shield taking is worse now. and its been weaker then armor and unbalanced for awhile now, they have 2x the number of hp given from their extenders, and they generally have better resists.. cut the asb reload time to 45 seconds, or give it back 1 or 2 more space for cap charges.
listening to a miss guided or PMSing few on the forums has been a lot of games downfalls, and when the changes hit the game, and the normal players see what just happened, they get pissed and leave.
i dont speak for everyone, but i do speak for some.
give the ferox its missiles back, add 5% damage and 7.5% range back to heavy missiles. (by default.) its pathetic that a Rapid light missile drake can out damage a heavy missile drake. give torpedoes a 25% over all range increase (by default.) battleships are large slow targets, the range on torps is so pore its a joke, infact increase all of the short range weapons.
speaking of range, whats up with this 100 km sniping range nonsense??? ive played games where the CWIS and Point defense guns, the point blank weapons, begin interception fire at 36 Km... most heavy weapons engaged at 800-1150 km, and very long range weapons could reach out to 1,600-2,400 km. now that may be extreme for this game, but do you see the point im trying to make?
double the damage of rail guns or give caldari ships a rate of fire or damage bonus, because they are a JOKE. their is a reason hardly anyone uses them. throw those USELESS range bonuses out the window. they are WAY to slow to keep and hold range, so that TOTALLY negates any kind of advantage range bonuses could of offered.. if you want to "bring missiles in line" and "balance the weapons", THEN BUFF THE WEAK / BROKEN ONES!!!! UH DUHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
add mine layers and mines back into the game. it will have a ripple effect, on the economy, and in game politics/combat, it also adds a strategic layer back into the game that it lost. and will make combat more fun.
let carriers use warp gates in level 5 missions.
make battleships and battle cruisers 2x and 1.5x (respectively) as effective as they are now against smaller vessels, its ridiculous that you get punished for advancing in ship class, theirs little to NO incentive to move out of anything larger then a cruiser or battlecruiser.
make frigates ACTUALLY FRIGATES, and not fighters. which is what they are now.... and a piloting a fighter/fighter bomber might not be a bad idea.
add PDS, CWIS, AoE, anti shield and anti hull weapons to the game. TOTALLY rework the combat aspect of the game to reflect an actual navy game. use [nexus the Jupiter incident] as a model for this, and a proper navy space game.. eve is a really, really, bad and sad joke in my books.
give caldari ships slightly larger drone bays, give the standard stabber its drone bay back.
speaking of drone bays, the larger the ship, the larger the bay. makes sense doesn't it? DO IT. 1 kilometer long battleship, drone bay of 50m3.... 60 meter long frigate, with a 50m3 or higher drone bay, or 200-300 meter long cruiser with a 200m3 or 300 m3 bay.... WHAT???? ^.0??
if you want to mess with battlecruisers, add faction Bcs. ied love to see a gurista ferox or rokh, with missiles as its weapons and swarms of drones. ied cream my self.
your game has been on a decline for a long time now eve, and their are many reasons for that, so go ahead ban me or what ever, i barely touched the surface, but theirs your feedback, for the off and improbable chance some of what i said actually helps better the game..
i dont really care what you do, because i quit this game. its gotten extremely boring and im done with it. if things improve and some one tells me, i might come back.
oh and UBER long training times to do ANYTHING remotely new or fun dont help either, but their are far more important things to worry about, like a decent combat system,.
I agree with some of what you wrote for sure! But that does not mean change the entire game again. Of all the people that post on here i prob have the most negative to say so far, I agree with Ferox and the reworking that they are doing is simplifying the game tremendously....
"listening to a miss guided or PMSing few on the forums has been a lot of games downfalls, and when the changes hit the game, and the normal players see what just happened, they get pissed and leave. "
I also agree with that. You do have to listen to what players want but as people do one thing be it anything, from normal life things to EvE over and over they will get lazy and want it easier when it was that same thing that was hard that brought them to this game. You can never make anything less ( Hard ) or (New) without change the very fabric of what the game is.
Although i agree and disagree with other points you have made they are my own choices as some may think it is good or bad choice.
You can not change EvE to suit everyone. There are just to many people with different opinions and what they think.
So what i recommend is that CCP make the game how they intended it. Not how they intended it now but how they intended it back when they started it. I know employees and company is growing so what happens is they get said amount of people well now they have to keep that amount to keep everyone paid etc that's the nature of a growing business and that is why so many games like these get ruined as they get to caught up on trying to increase revenue. That is what it will always come down to. Why did they make it so much easier for players to advance?
For the same reason.
I do strongly disagree with you on one point that I will write bellow.
Never take training away. If anything add. Asking to have more then one ( Option From CCP is like asking a chicken to cook it-self. ) |
|
|